Gemcitabine, epirubicin and docetaxel as primary systemic therapy in patients with early breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase I/II study

Hormone receptor and HER2 status: The only predictive factors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

We report our experience in neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy in a single centre between 2000 and 2011. We looked for predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the present study. A total of 110 consecutive breast cancer patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our centre. Pathological response was achieved in 24 HR+/HER2- (38.7%), 25 HER2+ (67.6%) and five triple-negative (45.5%) (p = 0.02) patients. No statistically significant differences were found in pathological tumour response according to T stage. The multivariate analysis revealed tumour subtype was the only associated factor for pathological response, with HER2 + tumours the best responders, OR 3.9 (1.5-9.9): 5-year DFS was 40% HER2+/no response; 78% HER2+/response; 65% HR+/HER2-/no response; 82% HR+/HER2-/response; 25% triple-negative/no response and 100% triple-negative/response. HR and HER2 status were the only prognostic factors for pathological response. pCR was correlated with survival in all tumour subtypes.

Gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine antimetabolite which has shown activity in metastatic breast cancer both as a single agent, but also in various combination regimens. It is characterized by a unique mechanism of action which includes cytotoxic self-potentiation, masked DNA chain termination and potent inhibition of DNA repair. The clinical application of gemcitabine is supported by a favorable toxicity profile. In metastatic breast cancer, several Phase II trials document the activity of gemcitabine in pretreated and unpretreated patients. In a single Phase III trial performed in elderly patients not pretreated, gemcitabine was inferior to epirubicin. High activity has, however, been obtained by the combination of gemcitabine with taxanes such as paclitaxel or docetaxel. In a randomized trial performed in anthracycline-pretreated patients, the combined use of gemcitabine and paclitaxel induced a significant improvement not only of response rate and time to disease progression, but also caused a significant increase in quality of life and survival when compared with paclitaxel alone. The combination of gemcitabine with vinorelbine and cisplatin has been validated in numerous Phase II trials and promises reliable activity in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated patients. Triple-agent regimens such as gemcitabine/epirubicin/paclitaxel provided consistently high response rates in Phase II trials, but failed to show superiority over the 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide regimen in a randomized Phase III trial. Based on high response rates and pathological complete remission rates achieved by preoperative induction therapy with gemcitabine/epirubicin/taxane regimens, ongoing trials focus on the incorporation of gemcitabine into neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens.

Comparison of neoadjuvant adriamycin and docetaxel versus adriamycin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in patients with operable breast cancer

Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is increasingly considered for patients with operable disease. Recently, as many clinical trials have demonstrated favorable outcomes of anthracycline-taxane based regimen, this approach has been widely used in the neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

We compared women who received adriamycine and docetaxel (AD) with adriamycin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (AC-T) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The AD group was scheduled for six cycles of AD (50 mg/m² and 75 mg/m², respectively) at a 3-week interval. The AC-T group was scheduled for four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m² and 500 mg/m², respectively) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) at a 3-week interval.

Results

The responses of chemotherapy were equivalent (overall response rate [AD, 75.7% vs. AC-T, 80.9%; P = 0.566], pathologic complete response [pCR] rate [breast and axilla: AD, 10.8% vs. AC-T, 12.8%; P = 1.000; breast only: AD, 18.9% vs. AC-T, 14.9%, P = 0.623], breast conserving surgery rate [P = 0.487], and breast conserving surgery conversion rate [P = 0.562]). The pCR rate in the breast was higher in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive cases (HER2 positive 33.3% vs. negative 10%, P = 0.002). Although nonhematologic toxicities were comparable, hematologic toxicities were more severe in the AD group. Most women in the AD group suffered from grade 3/4 neutropenia (P < 0.001) and neutropenic fever (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Tumor responses were not different in various variables between the two groups. However, AC-T was a more tolerable regimen than AD in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant epirubicin, gemcitabine and docetaxel for primary breast cancer: long-term survival data and major prognostic factors based on two consecutive neoadjuvant phase I/II trials

