Prediction of higher cost of antiretroviral therapy (ART) according to clinical complexity. A validated clinical index

Healthcare and economic impact

This chapter reviews the current model of HIV patient care and its economic impact. There are clinical and geographical differences in the care HIV patients receive and a need to develop new models of comprehen-sive HIV care has been identified. HIV infection in Spain is an important and expensive public health problem. The main costs are due to an-tiretroviral therapy, indirect costs and the cost of admission, consultation and diagnostic testing. A strong correlation between severity and cost has been identified. Patients diagnosed late have a poorer clinical course, increased mortality and require more medical and therapeutic resources. Early detection of the disease significantly improves the clinical outcomes of patients. The increased number of patients receiving treatment and their progressive ageing will increase costs of HIV healthcare in the coming years.

Budget impact of antiretroviral therapy in a French clinic cohort

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we first assessed costs associated with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in an infectious diseases University Hospital Clinic; second, we evaluated characteristics associated with these costs and finally simulated the impact on the overall ART budget of switching first-line and second-line regimens to less-costly regimens (as effective and well tolerated).

DESIGN

Cohort analysis including persons living with HIV (PLHIV) aged at least 18 years on ART to estimate ART costs during 2014.

METHODS

The current study was conducted in the Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital Clinic in Paris, France, where 4501 PLHIV consulted in 2014. We used the medical database Nadis to describe patients' ART, characteristics and estimated costs. When assessing the budgetary impact of potential switches, we considered patients' history of failure, CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, resistance mutations, hepatitis B surface antigen or HLAB5701 profile.

RESULTS

A total of 4238 of 4501 patients were on ART (94%). The total annual cost of ART prescribed was estimated at &OV0556;48 280 200 in 2014; first/second (simplification)-line regimens represented 25% (1076/4238) of the treated PLHIV and 23% (&OV0556;11 209 000) of the annual cost. For these PLHIV, we considered switches from the most common ART regimens (protease inhibitor boosted by ritonavir or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) to less-expensive regimens. We found savings ranging from &OV0556;36 100 to 1472 600/year. Savings were the highest when we considered switching to generic-based regimens or from protease inhibitor-based triple therapy to protease inhibitor monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Costs associated with ART prescriptions are very high. Switches to generic-based regimens are associated with large savings. However, those targeting protease inhibitor regimens are also associated with substantial savings and should be considered.