Simple Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Scoring System for the Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

Guidance for performance, utilization, and education of cardiac and lung point-of-care ultrasonography from the Japanese Society of Echocardiography

In recent years, bedside ultrasound examinations have been used in many clinical departments and are called point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Regarding POCUS in the cardiac field, a protocol called focus (focused) cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has been developed in Europe and the United States, is being used clinically, and an educational syllabus has been created. According to them, FoCUS is defined as a point-of-care cardiac ultrasound examination using standardized limited sections and protocols. FoCUS is primarily intended to be performed by non-cardiologists, and in order to avoid making mistakes in judgment, it is important to be familiar with its limitations and it is necessary to understand pathological conditions that can only be diagnosed using conventional comprehensive echocardiography. The Japanese Society of Echocardiography has edited this clinical guideline because we believe that FoCUS should be used effectively and appropriately in Japan, and that appropriate education is essential to popularize FoCUS in Japan. Furthermore, lung POCUS has recently come into clinical use. Lung POCUS is useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of heart failure when used in conjunction with FoCUS, and is especially useful in primary care where chest X-rays are not available. The working group that created this manual agreed that it is desirable to educate patients about lung POCUS in conjunction with FoCUS, so we decided to include the basic techniques of lung POCUS and how to use them in this manuscript.

Increased preload and echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function

AIMS

Echocardiographic diastolic parameters are used to diagnose and monitor increased left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and we hypothesized that increased loading conditions cause increased E/e'. Our aim was to assess the effect of preload augmentation on diastolic parameters among both healthy subjects and subjects with known cardiac disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 129 subjects merged from two cohorts; one dialysis cohort (n = 47) and one infusion cohort (n = 82). Echocardiography was performed immediately before and after hemodialysis (HD) or saline infusion, under low and high loading conditions. Elevated LVFP was defined as septal E/e' ≥ 15 and/or lateral E/e' ≥ 13 at high-loading conditions. The population was divided according to elevated LVFP (n = 31) and normal LVFP (n = 98). The load difference for the population was 972 ± 460 mL, with no differences in load difference between elevated and normal LVFP (p NS). The subjects with elevated LVFP were older (63 ± 11 vs. 46 ± 16 years, p < .001), and had lower LV ejection fraction (50 ± 14 vs. 59 ± 8.1%, p < .01). After augmented preload, EDV increased in the normal LVFP group (p < .01) but remained unchanged in the elevated LVFP group (p NS). Both E and e' increased among the subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e' remained unchanged (∆E/e' +.1 [-.5-1.2]), p NS). Among the subjects with elevated, LVFP we observed increased E but not e', resulting in significantly increased E/e' (∆ average E/e' +2.4 [0-4.0], p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Augmented preload does not seem to affect E/e' among subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e' seems to increase significantly among subjects with elevated LVFP.

Remote dielectric sensing predicts elevated left atrial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

There are currently no established non-invasive indices of echocardiography for elevated left atrial pressure (LAP) especially in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a novel non-invasive electromagnetic energy-based technology that quantifies total lung fluid, enabling the monitoring of volume status in patients with heart failure. The utility of ReDS for estimating LAP in patients with AF remains unknown.

Methods

We prospectively investigated patients with AF in whom LAP was directly measured during catheter ablation for AF, and ReDS measurements were conducted the day before ablation. Elevated LAP was defined as LAP ≥ 15 mmHg.

Results

A total of 61 patients were included (median age 66 years, 38 % female). Among them, 26 patients had elevated LAP. There was a positive correlation between ReDS and LAP (r = 0.363, P = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the prediction of elevated LAP demonstrated that the best cut-off value of ReDS was 30 %, with a sensitivity of 65 %, specificity of 69 %, and an area under the curve of 0.703 (95 % confidence interval 0.568-0.837). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ReDS was an independent predictor of elevated LAP, among covariates including left ventricular ejection fraction, the ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to septal mitral annular early diastolic velocity, and left atrial volume index.

Conclusions

Our results suggest ReDS could be a valuable marker of elevated LAP even in patients with AF. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effectiveness of a ReDS-guided decongestive strategy in patients with heart failure.

Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressure in aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

The assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (FP) is important for the management of aortic stenosis (AS) patients. Although, it is often restricted for predict LV FP in AS because of mitral annular calcification and a certain left ventricular hypertrophy. Thus, we tested the predictive ability of the algorithm for elevated LV FP in AS patients and also applied a recently-proposed echocardiographic scoring system of LV FP, visually assessed time difference between the mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening (VMT) score.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive 116 patients with at least moderate AS in sinus rhythm who underwent right heart catheterization and echocardiography within 7 days. Mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) was measured as invasive parameter of LV FP. LV diastolic dysfunction (DD) was graded according to the ASE/EACVI guidelines. The VMT score was defined as follows: time sequence of opening of mitral and tricuspid valves was scored to 0-2 (0: tricuspid valve first, 1: simultaneous, 2: mitral valve first). When the inferior vena cava was dilated, one point was added and VMT score was finally calculated as 0-3.

