CO2 capture in cement plants by “Tail-End” Calcium Looping process

Sustainable Hybrid Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Using Recycled Expanded Polystyrene

Global concrete production, reaching 14×1013m3/year, raises environmental concerns due to the resource-intensive nature of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) manufacturing. Simultaneously, 32.7×109 kg/year of expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste poses ecological threats. This research explores the mechanical behavior of lightweight concrete (LWAC) using recycled EPS manufactured with a hybrid cement mixture (OPC and alkali-activated cement). These types of cement have been shown to improve the compressive strength of concrete, while recycled EPS significantly decreases concrete density. However, the impact of these two materials on the LWAC mechanical behavior is unclear. LWAC comprises 35% lightweight aggregates (LWA)-a combination of EPS and expanded clays (EC) - and 65% normal-weight aggregates. As a cementitious matrix, this LWAC employs 30% OPC and 70% alkaline-activated cement (AAC) based on fly ash (FA) and lime. Compressive strength tests after 28 curing days show a remarkable 48.8% improvement, surpassing the ACI 213R-03 standard requirement, which would allow this sustainable hybrid lightweight aggregate concrete to be used as structural lightweight concrete. Also obtained was a 21.5% reduction in density; this implies potential cost savings through downsizing structural elements and enhancing thermal and acoustic insulation. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy reveal the presence of C-S-H, C-(A)-S-H, and N-A-S-H gels. However, anhydrous products in the hybrid LWAC suggest a slower reaction rate. Further investigation into activator solution dosage and curing temperature is recommended for improved mechanical performance on the 28th day of curing. This research highlights the potential for sustainable construction incorporating waste and underscores the importance of refining activation parameters for optimal performance.

Strength, porosity and life cycle analysis of geopolymer and hybrid cement mortars for sustainable construction

Owing to the application of industrial wastes, geopolymers are generally regarded as a sustainable alternative to traditional construction materials. However, their lack of adoption on the industrial scale demands detailed investigations. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the compressive strength of different geopolymer and hybrid cement mortars with varying proportions of sodium hydroxide (from 5 to 25 wt%) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) (from 15 to 35 wt%), respectively. The porosity of all designed mixtures was also analyzed using X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and water absorption tests. ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used for the Life cycle analysis of the geopolymer and hybrid cement mortars. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach was used to assess the sustainability potential of the designed mixtures based on compressive strength, porosity and overall environmental impact. Experimental results revealed that the increase in sodium hydroxide in geopolymer mortars up to 15 wt% offered its maximum compressive strength. Superior compressive strength was obtained at 35 wt% of OPC in hybrid cement mortars due to the formation of more C-S-H, C-A-S-H and N-A-S-H gels which fill up the voids and pores. Analysis of the macro and micro-porosity revealed that hybrid cement mortars yield denser structure than geopolymer mortars. Life cycle analysis based on 8 distinct impact categories showed that hybrid cement mortars outperform the geopolymers in all impact categories except 'mineral resource scarcity'. However, the overall environmental impact assessment using the 'coefficient of performance' depicts that hybrid cement mortars offer a significantly lower environmental burden than geopolymers. MCDM analysis shows that hybrid cement mortar with 5 wt% of sodium hydroxide and 35 wt% of OPC is the best choice for construction applications. This idea of sustainable hybrid cement mortar will be helpful for the construction industry to limit the environmental impact without compromising their structural performance.

CO2 Capture at Medium to High Temperature Using Solid Oxide-Based Sorbents: Fundamental Aspects, Mechanistic Insights, and Recent Advances

Carbon dioxide capture and mitigation form a key part of the technological response to combat climate change and reduce CO₂ emissions. Solid materials capable of reversibly absorbing CO₂ have been the focus of intense research for the past two decades, with promising stability and low energy costs to implement and operate compared to the more widely used liquid amines. In this review, we explore the fundamental aspects underpinning solid CO₂ sorbents based on alkali and alkaline earth metal oxides operating at medium to high temperature: how their structure, chemical composition, and morphology impact their performance and long-term use. Various optimization strategies are outlined to improve upon the most promising materials, and we combine recent advances across disparate scientific disciplines, including materials discovery, synthesis, and in situ characterization, to present a coherent understanding of the mechanisms of CO₂ absorption both at surfaces and within solid materials.

CO2 Capture, Use, and Storage in the Cement Industry: State of the Art and Expectations

The implementation of carbon capture, use, and storage in the cement industry is a necessity, not an option, if the climate targets are to be met. Although no capture technology has reached commercial scale demonstration in the cement sector yet, much progress has been made in the last decade. This work intends to provide a general overview of the CO2 capture technologies that have been evaluated so far in the cement industry at the pilot scale, and also about the current plans for future commercial demonstration.

Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO2 Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective

Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO2 intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO2 emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO2 emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO2 transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.