Patients with lymphatic metastasis of cutaneous malignant melanoma benefit from sentinel lymphonodectomy and early excision of their nodal disease

[Nuclear medicine procedure guideline for sentinel lymph node localization]

The authors present a procedure guideline for scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes in malignant melanoma, in breast cancer, in penile and vulva tumors, in head and neck cancer, and in prostate carcinoma. Important goals of sentinel lymph node scintigraphy comprise reduction of the extent of surgery, lower postoperative morbidity and optimization of histopathological examination focussing on relevant lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node scintigraphy itself does not diagnose tumorous lymph node involvement and is not indicated when lymph node or distant metastases have been definitely diagnosed before sentinel lymph node scintigraphy. Procedures are compiled with the aim to reliably localise sentinel lymph nodes with a high detection rate typically in early tumour stages. New aspects in this guideline are new radiopharmaceuticals such as tilmanocept and Tc-99m-PSMA and SPECT/CT allowing an easier anatomical orientation. Initial dynamic lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer is of little significance nowadays. Radiation exposure is low so that pregnancy is not a contraindication for sentinel lymph node scintigraphy. A one-day protocol should preferentially be used. Even with high volumes of scintigraphic sentinel lymph node procedures surgeons, theatre staff and pathologists receive a radiation exposure < 1 mSv/year so that they do not require occupational radiation surveillance. Aspects of quality control were included (scintigraphy, quality control of gamma probe, 6 h SLN course for surgeons, certified breast centers, medical surveillance center).

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is unreliable in predicting melanoma mortality for both younger and older patients

BACKGROUND

Melanoma disease patterns vary with patient age.

AIM

To evaluate sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in managing melanoma at differing patient ages.

METHODS

Online prediction tools were applied to compare SLNB positivity (SLNB+) and survival risk at patient ages 20-80. Tübingen melanoma data were used to determine variations in the hazard ratio of SLNB+ for mortality at different patient ages.

RESULTS

Regardless of tumour thickness, predicted SLNB+ rates were markedly higher than mortality rates for 20-year-old patients. For 80-year-old patients, it is the opposite.

DISCUSSION

If 1000 20-year-olds with a 0.4 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, 100 would likely be positive. If all 100 were to be offered adjuvant drug therapy (ADT), fewer than three more melanoma deaths in those 1000 patients would be avoided. In total, 97 patients would have received medication they may never have needed. If 1000 80-year-olds with a 3 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, only 40 would likely be positive. In total, 274 patients would be predicted to die of melanoma, 245 being SLNB negative and 29 SLNB+. ADT linked to SLNB+ could deny treatment to 89% of these high-risk patients.

LIMITATIONS

The authors relied on published risk data.

CONCLUSION

SLNB has poor specificity at predicting mortality in young melanoma patients and poor sensitivity in older patients. SLNB is not indicated in managing cutaneous melanoma for patients under 40 or over 60 years of age. Many such patients could be managed with wide local excision alone in their clinician's office-based practice. For all cutaneous melanoma patients at all ages, linking ADT to BAUSSS biomarker, (an algorithm of Breslow thickness, age, ulceration, subtype, sex and Site) rather than SLNB+ is likely more appropriate. BAUSSS provides a more accurate melanoma-specific mortality risk assessment for patients without burdening them with added surgery, hospitalization, costs or morbidity risk.

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Report of a Single-centre Experience

Aims and Background

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy provide important prognostic data in patients with early stage melanoma and are crucial in guiding the management of the tumor. We report our experience with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in a group of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma and discuss recent concepts and controversies on its use.

Patients and Methods

A total of 111 patients with stage I-II AJCC primary cutaneous melanoma underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy from December 1999 through December 2004 using a standardized technique of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and biopsy guided by blue dye injection in addition to a hand-held gamma probe. After removal, sentinel lymph nodes were submitted to serial sectioning and permanent preparations for histological and immunohistochemical examination. Complete lymph node dissection was performed only in patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Results

Sentinel lymph nodes were identified and removed in all patients (detection rate of 100%), and metastases were found in 17 cases (15.3%). The incidence of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes was 2.1%, 15.9%, 35.2%, and 41.6% for melanomas < or 1.0, 1.01-2.0, 2.01-4.0, and > 4.0 mm in thickness, respectively. Complete lymph node dissection was performed in 15 of 17 patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, and metastases in non-sentinel lymph nodes were detected in only 2 cases (11.7%). Recurrences were more frequently observed in patients with a positive than in those with negative sentinel lymph node (41.1% vs 5.3% at a median follow-up of 31.5 months, P<0.001). The false-negative rate was 2.1%.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy allow accurate staging and yield relevant prognostic information in patients with early stage melanoma.

