Quality of Virtual Patients on WeChat for Nursing History-Taking Training

Virtual patients improve history-taking competence and confidence in medical students

PURPOSE

Klark is a novel online medical education tool (www.klark-cases.com) where students take histories from virtual patients with common presentations from multiple specialities. We investigated whether Klark could enhance student confidence and competence in history-taking, and whether students find Klark helpful.

METHODS

A single cohort of first-year clinical medical students had access to Klark for three weeks. At both ends of the trial, participants were asked to complete feedback forms and participate in two mock Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) history stations. Outcome measures included self-reported confidence and competence in history-taking, performance in OSCE stations, and qualitative user experience data.

RESULTS

Seventy participants successfully completed a case on Klark (mean 18.7), of which 63 (90% user retention) completed  ≥ 2 cases. Self-reported competence (p < 0.001) and confidence (p < 0.001) improved. Participants found Klark to be helpful, impactful, and would recommend it to other students. OSCE scores improved for medical (57% vs. 69%, p < 0.001) and surgical (58% vs. 70%, p < 0.001) histories.

CONCLUSIONS

Klark improved competence and confidence in history-taking. Students found it helpful and chose to continue using the platform. By developing confidence and competence at their own pace in the Klark simulated environment, students can then maximise benefit from in-person clinical opportunities.

Web-based standardized patient simulation for taking anamnesis: an approach in nursing education during the pandemic

BACKGROUND

To address the challenges in nursing education brought about by the pandemic, this study aimed to evaluate the use of a web-based standardized patient practice in the development of nursing students' anamnesis taking skills and their views about its application.

METHOD

We conducted a descriptive intervention study with 39 s-year nursing students. The students completed anamnesis using the standardized patient practice in line with a scenario with real standardized patients in a web-based environment with audio and video.

RESULTS

The total scores of students' anamnesis skills were low. The agreement between the total scores, scores obtained from the health patterns, and each item in the control list was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Web-based standardized patient practice is an alternative for clinical practice facilitating the gaining of competencies in making holistic nursing diagnoses under conditions that limit face-to-face interactions, such as pandemics.

History-taking level and its influencing factors among nursing undergraduates based on the virtual standardized patient testing results: Cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

History-taking is an essential skill for nurses. In nursing education, it is necessary to objectively assess history-taking skills in a way that accurately reflects differences among students. Current history-taking evaluation methods lack objectivity, consistency and standardization, which makes it difficult to identify factors that influence history-taking skill. A virtual standardized patient (VSP) can provide history-taking practice with repeatability and consistency. It can make objective and standardized assessment possible by eliminating the subjectivity of different teachers and patients.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the history-taking skills of nursing undergraduates using a VSP, and to explore its independent influencing factors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was employed with a sample of convenience from 3 universities. All 174 nursing undergraduates had their history-taking level evaluated using one VSP via computer or mobile terminal. For each query raised by the students, the VSP could give a preset response. The responses were assigned corresponding scores according to their importance, with a total score of 100. The students' general demographics were documented, and their self-efficacy, critical thinking and communication skills were measured online with the Nursing History-taking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Yoon's Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument and the Supportive Communicative Scale. Univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were performed.

RESULTS

The mean total history-taking score was 58.53 ± 14.32. History-taking scores were well discriminated among the students tested, with 10% of the students scoring above 80, 37% between 60 and 80, 22% between 50 and 60 and 31% scored below 50. The history-taking level of the nursing students was significantly associated with ethnicity, previous academic performance, and Supportive Communicative Scale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the VSP as a history-taking assessment method is an effective way to achieve a relatively objective, standardized and consistent assessment of history-taking education. Ethnicity, previous academic performance and supportive communication skills independently influenced the students' history-taking level. Mature history-taking skills require not only solid theoretical knowledge but good communication skills.

The effectiveness of the virtual patient-based social learning approach in undergraduate nursing education: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

In nursing education, knowledge and competence in conducting physical assessments are crucial. Therefore, physical assessment knowledge has become a fundamental and essential education program for nursing students. However, most of the current nursing courses are taught via a didactic teaching approach, making it difficult for students to think deeply about relevant issues due to the lack of interaction and context. This may, in turn, have an impact on learning effectiveness and clinical judgment.

OBJECTIVE

A virtual patient (VP)-based social learning approach is proposed to enhance nursing students' performance and clinical judgment in education programs.

DESIGN

A quasi-experiment method was adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 40 senior nursing students participated in the study (VP-based social learning approach group = 20, control group = 20).

METHODS

The study involved a pre- and post-test to examine students' learning achievements, self-efficacy, and communication skills. The experimental group adopted the VP-based learning approach, while the control group adopted the conventional didactic learning approach. ANCOVA was employed to compare the performances of the two groups.

RESULTS

The experimental results indicate that using a VP for learning can enhance students' learning achievements, self-efficacy, and communication skills. In addition, based on the analysis of the results, students generally believed that learning with a VP makes learning more enjoyable.

CONCLUSION

The VP-based social learning approach would be an effective strategy to train nursing students who have limited opportunities to experience real clinical situations, in particular during the COVID-19 pandemic.