We previously reported primary endpoints of two consecutive phase I/II trials, evaluating different schedules of neoadjuvant epirubicin (E), gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (Doc) for primary breast cancer (PBC). Here, we report mature survival data and prognostic factors. One hundred fifty-one patients were recruited into two consecutive phase I/II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for T2-4 N0-2 M0 PBC. Patients received six cycles of G/E/Doc every 3 weeks with G repeated on d8 (GEDoc, n = 84) or five cycles of G/E followed by four cycles of Doc all given every two weeks (GEsDoc, n = 67). Prognostic factors were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. No survival differences by treatment were found. Among reported predictive factors for pathologic complete response (pCR), oestrogen receptor (ER) status was the only relevant factor in the multivariate analysis. Unexpectedly, pCR resulted in poorer survival (univariate HR for overall survival [OS] 3.11, p = 0.007). Multivariate analyses identified molecular subtype and tumour size as the most relevant prognostic factors for OS. HER2-receptor status and the CPS-EG score (Mittendorf et al., J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1956-62), based on clinical and pathological stage, ER-status and tumour grade, were particularly relevant in disease-free survival. Our findings cast doubt on the reliability of pCR as single marker for prognosis of this unselected breast cancer cohort, with an abundance of luminal subtypes. These results underline the significance of additional molecular characteristics for breast cancer survival.

Neoadjuvant dose-dense gemcitabine plus docetaxel and vinorelbine plus epirubicin for operable breast cancer: improved prognosis in triple-negative tumors

Background: Neoadjuvant anti-tumor activity of an alternating taxane- and anthracycline-based dose-dense regimen in patients with operable, noninflammatory large breast cancer was investigated.

Objective: The objective is to study the rate of pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer receiving dose-dense chemotherapy sequentially with gemcitabine plus docetaxel and vinorelbine plus epirubicin.

Methods: Women (n = 74) with clinical stage II or III breast cancer were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter study to receive six 2-weekly courses of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² plus docetaxel 75 mg/m² on days 1 and 15, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² plus epirubicin 100mg/m² on days 29 and 43. Patients with an objective response on day 56 then received another cycle of gemcitabine/ docetaxel on day 57 and of vinorelbine/epirubicin on day 71. Conservative surgery was scheduled for all patients.

Results: Of the patients enrolled, 30% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 22% overall, but was higher in TNBC than patients without TNBC (40.9% vs 14.0%; p=0.028). Among patients with a pCR, patients with TNBC had similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) to patients without TNBC. Among those without a pCR, RFS rates for patients with TNBC were significantly lower than for patients without TNBC (p=0.04). The most common severe hematologic toxicity was neutropenia.

Conclusions: Administering four drugs in a dose-dense alternating sequence gave a high pCR in patients with operable, invasive breast cancer. Patients with TNBC with a pCR had similar OS to patients without TNBC, whereas patients with TNBC without a pCR had poorer survival rate than their non- TNBC counterparts.

Prediction and prognosis: impact of gene expression profiling in personalized treatment of breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is a complex disease, whose heterogeneity is increasingly recognized. Despite considerable improvement in breast cancer treatment and survival, a significant proportion of patients seems to be over- or undertreated. To date, single clinicopathological parameters show limited success in predicting the likelihood of survival or response to endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Consequently, new gene expression based prognostic and predictive tests are emerging that promise an improvement in predicting survival and therapy response. Initial evidence has emerged that this leads to allocation of fewer patients into high-risk groups allowing a reduction of chemotherapy treatment. Moreover, pattern-based approaches have also been developed to predict response to endocrine therapy or particular chemotherapy regimens. Irrespective of current pitfalls such as lack of validation and standardization, these pattern-based biomarkers will prove useful for clinical decision making in the near future, especially if more patients get access to this form of personalized medicine.

