1
|
Tierrablanca LE, Ochalek J, Ford D, Babiker A, Gibb D, Butler K, Turkova A, Griffin S, Revill P. Economic evaluation of weekends-off antiretroviral therapy for young people in 11 countries. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e9698. [PMID: 29384848 PMCID: PMC5805420 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000009698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the cost effectiveness of short-cycle therapy (SCT), where patients take antiretroviral (ARV) drugs 5 consecutive days a week and have 2 days off, as an alternative to continuous ARV therapy for young people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and taking efavirenz-based first-line ARV drugs. METHODS We conduct a hierarchical cost-effectiveness analysis based on data on clinical outcomes and resource use from the BREATHER trial. BREATHER is a randomized trial investigating the effectiveness of SCT and continuous therapy in 199 participants aged 8 to 24 years and taking efavirenz-based first-line ARV drugs in 11 countries worldwide. Alongside nationally representative unit costs/prices, these data were used to estimate costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). An incremental cost-effectiveness comparison was performed using a multilevel bivariate regression approach for total costs and QALYs. Further analyses explored cost-effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries with access to low-cost generic ARV drugs and high-income countries purchasing branded ARV drugs, respectively. RESULTS At 48 weeks, SCT offered significant total cost savings over continuous therapy of US dollar (USD) 41 per patient in countries using generic drugs and USD 4346 per patient in countries using branded ARV drugs, while accruing nonsignificant total health benefits of 0.008 and 0.009 QALYs, respectively. Cost-effectiveness estimates were similar across settings with access to generic ARV drugs but showed significant variation among high-income countries where branded ARV drugs are purchased. CONCLUSION SCT is a cost-effective treatment alternative to continuous therapy for young people infected with HIV in countries where viral load monitoring is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Deborah Ford
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London
| | - Ab Babiker
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London
| | - Diana Gibb
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London
| | | | - Anna Turkova
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London
- Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costs and cost-efficacy analysis of the 2017 GESIDA/Spanish National AIDS Plan recommended guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2017; 36:268-276. [PMID: 28532596 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2017.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION GESIDA and the Spanish National AIDS Plan panel of experts have recommended preferred (PR), alternative (AR) and other regimens (OR) for antiretroviral therapy (ART) as initial therapy in HIV-infected patients for 2017. The objective of this study was to evaluate the costs and the efficiency of initiating treatment with PR and AR. METHODS Economic assessment of costs and efficiency (cost-efficacy) based on decision tree analyses. Efficacy was defined as the probability of reporting a viral load <50copies/mL at week 48, in an intention-to-treat analysis. Cost of initiating treatment with an ART regimen was defined as the costs of ART and its consequences (adverse effects, changes of ART regimen and drug resistance studies) during the first 48 weeks. The payer perspective (National Health System) was applied considering only differential direct costs: ART (official prices), management of adverse effects, resistance studies and HLA B*5701 screening. The setting was Spain and the costs correspond to those of 2017. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted, building three scenarios for each regimen: base case, most favourable and least favourable. RESULTS In the base case scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranged from 6882 euro for TFV/FTC/RPV (AR) to 10,904 euros for TFV/FTC+RAL (PR). The efficacy varied from 0.82 for TFV/FTC+DRV/p (AR) to 0.92 for TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI (PR). The efficiency, in terms of cost-efficacy, ranged from 7923 to 12,765 euros per responder at 48 weeks, for ABC/3TC/DTG (PR) and TFV/FTC+RAL (PR), respectively. CONCLUSION Considering ART official prices, the most efficient regimen was ABC/3TC/DTG (PR), followed by TFV/FTC/RPV (AR) and TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI (PR).
