EORTC–GCG process quality indicators for ovarian cancer surgery

Effect of quality control program on surgical management in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of our quality control (QC) program on the management strategy, completeness of the surgery, and clinical outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records from January 2005 to December 2019 identified 129 patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Cases were categorized into group 1 (2005-2013) and group 2 (2014-2019) before and after implementation of the QC program. Comparisons included clinicopathological variables, operative details, recurrence and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

In Group 2 (n=44), after QC program implementation, primary debulking surgery (PDS) decreased (87.1% vs. 63.6%) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) increased (12.9% vs. 36.4%), indicating a shift in surgical strategy. Optimal resection rates improved significantly for PDS in group 2 (50.0% to 75.0%, p=0.007) and remained high for IDS in both groups (81.8% vs. 81.3%, p>0.999). Post-QC, advanced debulking procedures and co-operation with other departments increased in the IDS (p<0.05). Intra/post-operative complication rates were statistically comparable (p>0.05), whereas postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in group 2 (17 days vs. 22 days, p=0.001). Median recurrence-free survival increased after QC, although not statistically significant (19.18 months vs. 25.38 months, p=0.855).

CONCLUSION

With QC program, treatment strategies and clinical outcomes were significantly improved in advanced ovarian cancer. Systematic QC monitoring program should be considered as routine surveillance for better surgical outcomes.

Quality of surgery and treatment and its association with hospital volume: A population-based study in more than 5000 Belgian ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Different sets of quality indicators are used to identify areas for improvement in ovarian cancer care. This study reports transparently on how (surgical) indicators were measured and on the association between hospital volume and indicator results in Belgium, a country setting without any centralisation of ovarian cancer care.

METHODS

From the population-based Belgian Cancer Registry, patients with a borderline malignant or invasive epithelial ovarian tumour diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 were selected and linked to health insurance and vital status data (n = 5119). Thirteen quality indicators on diagnosis and treatment were assessed and the association with hospital volume was analysed using logistic regression adjusted for case-mix.

RESULTS

The national results for most quality indicators on diagnosis and systemic therapy were around the predefined target value. Other indicators showed results below the benchmark: genetic testing, completeness of staging surgery, lymphadenectomy with at least 20 pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes removed, and timely start of chemotherapy after surgery (within 42 days). Ovarian cancer care in Belgium is dispersed over 100 hospitals. Lower volume hospitals showed poorer indicator results compared to higher volume hospitals for lymphadenectomy, staging, timely start of chemotherapy and genetic testing. In addition, surgery for advanced stage tumours was performed less often in lower volume hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The indicators that showed poorer results on a national level were also those with poorer results in lower-volume hospitals compared to higher-volume hospitals, consequently supporting centralisation. International benchmarking is hampered by different (surgical) definitions between countries and studies.

Cytoreductive surgery for giant locally advanced intra-abdominal tumors in Uganda

Cytoreductive surgery is removal of tumor as much as possible when complete resection is impossible because of advanced disease. It is a management option for giant intra-abdominal tumors with pressure symptoms. We present three patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for giant intra-abdominal tumors between May 2019 and November 2021. Patient 1 had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) involving stomach, spleen and transverse colon. En bloc resection of the GIST with the involved viscera was done. Patient 2 had a liposarcoma measuring 25.8 × 19.6 × 15.3 cm infiltrating the stomach, spleen and the left hemidiaphragm. Involved viscera and liposarcoma were resected en bloc. Patient 3 had a liposarcoma measuring 40 × 35 × 12 cm and encasing the left ureter. Mass was excised together with part of the left ureter and left ureter reconstructed. Giant intra-abdominal tumors are rare. Involvement of adjacent structures may necessitate multivisceral resections with or without organ reconstruction.

Acceptability of quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer: results of an online survey

BACKGROUND

Measuring quality indicators (QI's) is a tool to improve the quality of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of 36 QI's, defined after a literature search for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer. Relevant specialists in the field of interest were surveyed.

METHODS

To quantify the opinions of these specialists, an online survey was sent out via mailing to members of gynaecological or oncological societies. The relevance of each QI was questioned on a scale from one to five (1 = irrelevant, 2 = less relevant, 3 = no opinion/neutral, 4 = relevant, 5 = very relevant). If a QI received a score of 4 or 5 in 65% or more of the answers, we state that the respondents consider this QI to be sufficiently relevant to use in daily practice.

