Effect of exercise training on heart rate recovery in patients post anterior myocardial infarction

[Heart rate recovery and presence of coronary lesions in case of ischemic heart disease at the Abidjan Cardiology Institute in Côte d'Ivoire]

Introduction

Heart rate recovery (HRR) measured during stress tests, assesses the vago-sympathetic balance. It is a known prognostic and predictive parameter of cardiovascular mortality that is believed to be correlated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. The aim of this work was to assess the predictive value of heart rate recovery in the diagnostic and severity of coronary lesions in a major metropolis of sub-Saharan Africa where access to specialist care is unevenly distributed.

Patients and method

We conducted a retrospective observational study from January 2010 to February 2020 at the Abidjan Cardiology Institute, including patients who performed a diagnostic coronary angiography after a positive exercise test. Clinical, angiographic and exercise parameters were analyzed and compared in patients with abnormal heart rate recovery (HRR) and those with normal one.

Results

The main study limitation is small sampling due to the cost of the angiographic procedure which limits its realization. We recorded 41 subjects whose mean age was 53.4 ± 9.6 years with a male predominance (sex ratio of 3.6). The predominant age group was between 50 and 60 years. Males were older than females with no significant difference. The predominant cardiovascular risk factors were overweight/obesity (68.29%) and hypertension (61%). Eight patients (19.5%) presenting an abnormal HRR (≤12 bpm) had more significant coronary disease (p=0.02) and more severe ones (p=0.003). Patients with abnormal HRR tended to be older without statistical significance (p=0.081), and had lower chronotropic reserve and maximum heart rate (p=0.008 and p=0.042, respectively). The positive predictive value of HHR was 87.5% and its negative predictive value was 60.6%.

Conclusion

Abnormal HRR can predict the presence of coronary artery disease and its severity. Evaluating HRR during stress tests could help in the detection, evaluation, and monitoring of ischemic heart disease in our resource-limited countries.

Validity and sensitivity of field tests' heart-rate recovery assessment in recreational football players

We aimed at examining the criterion validity and sensitivity of heart-rate recovery (HRRec) in profiling cardiorespiratory fitness in male recreational football players in the untrained and trained status, using endurance field-tests. Thirty-two male untrained subjects (age 40 ± 6 years, VO2max 41.7 ± 5.7 ml·kg-1·min-1, body mass 82.7 ± 9.8 kg, stature 173.3 ± 7.4 cm) participated in a 12-week (2‒3 sessions per week) recreational football intervention and were tested pre- and post-intervention (i.e. untrained and trained status). The participants performed three intermittent field tests for aerobic performance assessment, namely Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 (YYIE1) and level 2 (YYIE2) tests, and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level 1 (YYIR1) test. VO2max was assessed by performing a progressive maximal treadmill test (TT) and maximal HR (HRmax) determined as the maximal value across the testing conditions (i.e., Yo-Yo intermittent tests or TT). HRRec was calculated as the difference between Yo-Yo tests' HRpeak or HRmax and HR at 30 s (HR30), 60 s (HR60) and 120 s (HR120) and considered as beats·min-1 (absolute) and as % of tests' HRpeak or HRmax values. Significant post-intervention improvements (p<0.0001) were shown in VO2max (8.6%) and Yo-Yo tests performance (23-35%). Trivial to small (p>0.05) associations were found between VO2max and HRRec (r = -0.05-0.27, p>0.05) across the Yo-Yo tests, and training status either expressed as percentage of HRpeak or HRmax. The results of this study do not support the use of field-test derived HRRec to track cardiorespiratory fitness and training status in adult male recreational football players.

The Autonomic Imbalance of Myocardial Ischemia during Exercise Stress Testing: Insight from Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Analysis