Collapse
|
3
|
Ribera E, Martínez-Sesmero JM, Sánchez-Rubio J, Rubio R, Pasquau J, Poveda JL, Pérez-Mitru A, Roldán C, Hernández-Novoa B. Economic impact of optimising antiretroviral treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with suppressed viral load in Spain, by implementing the grade A-1 evidence recommendations of the 2015 GESIDA/National AIDS Plan. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2017; 36:157-164. [PMID: 28109551 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2016.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Revised: 11/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/27/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study is to estimate the economic impact associated with the optimisation of triple antiretroviral treatment (ART) in patients with undetectable viral load according to the recommendations from the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) Consensus and their applicability in the Spanish clinical practice. METHODS A pharmacoeconomic model was developed based on data from a National Hospital Prescription Survey on ART (2014) and the A-I evidence recommendations for the optimisation of ART from the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) consensus. The optimisation model took into account the willingness to optimise a particular regimen and other assumptions, and the results were validated by an expert panel in HIV infection (Infectious Disease Specialists and Hospital Pharmacists). The analysis was conducted from the NHS perspective, considering the annual wholesale price and accounting for deductions stated in the RD-Law 8/2010 and the VAT. RESULTS The expert panel selected six optimisation strategies, and estimated that 10,863 (13.4%) of the 80,859 patients in Spain currently on triple ART, would be candidates to optimise their ART, leading to savings of €15.9M/year (2.4% of total triple ART drug cost). The most feasible strategies (>40% of patients candidates for optimisation, n=4,556) would be optimisations to ATV/r+3TC therapy. These would produce savings between €653 and €4,797 per patient per year depending on baseline triple ART. CONCLUSION Implementation of the main optimisation strategies recommended in the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) Consensus into Spanish clinical practice would lead to considerable savings, especially those based in dual therapy with ATV/r+3TC, thus contributing to the control of pharmaceutical expenditure and NHS sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esteban Ribera
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | - Rafael Rubio
- Unidad de Infección VIH, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - Juan Pasquau
- Sección de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - José Luis Poveda
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | | | - Celia Roldán
- Departamento Médico, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Madrid, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Llibre JM, de Lazzari E, Molina JM, Gallien S, Gonzalez-García J, Imaz A, Podzamczer D, Clotet B, Domingo P, Gatell JM. Cost-effectiveness of initial antiretroviral treatment administered as single vs. multiple tablet regimens with the same or different components. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2016; 36:16-20. [PMID: 27595183 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2016.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Revised: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficiency of single-tablet regimens (STR) and multiple-tablet regimens (MTR) with exactly the same or different components. METHODS A study was conducted on HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naïve patients from 6 Spanish or French centers, who were started on treatment with STR-Atripla®, or the same components separately (MTR-SC), or a different MTR (MTR-Other). Effectiveness was measured as percentage of HIV-RNA <50copies/mL at 48 weeks (ITT). Efficiency was the ratio between costs (direct cost of antiretrovirals plus outpatient visits, hospital admissions, and resistance tests) and effectiveness. RESULTS The study included a total of 2773 patients (759 STR-Atripla®, 483 MTR-SC, and 1531 MTR-Other). Median age was 37 years, 15% were HCV co-infected, 27% had a CD4+ count <200cells/μL, and 30% had viral load ≥100.000copies/mL. The duration of the assigned treatment was longer for STR-Atripla® (P<.0001). Response rates (adjusted for CD4+ count, viral load, and clustered on hospitals) at 48 weeks were 76%, 74%, and 62%, respectively (P<.0001). Virological failure was more common in MTR patients (P=.0025), and interruptions due to intolerance with MTR-Other (P<.0001). Cost per responder at 48 weeks (efficiency) was €12,406 with STR-Atripla®, €11,034 with MTR-SC (0.89 [0.82, 0.99] times lower), and €18,353 (1.48 [1.38, 1.61] times higher) with MTR-Other. CONCLUSIONS STR-Atripla® and MTR-SC regimens showed similar effectiveness, but virological failure rate was lower with STR-Atripla. MTR-SC, considered less convenient, had a marginally better efficiency, mainly due to lower direct costs. MTR-Other regimens had both a worse effectiveness and efficiency. Similar efficiency analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics should be recommended for new STRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep M Llibre
- Infectious Diseases Department and "Lluita contra la SIDA" Foundation, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Elisa de Lazzari
- Fundació Clinic per a la Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Clinic/IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Michel Molina
- Infectious Diseases, St. Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Gallien
- Infectious Diseases, St. Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | | | - Arkaitz Imaz
- HIV Unit, Infectious Disease Service, IDIBELL-Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Podzamczer
- HIV Unit, Infectious Disease Service, IDIBELL-Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bonaventura Clotet
- Infectious Diseases Department and "Lluita contra la SIDA" Foundation, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; UAB, UVIC-UCC, IEC, Spain
| | | | - Josep M Gatell
- Infectious Diseases & AIDS Units, Hospital Clinic/IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rivero A, Pérez-Molina JA, Blasco AJ, Arribas JR, Crespo M, Domingo P, Estrada V, Iribarren JA, Knobel H, Lázaro P, López-Aldeguer J, Lozano F, Moreno S, Palacios R, Pineda JA, Pulido F, Rubio R, de la Torre J, Tuset M, Gatell JM. Costs and cost-efficacy analysis of the 2016 GESIDA/Spanish AIDS National Plan recommended guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2016; 35:88-99. [PMID: 27459919 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2016.