RESULTS

The survey was visited 238 times and resulted in 53 complete responses (29 Belgian, 24 other European countries). The majority of the specialists were gynaecologists (45%). Five of the 36 QI's (13,9%) did not reach the cut-off of 65%: referral to a tertiary center, preoperative staging of endometrial cancer by MRI, preoperative staging of cervical cancer by positron-emission tomography, incorporation of intracavitary brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer, reporting ASA and WHO score for each patient. After removing the 5 QI's that were not considered as relevant by the specialists and 3 additional 3 QI's that we were considered to be superfluous, we obtained an optimized QI list.

CONCLUSION

As QI's gain importance in gynecological oncology, their use can only be of value if they are universally interpreted in the same manner. We propose an optimized list of 28 QI's for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer which responders of our survey found relevant. Further validation is needed to finalize and define a set of QI's that can be used in future studies, audits and benchmarking.

Clinical Outcome After Completion Surgery in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: The Charite Experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate surgical outcome and survival benefit after completion surgery.

METHODS

We evaluated 164 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent incomplete primary cytoreductive surgery or rather received only staging procedures from January 2000 to December 2014 in outside institutions. Patient-related data were registered in prospective database of Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer. The outcome analyses were performed for early and advanced stages of ovarian cancer separately.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were at the time of completion surgery in advanced stages of disease. From overall 111 advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients, 74 (66.6%) could be operated macroscopically tumor free, minimal residual disease 1 cm or less was achieved in 15.3% of the cases. Mean overall survival for patients without versus those with any tumor residual was 70 months (95% confidence interval, 61.3-81.5) versus 24.7 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1-42.4; P ≤ 0.0001). After applying completion surgery, 47 (28.6%) and 12 (6.7%) patients were upstaged in FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) IIIC and IV stages, respectively. Upstaging resulted in therapy changes in 10 patients (19%) with assumed FIGO IA stages. Major operative complications were registered in 28.8% of advanced cases, and 30-day mortality reached 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent research has shown that the most profound impact on survivorship occurs when women get proper care from surgeons trained in the latest techniques for treating ovarian cancer. Completion surgery maintained that even after initial incomplete cytoreduction outside of the high specialized units, after applying appropriate surgery techniques macroscopically, disease-free situation is achievable and outcomes are comparable with the results of primary debulking surgery.

Malignant Brenner tumor of the ovary: Case series and review of treatment strategies

Malignant Brenner tumor (MBTs) is a rare histological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, accounting for <0.05% of all ovarian neoplasms. As such, current evidence on the treatment of MBTs is predominantly limited to case studies and small case series. To add to existing literature, we performed a retrospective review of 10 cases of MBT diagnosed and treated at a single institution between 1999 and 2018. For the 10 cases included in our cohort, the median age was 64 and the median tumor stage was IIa/IIb. All patients underwent either a primary or interval debulking surgery and achieved an R0 resection per classifications set by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). Lymph node dissections were performed on 6 patients and found no evidence of positive nodal disease. 7 patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy and experienced a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 37 months. Recurrent disease was varied in terms of locoregional versus distant spread, and these patients had largely suboptimal responses to salvage chemotherapy with doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and eribulin. Sites of metastatic disease included the liver, lungs, bone, and brain. While there is no consensus for the optimal treatment of this rare disease, MBTs seem to respond well to adjuvant platinum-taxane treatment after complete surgical resection, consistent with the current management approach of other epithelial ovarian cancers. Recurrent disease is considerably more difficult to manage, and clinicians may consider a wider avenue of treatment options to include hormonal, biologic, and radiation therapies.

Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation

Background

Clinical variation in ovarian cancer care has been reported internationally. Using Wennberg’s classification of clinical variation as effective care we can conceptualise variation through deviation from clinical guidelines. The aim of this review was to address knowledge gaps in the effectiveness of attempts to reduce unwarranted clinical variation through addressing the following questions: What is the evidence of guideline adherence in ovarian cancer and its deviation?; what are the key factors associated with variation in guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?; and what quality improvement approaches have been used and what is the evidence of their effectiveness in enhancing guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?.

