1
|
Gomes Marques I, Vieites-Blanco C, Rodríguez-González PM, Segurado P, Marques M, Barrento MJ, Fernandes MR, Cupertino A, Almeida H, Biurrun I, Corcobado T, Costa E Silva F, Díez JJ, Dufour S, Faria C, Ferreira MT, Ferreira V, Jansson R, Machado H, Marçais B, Moreira AC, Oliva J, Pielech R, Rodrigues AP, David TS, Solla A, Jung T. The ADnet Bayesian belief network for alder decline: Integrating empirical data and expert knowledge. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 947:173619. [PMID: 38825208 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
The globalization in plant material trading has caused the emergence of invasive pests in many ecosystems, such as the alder pathogen Phytophthora ×alni in European riparian forests. Due to the ecological importance of alder to the functioning of rivers and the increasing incidence of P. ×alni-induced alder decline, effective and accessible decision tools are required to help managers and stakeholders control the disease. This study proposes a Bayesian belief network methodology to integrate diverse information on the factors affecting the survival and infection ability of P. ×alni in riparian habitats to help predict and manage disease incidence. The resulting Alder Decline Network (ADnet) management tool integrates information about alder decline from scientific literature, expert knowledge and empirical data. Expert knowledge was gathered through elicitation techniques that included 19 experts from 12 institutions and 8 countries. An original dataset was created covering 1189 European locations, from which P. ×alni occurrence was modeled based on bioclimatic variables. ADnet uncertainty was evaluated through its sensitivity to changes in states and three scenario analyses. The ADnet tool indicated that mild temperatures and high precipitation are key factors favoring pathogen survival. Flood timing, water velocity, and soil type have the strongest influence on disease incidence. ADnet can support ecosystem management decisions and knowledge transfer to address P. ×alni-induced alder decline at local or regional levels across Europe. Management actions such as avoiding the planting of potentially infected trees or removing man-made structures that increase the flooding period in disease-affected sites could decrease the incidence of alder disease in riparian forests and limit its spread. The coverage of the ADnet tool can be expanded by updating data on the pathogen's occurrence, particularly from its distributional limits. Research on the role of genetic variability in alder susceptibility and pathogen virulence may also help improve future ADnet versions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Gomes Marques
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal; cE3c - Center for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Change & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cristina Vieites-Blanco
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Patricia M Rodríguez-González
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Pedro Segurado
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marlene Marques
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria J Barrento
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I.P., Av. da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Maria R Fernandes
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Arthur Cupertino
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Helena Almeida
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Idoia Biurrun
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Apdo. 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
| | - Tamara Corcobado
- Austrian Research Centre for Forests (BFW), Vienna, Austria; Phytophthora Research Centre, Mendel University, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Filipe Costa E Silva
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Julio J Díez
- iuFOR- Sustainable Forest Management, Research Institute, University of Valladolid, 34004 Palencia, Spain
| | - Simon Dufour
- Université Rennes 2, CNRS, UMR LETG, CA 24307-35043 Rennes Cedex, France
| | - Carla Faria
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria T Ferreira
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Verónica Ferreira
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ARNET - Aquatic Research Network, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Roland Jansson
- Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Helena Machado
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I.P., Av. da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Benoit Marçais
- Université de Lorraine, INRAE, UMR Interactions arbres/microorganismes, F-54000 Nancy, France
| | - Ana C Moreira
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I.P., Av. da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Jonàs Oliva
- Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences and Engineering, University of Lleida, Av. Rovira Roure, 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain; Joint Research Unit CTFC-AGROTECNIO-CERCA, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Remigiusz Pielech
- Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland
| | - Ana P Rodrigues
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Teresa S David
- Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I.P., Av. da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Alejandro Solla
- Faculty of Forestry, Institute for Dehesa Research (INDEHESA), Universidad de Extremadura, Avenida Virgen del Puerto 2, 10600 Plasencia, Spain
| | - Thomas Jung
- Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Phytophthora Research Centre, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Phytophthora Research and Consultancy, 83131 Nussdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lindkvist E, Pellowe KE, Alexander SM, Drury O'Neill E, Finkbeiner EM, Girón‐Nava A, González‐Mon B, Johnson AF, Pittman J, Schill C, Wijermans N, Bodin Ö, Gelcich S, Glaser M. Untangling social-ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries. FISH AND FISHERIES (OXFORD, ENGLAND) 2022; 23:1202-1220. [PMID: 36247348 PMCID: PMC9546375 DOI: 10.1111/faf.12678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human-nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social-ecological systems' research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kara E. Pellowe
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
- School of Marine SciencesUniversity of MaineWalpoleMaineUSA
| | - Steven M. Alexander
- Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooOntarioCanada
- Environment and Biodiversity Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Elena M. Finkbeiner
- Center for Oceans, Conservation InternationalHonoluluHawaiiUSA
- Coastal Science and PolicyUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alfredo Girón‐Nava
- Stanford Center for Ocean SolutionsStanford UniversityPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Andrew F. Johnson
- MarFishEco Fisheries ConsultantsEdinburghUK
- School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, The Lyell Centre, Institute of Life and Earth SciencesMarineSPACE Group, Heriot‐Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
| | - Jeremy Pittman
- School of PlanningUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Caroline Schill
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
- Beijer Institute of Ecological EconomicsRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesStockholmSweden
| | - Nanda Wijermans
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | - Örjan Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | - Stefan Gelcich
- Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES)Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
- Instituto Milenio en Socio‐ecología costera (SECOS)SantiagoChile
| | - Marion Glaser
- Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT)BremenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Becker DJ, Albery GF, Sjodin AR, Poisot T, Bergner LM, Chen B, Cohen LE, Dallas TA, Eskew EA, Fagre AC, Farrell MJ, Guth S, Han BA, Simmons NB, Stock M, Teeling EC, Carlson CJ. Optimising predictive models to prioritise viral discovery in zoonotic reservoirs. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2022; 3:e625-e637. [PMID: 35036970 PMCID: PMC8747432 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(21)00245-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite the global investment in One Health disease surveillance, it remains difficult and costly to identify and monitor the wildlife reservoirs of novel zoonotic viruses. Statistical models can guide sampling target prioritisation, but the predictions from any given model might be highly uncertain; moreover, systematic model validation is rare, and the drivers of model performance are consequently under-documented. Here, we use the bat hosts of betacoronaviruses as a case study for the data-driven process of comparing and validating predictive models of probable reservoir hosts. In early 2020, we generated an ensemble of eight statistical models that predicted host-virus associations and developed priority sampling recommendations for potential bat reservoirs of betacoronaviruses and bridge hosts for SARS-CoV-2. During a time frame of more than a year, we tracked the discovery of 47 new bat hosts of betacoronaviruses, validated the initial predictions, and dynamically updated our analytical pipeline. We found that ecological trait-based models performed well at predicting these novel hosts, whereas network methods consistently performed approximately as well or worse than expected at random. These findings illustrate the importance of ensemble modelling as a buffer against mixed-model quality and highlight the value of including host ecology in predictive models. Our revised models showed an improved performance compared with the initial ensemble, and predicted more than 400 bat species globally that could be undetected betacoronavirus hosts. We show, through systematic validation, that machine learning models can help to optimise wildlife sampling for undiscovered viruses and illustrates how such approaches are best implemented through a dynamic process of prediction, data collection, validation, and updating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Becker
- Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Gregory F Albery
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anna R Sjodin
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Timothée Poisot
- Université de Montréal, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Laura M Bergner
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Medical Research Centre, University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK
| | - Binqi Chen
- Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lily E Cohen
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tad A Dallas
- Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Evan A Eskew
- Department of Biology, Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Anna C Fagre
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- Bat Health Foundation, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Maxwell J Farrell
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Guth
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Barbara A Han
- Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, USA
| | - Nancy B Simmons
- Department of Mammalogy, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michiel Stock
- Research Unit Knowledge-based Systems, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Emma C Teeling
- School of Biology and Environmental Science, Science Centre West, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colin J Carlson
