Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials

Bifidobacterium modulation of tumor immunotherapy and its mechanism

The advent of tumor immunotherapy in patients has revolutionized the treatment of tumors and significantly improved survival rates for a wide range of tumors. However, the full therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has yet to be realized, as not all patients have a lasting survival benefit from them, and a significant proportion of patients show primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Bifidobacterium is one of the most common probiotics, and its antitumor and immunomodulatory effects have been demonstrated in recent years, but its immunomodulatory effects in tumors, especially on ICIs and in combination, have not been extensively studied in clinical practice, and its effects on the immune system and the mechanisms that modulate immunotherapy are largely unknown. Therefore, this review will focus on the immunomodulatory effects of Bifidobacteria in malignancies and the possible mechanisms of action of Bifidobacteria on immunotherapy in the hope of providing a basis for further research and better application of Bifidobacteria in clinical practice.

Sex disparities revealed by single-cell and bulk sequencing and their impacts on the efficacy of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate on whether sex affects immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. Here, we explored the underlying molecular bases for sex dimorphisms and their impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

2360 EC patients from phase 3 trials were pooled to compare overall survivals by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Genomic data of 1425 samples were integrated to depict the genomic landscapes and antigenic features. We also examined the sex disparities based on single-cell RNA sequencing and T cell receptor-sequencing data from 105,145 immune cells in 60 patients.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy was associated with favorable outcomes in men (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79; P < 0.001), but not in women (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78-1.23; P = 0.84) (Pinteraction =0.02). The frequencies of 8 gene mutations, 12 single base substitutions signatures, and 131 reactome pathways were significantly different between male and female. Additionally, six subtypes of HLA-II antigens were enriched in women. Hence, we constructed and then validated a sex-related signature to better predict the outcomes of immunotherapy. Exhausted CD8+ T cells were highly infiltrated in men, while naïve CD8+ T cells were more common in women. Further examinations on multiple malignancies suggested exhausted CD8+ T cells were enriched in patients who responded to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study delineated the robust genomic and cellular sex disparities in EC. Furthermore, male, rather than female, derived significantly benefits from immunotherapy. These results have implications for treatment decision-making and developing immunotherapy for personalized care. In the past several years, immunotherapy has gradually replaced the traditional chemotherapy as the standard treatment in esophageal cancer. It is well-established that immunological responses in male and female differ significantly. However, there is an ongoing debate on whether sex can impact the treatment outcomes in immunotherapy. In the present study, we systematically characterized the genomic and cellular landscapes of esophageal cancer, and revealed the significant differences between male and female patients. Furthermore, with over 2000 patients with esophageal cancer, we showed that only men can benefit from immunotherapy. In women, immunotherapy failed to show superior over chemotherapy. These results have implications for treatment decision-making and developing next-generation immunotherapy for personalized care.

The impact of body mass index on survival endpoints among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A real-world multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies on the correlation between high body mass index (BMI) and extended survival among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been made, although findings have shown variability. Our research explored the phenomenon of the "obesity paradox" in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) undergoing treatment with ICIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with mUC who received a minimum of one cycle of ICI treatment at two medical centers in Taiwan from September 2015 to January 2023. Features of patients' clinicopathologic factors, including age, sex, primary or metastatic location, treatment line, and BMI were examined. The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), which were assessed utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. We employed the Cox-regression model to adjust for multiple covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 215 patients were included, with 128 (59.5%) being male, and the median age was 70 years. In the obese group (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 ), patients demonstrated significantly better median OS compared to the non-obese group (BMI <25 kg/m2 ) (21.9 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.021). However, there was no significant difference in median PFS between the high and low BMI groups (4.7 vs. 2.8 months; p = 0.16). Post-hoc subgroup revealed a survival benefit from ICI treatment in male patients within the BMI ≥25 kg/m2 group (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Based on real-world data from the Asia-Pacific region, there appears to be a correlation between obesity and prolonged OS in patients receiving ICI treatment for mUC.