Antifungal treatment administered in OPAT programs is a safe and effective option in selected patients

Use of echinocandin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection caused by Candida spp.: utilization, outcomes and impact of a change to weekly dosing

BACKGROUND

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) can deliver extended parenteral treatment of fungal infections in an ambulatory setting, whilst minimizing treatment burden and cost. The extended dosing interval of rezafungin may potentiate the benefits of OPAT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes all adult patients who received echinocandin therapy in a large OPAT programme between 2012 and 2022. Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were studied. Data were analysed to determine the effects of replacing daily dosing with weekly dosing of echinocandin.

RESULTS

Across the study period, 11% (44/386) of all patients in our Health Service treated with ≥7 days of echinocandin were managed via OPAT. All were Candida and related 'yeast-like' species infections. Nakaseomyces glabrata (20/41; 49%) was the most common pathogen, fungaemia the most common presentation (17/41; 41%) and azole resistance the most frequent indication for echinocandin use (21/41; 51%).In total, 633 days of echinocandin were administered as OPAT. Thirteen patients (13/41; 32%) received concurrent parenteral antibacterials. Treatment success was achieved in 30/41 (73%) patients. If daily echinocandin dosing was replaced with weekly dosing, a potential 52% (633 to 326) reduction in the total number of treatments (for any therapy) delivered by the OPAT team is possible. The ongoing need for daily antibacterial administration mitigated the benefit in some of this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Echinocandin therapy can be safely delivered via OPAT with outcomes equivalent to bed-based care. The extended dosing interval of rezafungin will allow for a substantial reduction in the number of treatments required across the patient cohort.

Challenges and considerations for antifungal prophylaxis in children with acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Children receiving treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Evidence from pediatric studies support the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in reducing the burden of IFD in children receiving therapy for AML, yet existing antifungal agents have specific limitations and comparative data to inform the optimal prophylactic approach are lacking.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the epidemiology of invasive fungal disease (IFD) and current antifungal prophylaxis recommendations for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Challenges with currently available antifungal agents and considerations related to the changing landscape of AML therapy are reviewed. A keyword search was conducted to identify pediatric studies regarding IFD and antifungal prophylaxis in children with AML up to December 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Children undergoing treatment for AML are recommended to receive antifungal prophylaxis to reduce risk of IFD, with tolerability, pharmacokinetics, feasibility of administration, and drug interactions all factors that require consideration in this context. With increased use of novel targeted agents for AML therapy, together with the development of new antifungal agents, data from well-designed clinical studies to optimize prophylactic approaches will be essential to limit the burden of IFD in this vulnerable cohort.

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Case Commentary: Extending our therapeutic range against multidrug-resistant Candida

Deep-seated Candida spp. infections may necessitate extended durations of antifungal therapy. Increasing resistance to first-line antifungals threatens the most common options for long-term treatment. In this issue, Ponta et al. (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 68:e00750-24, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00750-24) present cases in which they used rezafungin, a novel long-acting echinocandin antifungal, for extended durations. While excellent clinical evidence supports the short-term safety of rezafungin, these cases demonstrate that rezafungin may additionally have a role in long-term suppressive therapy for antifungal-resistant Candida spp. infections.

Conventional Hospitalization versus Sequential Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Cohort

It is not known whether sequential outpatient parenteral antimicrobial (OPAT) is as safe and effective as conventional hospitalization in patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB). A post-hoc analysis of the comparative effectiveness of conventional hospitalization versus sequential OPAT was performed in two prospective Spanish cohorts of patients with S. aureus bacteremia. The PROBAC cohort is a national, multicenter, prospective observational cohort of patients diagnosed in 22 Spanish hospitals between October 2016 and March 2017. The DOMUS OPAT cohort is a prospective observational cohort including patients from two university hospitals in Seville, Spain from 2012 to 2021. Multivariate regression was performed, including a propensity score (PS) for receiving OPAT, stratified analysis according to PS quartiles, and matched pair analyses based on PS. Four hundred and thirteen patients were included in the analysis: 150 in sequential OPAT and 263 in the full hospitalization therapy group. In multivariate analysis, including PS and center effect as covariates, 60-day treatment failure was lower in the OPAT group than in the full hospitalization group (p < 0.001; OR 0.275, 95%CI 0.129−0.584). In the PS-based matched analyses, sequential treatment under OPAT was not associated with higher 60-day treatment failure (p = 0.253; adjusted OR 0.660; % CI 0.324−1.345). OPAT is a safe and effective alternative to conventional in-patient therapy for completion of treatment in well-selected patients with SAB, mainly those associated with a low-risk source and without end-stage kidney disease.

