Clinical Usefulness of Pressure Recovery Adjustment in Patients with Predominantly Severe Aortic Stenosis: Asian Valve Registry Data

Impact of Pressure Recovery Adjustment on Aortic Valve Area Classification of Disease Severity in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of pressure recovery (PR) adjustment on disease severity grading in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The authors hypothesized that accounting for PR would result in echocardiographic reclassification of aortic stenosis severity in a significant number of patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study between October 2013 and February 2021.

SETTING

A single-center, quaternary-care academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (≥18 years old) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

INTERVENTIONS

TAVI.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 342 patients were evaluated in this study. Left ventricle mass index was significantly greater in patients who continued to be severe after PR (100.47 ± 28.77 v 90.15 ± 24.03, p = < 0.000001). Using PR-adjusted aortic valve area (AVA) resulted in the reclassification of 81 patients (24%) from severe to moderate aortic stenosis (AVA >1.0 cm2). Of the 81 patients who were reclassified, 23 patients (28%) had sinotubular junction (STJ) diameters >3.0 cm.

CONCLUSION

Adjusting calculated AVA for PR resulted in a reclassification of a significant number of adult patients from severe to moderate aortic stenosis. PR was significantly larger in patients who reclassified from severe to moderate aortic stenosis after adjusting for PR. PR appeared to remain relevant in patients with STJ ≥3.0 cm. Clinicians need to be aware of PR and how to account for its effect when measuring pressure gradients with Doppler.

Effect of race on pressure recovery adjustment for prevention of aortic stenosis grading discordance

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the potential impact of racial difference (Asians vs Caucasians) on the clinical usefulness of pressure recovery (PR) adjustment for preventing discordant aortic stenosis (AS) grading in patients with severe AS.

METHODS

Data from 1450 patients (mean age, 70.2±10.6 years; 290 (20%) Caucasians; aortic valve area (AVA), 0.77±0.26 cm2) were retrospectively analysed. PR-adjusted AVA was calculated using a validated equation. Discordant grading of severe AS was defined as AVA of <1.0 cm2 and mean gradient of <40 mm Hg. The frequency of discordant grading was assessed in the overall cohort and the propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Before PR adjustment, 1186 patients showed AVA values of <1.0 cm2; after PR adjustment, 170 (14.3%) were reclassified as having moderate AS. PR adjustment decreased the frequency of discordant grading from 31.4% to 14.1% in Caucasians and from 13.8% to 7.9% in Asians. Patients with reclassification to moderate AS after PR adjustment had a significantly lower risk of a composite of aortic valve replacement or all-cause death than did those with severe AS after PR adjustment (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.31-0.46; p<0.001). In propensity score-matched cohorts (173 pairs), the frequency of discordant grading before PR adjustment was 42.2% and 43.9% in the Caucasian and Asian patients, respectively, which decreased to 21.4% and 20.2%, respectively, after PR adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically relevant PR occurred, regardless of race in patients with moderate to severe AS. Routine PR adjustment may be useful for reconciling discordant AS grading.

Improving accuracy in diagnosing aortic stenosis severity: An in-depth analysis of echocardiographic measurement error through literature review and simulation study

AIMS

The present guidelines advise replacing the aortic valve for individuals with severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on various echocardiographic parameters. Accurate measurements are essential to avoid misclassification and unnecessary interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of measurement error on the echocardiographic evaluation of the severity of AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review was performed to examine whether measurement errors are reported in studies focusing on the prognostic value of peak aortic jet velocity (Vmax ), mean pressure gradient (MPG), and effective orifice area (EOA) in asymptomatic patients with AS. Out of the 37 studies reviewed, 17 (46%) acknowledged the existence of measurement errors, but none of them utilized methods to address them. Secondly, the magnitude of potential errors was collected from available literature for use in clinical simulations. Interobserver variability ranged between 0.9% and 8.3% for Vmax and MPG but was higher for EOA (range 7.7%-12.7%), indicating lower reliability. Assuming a circular left ventricular outflow tract area led to a median underestimation of EOA by 23% compared to planimetry by other modalities. A clinical simulation resulted in the reclassification of 42% of patients, shifting them from a diagnosis of severe AS to moderate AS.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement errors are underreported in studies on echocardiographic assessment of AS severity. These errors can lead to misclassification and misdiagnosis. Clinicians and scientists should be aware of the implications for accurate clinical decision-making and assuring research validity.

Integrating hemodynamics with ventricular and valvular remodeling in aortic stenosis. A paradigm shift in therapeutic decision making

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) has traditionally been approached in hemodynamic terms. Although hemodynamics and symptoms have formed the basis of recommending interventional treatment in AS, other factors reflecting left ventricular and valvular and/or vascular remodeling are equally important for the prognosis and outcome of patients with AS. Left ventricular and valvular/vascular remodeling in AS do not consistently correlate with hemodynamic severity of AS. Those remodeling changes are reflected and can be detected by a variety of novel laboratory and imaging techniques, including biomarkers, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and gated Computer Tomography (CT) imaging. Taking all those elements into Heart Team therapeutic decision making in patients with AS, can significantly improve appropriate patient selection for interventional treatment and patient outcomes. We review this novel approach and propose a simple algorithm for decision making by the Heart Team, in patients with moderate or severe AS.