RESULTS

Of the 116 patients, 29 patients showed elevated PAWP. Ninety patients (93%) and 67 patients (63%) showed increased values for left atrium volume index (LAVI) and E/e', respectively when the cut-off values recommended by the guidelines were applied and thus the algorism predicted elevated PAWP with a low specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). VMT ≥ 2 predicted elevated PAWP with a sensitivity of 59%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 59%, and negative predictive value of 89%. An alternative algorithm that applied tricuspid regurgitation velocity and VMT scores was tested, and its predictive ability was markedly improved.

CONCLUSION

VMT score was applicable for AS patients. Alternative use of VMT score improved diagnostic accuracy of guideline-recommended algorism.

The prognostic value of the visually assessed time difference between mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening score for patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The visually assessed time difference between the mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening (VMT) score was correlated with the increase of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP).

HYPOTHESIS

We suspected that the VMT score might be a valuable prognostic biomarker for heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients. This study was to evaluate the predictive value of VMT score for 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-cause mortality in HFmrEF patients.

METHODS

This cohort study enrolled 379 patients aged ≥18 years old with HFmrEF. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was employed to assess the association between VMT score and all-cause or CVD-cause mortality in HFmrEF patients. Hazards ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were effect sizes. Kaplan-Meier curves showed the survival probability of patients. The area under the curve (AUC) evaluated the prognostic value of the VMT score.

RESULTS

The risk of all-cause mortality was increased in HFmrEF patients in the VMT score of 2 (HR = 2.80, 95%CI: 1.04-7.52) and 3 (HR = 4.29, 95%CI: 1.58-11.66). The VMT score of 3 was associated with an increased risk of 1-year CVD-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF (HR = 7.63, 95%CI: 1.70-34.33). The AUC of VMT score for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality of HFmrEF patients was 0.724, and for predicting 1-year CVD-cause mortality of HFmrEF patients was 0.748. The survival probability of patients with the VMT score < 2 was higher than those with the VMT score of 2 and 3.

CONCLUSION

The VMT score might be a reliable prognostic index for 1-year all-cause or CVD-cause mortality of HFmrEF patients.

Application of an echocardiographic scoring system of left ventricular filling pressure to diagnose acute heart failure in patients complaining dyspnea

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is a common symptom in acute heart failure (AHF) patients. Although an accurate and rapid diagnosis of AHF is essential to improve prognosis, estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (FP) remains challenging, especially for noncardiologists. We evaluated the usefulness of a recently-proposed parameter of LV FP, visually assessed time difference between the mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening (VMT) score, to detect AHF in patients complaining of dyspnea.

METHODS

Echocardiography and lung ultrasonography (LUS) were performed in 121 consecutive patients (68 ± 14 years old, 75 males) presenting with dyspnea. The VMT score was determined from the atrioventricular valve opening phase (tricuspid valve first: 0, simultaneous: 1, mitral valve first: 2) and inferior vena cava dilatation (absent: 0, present: 1), and VMT ≥2 was judged as positive. LUS was performed with the 8 zones method and judged as positive if 3 or more B-lines were observed in bilateral regions. The AHF diagnosis was performed by certified cardiologists according to recent guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients, 33 were diagnosed with AHF. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing AHF were 64 % and 84 % for LUS and 94 % and 88 % for VMT score. In logistic regression analysis, VMT score showed a significantly higher c-index than LUS (0.91 vs 0.74, p = 0.002). In multivariable analyses, VMT score was associated with AHF independently of clinically relevant covariates and LUS. In addition, serial assessment of VMT score followed by LUS provided a diagnostic flow chart to diagnose AHF (VMT 3: AHF definitive, VMT 2 and LUS positive: AHF highly suspicious; VMT 2 and LUS negative: further investigation is needed; VMT ≤ 1: AHF rejected).

CONCLUSIONS

VMT score showed high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing AHF. Combined assessment of the VMT score and LUS could become a reliable strategy for diagnosis of AHF by non-cardiologists.

Visual echocardiographic scoring system of the left ventricular filling pressure and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Aims

Elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is a powerful indicator of worsening clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, detection of elevated LVFP is often challenging. This study aimed to determine the association between the newly proposed echocardiographic LVFP parameter, visually assessed time difference between the mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening (VMT) score, and clinical outcomes of HFpEF.

Methods and results

We retrospectively investigated 310 well-differentiated HFpEF patients in stable conditions. VMT was scored from 0 to 3 using two-dimensional echocardiographic images, and VMT ≥2 was regarded as a sign of elevated LVFP. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death or heart failure hospitalization during the 2 years after the echocardiographic examination. In all patients, Kaplan–Meier curves showed that VMT ≥2 (n = 54) was associated with worse outcomes than the VMT ≤1 group (n = 256) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, VMT ≥2 was associated with worse outcomes when tested in 100 HFpEF patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (P = 0.026). In the adjusted model, VMT ≥2 was independently associated with the primary outcome (hazard ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.46–4.61; P = 0.001). Additionally, VMT scoring provided an incremental prognostic value over clinically relevant variables and diastolic function grading (χ² 10.8–16.3, P = 0.035).

Conclusions

In patients with HFpEF, the VMT score was independently and incrementally associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Moreover, it could also predict clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients with AF.