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Revised: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION GESIDA and the AIDS National Plan panel of experts suggest preferred (PR), alternative (AR), and other regimens (OR) for antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV-infected patients for the year 2016. The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and the efficacy of initiating treatment with these regimens. METHODS Economic assessment of costs and efficiency (cost/efficacy) based on decision tree analyses. Efficacy was defined as the probability of reporting a viral load <50copies/mL at week 48 in an intention-to-treat analysis. Cost of initiating treatment with an ART regimen was defined as the costs of ART and its consequences (adverse effects, changes of ART regimen, and drug resistance studies) during the first 48 weeks. The payer perspective (National Health System) was applied, only taking into account differential direct costs: ART (official prices), management of adverse effects, studies of resistance, and HLA B*5701 testing. The setting is Spain and the costs correspond to those of 2016. A sensitivity deterministic analysis was conducted, building three scenarios for each regimen: base case, most favourable, and least favourable. RESULTS In the base case scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranges from 4663 Euros for 3TC+LPV/r (OR) to 10,894 Euros for TDF/FTC+RAL (PR). The efficacy varies from 0.66 for ABC/3TC+ATV/r (AR) and ABC/3TC+LPV/r (OR), to 0.89 for TDF/FTC+DTG (PR) and TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI (AR). The efficiency, in terms of cost/efficacy, ranges from 5280 to 12,836 Euros per responder at 48 weeks, for 3TC+LPV/r (OR), and RAL+DRV/r (OR), respectively. CONCLUSION Despite the overall most efficient regimen being 3TC+LPV/r (OR), among the PR and AR, the most efficient regimen was ABC/3TC/DTG (PR). Among the AR regimes, the most efficient was TDF/FTC/RPV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Rivero
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | | | - José Ramón Arribas
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Unidad de VIH, IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Crespo
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pere Domingo
- Hospitals Universitaris Arnau de Vilanova & Santa María, Universitat de Lleida, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica (IRB) de Lleida, Lieida, Spain
| | - Vicente Estrada
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC; Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Antonio Iribarren
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Hernando Knobel
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - José López-Aldeguer
- Servicio de Medicina Interna y Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fernando Lozano
- Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Santiago Moreno
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosario Palacios
- Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio Pineda
- Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Federico Pulido
- Unidad VIH, i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Rubio
- Unidad VIH, i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier de la Torre
- Grupo de Enfermedades Infecciosas de la Unidad de Medicina Interna, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Josep M Gatell
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bracchi M, Pozniak A. Observing the revolution: A commentary on the new GeSIDA HIV guidelines. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2015; 33:505-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
7
|
Costs and cost-effectiveness analysis of 2015 GESIDA/Spanish AIDS National Plan recommended guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2015; 34:361-71. [PMID: 26321131 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Revised: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION GESIDA and the AIDS National Plan panel of experts suggest a preferred (PR), alternative (AR) and other regimens (OR) for antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV-infected patients for 2015. The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and the effectiveness of initiating treatment with these regimens. METHODS Economic assessment of costs and effectiveness (cost/effectiveness) based on decision tree analyses. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of reporting a viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48, in an intention-to-treat analysis. Cost of initiating treatment with an ART regimen was defined as the costs of ART and its consequences (adverse effects, changes of ART regimen, and drug resistance studies) during the first 48 weeks. The payer perspective (National Health System) was applied, only taking into account differential direct costs: ART (official prices), management of adverse effects, studies of resistance, and HLA B*5701 testing. The setting is Spain and the costs correspond to those of 2015. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted, building three scenarios for each regimen: base case, most favourable and least favourable. RESULTS In the base case scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranges from 4663 Euros for 3TC+LPV/r (OR) to 10,902 Euros for TDF/FTC+RAL (PR). The effectiveness varies from 0.66 for ABC/3TC+ATV/r (AR) and ABC/3TC+LPV/r (OR), to 0.89 for TDF/FTC+DTG (PR) and TDF/FTC/EVG/COBI (AR). The efficiency, in terms of cost/effectiveness, ranges from 5280 to 12,836 Euros per responder at 48 weeks, for 3TC+LPV/r (OR) and RAL+DRV/r (OR), respectively. CONCLUSION The most efficient regimen was 3TC+LPV/r (OR). Among the PR and AR, the most efficient regimen was TDF/FTC/RPV (AR). Among the PR regimes, the most efficient was ABC/3TC+DTG.
Collapse
|
8
|
Andreu-Crespo À, Llibre JM, Cardona-Peitx G, Sala-Piñol F, Clotet B, Bonafont-Pujol X. Hidden costs of antiretroviral treatment: the public health efficiency of drug packaging. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2015; 9:4287-90. [PMID: 26273190 PMCID: PMC4532345 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s87075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
While the overall percentage of unused antiretroviral medicines returned to the hospital pharmacy is low, their cost is quite high. Adverse events, treatment failure, pharmacokinetic interactions, pregnancy, or treatment simplification are common reasons for unplanned treatment changes. Socially inefficient antiretroviral packages prevent the reuse of drugs returned to the hospital pharmacy. We defined antiretroviral package categories based on the excellence of drug packaging and analyzed the number of pills and costs of drugs returned during a period of 1 year in a hospital-based HIV unit attending to 2,413 treated individuals. A total of 6,090 pills (34% of all returned antiretrovirals) – with a cost of 47,139.91€ – would be totally lost, mainly due to being packed up in the lowest efficiency packages. Newer treatments are packaged in low-excellence categories of packages, thus favoring the maintenance of these hidden costs in the near future. Therefore, costs of this low-efficiency drug packaging, where medication packages are started but not completed, in high-cost medications are substantial and should be properly addressed. Any improvement in the packaging by the manufacturer, and favoring the choice of drugs supplied through efficient packages (when efficacy, toxicity, and convenience are similar), should minimize the treatment expenditures paid by national health budgets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josep M Llibre
- HIV Unit and "Lluita contra la SIDA" Foundation, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain ; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Vic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ferran Sala-Piñol
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Bonaventura Clotet
- HIV Unit and "Lluita contra la SIDA" Foundation, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain ; Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|