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hatum PS, McMahon K, Mengersen K, Wu PP. Guidelines for model adaptation: A study of the transferability of a general seagrass ecosystem Dynamic Bayesian Networks model. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e9172. [PMID: 35949537 PMCID: PMC9353019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In general, it is not feasible to collect enough empirical data to capture the entire range of processes that define a complex system, either intrinsically or when viewing the system from a different geographical or temporal perspective. In this context, an alternative approach is to consider model transferability, which is the act of translating a model built for one environment to another less well-known situation. Model transferability and adaptability may be extremely beneficial-approaches that aid in the reuse and adaption of models, particularly for sites with limited data, would benefit from widespread model uptake. Besides the reduced effort required to develop a model, data collection can be simplified when transferring a model to a different application context. The research presented in this paper focused on a case study to identify and implement guidelines for model adaptation. Our study adapted a general Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN) of a seagrass ecosystem to a new location where nodes were similar, but the conditional probability tables varied. We focused on two species of seagrass (Zostera noltei and Zostera marina) located in Arcachon Bay, France. Expert knowledge was used to complement peer-reviewed literature to identify which components needed adjustment including parameterization and quantification of the model and desired outcomes. We adopted both linguistic labels and scenario-based elicitation to elicit from experts the conditional probabilities used to quantify the DBN. Following the proposed guidelines, the model structure of the general DBN was retained, but the conditional probability tables were adapted for nodes that characterized the growth dynamics in Zostera spp. population located in Arcachon Bay, as well as the seasonal variation on their reproduction. Particular attention was paid to the light variable as it is a crucial driver of growth and physiology for seagrasses. Our guidelines provide a way to adapt a general DBN to specific ecosystems to maximize model reuse and minimize re-development effort. Especially important from a transferability perspective are guidelines for ecosystems with limited data, and how simulation and prior predictive approaches can be used in these contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Sobenko Hatum
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Kathryn McMahon
- Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research, School of ScienceEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Kerrie Mengersen
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Paul Pao‐Yen Wu
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Korpinen S, Uusitalo L, Nordström MC, Dierking J, Tomczak MT, Haldin J, Opitz S, Bonsdorff E, Neuenfeldt S. Food web assessments in the Baltic Sea: Models bridging the gap between indicators and policy needs. AMBIO 2022; 51:1687-1697. [PMID: 35092571 PMCID: PMC9110573 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01692-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Ecosystem-based management requires understanding of food webs. Consequently, assessment of food web status is mandatory according to the European Union's Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) for EU Member States. However, how to best monitor and assess food webs in practise has proven a challenging question. Here, we review and assess the current status of food web indicators and food web models, and discuss whether the models can help addressing current shortcomings of indicator-based food web assessments, using the Baltic Sea as an example region. We show that although the MSFD food web assessment was designed to use food web indicators alone, they are currently poorly fit for the purpose, because they lack interconnectivity of trophic guilds. We then argue that the multiple food web models published for this region have a high potential to provide additional coherence to the definition of good environmental status, the evaluation of uncertainties, and estimates for unsampled indicator values, but we also identify current limitations that stand in the way of more formal implementation of this approach. We close with a discussion of which current models have the best capacity for this purpose in the Baltic Sea, and of the way forward towards the combination of measurable indicators and modelling approaches in food web assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuli Korpinen
- Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura Uusitalo
- Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Jan Dierking
- GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Duesternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Jannica Haldin
- HELCOM Secretariat, Katajanokanlaituri 6B, 00160 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Silvia Opitz
- GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Duesternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Neuenfeldt
- National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark (DTU Aqua), Kemitorvet, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hui E, Stafford R, Matthews IM, Smith VA. Bayesian networks as a novel tool to enhance interpretability and predictive power of ecological models. ECOL INFORM 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
7
|