Clinical Outcomes of an Innovative Cefazolin Delivery Program for MSSA Infections in OPAT

Cefazolin is a recommended treatment for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections that has been successfully used in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programs. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of cefazolin delivered each day (Group 24) vs. every two days (Group 48) for MSSA infections in OPAT programs. It was a prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of a cohort of MSSA infections attended in OPAT. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as completing the antimicrobial regimen without death, treatment discontinuation, or readmission during treatment and follow-up. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was built. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 149 MSSA infections treated with cefazolin 2 g/8 h in OPATs, 94 and 55 patients were included in the delivery Group 24 and Group 48, respectively. Treatment failure and unplanned readmission rates were similar in both groups (11.7% vs. 7.3% p = 0.752 and 8.5% vs. 5.5% p = 0.491). There was a significant increase in vascular access complications in Group 24 (33.0%) with respect to Group 48 (7.3%) (p < 0.001). Treating uncomplicated MSSA infection with cefazolin home-delivered every two days through an OPAT program is not associated with an increased risk of treatment failure and entails a significant reduction in resource consumption compared to daily delivery.

Stability of Antimicrobials in Elastomeric Pumps: A Systematic Review

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAThttp) programs have become an important healthcare tool around the world. Portable elastomeric infusion pumps are functional devices for ambulatory delivery of antimicrobial drugs, and their stability is an essential point to guarantee an appropriate infusion administration. We conducted a systematic review to provide a synthesis and a critical evaluation of the current evidence regarding antimicrobial stability in elastomeric pumps. Data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences. The review protocol was registered on the Center for Open Science, and it was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were eligible if the aim was the evaluation of the physicochemical stability of an antimicrobial agent stored in an elastomeric device. Of the 613 papers identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria. The most studied group of antimicrobials was penicillins, followed by cephalosporins and carbapenems. In general, the stability results of the antimicrobials that have been studied in more than one article agree with each other, with the exception of ampicillin, flucloxacillin, and ceftazidime. The antibiotics that displayed a longer stability were glycopeptides and clindamycin. Regarding the stability of antifungals and antivirals, only caspofungin, voriconazole, and ganciclovir have been investigated. The information provided in this article should be considered in patient treatments within the OPAT setting. Further stability studies are needed to confirm the appropriate use of the antimicrobials included in this program to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Experience with Liposomal Amphotericin B in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe, effective, and convenient treatment strategy for patients receiving intravenous antimicrobials in the outpatient setting; however, data are limited describing the use and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB). Records of patients receiving L-AMB OPAT between 1/1/2015 and 7/31/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary objective was to describe the OPAT patient population discharged on L-AMB and evaluate factors associated with readmission and adverse events (AEs). Analysis was performed to evaluate for predictors of worse outcomes. Forty-two patients (67% male, median age 50 years) were identified, most of whom were treated for histoplasmosis. The most common doses of L-AMB were 3 mg/kg (n = 16, 38%) or 5 mg/kg (n = 14, 33%) based on actual body weight. Twenty-six (62%) patients completed their anticipated course of L-AMB. Twenty-two (52%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge; median time to readmission was 11 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5 to 18). While hypokalemia and acute kidney injury (AKI) were common, occurring in 26 (62%) and 20 (48%) patients, respectively, only 5 (12%) were readmitted to the hospital due to L-AMB-associated AEs. Ninety percent of patients achieved at least partial renal recovery within 30 days after L-AMB discontinuation. Factors significantly associated with AKI include higher L-AMB dose, lower serum potassium levels after therapy initiation, and receipt of potassium supplementation at discharge. L-AMB is associated with significant AEs; however, these results suggest that treatment is feasible in the outpatient setting with close monitoring, as the majority of AEs were managed effectively in an outpatient without long-term sequelae.