1
|
Modir H, Moshiri E, Naghavi F. Efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration with dexmedetomidine versus tramadol in comparison to placebo for pain control and sedation after tonsillectomy in pediatric patients: A randomized clinical trial. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2024; 15:40-46. [PMID: 38690235 PMCID: PMC11057600 DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_507_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This article aimed to assess the efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration with dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus tramadol-ropivacaine for pain control and sedation after tonsillectomy in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods This double-blind clinical trial recruited 99 eligible children (4-8 years old) undergoing tonsillectomy and assigned to three block-randomized groups, receiving dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine (group A), tramadol-ropivacaine (group B), or placebo-ropivacaine (group C). The vital signs included blood pressure, heart rate, and SaO2 before anesthesia induction, during surgery at regular intervals until 24 h after surgery. The duration of surgery and recovery, complications, and analgesic consumption were recorded and pain scores were measured by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Oucher scales as well as sedation scores by the Wilson sedation scale. Data were analyzed within SPSS 20 at a significance level of 0.05. Results The lowest pain scores were measured by the CHEOPS scale in the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine group (P < 0.05). Statistically significant difference was observed in the CHEOPS pain score between the first two groups at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h after surgery (P < 0.01). The differences were revealed in the Oucher pain assessments among all groups from the time of recovery to four postoperative hours (P < 0.05), with the lowest in the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine group whose sedation score was greater during recovery and 5 min after surgery (P < 0.05). Subjects in tramadol group had six cases of dizziness and nausea, while no side effects were observed in two other groups (P < 0.05). Only seven participants receiving dexmedetomidine required acetaminophen, but 29 in the tramadol group and all in the placebo group demanded to receive acetaminophen (P = 0.001). Conclusion The authors concluded that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine has better performance in local infiltration for intra- and post-tonsillectomy analgesia and postoperative sedation, without any special side effects (like the placebo group), and that it hence is recommended to be used for local infiltration during tonsillectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesameddin Modir
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Valiasar Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Esmail Moshiri
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Valiasar Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Faezeh Naghavi
- Students Research Committee, Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Valiasar Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang YJ, Cho JH, Hwang SH. The analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Topically Applied Tramadol in Peritonsillar Space During Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132:1156-1167. [PMID: 36433693 DOI: 10.1177/00034894221136998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of topically applied tramadol in peritonsillar area for pain control and induction of perioperative morbidity in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. METHODS Two authors independently searched the databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases) up to April 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of an intraoperative peritonsillar administered tramadol with placebo or other agents only in pediatric patients. The outcomes were postoperative pain scores, time to take the first pain reducing drugs, and postoperative nausea/vomiting. RESULTS Our analysis was based on 17 trials. Peritonsillar administered tramadol significantly reduced postoperative pain at less than 20 minutes (SMD -1.5852, 95% CI [-2.3900; -0.7804]), 1 hour (SMD -1.5811, 95% CI [-2.3400; -0.8222]), 8 hours (SMD -1.0258, 95% CI [-1.8792; -0.1724]), 16 hours (SMD -0.8397, 95% CI [-1.4266; -0.2529]), and 1 day (SMD -1.0110, 95% CI [-1.5213; -0.5007]) and the time to take the first analgesic drug (SMD 1.6565, 95% CI [0.2838; 3.0293]) compared with the placebo. However, tramadol showed no significant difference on postoperative pain relief effects and the time to take the first analgesic drug compared to the other topical agents (bupivacaine, lidocaine, ketamine, and dexamethasone). Tramadol did not cause significant postoperative nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that intraoperatively applied topical tramadol could control postoperative pain and reduce the analgesic uptake compared with a control. However, the efficacy of tramadol in pain control was similar to other agents in pediatric adenotonsillectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Jin Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Hee Cho
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hwan Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shih MC, Long BD, Pecha PP, White DR, Liu YC, Brennan E, Nguyen MI, Clemmens CS. A scoping review of randomized clinical trials for pain management in pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 9:9-26. [PMID: 37006744 PMCID: PMC10050970 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To examine the volume, topics, and reporting trends in the published literature of randomized clinical trials for pharmacologic pain management of pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy and to identify areas requiring further research. Data Sources PubMed (National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Cochrane Library (Wiley). Methods A systematic search of four databases was conducted. Only randomized controlled or comparison trials examining pain improvement with a pharmacologic intervention in pediatric tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were included. Data collected included demographics, pain-related outcomes, sedation scores, nausea/vomiting, postoperative bleeding, types of drug comparisons, modes of administration, timing of administration, and identities of the investigated drugs. Results One hundred and eighty-nine studies were included for analysis. Most studies included validated pain scales, with the majority using visual-assisted scales (49.21%). Fewer studies examined pain beyond 24 h postoperation (24.87%), and few studies included a validated sedation scale (12.17%). Studies have compared several different dimensions of pharmacologic treatment, including different drugs, timing of administration, modes of administration, and dosages. Only 23 (12.17%) studies examined medications administered postoperatively, and only 29 (15.34%) studies examined oral medications. Acetaminophen only had four self-comparisons. Conclusion Our work provides the first scoping review of pain and pediatric tonsillectomy. With drug safety profiles considered, the literature does not have enough data to determine which treatment regimen provides superior pain control in pediatric tonsillectomy. Even common drugs like acetaminophen and ibuprofen require further research for optimizing the treatment of posttonsillectomy pain. The heterogeneity in study design and comparisons weakens the conclusions of potential systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Future directions include more noninferiority studies of unique comparisons and more studies examining oral medications given postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
- Baylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Barry D. Long
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryVirginia Commonwealth University School of MedicineRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Phayvanh P. Pecha
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - David R. White
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Yi‐Chun C. Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Surgery ‐ Division of Pediatric OtolaryngologyTexas Children's HospitalHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Emily Brennan
- Department of Research and Education ServicesMedical University of South Carolina LibraryCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Mariam I. Nguyen
- Charleston County School of the ArtsNorth CharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Clarice S. Clemmens
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eizaga Rebollar R, García Palacios MV, Fernández Riobó MC, Torres Morera LM. Dexmedetomidine and perioperative analgesia in children. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2022; 69:487-492. [PMID: 36100555 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an anaesthetic agent that mimics natural deep sleep and produces minimal cardiorespiratory depression. As such, it is a very valuable option in the management of such a challenging population as paediatric patients. The main objective of this mini review was to evaluate the role of DEX as a perioperative analgesic in children receiving anaesthesia. We searched Google, Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between 2010 and 2021, and reviewed various of aspects of DEX, such as pharmacology, effectiveness, safety, and the most recent evidence on its clinical use as an analgesic in paediatric anaesthesia. We also include a cost estimate of perioperative analgesia with DEX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Eizaga Rebollar
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
| | - M V García Palacios
- Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | - M C Fernández Riobó
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | - L M Torres Morera
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hatami M, Jalali M, Ayatollahi V, Baradaranfar M, Vaziribozorg S. Comparison of the effect of peritonsillar infiltration of tramadol vs dexmedetomidine on post-tonsillectomy pain. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:2665-2669. [PMID: 34564759 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07102-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to comparing the effect of peritonsillar infiltration of tramadol and dexmedetomidine in relieving post-tonsillectomy pain. METHODS In this randomized double blinded clinical trial study, 90 children 5-12 years old undergoing tonsillectomy, involved. Induction of anesthesia was done by fentanyl 1 µg/kg, sodium thiopental 5 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg and intubation was done after 3 min. Anesthesia maintained by nitrous oxide 60% and oxygen 40% with isoflurane (1.2%). Tramadol 2 mg/kg in group A, dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg in group B, and normal saline in group c were injected into the bed and anterior tonsillar pillar and surgery has begun after 3 min of injection. Time of surgery, all hemodynamic variables, pain intensity and degree of sedation were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS The results showed that duration of the surgery (p value = 0.28) and duration of anesthesia (p value = 0.43) were not significantly different between the groups but pain score was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group in comparison to tramadol and placebo group (p value = 0.001). The first time for analgesic request was longer in dexmedetomidine group (p value = 0.001) and Hemodynamic parameters were significantly lower in tramadol and dexmedetomidine group (p value = 0.001). Sedation level was not significantly different between tramadol and dexmedetomidine group (p value = 0.001). CONCLUSION According to the results peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is effective and safe in relieving post-tonsillectomy pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Hatami
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohsen Jalali
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Vida Ayatollahi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammadhossein Baradaranfar
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Sedighe Vaziribozorg
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eizaga Rebollar R, García Palacios MV, Del Carmen Fernández Riobó M, Torres Morera LM. Dexmedetomidine & perioperative analgesia in children. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2021; 69:S0034-9356(21)00144-4. [PMID: 34049712 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an anaesthetic agent that mimics natural deep sleep and produces minimal cardiorespiratory depression. As such, it is a very valuable option in the management of such a challenging population as paediatric patients. The main objective of this mini review was to evaluate the role of DEX as a perioperative analgesic in children receiving anaesthesia. We searched Google, Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between 2010 and 2021, and reviewed various of aspects of DEX, such as pharmacology, effectiveness, safety, and the most recent evidence on its clinical use as an analgesic in paediatric anaesthesia. We also include a cost estimate of perioperative analgesia with DEX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Eizaga Rebollar
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, España.