Melanoma & nuclear medicine: new insights & advances

The contribution of nuclear medicine to management of melanoma patients is increasing. In intermediate-thickness N0 melanomas, lymphoscintigraphy provides a roadmap for sentinel node biopsy. With the introduction of single-photon emission computed tomography images with integrated computed tomography (SPECT/CT), 3D anatomic environments for accurate surgical planning are now possible. Sentinel node identification in intricate anatomical areas (pelvic cavity, head/neck) has been improved using hybrid radioactive/fluorescent tracers, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT together with modern intraoperative portable imaging technologies for surgical navigation (free-hand SPECT, portable gamma cameras). Furthermore, PET/CT today provides 3D roadmaps to resect 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid melanoma lesions. Simultaneously, in advanced-stage melanoma and recurrences, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT is useful in clinical staging and treatment decision as well as in the evaluation of therapy response. In this article, we review new insights and recent nuclear medicine advances in the management of melanoma patients.

Identification of Risk Factors in Lymphatic Surgeries for Melanoma: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Review

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy (LAD) are commonly performed in the staging and care of patients with malignant melanoma. These procedures are accompanied by complications that may result in hospital readmission, negatively affecting patient outcomes and potentially affecting surgical procedure reimbursement. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database offers a large data set allowing physicians to evaluate 30-day readmission for surgical complications. We used this database to explore predictors of 30-day hospital readmission for SLNB and LAD in the axillary, cervical, and inguinal regions.

METHODS

Data from the years 2005 to 2014 of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database were used. Cohorts were constructed according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, classification and current procedural terminology codes. The outcome of 30-day return to hospital was defined as patients who were readmitted to the hospital or the operating room within 30 days. Multiple logistic regression results are presented for a prespecified set of predictors and predictors that were significant on univariate logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated using maximum likelihood estimates, along with Wald test P values.

RESULTS

A total of 3006 patients were included. Of those, 151 (5.0%) returned to the hospital. Among 1235 LAD patients, 65 (5.3%) returned; among 1771 SLNB patients, 86 (4.9%) returned. Smoking was a predictor of hospital readmission for overall SLNB and for cervical SLNB on multivariate analysis. Age was a significant predictor for cervical and inguinal LAD. Hypertension was significant for cervical LAD. Diabetes, preoperative hematocrit, and male sex were predictors for inguinal SLNB. There were no significant predictors for axillary SLNB and axillary LAD, as well as overall LAD procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first and largest study using American College of Surgeons NSQIP to examine 30-day readmission after SLNB and LAD for melanoma in 3 commonly operated anatomical regions. We have found several significant risk factors associated with hospital readmission, which are now being used as a quality measure for hospital performance and reimbursement, that may help surgeons optimize patient selection for SLNB and LAD.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging procedure in patients with melanoma: A critical appraisal

Worldwide, sentinel node (SN) biopsy for accurate staging is now part of the standard work-up of patients with melanomas ≥1.0 mm Breslow thickness, as it is for staging patients with breast cancer. Nuclear medicine imaging and surgical techniques have evolved to such a degree that a SN can be identified and removed in virtually every patient. Nevertheless, some opposition to a routine SN biopsy remains, perhaps due to a failure to appreciate the serious implications of incomplete or inaccurate staging. Guided by a critical appraisal of the available evidence, this review elucidates the definition of an SN, discusses the sensitivity and specificity of the information it provides, emphasises that it is a minor staging procedure that can lead to improved survival when followed by appropriate therapy, and explains the necessarily unconventional and complex design of the only randomised trial that addresses this subject. It also describes other benefits and risks of an SN biopsy and outlines its role in current melanoma management.

Completion lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy

Melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer that represents a significant disease burden, making diagnosis and appropriate control of disease vital for improving morbidity and mortality. The most recent guidelines for melanoma treatment advise performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy for intermediate thickness melanomas, with subsequent completion lymph node dissection (CLND) if sentinel nodes are positive. This guideline is controversial due to the limited availability of data on this topic. CLND is an extensive surgery with known risks and complications and a small survival benefit. However, in patients without significant comorbidities and at low risk for surgery, the survival benefit outweighs the procedural risk. This article reviews CLND and the current recommendations.

Improved Survival in Male Melanoma Patients in the Era of Sentinel Node Biopsy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sentinel node biopsy is a standard method for nodal staging in patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanoma, but the survival advantage of sentinel node biopsy remains unsolved. The aim of this case-control study was to investigate the survival benefit of sentinel node biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 305 prospective melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy were compared with 616 retrospective control patients with clinically localized melanoma whom have not undergone sentinel node biopsy. Survival differences were calculated with the median follow-up time of 71 months in sentinel node biopsy patients and 74 months in control patients. Analyses were calculated overall and separately in males and females.

RESULTS

Overall, there were no differences in relapse-free survival or cancer-specific survival between sentinel node biopsy patients and control patients. Male sentinel node biopsy patients had significantly higher relapse-free survival ( P = 0.021) and cancer-specific survival ( P = 0.024) than control patients. In females, no differences were found. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5 years were 87.8% in sentinel node biopsy patients and 85.2% in controls overall with 88.3% in male sentinel node biopsy patients and 80.6% in male controls and 87.3% in female sentinel node biopsy patients and 89.8% in female controls.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node biopsy did not improve survival in melanoma patients overall. While females had no differences in survival, males had significantly improved relapse-free survival and cancer-specific survival following sentinel node biopsy.