A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling

This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast cancer received 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(-2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg m(-2) (Gem+Dox), then 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) plus cisplatin 70 mg m(-2) (Gem+Cis), and surgery. Three alternate dosing sequences were used during cycle 1 to examine dynamic changes in molecular profiles. Of 65 women treated, 13 (24.5% of 53 patients with surgery) had a pCR and 22 (33.8%) had a complete clinical response. Patients administered Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 in cycle 1 (20 of 65) reported more toxicities, with G3/4 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia (7 of 20) as the most common cycle-1 event. Four drug-related deaths occurred. In 46 of 65 patients, 10-fold cross validated supervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that predicted with >or=73% accuracy (1) clinical complete response after eight cycles, (2) overall clinical complete response, and (3) pCR. This regimen shows strong activity. Patients receiving Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 experienced unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients on other sequences had manageable safety profiles. Gene expression patterns may predict benefit from gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant therapy.

Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer: A review of clinical trials and perspectives

Primary systemic therapy represents the standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer and has becoming an attractive alternative in earlier stages. A part from the proven advantage of increasing the rate of breast conservative surgery, the up front use of systemic therapy can allow for an in vivo test of treatment sensitivity, and response to primary treatment discriminates patients at different prognosis. This review will summarize the more relevant data on the preoperative treatment with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted agents.

Docetaxel/anthracycline combinations for breast cancer treatment

Anthracyclines and taxanes represent the most active group of cytotoxic agents for the treatment of breast cancer. Combining docetaxel with anthracyclines is widely used in the clinic, but, due to an overlap in toxicities this strategy remains somewhat challenging. Combinations of docetaxel with doxorubicin, epirubicin or liposomal doxorubicin in conventional or dose-dense cycles are reviewed in this article. A specific focus is given to the three-drug combination of docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC regimen), as it is registered for the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. Febrile neutropenia and associated toxicities are frequently associated with the TAC combination. However, when used as primary prophylaxis with granulocyte growth factors, as well as antibiotics, this regimen is considered as a safely-applicable standard option for early breast cancer treatment.

Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer: clinical data and biological fall-out

Primary systemic chemotherapy (PST) was first used in early 1970s for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer; in this setting primary chemotherapy was administered to allow for radical surgery and the objective response rates were high with a substantial proportion of patients amenable to surgery. On the basis of this activity, PST was subsequently used to treat operable locally advanced or large primary tumors to increase the rate of conservative surgery. First generation clinical trials demonstrated that breast conservation rates were improved, that a proportion of patients experienced a complete pathologic response and that response to PST was a good predictor of long term outcome. Second generation of clinical trials were designed to compare PST to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy: here again the rate of conservative surgery was significantly improved and the pathologic response rate demonstrated its prognostic value, however no progression free or survival improvement was obtained in comparison with postoperative treatments. Another interesting observation from these trials was that some tumor parameters (histology, grade, hormone receptor status) can predict the likelihood of achieving a pathologic complete response. On the basis of these data, PST can now be considered the standard of care for locally advanced disease, an reasonable option in case of large primary breast tumors not eligible for conservative surgery and an acceptable alternative for all the patients who are candidate to adjuvant treatment. It however clear that PST represents an excellent in vivo model to test new regimens, to evaluate biomarkers with predictive value and to evaluate the treatment induced modifications in tumor biology. Availability of new technologies able to measure the expression of thousands of genes and of new molecularly directed drugs will increase further the interest in this treatment strategy.

Gene Expression Signature Predicting Pathologic Complete Response With Gemcitabine, Epirubicin, and Docetaxel in Primary Breast Cancer

Purpose

Primary systemic therapy (PST) with gemcitabine (G), epirubicin (E), and docetaxel (Doc) has resulted in a pathologic complete response (pCR) in 26% of primary breast cancer patients. This study was aimed at the identification of a gene expression signature in diagnostic core biopsy tissue samples that predicts pCR.

