[Stability: a factor to consider in antibiotic-lock solutions]

Addressing catheter lock therapy: Does heparin reduce the bioactivity of dalbavancin when together in solution during freezing?

INTRODUCTION

The possible use of dalbavancin as a catheter lock solution was previously demonstrated by our study group. However, it was needed to assess whether heparin could affect dalbavancin bioactivity during freezing storage.

METHODS

We tested the bioactivity of a dalbavancin+heparin (DH) vs. dalbavancin (D) against Staphylococcal biofilms comparing DH median value of cfu counts and metabolic activity with that obtained for D before and during storage under freezing up to 6 months.

RESULTS

Despite there was a slight decrease in the median percentage reduction of metabolic activity at month 3 in Staphylococcus epidermidis between DH and D (97.6 vs. 100, p=0.037), considering the clinical criteria, no significant reduction in any of the variables tested was observed at the end of the experiment between D and DH solutions.

CONCLUSION

The addition of heparin to a dalbavancin lock solution did not affect its bioactivity against staphylococcal biofilms irrespective of its preservation time under freezing.

In Vitro Study To Evaluate the Bioactivity of Freezing a Heparin-Based Dalbavancin Lock Solution

The use of dalbavancin as a catheter lock solution must be addressed in depth before implementation in clinical practice. We assessed whether a heparin-based dalbavancin lock solution could be frozen in single-dose vials for 6 months without affecting its bioactivity against biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Over 6 months, we tested the bioactivity of a frozen solution of dalbavancin (≈1 mg/ml) plus heparin (60 IU) in terms of CFU counts and metabolic activity against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 (MRSE). The Anti-Xa assay was also performed to assess whether the anticoagulant activity of heparin was reduced under freezing. Every month, we compared the mean value of each variable with that obtained at baseline (before freezing, month 0) using both clinical criteria (values were within 25% of the baseline value) and statistical criteria (linear mixed models). At the end of the experiment (month 6), neither a clinically nor a statistically significant reduction in the bioactivity of dalbavancin-heparin solution was observed in terms of CFU counts and metabolic activity against biofilm of MRSA. Regarding MRSE, considering the clinical criteria, neither CFU counts nor metabolic activity decreased significantly. However, the reduction was statistically significant for all variables. Anti-Xa values (mean [standard deviation] international units per milliliter) for heparin in combination with dalbavancin were within 25% of the heparin-water value. A heparin-based dalbavancin lock solution can be frozen for up to 6 months with no effect on its bioactivity against MRSA and MRSE biofilms.

Can dalbavancin be used as a catheter lock solution?

Purpose. The new lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin has only been approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. However, its alternative use as a catheter lock solution could facilitate the conservative management of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Our objective was to assess the stability and activity of dalbavancin alone and in combination with heparin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) biofilms. We also compared the results with those obtained with vancomycin alone and in combination with heparin.Methodology. We used a 96-well plate in vitro model based on 24 h biofilms of MRSA and MRSE (ATCC 43300, ATCC 35984 and one clinical strain of each). The biofilms were exposed to dalbavancin (0.128 mg ml^-1) and vancomycin (5 mg ml^-1) alone and in combination with heparin (60 IU). The median percentage reductions in metabolic activity, biomass, bacterial load, and cell viability for each solution were compared.Results. Dalbavancin combined with heparin significantly reduced the median [interquartile range (IQR)] percentage of metabolic activity in MRSA biofilms compared with vancomycin [90.0 % (70.4-92.9 %) versus 35.0 % (14.8-59.6 %), P=0.006]. For the remaining variables studied, the combination was not inferior to vancomycin for MRSA and MRSE.Conclusions. Dalbavancin proved to be active against MRSA and MRSE biofilms. The combination of dalbavancin with heparin is a promising catheter lock solution that has the advantage of locking the catheter at home for 7 days.

Long-term catheterization: current approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of port-related infections

Since the first description in 1982, totally implanted venous access ports have progressively improved patients' quality of life and medical assistance when a medical condition requires the use of long-term venous access. Currently, they are part of the standard medical care for oncohematologic patients. However, apart from mechanical and thrombotic complications, there are also complications associated with biofilm development inside the catheters. These biofilms increase the cost of medical assistance and extend hospitalization. The most frequently involved micro-organisms in these infections are gram-positive cocci. Many efforts have been made to understand biofilm formation within the lumen catheters, and to resolve catheter-related infection once it has been established. Apart from systemic antibiotic treatment, the use of local catheter treatment (ie, antibiotic lock technique) is widely employed. Many different antimicrobial options have been tested, with different outcomes, in clinical and in in vitro assays. The stability of antibiotic concentration in the lock solution once instilled inside the catheter lumen remains unresolved. To prevent infection, it is mandatory to perform hand hygiene before catheter insertion and manipulation, and to disinfect catheter hubs, connectors, and injection ports before accessing the catheter. At present, there are still unresolved questions regarding the best antimicrobial agent for catheter-related bloodstream infection treatment and the duration of concentration stability of the antibiotic solution within the lumen of the port.