Exercise stress testing (EST) has limited power in diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The heart rate variability (HRV) analysis might increase the sensitivity of CAD detection. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between short-term HRV and myocardial ischemia during EST, including the acceleration, maximum, and recovery stages of heart rate (HR). The HRV during EST from 19 healthy (RHC) subjects and 35 patients with CAD (25 patients with insignificant CAD (iCAD), and 10 patients with significant CAD (sCAD)) were compared. As a result, all HRV indices decreased at the maximum stage and no significant differences between iCAD and sCAD were found. The low-frequency power of heart rate signal (LF) of the RHC group recovered relatively quickly from the third to the sixth minutes after maximum HR, compared with that of the sCAD group. The relative changes of most HRV indices between maximum HR and recovery stage were lower in the sCAD group than in the RHC group, especially in LF, the standard deviation of all normal to normal intervals (SDNN), and the standard deviation in the long axis direction of the Poincaré plot analysis (SD2) indices (p < 0.05). The recovery slope of LF was significantly smaller in the sCAD group than in the RHC group (p = 0.02). The result suggests that monitoring short-term HRV during EST provides helpful insight into the cardiovascular autonomic imbalance in patients with significant CAD. The relative change of autonomic tone, especially the delayed sympathetic recovery, could be an additional marker for diagnosing myocardial ischemia.

Influence of Risk Factors on Exercise Tolerance in Patients after Myocardial Infarction—Early Cardiac Rehabilitation in Poland

(1) Background: Prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases is significantly influenced by lifestyle and the control of risk factors. Patients after myocardial infarction require special care and promptly introduced cardiac rehabilitation. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors and their influence on exercise tolerance before and after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) provided under the Coordinated Specialist Care Programme—Infarct (CSC-Infarct). (2) Methods: The study was carried out at the Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre of Slupsk Specialist Hospital on a group of 112 patients aged 35–87 (62.78 ± 10.09 years) after myocardial infarction (MI), participating in CSC-Infarct. An exercise test (treadmill ECG test), the 6 min walk test (6MWT), echocardiography, blood test (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, TG), measurement of diastolic pressure ratio (DPr), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and BMI were performed in participants on the first and last day of CR. Rating of perceived exertion was assessed with Borg’s scale. (3) Results: The overweight variable had the strongest effect on the increased value of initial: HR rest, HR max, and HR 1 min after exercise compared to subjects with normal BMI. DPr values before and after CR were also higher in overweight patients. Scores of 6MWT were higher in smokers compared to non-smokers. The final MET value was significantly higher in non-diabetic subjects. Hyperlipidaemia was associated with a higher initial HR max and initial HR 1 min after exercise. DPr before CR was also higher. The initial and final MET values were lower in hypertensive patients. Borg’s rating of perceived exertion measured after the final exercise test was also higher in hypertensive patients. Hypertension influenced the initial and final 6MWT scores, which were significantly higher in normotensive patients. (4) Conclusions: CR within CSC-infarction in patients after myocardial infarction improves exercise tolerance. Exercise tolerance in post-MI patients with concomitant risk factors is lower compared to post-MI patients without risk factors.

Exercise-Based Interventions in Middle-Aged and Older Adults after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

This study summarized the relevant literature and aimed to determine the effect of exercise-based interventions after myocardial infarction in middle-aged and older adults. Studies were identified and analyzed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The following electronic databases were used: Google Scholar, PubMed, Mendeley, Science Direct, and Scopus. The identified studies had to be longitudinal, be published in English, have taken place between 2010 and 2020, involve participants who had suffered myocardial infarction, and address different types of exercise-based interventions to be included. Of the 592 relevant studies identified, 20 were included in the qualitative analysis. After analyzing the results obtained, it could be concluded that different types of exercise-based interventions or their combination have a positive effect after myocardial infarction in middle-aged and elderly adults. It can also be suggested that the combination of a cycle ergometer and a treadmill may be the most effective exercise-based intervention. An adequate choice of intensity and volume is crucial, with the optimal duration of the experimental program and the type(s) of exercises adapted to participants after myocardial infarction.

Effects of mind-body exercise on cardiopulmonary function, blood pressure, and quality of life in CHD patients: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the highest mortality diseases in the world, which seriously threatens human health and quality of life (QOL). The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the effects of mind-body exercise on cardiopulmonary function, blood pressure and QOL in CHD patients, and to provide scientific evidence-based exercise prescription for patients with coronary heart disease.

METHODS

This research review will include the following electronic databases from its establishment to December 2020: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, and Wanfang. Objective to search randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effects of mind-body exercise on cardiopulmonary function, blood pressure and QOL in patients with coronary heart disease.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide strong evidence for the efficacy and safety of mind-body exercise in patients with coronary heart disease.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY202120016.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be necessary since this systematic review and meta-analysis will not contain any private information of participants or violate their human rights.