Methods

Keywords and synonyms for the major concepts of ovarian cancer, guideline adherence and safety were developed and combined to form the search strategy. Systematic searches of four electronic databases were undertaken of publications from January 2007 to November 2018. Retrieved articles were assessed against the eligibility criteria to determine those for inclusion.

Results

Thirty-two papers were included in the review with three broad groupings identified: adherence to and deviation from guidelines (either local, national or international guidelines); factors impacting guidelines adherence; and quality improvement approaches.

Conclusions

Unwarranted clinical variation may be used as a marker for the effectiveness of a health system, based on the outcome of this systematic review. This review found that the implementation of quality indicators through a formal quality improvement program lead to improvements in guideline adherent care. Further research on outcomes of implementing quality improvement programs in ovarian cancer care will improve the ability to implement centralised care and further identify factors that to improve outcomes in ovarian cancer care.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Optimization of surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a Spanish expert perspective

BACKGROUND

Optimal upfront treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer is complex and requires the adequate function of a multidisciplinary team. Specific standard of quality of care needs to be taken into consideration.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed was performed using the following criteria: ("ovarian neoplasms"[MeSH Terms] OR ("ovarian"[All Fields] AND "neoplasms"[All Fields]) OR "ovarian neoplasms"[All Fields] OR ("ovarian"[All Fields] AND "cancer"[All Fields]) OR "ovarian cancer"[All Fields])"[Date - Publication]: "2018/01/14"[Date - Publication]).

RESULTS

This article describes how to optimize the surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer, to achieve the best results in terms of survival and quality of life. For this purpose, this document will cover aspects related to pre-, intra- and postoperative care of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing upfront treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer is complex and requires a structured quality management program including the wise judgment of a multidisciplinary team. Surgeries performed by gynecologic oncologists with formal training in cytoreductive techniques at referral centers are crucial factors to obtain better clinical and oncological outcomes. However, other factors such as the patient's clinical status, the hospital infrastructure and equipment, as well as the tumor biology of each individual patient should also be taken into account before deciding on an initial therapeutic strategy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer to offer patients the best quality of care.

Surgery in ovarian cancer - Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus

Surgical management in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a significant impact in overall survival and progression-free survival. The Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) supported a taskforce of experts to reach a consensus: experienced and specialised trained surgeons, in cancer centres, provide the best EOC surgery. Laparoscopic and/or radiological staging prognosticates the possibility of complete cytoreduction (CC0) and helps to reduce unnecessary laparotomies. Surgical techniques were reviewed. Multidisciplinary input is essential for treatment planning. Quality assurance criteria are proposed and require national consensus. Genetic testing is mandatory. This consensus states the final recommendations from BSSO for management of EOC.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus for surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

Racial and ethnic disparities over time in the treatment and mortality of women with gynecological malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To examine temporal trends in treatment and survival among black, Asian, Hispanic, and white women diagnosed with endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), we identified women diagnosed with endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer. For each disease site, we analyzed race/ethnicity-specific trends in receipt of evidence-based practices. Professional societies' recommendations were used to define these practices. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2000-2009) we analyzed trends in 5-year survival.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period black (64.8%) and Hispanic (68.3%) women were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy for stage I ovarian cancer compared to Asian (79.5%) and white patients (74.6%). Black women were the least likely group to undergo lymphadenectomy in all periods. Among patients with stage II-IV ovarian cancer, 76.6% of white and Asian women received both surgery and chemotherapy, compared to 70.8% of black and 73.9% Hispanic women. Hispanic women with deeply invasive or high-grade stage I endometrial cancer underwent lymphadenectomy less frequently (74.5%) than all other groups (80.7%). Black women were less likely to have chemo-radiotherapy for stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer (75.6% versus 80.4% of all others). Black women were also less likely to have a surgical lymph node evaluation for vulvar cancer (58.8% versus 63.5% of all others). Among women diagnosed with ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, black women had lower five-year survival than other groups.

CONCLUSION

Significant racial disparities persist in the delivery of evidence-based care. Black women with ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer continue to experience higher cancer-specific mortality than other groups.

Association of Hospital Volume and Quality of Care With Survival for Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether strict adherence to quality metrics by hospitals could explain the association between hospital volume and survival for ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to perform a retrospective cohort study of women with ovarian cancer from 2004 to 2013. Hospitals were stratified by annual case volume into quintiles (2 or less, 2.01-5, 5.01-9, 9.01-19.9, 20 cases or greater) and by adherence to ovarian cancer quality metrics into quartiles. Hospital-level adjusted 2- and 5-year survival rates were compared based on volume and adherence to the quality metrics.

