Feasibility and time-analysis of 3D and myocardial deformation versus conventional 2D echocardiography to assess cardiac chambers

Utility of the Ratio Between the Size of the Right Atrium and the Right Ventricle at End-Systole to Diagnose Atrial Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

In the multiparametric framework for diagnosing atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation (A-STR), an end-systolic (ES) right atrial (RA)-to-right ventricular (RV) volume or area ratio ≥1.5 supports the diagnosis of A-STR over the ventricular secondary tricuspid regurgitation phenotype (V-STR). However, this threshold value has never been tested.

METHODS

A single-center study was conducted, prospectively enrolling consecutive patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation who underwent two- and three-dimensional echocardiography.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients were enrolled (mean age, 75 ± 13 years; 65% women). Although patients with A-STR and V-STR presented similar degrees of secondary tricuspid regurgitation and comparable RA size, the ES RA/RV volume ratio was significantly larger in A-STR than in V-STR (1.75 [interquartile range, 1.35-2.45] vs 1.18 [interquartile range, 0.81-1.66], respectively; P < .001). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the ES RA/RV volume ratio showed a significantly higher predictive power for A-STR (area under the curve [AUC], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78) compared with RA maximum volume (AUC, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.54-0.66; P = .01), RA minimum volume (AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.65; P = .007), and ratio of RA minimum volume to RV end-diastolic volume (AUC, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63; P < .001). However, the predictive power of the ES RA/RV volume ratio (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78) and the ES RA/RV area ratio (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81) for the diagnosis of A-STR was similar (P = .58). The threshold value for ES RA/RV volume ratio that best distinguished between A-STR and V-STR was 1.40 (AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63-0.73), whereas for ES RA/RV area ratio, it was 1.6 (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69). A multivariable model that included either ES RA/RV volume ratio or ES RA/RV area ratio, along with LV ejection fraction, RV ejection fraction, RV ES volume, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure, resulted in an AUC of 0.97 for differentiating between A-STR and V-STR.

CONCLUSIONS

ES RA/RV volume ratio ≥ 1.4 and ES RA/RV area ratio ≥ 1.6 support the diagnosis of A-STR over V-STR.

Values of three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a top life-threatening disease and early and sensitive detection of CAD remains a challenge. This study aimed to assess the value of three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (3D-STI) in diagnosing CAD patients and investigate the parameters of 3D-STI associated with disease severity. Methods: A total of 260 suspected CAD patients who met the study criteria underwent coronary angiography within one week after the ultrasound examination. Based on the examination results, 142 patients were confirmed to have CAD (CAD group), while 118 patients were classified as non-CAD (NCAD group). Age, gender, family history, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, electrocardiogram, BMI, heart rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction were compared between the two groups. Additionally, 3D-STI parameters including left ventricular global radial strain (GRS), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular global area strain (GAS), and left ventricular global circumferential strain (GCS) were analyzed. Results: No significant differences were found between the CAD and NCAD groups in terms of demographics, smoking history, physiological measurements, and common comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia. However, when comparing the 3D-STI parameters, all four parameters, including GLS, GRS, GCS, and GAS, were significantly different in the CAD group compared to the NCAD group. The results suggest that 3D-STI parameters have diagnostic value for CAD, and their changes are associated with CAD severity. Conclusions: Combined detection of these parameters enhances diagnostic accuracy compared to individual detection.

Role and application of three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of left and right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a UK nationwide survey

Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) imaging has permitted advancements in the quantification of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction. We evaluated the availability of 3DE equipment / analysis software, the integration of 3DE assessment of the LV and RV in routine clinical practice, current training provisions in 3DE, and aimed to ascertain barriers preventing the routine use of 3DE for volumetric analysis. Through the British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) regional representatives' network, echocardiographers were invited to participate in an open online survey. A total of 181 participants from echocardiography departments in the United Kingdom (UK), the majority from tertiary centres (61%), completed the 28-question survey. For 3DE quantification, 3DE-LV was adopted more frequently than 3DE-RV (48% vs 11%, respectively). Imaging feasibility was a recognised factor in 3DE RV and LV adoption. Many respondents had access to 3D probes (93%). The largest observed barriers to 3DE routine use were training deficiencies, with 83% reporting they would benefit from additional training opportunities and the duration of time permitted for the scan, with 68% of responders reporting allowances of less than the BSE standard of 45-60 min per patient (8% < 30-min). Furthermore, of those respondents who had undertaken professional accreditation, competence in 3DE was not formally assessed in 89%. This UK survey also reported good accessibility to magnetic resonance imaging (72%), which was related to overall 3DE adoption. In summary, although 3DE is now readily available, it remains underutilised. Further training opportunities, integrated formal assessment, improved adoption of BSE minimum recommended scanning times, alongside industry and societal support, may increase 3DE utilisation in routine practice.

Current national availability of advanced echocardiography imaging: real world data from an Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging survey

Aims

Advanced echocardiographic imaging (AEI) techniques, such as three-dimensional (3D) and multi-chamber speckle-tracking deformation imaging (strain) analysis, have been shown to be more accurate in assessing heart chamber geometry and function when compared with conventional echocardiography providing additional prognostic value. However, incorporating AEI alongside standard examinations may be heterogeneous between echo laboratories (echo labs). Thus, our goal was to gain a better understanding of the many AEI modalities that are available and employed in Italy.