Effect of a 6-week and 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery

Background

Cardiac rehabilitation has been shown to reduce cardiac mortality, improve quality of life, and reduce hospitalizations. Cardiac rehabilitation programs are usually performed over a 12-week period. Studies have shown that similar benefits could be achieved with shorter programs. Abnormal heart rate recovery after exercise has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. The main aim of this study was to compare the effect of a 6-week phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery to a 12-week one in patients who had recovered from an anterior wall ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Results

This prospective study included 60 patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation programs randomized into two equal groups: a 6-week and a 12-week program. Baseline patient demographics, lipid profile, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed. METs achieved, total exercise time, resting heart rate, peak heart rate, and heart rate recovery at 1 min were examined. These were re-assessed at the end of each program.

Results showed no difference between both groups at the end of each program regarding lipid profile and LVEF. Patients enrolled in the 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program were able to achieve more METs, had a longer exercise time, a higher peak heart rate, and had a lower resting heart rate at the end of the program. Heart rate recovery was slightly higher in patients enrolled in the 6-week program 26.5 ± 6.78 versus 23.17 ± 6.12 bpm (p = 0.051).

On comparing the magnitude of change between both programs, those in the 12-week program had more increase in HDL-C levels, METs achieved, and exercise time. Additionally, they had more reduction of resting heart rate. Heart rate recovery was more increased for those in the 6-week program.

Conclusion

Although heart rate recovery increases after completion of each of a 6-week and 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program compared to their baseline, there is no difference on comparing heart rate recovery between both programs at their end.

Patients enrolled in a standard 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program achieve more METs, have a longer exercise time, a higher peak HR, and a lower resting HR at the end of the program compared to those in the 6-week program.

The Beneficial Role of Exercise Training for Myocardial Infarction Treatment in Elderly

Worldwide, elderly people have a higher prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI), which is associated with body function aging and a sedentary lifestyle. In addition to medication, exercise training is a well-established supplementary method to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Substantial evidence has shown the value of different intensity exercise programs in the prevention and treatment of MI, and exercise rehabilitation programs are also applicable to elderly patients with MI. Although exercise rehabilitation programs could significantly improve function, quality of life (QoL), and lower mortality and morbidity for people with MI, such programs are underused because their mechanisms are not accurately elucidated. To promote the application of exercise therapy for MI, this review summarizes the benefits and mechanisms of exercise rehabilitation for post-MI patients and provides rationalized proposals for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Exercise-based rehabilitation for major non-communicable diseases in low-resource settings: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

While there is substantial evidence for the benefits of exercise-based rehabilitation in the prevention and management of non-communicable disease (NCD) in high-resource settings, it is not evident that these programmes can be effectively implemented in a low-resource setting (LRS). Correspondingly, it is unclear if similar benefits can be obtained. The objective of this scoping review was to summarise existing studies evaluating exercise-based rehabilitation, rehabilitation intervention characteristics and outcomes conducted in an LRS for patients with one (or more) of the major NCDs.

METHODS

The following databases were searched from inception until October 2018: PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and trial registries. Studies on exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer or chronic respiratory disease conducted in an LRS were included. Data were extracted with respect to study design (eg, type, patient sample, context), rehabilitation characteristics (eg, delivery model, programme adaptations) and included outcome measures.

RESULTS

The search yielded 5930 unique citations of which 60 unique studies were included. Study populations included patients with cardiovascular disease (48.3%), diabetes (28.3%), respiratory disease (21.7%) and cancer (1.7%). Adaptations included transition to predominant patient-driven home-based rehabilitation, training of non-conventional health workers, integration of rehabilitation in community health centres, or triage based on contextual or patient factors. Uptake of adapted rehabilitation models was 54%, retention 78% and adherence 89%. The majority of the outcome measures included were related to body function (65.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The scope of evidence suggests that adapted exercise-based rehabilitation programmes can be implemented in LRS. However, this scope of evidence originated largely from lower middle-income, urban settings and has mostly been conducted in an academic context which may hamper extrapolation of evidence to other LRS. Cost-benefits, impact on activity limitations and participation restrictions, and subsequent mortality and morbidity are grossly understudied.