Melanoma and nuclear medicine

Supported by a large body of published work, the contribution of nuclear medicine technologies to the assessment of melanoma has been increasing in recent years. Lymphoscintigraphy-assisted sentinel lymph node biopsy and PET are in continuous evolution with the aid of technological imaging advances, making it possible to fuse functional and anatomic images (e.g., with SPECT/CT, PET/CT and 3D rendering systems). The development of hybrid fluorescent-radioactive tracers that enable high-quality preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT, and the optimization of modern intraoperative portable imaging technologies, such as free-hand SPECT and portable γ-cameras, are important innovations that have improved sentinel lymph node identification in complex anatomical areas, such as the pelvis and head and neck. Concurrently, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET has proved its usefulness in the clinical staging and treatment decision-making process, and there is also emerging evidence regarding its utility in the evaluation of therapeutic response. The potential uses of other novel PET radiotracers could open up a new field of use for this technique. In this article, we review the current and future role of nuclear medicine in the management of melanoma.

Outcome following sentinel node biopsy plus wide local excision versus wide local excision only for primary cutaneous melanoma: analysis of 5840 patients treated at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

Worldwide, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is now a standard staging procedure for most patients with melanomas 1 mm or more in thickness, but its therapeutic benefit is not clear, pending randomized trial results. This study sought to assess the therapeutic benefit of SNB in a large, nonrandomized patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients with primary melanomas 1.00 mm or more thick or with adverse prognostic features treated with wide local excision (WLE) at a single institution between 1992 and 2008 were identified. The outcomes for those who underwent WLE plus SNB (n = 2909) were compared with the outcomes for patients in an observation (OBS) group who had WLE only (n = 2931). Median follow-up was 42 months.

RESULTS

Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) was not significantly different for patients in the SNB and OBS groups. However, a stratified univariate analysis of MSS for different thickness subgroups indicated a significantly better MSS for SNB patients with T2 and T3 melanomas (>1.0 to 4.0 mm thick) (P = 0.011), but this was not independently significant in multivariate analysis. Compared with OBS patients, SNB patients demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001) and regional recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001). There was also an improvement in distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for SNB patients with T2 and T3 melanomas (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the outcome for the overall cohort after WLE alone did not differ significantly from the outcome after additional SNB. However, the outcome for the subgroup of patients with melanomas more than 1.0 to 4.0 mm in thickness was improved if they had a SNB, with significantly improved disease-free and DMFS.

Update and Review on the Surgical Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

The surgical management of malignant melanoma historically called for wide excision of skin and subcutaneous tissue for any given lesion, but has evolved to be rationally-based on pathological staging. Breslow and Clark independently described level and thickness as determinant in prognosis and margin of excision. The American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) in 1988 combined features from each of these histologic classifications, generating a new system, which is continuously updated and improved. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has also combined several large randomized prospective trials to generate current guidelines for melanoma excision as well. In this article, we reviewed: (1) Breslow and Clark classifications, AJCC and NCCN guidelines, the World Health Organization's 1988 study, and the Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial; (2) Experimental use of Mohs surgery for in situ melanoma; and (3) Surgical margins and utility and indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy. Current guidelines for the surgical management of a primary melanoma of the skin is based on Breslow microstaging and call for cutaneous margins of resection of 0.5 cm for MIS, 1.0 cm for melanomas ≤1.0 mm thick, 1-2 cm for melanoma thickness of 1.01-2 mm, 2 cm margins for melanoma thickness of 2.01-4 mm, and 2 cm margins for melanomas >4 mm thick. Although the role of SLNB, CLND, and TLND continue to be studied, current recommendations include SLNB for Stage IB (includes T1b lesions ≤1.0 with the adverse features of ulceration or ≥1 mitoses/mm²) and Stage II melanomas. CLND is recommended when sentinel nodes contain metastatic deposits.

Is complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma always necessary? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation for patients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a complete lymph node dissection (CLND). However, metastatic melanoma is not present in approximately 80% of CLND specimens. A meta-analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological variables most predictive of non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases when the sentinel node is positive in patients with melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The search identified 54 relevant articles reporting the frequency of NSN metastases in melanoma. Original data was abstracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

FINDINGS

The pooled estimates that were found to be significantly associated with the high likelihood of NSN metastases were: ulceration (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.53-2.31), satellitosis (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.86-5.66), neurotropism (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.39-4.53), >1 positive SLN (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.2-2.62), Starz 3 (old) (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.89-3.76), Angiolymphatic invasion (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.34-4.54), extensive location (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.74-2.81), macrometastases >2 mm (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.61-2.35), extranodal extension (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.79-6.40) and capsular involvement (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.37-7.27). There were 3 characteristics not associated with NSN metastases: subcapsular location (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.67), Rotterdam Criteria <0.1 mm (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.50) and Starz I (new) (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.91). Other variables including gender, Breslow thickness 2-4 mm and extremity as primary site were found to be equivocal.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with low SLN tumor burden could probably be spared the morbidity associated with CLND. We identified 9 factors predictive of non-SLN metastases that should be recorded and evaluated routinely in SLN databases. However, further studies are needed to confirm the standard criteria for not performing CLND.

Prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of lymph node involvement in gastric cancer: Maruyama computer program versus sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Stage-adapted surgery guarantees the best outcome for patients with gastric cancer. Successful identification of lymph node involvement may help to reduce the number of extended lymphadenectomies. Preoperative diagnostic tools have low sensitivity and specificity for determining lymph node involvement. Evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) intraoperatively has good results, while the accuracy of the Maruyama computer program (MCP) is controversial.

METHODS

We investigated 40 patients by the Maruyama computer model and labeled lymph nodes with blue dye for SLN mapping. To compare the probability calculations by MCP and the results of SLN mapping, we had to define a cutoff level; we did this using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Sentinel lymph nodes were examined in frozen sections intraoperatively and by standard hematoxylin and eosin staining postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 795 lymph nodes were removed and examined. The Maruyama computer model had a sensitivity of 91.3 %, specificity of 64 %, and accuracy of 80 % by the best cutoff point. The false-negative rate was 8.7 %. The sensitivity of SLN mapping was 95.7 %, the false-negative rate was 4.3 %, and the specificity was 100 %. The accuracy of SLN mapping was 97.4 %. Only the sensitivity of MCP and SLN biopsy was proven equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that intraoperative SLN examination is superior to preoperative estimation with the MCP. Correct definition of lymph node involvement helps in planning the best stage-adapted surgery in gastric cancer.

Individualized surgery: gamma-probe-guided lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically enlarged lymph node metastases from melanomas

Background

The value of a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in melanoma patients with clinically evident regional lymph node metastases has not been studied. Therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) is regarded as the clinical standard, but the appropriate extent of TLND is controversial in all lymphatic basins.

Patients and Methods

Of the 115 consecutive patients with surgery on palpable lymph node metastases, 34 received a pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphatic drainage to a second nodal basin outside the clinically involved basin was found in 15 cases. In 13 patients, the ectopic tumor-draining lymph nodes were excised as in a sentinel node biopsy. The lymph nodes from the TLND specimens were postoperatively separated and classified as either radioactive or non-radioactive.

Results

A total of 493 lymph nodes were examined pathologically. The largest macrometastasis maintained the ability to take up radiotracer in 77% of cases. Radioactively labeled lymph nodes carried a higher risk of being involved with metastasis. The proportions of tumor involvement for radioactive and non-radioactive lymph nodes were 44.5 and 16.9%, respectively (P=0.00002). Of the 13 ectopic nodal basins surgically explored, six harbored clinically occult metastases.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing TLND for palpable metastases, tumor-draining lymph nodes in a second, ectopic nodal basin should be excised, because they could be affected by occult metastasis. With respect to radioactive lymph nodes situated within the nodal basin of the macrometastasis but beyond the borders of a less-radical lymphadenectomy, further studies are needed.

A multicenter prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of F-18 FDG-PET/CT in patients with AJCC stage IIIB or IIIC extremity melanoma

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

There is a high risk of relapse in stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma. The utility of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in these patients to evaluate response to treatment or for surveillance after treatment is currently not well defined.

METHODS

Prospective data from 2 centers identified 97 patients with stage IIIB/IIIC extremity melanoma undergoing isolated limb infusion (ILI) who had whole body FDG-PET/CT scans before and every 3 months after treatment. Clinical response was determined at 3 months by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

Complete response (CR) after ILI occurred in 33% (32/97) of patients. FDG-PET/CT accurately identified 59% of patients who were CRs (19/32), whereas 41% (13/32) had residual metabolic activity in the extremity that was histologically negative for melanoma. The 3-year disease-free rate was 62.2% (95% CI: 40.1%-96.4%) for those patients who were CRs by both clinical/pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT (n = 19) compared to only 29.4% (95% CI: 9.9%-87.2%) of those CRs who still had residual FDG-PET/CT activity (n = 13). FDG-PET/CT was utilized for surveillance of disease recurrence outside the regional field of treatment. Fifty-two percent (51/97) of patients developed disease outside the extremity at a median time of 212 days from pre-ILI FDG-PET/CT. In 47% (29/62) of these cases, the recurrence was resected.

CONCLUSIONS

Although FDG-PET/CT does not appear to accurately identify patients who appear to be CRs to ILI, it does appear to identify a subgroup of patients whose regional progression-free survival is markedly worse. However, FDG-PET/CT appears to be an excellent method for surveillance in stage IIIB/IIIC patients after ILI with ability to identify surgically resectable recurrent disease in these high-risk patients.