| | - M V García Palacios
- Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, España
| | | | - L M Torres Morera
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Mar, Cádiz, España
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aldamluji N, Burgess A, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Raeder J, Beloeil H. PROSPECT guideline for tonsillectomy: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:947-961. [PMID: 33201518 PMCID: PMC8247026 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tonsillectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures; however, pain management remains challenging. Procedure‐specific efficacy as well as specific risks of treatment options should guide selection of pain management protocols based on evidence and should optimise analgesia without harm. The aims of this systematic review were to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after tonsillectomy. A systematic review utilising preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis guidelines with procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language up to November 2019 assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified. Out of the 719 potentially eligible studies identified, 226 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, excluding the studies examining surgical techniques. Pre‐operative and intra‐operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; intravenous dexamethasone; ketamine (only assessed in children); gabapentinoids; dexmedetomidine; honey; and acupuncture. Inconsistent evidence was found for local anaesthetic infiltration; antibiotics; and magnesium sulphate. Limited evidence was found for clonidine. The analgesic regimen for tonsillectomy should include paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone, with opioids as rescue analgesics. Analgesic adjuncts such as intra‐operative and postoperative acupuncture as well as postoperative honey are also recommended. Ketamine (only for children); dexmedetomidine; or gabapentinoids may be considered when some of the first‐line analgesics are contra‐indicated. Further randomised controlled trials are required to define risk and combination of drugs most effective for postoperative pain relief after tonsillectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Aldamluji
- Department of Adult Anaesthesiology, Sidra Medicine, Qatar
| | - A Burgess
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Com Maillot-Hartmann Private Hospital, Neuilly sur Seine, France
| | - E Pogatzki-Zahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - J Raeder
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Beloeil
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Université Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yadav U, Srivastava S, Srivastav D. Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Bupivacaine alone and with Dexmedetomidine in Wound Instillation for Lumbar Laminectomy: A Randomized Control Trial. Anesth Essays Res 2020; 14:149-153. [PMID: 32843809 PMCID: PMC7428108 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_3_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Dexmedetomidine has been used as an effective adjuvant to local anesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks and at the incision site. Aims: We compared the postoperative analgesic effect of bupivacaine alone and in addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in wound instillation during lumbar laminectomy. Setting and Design: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized control trial. Subjects and Methods: Sixty adults of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I–II scheduled for elective lumbar laminectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. Group B (control group) patients received wound instillation with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of surgery and Group D patients received 2 μg.kg−1 dexmedetomidine diluted in 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine as instillation over the incision site. If the NRS exceeded “4” at any point of time, rescue analgesia with injection diclofenac 75 mg deep intramuscular was administered. Postoperative pain score, duration of analgesia, total rescue analgesic required in the first 24 h, and side effects were compared between the groups. Results: Demographic data were comparable in both the groups. Duration of analgesia (19.93 ± 3.2 in Group D vs. 12.13 ± 1.8 in Group B) was significantly more in Group D, number of analgesic demands were less in group D as compared to Group B, and total rescue analgesic required (62.51 ± 39.13 vs. 95.68 ± 33.5) was significantly less in Group D as compared to Group B. Conclusions: We conclude that dexmedetomidine 2 μg.kg−1 is an effective adjuvant to bupivacaine for wound instillation in terms of quality and duration of postoperative analgesia following lumbar laminectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urvashi Yadav
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Swati Srivastava
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Dheeraj Srivastav