Methods and results

The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey over a month (November 2022) to describe the use of AEI in Italy. Data were retrieved via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire uploaded on the SIECVI website. Data obtained from 173 echo labs were divided into 3 groups, according to the numbers of echocardiograms performed: <250 exams (low-volume activity, 53 centres), between 251 and 550 exams (moderate-volume activity, 62 centres), and ≥550 exams (high-volume activity, 58 centres). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) 3D was in use in 75% of centres with a consistent difference between low (55%), medium (71%), and high activity volume (85%) (P = 0.002), while 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was in use in 84% of centres, reaching the 95% in high activity volume echo labs (P = 0.006). In centres with available 3D TTE, it was used for the left ventricle (LV) analysis in 67%, for the right ventricle (RV) in 45%, and for the left atrium (LA) in 40%, showing greater use in high-volume centres compared with low- and medium-volume centres (all P < 0.04). Strain analysis was utilized in most echo labs (80%), with a trend towards greater use in high-volume centres than low- and medium-volume centres (77%, 74%, and 90%, respectively; P = 0.08). In centres with available strain analysis, it was mainly employed for the LV (80%) and much less frequently for the RV and LA (49% and 48%, respectively).

Conclusion

In Italy, the AEI modalities are more frequently available in centres with high-volume activity but employed only in a few applications, being more frequent in analysing the LV compared with the RV and LA. Therefore, the echocardiography community and SIECVI should promote uniformity and effective training across the Italian centres. Meanwhile, collaborations across centres with various resources and expertise should be encouraged to use the benefits of the AEI.

Association of Right Ventricular Functional Parameters With Adverse Cardiopulmonary Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

AIMS

We aimed to confirm that three-dimensional echocardiography-derived right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is better associated with adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes than the conventional echocardiographic parameters.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of studies reporting the impact of unit change of RVEF, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and free-wall longitudinal strain (FWLS) on clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes). Hazard ratios (HRs) were rescaled by the within-study SDs to represent standardized changes. Within each study, we calculated the ratio of HRs related to a 1 SD reduction in RVEF versus TAPSE, or FAC, or FWLS, to quantify the association of RVEF with adverse outcomes relative to the other metrics. These ratios of HRs were pooled using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Ten independent studies were identified as suitable, including data on 1,928 patients with various cardiopulmonary conditions. Overall, a 1 SD reduction in RVEF was robustly associated with adverse outcomes (HR = 2.64 [95% CI, 2.18-3.20], P < .001; heterogeneity: I² = 65%, P = .002). In studies reporting HRs for RVEF and TAPSE, or RVEF and FAC, or RVEF and FWLS in the same cohort, head-to-head comparison revealed that RVEF showed significantly stronger association with adverse outcomes per SD reduction versus the other 3 parameters (vs TAPSE, HR = 1.54 [95% CI, 1.04-2.28], P = .031; vs FAC, HR = 1.45 [95% CI, 1.15-1.81], P = .001; vs FWLS, HR = 1.44 [95% CI, 1.07-1.95], P = .018).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in three-dimensional echocardiography-derived RVEF shows stronger association with adverse clinical outcomes than conventional right ventricular functional indices; therefore, it might further refine the risk stratification of patients with cardiopulmonary diseases.

Association of outcome with left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction measured with two- and three-dimensional echocardiography in patients referred for routine, clinically indicated studies

Objectives

We sought to analyze if left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have incremental prognostic value over measurements obtained from two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) in patients referred to a high-volume echocardiography laboratory for routine, clinically-indicated studies.

Methods

We measured LV volumes and EF using both 2DE and 3DE in 725 consecutive patients (67% men; 59 ± 18 years) with various clinical indications referred for a routine clinical study.

Results

LV volumes were significantly larger, and EF was lower when measured by 3DE than 2DE. During follow-up (3.6 ± 1.2 years), 111 (15.3%) all-cause deaths and 248 (34.2%) cardiac hospitalizations occurred. Larger LV volumes and lower EF were associated with worse outcome independent of age, creatinine, hemoglobin, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic heart diseases). In stepwise Cox regression analyses, the associations of both death and cardiac hospitalization with clinical data (CD: age, creatinine, hemoglobin, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic heart disease) whose Harrel's C-index (HC) was 0.775, were augmented more by the LV volumes and EF obtained by 3DE than by 2DE parameters. The association of CD with death was not affected by LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) either measured by 2DE or 3DE. Conversely, it was incremented by 3DE LVEF (HC = 0.84, p < 0.001) more than 2DE LVEF (HC = 0.814, p < 0.001). The association of CD with the composite endpoint (HC = 0.64, p = 0.002) was augmented more by 3DE LV EDV (HC = 0.786, p < 0.001), end-systolic volume (HC = 0.801, p < 0.001), and EF (HC = 0.84, p < 0.001) than by the correspondent 2DE parameters (HC = 0.786, HC = 0.796, and 0.84, all p < 0.001) In addition, partition values for mild, moderate and severe reduction of the LVEF measured by 3DE showed a higher discriminative power than those measured by 2DE for cardiac death (Log-Rank: χ² = 98.3 vs. χ² = 77.1; p < 0.001). Finally, LV dilation defined according to the 3DE threshold values showed higher discriminatory power and prognostic value for death than when using 2DE reference values (3DE LVEDV: χ² = 15.9, p < 0.001 vs. χ² = 10.8, p = 0.001; 3DE LVESV: χ² = 24.4, p < 0.001 vs. χ² = 17.4, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients who underwent routine, clinically-indicated echocardiography, 3DE LVEF and ESV showed stronger association with outcome than the corresponding 2DE parameters.