[Prospective comparative study of sentinel lymph node mapping in gastric cancer -- submucosal versus subserosal marking method]

BACKGROUND

Forty percent of patients with gastric cancer undergo unnecessary extended lymph node dissection which may result in higher rate of morbidity and mortality. Successful sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping may help to reduce the number of extended lymphadenectomy. Various marking methods are in use to detect the sentinel lymph node in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients underwent open gastric resection with blue dye mapping and modified D2 lymph node dissection. Sixteen patients (group A) were marked submucosally with endoscopy and 24 patients (group B) were labelled by the surgeon subserosally. The staining method and the lymphadenectomy were supervised by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 795 lymph nodes were removed and examined. The mean number of blue nodes was 4.1 per patient in group A and 4.8 in group B. The false negative rate was 0% in group A and 7.7% in group B. The sensitivity and specificity of SLN mapping was 100% in the submucosal group. The specificity of subserosal marking method was 100%, while the seínsitivity was 92.3%. Submucosal and subserosal marking methods were proven to be equivalent in detection rate, sensitivity and specificity based on 90% confidence interval of the ratio of indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that sentinel lymph node mapping with blue dye alone represents a safety procedure and seems to be adaptable with high sensitivity and specificity, especially in cases of T1 and T2 tumors.

Value of sentinel lymph node mapping using a blue dye-only method in gastric cancer: a single-center experience from North-East Hungary

BACKGROUND

Forty percent of patients with gastric cancer have unnecessarily extended lymph node dissections with higher rates of morbidity and mortality than those in non-extended procedures. Successful sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping may help to reduce the number of extended lymphadenectomies.

METHODS

SLN mapping was investigated by a blue dye-only method in patients with gastric cancer. The first cohort of patients (n = 16) were marked submucosally by an endoscopist and in the second cohort of patients (n = 23) a subserosal injection was performed by the surgeon.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients, all Caucasians, underwent gastric resection or total gastrectomy with SLN biopsy using patent blue-dye mapping and modified D2 lymphadenectomy. The mapping procedure and the lymphadenectomy were supervised by the same surgeon. A total of 770 lymph nodes were removed and examined. The mean number of blue nodes was 4.3 per patient. In 22/23 cases at least one SLN showed tumor involvement. The sensitivity of SLN mapping was 95.7%, the false-negative rate was 4.3%, and the specificity was 100%. The negative predictive value was 93.8% and the positive predictive value was 100%. In cases of T1 and T2 tumors the sensitivity was 100%. We found the two marking methods (submucosal vs. subserosal) to be equivalent and there was no side-effect of the blue-dye mapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that SLN mapping with blue dye alone represents a safe procedure that seems to be adaptable for non-obese patients undergoing open surgery for gastric cancer in the Eastern European region. The procedure has high sensitivity and specificity, especially in cases of T1 and T2 tumors.

Analysis of predictive factors for the outcome of complete lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted procedure to accurately stage patients with melanoma. However, there is no consensus concerning the practical consequences of a positive SLN, since a survival benefit of a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) has not yet been demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

We wondered whether we could identify a subgroup of patients with metastatic involvement of the SLN who could be excluded from the recommendation to undergo CLND.

METHODS

At the Department of Dermatology at the University of Munich, a total of 213 patients with metastatic SLNs (24.9%) were identified among 854 patients who had undergone SLNB between 1996 and 2007. All SLN-positive patients had been advised to have CLND. Survival analyses were performed by using the Kaplan-Meier approach.

RESULTS

A total of 176 (82.6%) of 213 SLN-positive patients underwent CLND. In this group, 26 patients (14.8%) showed metastatic disease in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 26.1% in NSLN-positive patients and 74% in NSLN-negative patients. SLN-positive patients who refused CLND had a better prognosis than patients with CLND. Breslow tumor thickness was significantly associated with positive CLND status with higher median values in CLND-positive than CLND-negative patients (3.03 vs 2.22 mm).

LIMITATIONS

The subgroup of patients with metastatic disease in CLND may have been too small to reach statistical significance for other tumor- or patient-related parameters. Mitotic indices of the primary melanomas had not been determined in this retrospective study; thus a possible correlation with lymph node status could not be tested.

CONCLUSION

Among SLN-positive patients, the presence of metastatic NSLN is a highly significant poor prognostic factor. Tumor thickness is a significant prognostic parameter for positive CLND status and might be considered in the decision to perform CLND in case of metastatic SLN.

Importance of tumor load in the sentinel node in melanoma: clinical dilemmas

There are two hypotheses to explain melanoma dissemination: first, simultaneous lymphatic and hematogeneous spread, with regional lymph nodes as indicators of metastatic disease; and second, orderly progression, with regional lymph nodes as governors of metastatic disease. The sentinel node (SN) has been defined as the first draining lymph node from a tumor and is harvested with the use of the triple technique and is processed by an extensive pathology protocol. The SN status is a strong prognostic factor for survival (83-94% for SN negative, 56-75% SN-positive patients). False-negative rates are considerable (9-21%). Preliminary results of the MSLT-1 trial did not demonstrate a survival benefit for the SN procedure, although a subgroup analysis indicates a possible benefit. A mathematical model has demonstrated 24% prognostic false positivity. SN tumor burden represents a heterogeneous patient population and is classified most frequently with the Starz, Dewar or Rotterdam Criteria. A completion lymph-node dissection might not be indicated in all SN-positive patients. Patients classified with metastases <0.1 mm by the Rotterdam Criteria have excellent survival rates. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology is emerging as a staging tool for high-risk patients, but more research is necessary before this can change clinical practice.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and melanoma: 2010 update Part II

This article will discuss the evidence for and against the therapeutic efficacy of early removal of potentially affected lymph nodes, morbidity associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymphadenectomy, current guidelines regarding patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and the remaining questions that ongoing clinical trials are attempting to answer. The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial and the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials I and II will be discussed in detail.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be able to discuss the data regarding early surgical removal of lymph nodes and its effect on the overall survival of melanoma patients, be able to discuss the potential benefits and morbidity associated with complete lymph node dissection, and to summarize the ongoing trials aimed at addressing the question of therapeutic value of early surgical treatment of regional lymph nodes that may contain micrometastases.

