The Association of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation with Poor Survival is Modified by Right Ventricular Pressure and Function

Secondary tricuspid regurgitation: incidence, types, and outcomes in atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Incidence and types of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are not well defined in atrial fibrillation (AFib) and sinus rhythm (SR). Atrial secondary TR (A-STR) is associated with pre-existing AFib; however, close to 50% of patients with A-STR do not have AFib. The aim of this study was to assess incidence, types, and outcomes of ≥ moderate TR in AFib vs. SR.

METHODS

Adults with and without new-onset AFib without structural heart disease or ≥ moderate TR at baseline were followed for the development of ≥ moderate TR. Tricuspid regurgitation types were pacemaker, left-sided valve disease, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension (PH), isolated ventricular, and A-STR.

RESULTS

Among 1359 patients with AFib and 20 438 in SR, 109 and 378 patients developed ≥ moderate TR, respectively. The individual types of TR occurred more frequently in AFib related to the higher pacemaker implantation rates (1.12 vs. 0.19 per 100 person-years, P < .001), larger right atrial size (median 78 vs. 53 mL, P < .001), and higher pulmonary pressures (median 30 vs. 28 mmHg, P < .001). The most common TR types irrespective of rhythm were LV dysfunction-TR and A-STR. Among patients in SR, those with A-STR were older, predominantly women with more diastolic abnormalities and higher pulmonary pressures. All types of secondary TR were associated with all-cause mortality, highest in PH-TR and LV dysfunction-TR.

CONCLUSIONS

New-onset AFib vs. SR conferred a higher risk of the individual TR types related to sequelae of AFib and higher pacemaker implantation rates, although the distribution of TR types was similar. Secondary TR was universally associated with increased mortality.

Contemporary Approach to Tricuspid Regurgitation: Knowns, Unknowns, and Future Challenges

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) worsens heart failure and is associated with impaired survival. In daily clinical practice, patients are referred late, and tricuspid valve interventions (surgical or transcatheter) are underutilised, which may lead to irreversible right ventricular damage and increases risk. This article addresses the appropriate timing and modality for an intervention (surgical or transcatheter), and its potential benefits on clinical outcomes. Ongoing randomised controlled trials will provide further insights into the efficacy of transcatheter valve interventions compared with medical treatment.

[Pulmonary heart: A review]

The review on the problem of the pulmonary heart pursues two goals: firstly, to restore historical justice and to show the priority studies of doctor Dmitry D. Pletnev on such problems as diagnosis of right ventricular myocardial infarction, clinical characteristics of congestive heart failure of the right ventricle; secondly, to outline the modern concept of the pulmonary heart. The review provides an analysis of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of heart failure in the pulmonary heart. Much attention is paid to echo cardiography data and biological markers are emphasized in assessing the function of the right atrium, right ventricle, tricuspid valve regurgitation, pulmonary artery pressure. Prognostically unfavorable signs of the course of the pulmonary heart have been identified, which include a high degree of tricuspid valve regurgitation, the amplitude of movement of the fibrous valve ring (TAPSE) and atrial fibrillation developing with dilation of the right atrium.

Clinical Value of a Novel Three-Dimensional Echocardiography-Derived Index of Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery Coupling in Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Echocardiographic surrogates of right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling have been reported to be associated with outcomes in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR). However, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) is difficult to estimate using echocardiography in patients with severe STR. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the predictive power of a surrogate of RV-PA coupling obtained using right ventricular (RV) volumes measured on three-dimensional echocardiography.

METHODS

One hundred eight patients (mean age, 73 ± 13 years; 61% women) with moderate or severe STR were included.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 2-48 months), 72 patients (40%) had reached the composite end point of death of any cause and heart failure hospitalization. RV-PA coupling was computed as the ratio between RV forward stroke volume (SV) (i.e., RV SV - regurgitant volume) and RV end-systolic volume (ESV). RV forward SV/ESV was significantly more related to the composite end point than RV ejection fraction (area under the curve, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93] vs 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.83], respectively; P = .03). A value of 0.40 was found to best correlate with outcome. On multivariate Cox regression, RV forward SV/ESV, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PASP, and RV free wall longitudinal strain/PASP were all independently associated with the occurrence of the composite end point when added to a group of parameters including STR severity (severe vs moderate), atrial fibrillation, pulmonary arterial hypertension, right atrial volume, RV end-diastolic volume, and RV free wall longitudinal strain. RV forward SV/ESV < 0.40 (HR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.49-7.56; P < .01) carried higher related risk than RV free wall longitudinal strain/PASP < -0.42%/mm Hg (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.26-7.84; P = .01) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PASP < 0.36 mm/mm Hg (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.29-5.58; P = .01). RV ejection fraction did not correlate independently with prognosis when added to the same group of variables.