Aortic Viscous Energy Loss for Assessment of Valve-related Hemodynamics in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

Purpose

To investigate whether functional assessment of aberrant flow patterns by viscous energy loss (E′L ) using four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI could determine aortic stenosis (AS) severity in accordance with transvalvular energy loss and aid in surgical decision-making in asymptomatic patients with severe AS.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective, single-center study, E′L was measured in the thoracic aorta of 74 consecutive asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who presented between January 2015 and December 2017, and 23 healthy volunteers using 4D flow MRI. Transvalvular energy loss was assessed based on the energy loss index (ELI) measured using Doppler echocardiography. The association between E′L and AS-related events including aortic valve replacement was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

Among 74 asymptomatic patients with severe AS (mean age, 60 years ± 9 [SD]; 43 men; 56 with bicuspid aortic valve), 33 experienced AS-related events during a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR, 30–53 months). Altered flow patterns in severe AS resulted in a sevenfold increase in peak systolic E′L in the ascending aorta compared with controls (13.9 mW ± 3.4 vs 1.80 mW ± 0.44; P < .001). Peak systolic E′L in the ascending aorta was independently associated with the ELI (standardized β, −0.52; P < .001) and showed better discrimination for AS-related events (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93; P < .001) than conventional echocardiographic parameters. After adjustment for confounding variables, peak systolic E′L in the ascending aorta was associated with a significant increase in AS-related events (P < .001 for adjusted hazard ratio).

Conclusion

Changes in AS-mediated poststenotic three-dimensional outflow patterns can be quantified by 4D flow MRI-derived energetic markers to aid in the risk stratification and clinical management of asymptomatic patients with severe AS.

Keywords: Aortic Stenosis, 4D Flow MRI, Flow Energetics, Vascular, Aorta, Aortic Valve, MR Angiography

Supplemental material is available for this article.

© RSNA, 2022

Discrepancy of Aortic Valve Area Measurements by Doppler vs. Biplane Stroke Volume Measurements and Utility of Combining the Different Areas in Aortic Valve Stenosis - The Asian Valve Registry

BACKGROUND

The aortic valve area index (AVAI) in aortic stenosis (AS) is measured by echocardiography with a continuity equation using the stroke volume index by Doppler (SVIDoppler) or biplane Simpson (SVIBiplane) method. AVAIDopplerand AVAIBiplaneoften show discrepancy due to differences between SVIDopplerand SVIBiplane. The degree of discrepancy and utility of combined AVAIs have not been investigated in a large population of AS patients, and the characteristics of subjects with larger discrepancies are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 820 patients with significant AS (AVADoppler<1.5 cm2) enrolled in the Asian Valve Registry, a prospective multicenter registry at 12 Asian centers. All-cause death and aortic valve replacement were defined as events. SVIDopplerwas significantly larger than SVIBiplane(49±11 vs. 39±11 mL/m2, P<0.01) and AVAIDopplerwas larger than AVAIBiplane(0.51±0.15 vs. 0.41±0.14 cm2/m2, P<0.01). An increase in (AVAIDoppler- AVAIBiplane) correlated with shorter height, lower weight, older age, smaller left ventricular (LV) diameter and increased velocity of ejection flow at the LV outflow tract. Severe AS by AVAIDoppleror AVAIBiplaneenabled prediction of events, and combining these AVAIs improved the predictive value of each.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancy in AVAI by Doppler vs. biplane method was significantly more pronounced with increased LV outflow tract flow velocity, shorter height, lower weight, older age and smaller LV cavity dimensions. Combining the AVAIs enabled mutual and incremental value in predicting events.

Elevated Prosthetic Valve Gradients: What to Consider When Determining an Etiology

DOPPLER echocardiography is a useful noninvasive tool for the assessment of cardiac hemodynamics. However, it is subject to limitations that can have important clinical implications, especially in the setting of valve prosthesis. Elevation in mean transvalvular gradient is a finding that has a variety of etiologies. One such etiology is the pressure-recovery (PR) phenomenon, a consequence of stream convergence and energy conversion across a narrowing, which is an artifact of Doppler echocardiographic calculations of valvular flow. The elevated gradient measured with Doppler echocardiography as a result of PR is not present on cardiac catheterization and does not represent true problematic valve hemodynamics. PR should be suspected with an elevated gradient on Doppler echocardiography with normal leaflet motion, especially in the setting of a small proximal aorta. Understanding and awareness of PR are important because PR can lead to overestimation of disease severity in the clinical setting.