Cutting a sentinel lymph node into slices is the optimal first step for examination of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients

The optimal processing for the pathology of sentinel lymph nodes of patients with melanoma is still a matter of debate. We compared two protocols of sentinel lymph node processing, which were consecutively applied. For the first protocol, the sentinel lymph nodes were cut into 1-2 mm thick slices. From each slice, 12 microtome sections were stained (multiple slices protocol). For the second protocol, which is a modification of the recent European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer protocol, the sentinel lymph nodes were bivalved. Five consecutive series of microtome sections, with gaps of 50 microm between them, were prepared from each cut surface (bivalving protocol). H&E and immunohistochemical staining were integral elements of both protocols. A total of 584 sentinel lymph nodes (1.8+/-0.9 per patient) were examined. The percentages of micrometastases (29 versus 27%) and of capsular naevi (13 versus 15%) detected were very similar for both protocols. As shown by multivariate logistic regression, Breslow thickness (P=0.003) and younger age (P=0.01) correlated with nodal metastasis. The type of histological preparation, ulceration and sex were not significant. The multiple slices protocol produced, on average, 4 paraffin blocks and 46 microtome sections per node. The bivalving protocol constantly produced 2 paraffin blocks and 42 microtome sections. For technical processing, the multiple slices protocol required, on average, 38 min per sentinel lymph node, whereas the bivalving protocol required 55 min. Both protocols yielded excellent detection rates with a similar amount of work being required on the part of the pathologist. Compared with the bivalving protocol, the multiple slices protocol was less labor intensive for the technical staff.

Cutaneous Melanomas of the Eyelid

Cutaneous eyelid melanomas are very rare lesions. The lentiginous subtypes are the most frequent melanocytic lesions of the eyelid and can be likened to conjunctival melanocytic lesions like PAM, PAM with atypia and conjunctival melanoma. Compared to melanomas elsewhere on the body, eyelid melanomas have special considerations. Eyelid skin is very thin, the mucocutaneous junction at the lid margin can affect prognosis, the lymphatic drainage pattern is very variable and there is an inherent difficulty to excise wide margins without sacrificing important structures. A customized excision approach, using tissue-sparing "Slow-Mohs" technique, is suggested. Sentinel lymph node dissection has an evolving therapeutic role but remains controversial.

Predicting outcome in melanoma: where are we now?

Melanoma incidence continues to rise in most countries. This is of grave concern, given the mortality rate in a relatively young population. Current staging tools are limited in their ability to predict accurately those at risk of metastatic disease, relapse and treatment failure. This overview comprehensively reviews relevant literature, with the focus on the last 5 years, and discusses the current state of traditional and emerging novel methods of staging for melanoma and their effect on prognosis in this population.

Multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma

This article covers the multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma. Excision margins and the need for sentinel lymphadenectomy are mainly dictated by the Breslow thickness although exceptions to this dictum do exist. Interferon is the only FDA approved adjuvant therapy for high risk melanoma although its overall survival benefit is minimal. Trials examining different doses or duration of interferon therapy have not demonstrated any promising survival data so far. There have been several randomized vaccine trials for melanoma but none have shown an overall survival benefit. Research into T-cell regulation continues and will hopefully bring promise for the future of melanoma treatment.

Regional Differences in the Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: A Potential Quality Measure

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) provides accurate nodal staging in patients with melanoma. However, its prevalence across geographic regions is unknown. Our aim was to determine if SLNB for melanoma has been widely adopted throughout the United States. All patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry for 2004 with melanoma were evaluated. Data were collected for demographics, depth of melanoma, and type of nodal evaluation (regional lymph node dissection vs SLNB). Registry sites were categorized into West, Midwest, Northeast, and Southeast. χ2 analysis was performed to identify regional differences in receipt of SLNB. Overall, the West region (n = 2352) had a higher use of SLNB compared with the Midwest (n = 497), Northeast (n = 630), and Southeast (n = 268) regions (82.1% vs 77.9%, 65.4%, and 60.1%, respectively; P < 0.001). Intermediate-thickness (1 to 4 mm) melanomas had differences in SLNB use between the West and Midwest (83.6% and 81.4%) versus the Northeast and Southeast (66.3% and 60.2%) (P < 0.05). This population-based analysis shows low use of SLNB for melanoma in some U.S. regions. Further studies need to address the reasons for these differences and target ways to improve rates. Results suggest that SLNB may be considered as a potential quality measure.

