1
|
Tavanaei R, Rezaee-Naserabad SS, Alizadeh S, Yazdani KO, Zali A, Farsani HA, Oraee-Yazdani S. Analgesic Effects of Preoperative Combination of Oral Pregabalin and Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A 4-arm, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2024; 36:134-141. [PMID: 36603131 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal perioperative pain management including nonopioid analgesia is a major pillar of enhanced recovery after surgery programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the preoperative combination of 2 nonopioid drugs, oral pregabalin and intravenous magnesium sulfate, in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS This 4-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 104 patients randomly allocated to receive: magnesium sulfate and pregabalin (MP), magnesium sulfate and oral placebo (M), 0.9% saline and oral pregabalin (P), and 0.9% saline and oral placebo (C). The study drugs were administered 1 hour preoperatively. The primary outcome was the cumulative morphine consumption on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale scores for leg pain at rest and with movement, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the first 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS Cumulative morphine consumption on postoperative day 1 was lower in group MP (19.6±8.0 mg) compared with group M (32.6±9.5 mg; P <0.001), group P (28.9±9.4 mg; P =0.001), or group C (38.8±10.3 mg; P <0.001). Multiple linear regression demonstrated a significant association between group MP and cumulative morphine consumption (B=-5.4 [95% CI, -7.1, -3.7], P <0.001). Visual analog scale scores for leg pain at rest and with movement were lower in group MP compared with other groups ( P =0.006 and <0.001). The incidence of PONV was also lowest in group MP ( P =0.032). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative administration of oral pregabalin and intravenous magnesium sulfate resulted in reduced morphine consumption and greater analgesic effect than the use of each drug individually or placebo in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roozbeh Tavanaei
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
| | - Seyyed S Rezaee-Naserabad
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
| | - Sajjad Alizadeh
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
| | - Kaveh O Yazdani
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan, Iran
| | - Alireza Zali
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
| | - Hamidreza A Farsani
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Saeed Oraee-Yazdani
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meyrat R, Vivian E, Sridhar A, Gulden RH, Bruce S, Martinez A, Montgomery L, Reed DN, Rappa PJ, Makanbhai H, Raney K, Belisle J, Castellanos S, Cwikla J, Elzey K, Wilck K, Nicolosi F, Sabat ME, Shoup C, Graham RB, Katzen S, Mitchell B, Oh MC, Patel N. Development of multidisciplinary, evidenced-based protocol recommendations and implementation strategies for anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery following a literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36142. [PMID: 38013300 PMCID: PMC10681460 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure involves several surgical specialties, including general, vascular, and spinal surgery due to its unique approach and anatomy involved. It also carries its own set of complications that differentiate it from posterior lumbar fusion surgeries. The demonstrated benefits of treatment guidelines, such as Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in other surgical procedures, and the lack of current recommendations regarding the anterior approach, underscores the need to develop protocols that specifically address the complexities of ALIF. We aimed to create an evidence-based protocol for pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of ALIF patients and implementation strategies for our health system. A 12-member multidisciplinary workgroup convened to develop an evidence-based treatment protocol for ALIF using a Delphi consensus methodology and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system for rating the quality of evidence and strength of protocol recommendations. The quality of evidence, strength of the recommendation and specific implementation strategies for Methodist Health System for each recommendation were described. The literature search resulted in 295 articles that were included in the development of protocol recommendations. No disagreements remained once the authors reviewed the final GRADE assessment of the quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations. Ultimately, there were 39 protocol recommendations, with 16 appropriate preoperative protocol recommendations (out of 17 proposed), 9 appropriate intraoperative recommendations, and 14 appropriate postoperative recommendations. This novel set of evidence-based recommendations is designed to optimize the patient's ALIF experience from the preoperative to the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Meyrat
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Elaina Vivian
- Performance Improvement, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Archana Sridhar
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - R. Heath Gulden
- Anesthesia Consultants of Dallas Division, US Anesthesia Partners, Dallas, TX
| | - Sue Bruce
- Clinical Outcomes Management, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Amber Martinez
- Pre-Surgery Assessment, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Lisa Montgomery
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Donald N. Reed
- Neurosurgery Division, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Stacey Castellanos
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Judy Cwikla
- Neurocritical Care Unit, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kristin Elzey
- Pharmacy, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kristen Wilck
- Clinical Nutrition, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Fallon Nicolosi
- Methodist Community Pharmacy – Dallas, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael E. Sabat
- Surgery and Recovery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Chris Shoup
- Executive Office, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Randall B. Graham
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Stephen Katzen
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Bartley Mitchell
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael C. Oh
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| | - Nimesh Patel
- Methodist Moody Brain and Spine Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bullock WM, Kumar AH, Manning E, Jones J. Perioperative Analgesia in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Data Supporting Future Direction. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:495-506. [PMID: 37718088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
This Clinical Research discusses the diverse nature of spine surgery procedures and the use of multimodal analgesia within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols to improve patient outcomes. Spine surgeries range from minor decompressions to extensive tumor resections, performed by neurosurgeons or orthopedic spine surgeons on adults and children. To manage perioperative pain effectively, various methods have been employed, including multimodal analgesia within ERAS protocols. Incorporating ERAS protocols into spine surgery has shown benefits such as reduced pain scores, decreased opioid use, shorter hospital stays, and improved functionality. ERAS protocols help to enhance patient outcomes, focusing on deconstructing these protocols for surgeons and anesthesiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Michael Bullock
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, 5672C HAFS, Durham, NC 27710, USA. https://twitter.com/wmbullockMDPhD
| | - Amanda H Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, 5672C HAFS, Durham, NC 27710, USA. https://twitter.com/amandakumarMD
| | - Erin Manning
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, 5672C HAFS, Durham, NC 27710, USA. https://twitter.com/ukmdphd2006
| | - Jerry Jones
- East Memphis Anesthesia Services, 5545 Murray Avenue, Suite 130, Memphis, TN 38119, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 877 Jefferson Avenue, Chandler Building, Suite 600, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Complex spinal surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. The purpose of this paper is to review recent literature on postoperative pain management in adult and adolescent patients having complex spinal surgery. RECENT FINDINGS We conducted a literature search using the Medline database for relevant publications from 2020 to 2022 on postoperative pain after complex spinal surgery. Although opioids remain the mainstay to manage pain after complex spinal surgery, they are associated with adverse effects. Multimodal analgesia may be used to reduce these adverse effects by combining different drugs targeting different parts of the pain pathway. Recent publications suggest continuous low dose fentanyl or morphine infusion, methadone, intravenous paracetamol and ibuprofen, ketorolac, ketamine, magnesium infusion, lidocaine infusion and dexmedetomidine appear to be effective and safe to manage pain after complex spinal surgery. Regional techniques including bilateral erector spinae block, interfascial plane block and intrathecal morphine also appear to be effective and safe. SUMMARY Pain management after complex spinal surgery remains challenging. Therefore, further studies are still required to determine the optimal multimodal analgesic regimen for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Way Siong Koh
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital
| | - Kate Leslie
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital.,Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|