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cho HK, Yoon HY, Jin HJ, Hwang SH. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine for perioperative morbidities in pediatric tonsillectomy: A metaanalysis. Laryngoscope 2017; 128:E184-E193. [PMID: 28895149 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to tonsillectomy compared with opioid or sham in children. DATA SOURCE Five databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from inception of article collections to April 2017. REVIEW METHODS Prospective, randomized controlled studies that compared outcomes between children who underwent tonsillectomy plus dexmedetomidine administration (intervention) and children who underwent tonsillectomy with placebo or opioid (control) were systemically and independently reviewed by two researchers. The outcomes of interest were emergence agitation, postoperative pain intensity, rescue analgesic consumption, and other morbidities (nausea and vomiting and agitation). RESULTS Fifteen studies with n = 1,552 met the inclusion criteria. Postoperative pain scores and the need for analgesics in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were significantly decreased in the dexmedetomidine group versus the control group. The incidence and degree of agitation and desaturation incidence in the PACU also were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the duration of staying PACU between both groups. In subgroup analyses by administration method (bolus injection or continuous injection), dexmedetomidine was shown to be effective at reducing postoperative morbidities regardless of administration method. CONCLUSION Perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine can provide pain and agitation relief without side effects in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Considering the high heterogeneity of results within some parameters; however, further clinical trials with robust research methodology should be conducted to confirm the results of this study. Laryngoscope, 128:E184-E193, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Kyung Cho
- Department of Pediatrics, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon
| | - Ho Young Yoon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Jun Jin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Se Hwan Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Govindaraj K, Jyothi B, Pratishruthi, Shaikh S. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine, levobupivacaine and clonidine, and levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine in wound infiltration technique for abdominal surgeries: A prospective randomized controlled study. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN 2017. [DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_20_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
11
|
Mandal D, Das A, Chhaule S, Halder PS, Paul J, RoyBasunia S, Chattopadhyay S, Mandal SK. The effect of dexmedetomidine added to preemptive (2% lignocaine with adrenaline) infiltration on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain after ambulatory maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res 2016; 10:324-31. [PMID: 27212769 PMCID: PMC4864705 DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.167837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lignocaine + adrenaline; a local anesthetic agent; frequently used for perilesional infiltration, maintains the stable hemodynamics and decreases the postoperative pain after maxillofacial surgery. α2 agonists have peripheral analgesic effects. This prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perilesional dexmedetomidine administered preincisionally in addition to conventional lignocaine adrenaline combinations for reconstructive maxillofacial surgery in an ambulatory care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS 76, American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients scheduled for unilateral traumatic maxillofacial surgeries were randomly allocated into group DL (n = 38) receiving 15 cc of 2% lignocaine + adrenaline (1:200,000) mixed with 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and group PL receiving 15 cc of 2% lignocaine + adrenaline with normal saline (placebo) via local wound infiltration 5 min prior to skin incision. Perioperative hemodynamics, time to first analgesic use, total analgesic need, bleeding, and side effects were recorded for each patient. RESULTS Dosage of supplemental propofol; total perioperative, postoperative, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) fentanyl consumption was significantly lower (P = 0.0001, P= 0.0001, P= 0.0001, P= 0.004, respectively) in dexmedetomine treated group than placebo. Rescue analgesic requirement was significantly earlier in group PL than group DL. Group DL patients suffered from significantly less (P = 0.02) bleeding and surgeon's satisfaction score was also high in this group. Discharge from PACU was significantly earlier in group DL. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were significantly lower in group DL (P < 0.05) without any appreciable side effects. CONCLUSION Thus, prior dexmedetomidine local infiltration at the site of maxillofacial trauma has significantly reduced bleeding from wound site; perioperative fentanyl, propofol consumption, and subsequently ensured earlier discharge from PACU, better surgeon's satisfaction score with better hemodynamic control and lesser side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debabrata Mandal
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, R. Ahmed Dental College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Anjan Das
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Subinay Chhaule
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Partha Sarathi Halder
- Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Joydip Paul
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sandip RoyBasunia
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Midnapore Medical College and Hospital, Midnapore, West Bengal, India
| | - Surajit Chattopadhyay
- Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Subrata Kumar Mandal
- Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|