Microscopic tumor burden in sentinel lymph nodes predicts synchronous nonsentinel lymph node involvement in patients with melanoma

PURPOSE

We and others have demonstrated that additional positive lymph nodes (LNs) are identified in only 8% to 33% of patients with melanoma who have positive sentinel LNs (SLNs) and undergo complete therapeutic LN dissection (cTLND). We sought to determine predictors of additional regional LN involvement in patients with positive SLNs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinically node-negative melanoma who underwent SLN biopsy (1991 to 2003) and had positive SLNs were identified. Clinicopathologic factors, including extent of microscopic disease within SLNs, were evaluated as potential predictors of positive non-SLNs.

RESULTS

Overall, 359 (16.3%) of the 2,203 patients identified had a positive SLN. Positive non-SLNs were identified in 48 (14.0%) of the 343 patients with positive SLNs who underwent cTLND. On univariate analysis, several measures of SLN microscopic tumor burden, one versus three or more SLNs harvested, tumor thickness more than 2 mm, age older than 50 years, and Clark level higher than III were predictive of positive non-SLNs; primary tumor ulceration and number of positive SLNs had no apparent impact. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, measures of SLN microscopic tumor burden were the most significant independent predictors of positive non-SLNs; tumor thickness more than 2 mm and number of SLNs harvested also predicted additional disease. A model was developed that stratified patients according to their risk for non-SLN involvement.

CONCLUSION

In melanoma patients with positive SLNs, SLN tumor burden, primary tumor thickness, and number of SLNs harvested may be useful in identifying a group at low risk for positive non-SLNs and be spared the potential morbidity of a cTLND.

Adverse outcomes associated with noncompliance with melanoma treatment guidelines

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to improve melanoma patient care. However, it is unclear whether failure to comply with these standards (either excessive or inadequate treatment) increases morbidity or relapse rates. Therefore, we undertook this study to evaluate the effect of variance from National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations on postoperative complication rates and disease recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional cancer registry data on 327 clinically node-negative melanoma patients and assessed compliance with NCCN guidelines, complication rates, and outcome. Data were confirmed by chart, pathology report, and operative note review. Statistical analysis was performed by using the SAS statistical software package.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications were documented in 17% of patients and were 3.4-fold higher for patients treated in a margin-noncompliant fashion and 2.4-fold higher for patients treated in a lymph-node-noncompliant manner (P < 0.001 for both). After mean follow-up of 51 months, disease recurred in 58 patients (18%) at a mean of 33 months (range 4-93 months). Locoregional disease alone as the first site of relapse was seen in 24% of margin-noncompliant versus 6% of margin-compliant cases and in 33% of lymph-node-noncompliant versus 6% of lymph-node-compliant cases (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

While there are valid reasons for variance from treatment algorithms, these data suggest that compliance with NCCN guidelines improves outcome and decreases morbidity in clinically node-negative melanoma patients.

The survival benefit to patients with positive sentinel node melanoma after completion lymph node dissection may be limited to the subgroup with a primary lesion Breslow thickness greater than 1.0 and less than or equal to 4 mm (pT2-pT3)

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of sentinel node biopsy is still controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the overall survival (OS; calculated both from the date of primary tumor excision and lymph node dissection) data from two large groups of AJCC 2002 stage-III cutaneous melanoma patients-after completion lymph node dissection (CLND after positive sentinel node biopsy) and after therapeutic LND (TLND for clinically/cytologically detected regional lymph node metastases).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcomes for 544 consecutive patients, who underwent CLND (47.4%; 258 patients) or TLND (52.6%; 286 patients) at one institution between December 1994 and January 2005. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age and gender distribution and in the parameters of the primary tumor. Median follow-up time was 36 months (range 6-110 months).

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in OS (from the date of primary tumor excision) between CLND and TLND patients in the groups with primary tumor thicknesses of 1.0 mm or less or greater than 4.0 mm (pT1 and pT4); however, in patients with thicknesses greater than 1.0 mm and 4.0 mm or less (in subgroups pT2 and pT3), we found significantly better OS for CLND than for TLND patients-CLND: median OS not reached, 5-year OS was 57.2% (95%CI: 44.4-70.1%); TLND: median OS 42.1 months, 5-year OS was 37.9% (95%CI: 26.5-49.2%) (P = 0.0006). In the entire CLND and TLND groups, the median OS and 5-year OS rates were 60.5 months and 52.5% (95%CI: 45.6-61.5%) and 38.2 months and 39.5% (95%CI: 32.7-46.5%), respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, we have found that in the CLND group the important factors negatively influencing OS (from the date of lymphadenectomy) are: male gender, features of primary tumor (higher Breslow thickness and presence of ulceration) and features of nodal metastases (extracapsular invasion and number of involved nodes). In the TLND group, however, the negative prognostic factors are: male gender and features of nodal metastases (extracapsular invasion and number of involved nodes) without the impact of primary tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study demonstrate that the survival benefit after positive sentinel node biopsy with subsequent CLND is probably limited only to the subgroup of patients with primary tumor thicknesses not larger than 4 mm and not less than 1 mm when compared with lymph node dissection of palpable nodes. The primary tumor features have no impact on survival after lymphadenectomy performed for clinically involved nodes.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma

Is unnecessary as clinically important micrometastases can be identified by ultrasound

Postoperative morbidity of lymph node excision for cutaneous melanoma-sentinel lymphonodectomy versus complete regional lymph node dissection

For patients with melanoma metastasis to a sentinel lymph node, subsequent complete regional lymph node dissection (CLND) is currently regarded to be the surgical standard. This approach, however, has not been confirmed by controlled studies, so that surgical morbidity is of primary importance. Using clinical examination and a questionnaire, we determined morbidity in 315 patients with axillary or inguinal lymph node excision on whom 275 sentinel lymphonodectomies (SLNEs) and 90 CLNDs were performed. The overall incidence of at least one complication following SLNE was 13.8%. The short-term complication rate was 11.3% (allergic reaction to blue dye 0%, wound breakdown 0%, haematoma 2.5%, wound infection 3.6%, seroma 6.9%). The incidence of long-term complications was 4.1% (persistent tattoo 0.4%, functional deficit 0.4%, nerve dysfunction/pain 0.7% or swelling 2.5%). All complications were mild. Significantly, the complication rate was not higher for patients aged 70 years or older. After CLND, the overall complication rate was significantly higher (65.5%, P<0.000001). The incidence of short-term complications was 50% (haematoma 0%, wound breakdown 6.7%, wound infection 24.7% or seroma 34.8%). The incidence of long-term complications was also 50% (nerve dysfunction/pain 8.9%, functional deficit 16.8%, swelling 37.1%). Overall, inguinal lymph node excision was burdened by a higher complication rate (P=0.015). Age and sex did not influence postoperative morbidity. No deaths linked to either procedure were noted. Complication rates after SLNE are low and most complications are minor and short-lasting. In contrast, CLND has been demonstrated to be a major and potentially morbid surgical procedure. This highlights the importance of testing the therapeutic value that CLND adds to the sentinel lymph node procedure.

Solitary lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

The feasibility and diagnostic reliability of sentinel node (SN) biopsy for gastric cancer are still controversial. We studied the clinicopathological features and localization of solitary lymph node metastasis (SLM) in gastric cancer to provide useful information for use of the SN concept in gastric cancer. From 2000 to 2004, 3,267 patients with gastric cancer underwent D2 radical gastrectomy. The clinicopathological features of 195 patients with histologically proven SLM and the distribution of metastasized nodes were assessed. The incidence of SLM was 6.0% in all cases. Compared with the node-negative patients, significant differences were observed in age, tumor size, depth of invasion, and surgical type. The cumulative 5-year survival rate of patients with SLM was 80.5%, which was significantly lower than 90.2% for node-negative patients (P<0.001). Of patients with SLM, 82.6% had it in the perigastric node area (N1), and the other 17.4% patients had skip metastasis in the N2-N3 nodes. Perigastric nodes were the most common first sites of drainage from the tumor, making them the main targets of the operative SN mapping procedure. Due to the higher than expected incidence of skip metastasis in gastric cancer, D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed until the reliability of SN navigation surgery is validated in multicenter prospective clinical trials.

Impact of sentinel lymphadenectomy on survival in a murine model of melanoma

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy-also termed sentinel lymphadenectomy (SL)-has become a standard of care for patients with primary invasive cutaneous melanoma. This technique has been shown to provide accurate information about the disease status of the regional lymph node basins at risk for metastasis, provide prognostic information, and provide durable regional lymph node control. The potential survival benefit afforded to patients undergoing SL is controversial. Central to this controversy is whether metastasis to regional lymph nodes occurs independent of or prior to widespread hematogenous dissemination. A related area of uncertainty is whether tumor cells residing within regional lymph nodes have increased metastatic potential. We have used a murine model of primary invasive cutaneous melanoma based on injection of B16-BL6 melanoma cells into the pinna to address two questions: (1) does SL plus wide excision of the primary tumor result in a survival advantage over wide excision alone; and (2) do melanoma cells growing within lymph nodes produce a higher incidence of hematogenous metastases than do cells growing at the primary tumor site? We found that SL significantly improved the survival of mice with small primary tumors. We found no difference in the incidence of lung metastases produced by B16-BL6 melanoma cells growing exclusively within regional lymph nodes and cells growing within the pinna.

Prognostic false-positivity of the sentinel node in melanoma

It is a basic tenet of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy procedure that all positive sentinel lymph nodes will inevitably progress to palpable nodal recurrence if not removed. Comparison of survival is, therefore, considered permissible among patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes who undergo early lymphadenectomy with that among patients who have delayed lymphadenectomy for palpable regional node metastasis, providing that survival is calculated from the date of wide local excision of the primary tumor. Here, that fundamental assumption is contested and evidence is presented to show that a positive sentinel lymph node might have no adverse prognostic relevance in up to one-third of patients. Furthermore, in the same patients, progression to palpable nodal disease might not have occurred even if the positive sentinel node had not been removed. The term prognostic false-positivity is used to describe this phenomenon. Such patients are incorrectly up-staged, are given inaccurate prognostic information and can undergo unnecessary completion lymphadenectomy and unnecessary adjuvant therapy.