Patients and Methods

Core biopsy samples from patients with operable primary breast cancer, T2-4N0-2M0, enrolled onto two phase I and II trials evaluating GEDoc (n = 48) and GE sequentially followed by Doc (GEsDoc; n = 52) as PST were snap frozen and subjected to RNA expression profiling. A signature predicting pCR was discovered in the training set (GEsDoc) applying a support vector machine algorithm, and performance of this classifier was validated on the independent test set (GEDoc) by receiver operator characteristics analysis.

Results

We identified a signature consisting of 512 genes, which was enriched in genes involved in transforming growth factor beta and RAS-mediated signaling pathways, that predicts pCR with a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 90%, and an overall accuracy of 88% (95% CI, 75% to 95%). Apart from our signature, only HER2 overexpression was an independent predictor of pCR in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our gene expression signature allows prediction of pCR to PST containing G, E, and Doc with unprecedented high overall accuracy and robustness.

Dose-dense primary systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus epirubicin sequentially followed by docetaxel for early breast cancer: final results of a phase I/II trial

We recruited 50 patients with T2-4 N0-2 M0 primary breast cancer into a phase I/II study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy and tolerability of preoperative gemcitabine (1250 mg/m fixed dose) plus epirubicin (doses escalated from 90 mg/m) for 5 cycles followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel (scheduled fixed dose 100 mg/m) given on day 1 every 2 weeks (q2w) with pegfilgrastim support. The MTD for epirubicin was 100 mg/m, but the docetaxel dose had to be reduced to 80 mg/m. Dose-limiting toxicities included fatigue, stomatitis, diarrhea and dyspnea (all grade 3) during gemcitabine plus epirubicin, and fatigue (grade 3) and allergic reaction (grade 4) during docetaxel treatment, respectively. A pathologic complete response could be achieved in 13 patients (pT0+pTis, 26%), and in the breast and axilla in 12 patients [(pT0 or pTis)+pN0, 24%). Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was possible in 35 patients (70%). Main grade 3/4 adverse events at MTD were fatigue (57/0%), leukopenia (27/8%), and liver (14/0%) and lung toxicity (14/0%). In conclusion, gemcitabine plus epirubicin 1250/100 mg/m q2w followed sequentially by docetaxel 80 mg/m q2w is highly effective as pre-operative chemotherapy with manageable toxicity. However, response and BCS rates could not be increased by administering gemcitabine plus epirubicin and docetaxel in a dose-dense fashion.

Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine, epirubicin and taxol (GET) in operable breast cancer: a phase II study

This trial was conducted to assess the activity and tolerability of the gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol triplet combination in patients with operable breast cancer. After core biopsy, 43 women with stage II-IIIA breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) over 30 min on days 1 and 4, epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) as an intravenous bolus on day 1, and taxol 175 mg m(-2) as a 3-h infusion on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was the percentage of pathological complete responses (pCR) in the breast; secondary end points were tolerability, clinical response rates, overall and progression-free survival, tumour biomarkers before and after primary chemotherapy (PCT). All patients were included in safety and survival analyses; 41 eligible patients were evaluated for response. The overall clinical response rate was 87.8% (95% CI 77.8-97.8), with 26.8% complete responses (95% CI 13.3-40.3). A pCR in the breast was observed in six patients (14.6%; 95% CI 3.8-25.4); 15 patients (36.6%; 95% CI 21.9-51.3) had negative axillary lymph nodes. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 67.4% of the patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 1.9% of cycles (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 3.2% of the cycles to shorten the duration of neutropenia). A statistically significant difference between Mib-1 at baseline (> or =20% in 71.4% of the patients) and at definitive surgery (28.6%, P < 0.05) was observed. The gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol regimen is active and well tolerated as PCT for operable breast cancer. This combination allows the administration of full doses of active agents with a low incidence of febrile neutropenia.