CONCLUSIONS

RV forward SV/ESV is associated with the risk for death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with STR.

Tricuspid Regurgitation: Right Ventricular Volume Versus Pressure Load

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality in proportion to right ventricular adaptation to increased volume loading and pulmonary artery pressure. We here review recent progress in the understanding of right ventricular adaptation to pre- and after-loading conditions for improved recommendations of tricuspid valve repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

Trans-catheter tricuspid valve repair has made the correction of tricuspid regurgitation more easily available, triggering a need of tighter indications. Several studies have shown the feasibility and relevance to the indications of tricuspid valve repair of imaging of right ventricular ejection fraction measured by magnetic resonance imaging or 3D-echocardiography, and the 2D-echocardiography of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio combined with invasively determined mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Improved definitions of right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension may be considered in future recommendations on the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation.

Functional Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation across the Whole Spectrum of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Recognizing the Elephant in the Room of Heart Failure

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) occur due to cardiac remodeling in the presence of structurally normal valve apparatus. Two main mechanisms are involved, distinguishing an atrial functional form (when annulus dilatation is predominant) and a ventricular form (when ventricular remodeling and dysfunction predominate). Both affect the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) across the entire spectrum of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), including preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), or reduced (HFrEF). Currently, data on the management of functional valve regurgitation in the various HF phenotypes are limited. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of FMR and FTR within the different patterns of HF, as defined by LVEF.

New therapeutic approach for tricuspid regurgitation: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement or repair

The tricuspid valve is a complex structure with normal function dependent on the leaflet morphology, right atrial and annular dynamics, and right ventricular and chordal support. Thus, the pathophysiology of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is equally complex and current medical and surgical management options are limited. Transcatheter devices are currently being investigated as possible treatment options with lower morbidity and mortality than open surgical procedures. These devices can be divided by their implant location/mechanism of action: leaflet approximation devices, annuloplasty devices, orthotopic valve implants, and heterotopic valve implants. The current review will discuss each class of transcatheter device therapy, and further delve into the current understanding of who and when to treat. Finally, we will include a brief discussion of the future of device and surgical therapy trials for TR and the remaining questions to answer about this complex disease process.

The atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation is associated to more favorable outcome than the ventricular phenotype

Aim

We sought to evaluate the differences in prognosis between the atrial (A-STR) and the ventricular (V-STR) phenotypes of secondary tricuspid regurgitation.

Materials and methods

Consecutive patients with moderate or severe STR referred for echocardiography were enrolled. A-STR and V-STR were defined according to the last ACC/AHA guidelines criteria. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations.

Results

A total of 211 patients were enrolled. The prevalence of A-STR in our cohort was 26%. Patients with A- STR were significantly older and with lower NYHA functional class than V-STR patients. The prevalence of severe STR was similar (28% in A-STR vs. 37% in V-STR, p = 0.291). A-STR patients had smaller tenting height (TH) (10 ± 4 mm vs. 12 ± 7 mm, p = 0.023), larger end-diastolic tricuspid annulus area (9 ± 2 cm2 vs. 7 ± 6 cm2/m2, p = 0.007), smaller right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volumes (72 ± 27 ml/m2 vs. 92 ± 38 ml/m2; p = 0.001), and better RV longitudinal function (18 ± 7 mm vs. 16 ± 6 mm; p = 0.126 for TAPSE, and −21 ± 5% vs. −18 ± 5%; p = 0.006, for RV free-wall longitudinal strain, RVFWLS) than V-STR patients. Conversely, RV ejection fraction (RVEF, 48 ± 10% vs. 46 ± 11%, p = 0.257) and maximal right atrial volumes (64 ± 38 ml/m2 vs. 55 ± 23 ml/m2, p = 0.327) were similar between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 10 months, patients with V-STR had a 2.7-fold higher risk (HR: 2.7, 95% CI 95% = 1.3–5.7) of experiencing the combined endpoint than A-STR patients. The factors related to outcomes resulted different between the two STR phenotypes: TR-severity (HR: 5.8, CI 95% = 1, 4–25, P = 0.019) in A-STR patients; TR severity (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4–6.3, p = 0.005), RVEF (HR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p = 0.044), and RVFWLS (HR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.85–0.98, p = 0.009) in V-STR.

Conclusion

Almost one-third of patients referred to the echocardiography laboratory for significant STR have A-STR. A-STR patients had a lower incidence of the combined endpoint than V-STR patients. Moreover, while TR severity was the only independent factor associated to outcome in A-STR patients, TR severity and RV function were independently associated with outcome in V-STR patients.