Yousefi L, Tucker A. Identifying latent variables in Dynamic Bayesian Networks with bootstrapping applied to Type 2 Diabetes complication prediction. INTELL DATA ANAL 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/ida-205570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Predicting complications associated with complex disease is a challenging task given imbalanced and highly correlated disease complications along with unmeasured or latent factors. To analyse the complications associated with complex disease, this article attempts to deal with complex imbalanced clinical data, whilst determining the influence of latent variables within causal networks generated from the observation. This work proposes appropriate Intelligent Data Analysis methods for building Dynamic Bayesian networks with latent variables, applied to small-sized clinical data (a case of Type 2 Diabetes complications). First, it adopts a Time Series Bootstrapping approach to re-sample the rare complication class with a replacement with respect to the dynamics of disease progression. Then, a combination of the Induction Causation algorithm and Link Strength metric (which is called IC*LS approach) is applied on the bootstrapped data for incrementally identifying latent variables. The most highlighted contribution of this paper gained insight into the disease progression by interpreting the latent states (with respect to the associated distributions of complications). An exploration of inference methods along with confidence interval assessed the influences of these latent variables. The obtained results demonstrated an improvement in the prediction performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Yousefi
- Department of Life Science, Brunel University London, UK
| | - Allan Tucker
- Department of Computer Science, Brunel University London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Scutari
- Istituto Dalle Molle di Studi sull'Intelligenza Artificiale (IDSIA) Manno Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Predicting ecosystem components in the Gulf of Mexico and their responses to climate variability with a dynamic Bayesian network model. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0209257. [PMID: 30673705 PMCID: PMC6344104 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Gulf of Mexico is an ecologically and economically important marine ecosystem that is affected by a variety of natural and anthropogenic pressures. These complex and interacting pressures, together with the dynamic environment of the Gulf, present challenges for the effective management of its resources. The recent adoption of Bayesian networks to ecology allows for the discovery and quantification of complex interactions from data after making only a few assumptions about observations of the system. In this study, we apply Bayesian network models, with different levels of structural complexity and a varying number of hidden variables to account for uncertainty when modeling ecosystem dynamics. From these models, we predict focal ecosystem components within the Gulf of Mexico. The predictive ability of the models varied with their structure. The model that performed best was parameterized through data-driven learning techniques and accounted for multiple ecosystem components’ associations and their interactions with human and natural pressures over time. Then, we altered sea surface temperature in the best performing model to explore the response of different ecosystem components to increased temperature. The magnitude and even direction of predicted responses varied by ecosystem components due to heterogeneity in driving factors and their spatial overlap. Our findings suggest that due to varying components’ sensitivity to drivers, changes in temperature will potentially lead to trade-offs in terms of population productivity. We were able to discover meaningful interactions between ecosystem components and their environment and show how sensitive these relationships are to climate perturbations, which increases our understanding of the potential future response of the system to increasing temperature. Our findings demonstrate that accounting for additional sources of variation, by incorporating multiple interactions and pressures in the model layout, has the potential for gaining deeper insights into the structure and dynamics of ecosystems.
Collapse
|
10
|
Majdi N, Hette-Tronquart N, Auclair E, Bec A, Chouvelon T, Cognie B, Danger M, Decottignies P, Dessier A, Desvilettes C, Dubois S, Dupuy C, Fritsch C, Gaucherel C, Hedde M, Jabot F, Lefebvre S, Marzloff MP, Pey B, Peyrard N, Powolny T, Sabbadin R, Thébault E, Perga ME. There's no harm in having too much: A comprehensive toolbox of methods in trophic ecology. FOOD WEBS 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fooweb.2018.e00100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
11
|
|
12
|
Cardona C, Weisenhorn P, Henry C, Gilbert JA. Network-based metabolic analysis and microbial community modeling. Curr Opin Microbiol 2016; 31:124-131. [PMID: 27060776 DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Revised: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Network inference is being applied to studies of microbial ecology to visualize and characterize microbial communities. Network representations can allow examination of the underlying organizational structure of a microbial community, and identification of key players or environmental conditions that influence community assembly and stability. Microbial co-association networks provide information on the dynamics of community structure as a function of time or other external variables. Community metabolic networks can provide a mechanistic link between species through identification of metabolite exchanges and species specific resource requirements. When used together, co-association networks and metabolic networks can provide a more in-depth view of the hidden rules that govern the stability and dynamics of microbial communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesar Cardona
- Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Pamela Weisenhorn
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Division of Biosciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, United States
| | - Chris Henry
- Division of Mathematics and Computer Science, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, United States
| | - Jack A Gilbert
- Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Division of Biosciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, United States.
| |
Collapse
|