RESULTS

A total of 100,725 patients at 1,268 hospitals were identified. Higher volume hospitals were more likely to adhere to the quality metrics. Both 2- and 5-year survival increased with hospital volume and with adherence to the measured quality metrics. For example, 2-year survival increased from 64.4% (95% CI 62.5-66.4%) at low-volume to 77.4% (95% CI 77.0-77.8%) at high-volume centers and from 66.5% (95% CI 65.5-67.5%) at low-quality to 77.3% (95% CI 76.8-77.7%) at high-quality hospitals (P<.001 for both). For each hospital volume category, survival increased with increasing adherence to the quality metrics. For example, in the lowest volume hospitals (two or less cases annually), adjusted 2-year survival was 61.4% (95% CI 58.4-64.5%) at hospitals with the lowest adherence to quality metrics and rose to 65.8% (95% CI 61.2-70.8%) at the hospitals with highest adherence to the quality metrics (P<.001). However, lower volume hospitals with higher quality scores still had survival that was lower than higher volume hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Although both hospital volume and adherence to quality metrics are associated with survival for ovarian cancer, low-volume hospitals that provide high-quality care still have survival rates that are lower than high-volume centers.

Quality control in ovarian cancer surgery

The optimal surgical management of patients with ovarian cancer includes a thorough staging with peritoneal and retroperitoneal assessment for early disease stages and a complete debulking with the removal of all macroscopic tumor for advanced disease stages. Disparities across different institutions in terms of optimal surgical management have been described. Surgical quality control programs constitute a real possibility to ensure and improve the quality of the surgery performed. Guidelines for surgery in early and advanced disease stages have been recently reviewed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and several quality indicators (QIs) have been proposed. These QIs can be used as a powerful tool to monitor, compare, and improve the quality of surgery across different centers and institutions. Furthermore, a transparent report of surgical outcomes through the creation of National and International Networks, adherence to the NCCN guidelines, and the establishment of quality control programs with a strong training and education component are key factors in enhancing the quality of surgery for patients with ovarian cancer.

European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology Quality Indicators for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery

Objectives

The surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer involves complex surgery. Implementation of a quality management program has a major impact on survival. The goal of this work was to develop a list of quality indicators (QIs) for advanced ovarian cancer surgery that can be used to audit and improve the clinical practice. This task has been carried out under the auspices of the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO).

Methods

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. A 4-step evaluation process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and the documentation of scientific evidence, physical meetings of an ad hoc multidisciplinarity International Development Group, an internal validation of the targets and scoring system, and an external review process involving physicians and patients.

Results

Ten structural, process, or outcome indicators were selected. Quality indicators 1 to 3 are related to achievement of complete cytoreduction, caseload in the center, training, and experience of the surgeon. Quality indicators 4 to 6 are related to the overall management, including active participation to clinical research, decision-making process within a structured multidisciplinary team, and preoperative workup. Quality indicator 7 addresses the high value of adequate perioperative management. Quality indicators 8 to 10 highlight the need of recording pertinent information relevant to improvement of quality. An ESGO-approved template for the operative report has been designed. Quality indicators were described using a structured format specifying what the indicator is measuring, measurability specifications, and targets. Each QI was associated with a score, and an assessment form was built.

Conclusions

The ESGO quality criteria can be used for self-assessment, for institutional or governmental quality assurance programs, and for the certification of centers. Quality indicators and corresponding targets give practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes in the surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer.

Results of optimal debulking surgery with bowel resection in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer is based on maximal cytoreduction with widening the debulking on the extra-ovarian tissues and infiltrated organs. The purpose of the study was to assess the outcome after optimal cytoreduction with partial bowel resection and to find the risk factors of relapse. Another goal was the quantitative and qualitative assessment of intra- and postoperative complications in the studied group.

METHODS

The analysis of debulking procedures with intestinal resection and postoperative period in 33 ovarian cancer patients, The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III and IV, was performed.

RESULTS

The optimal cytoreduction defined as less than 1.0 cm residual disease was achieved in all patients including the following: 26 patients (78.8%) with no macroscopic residual disease, 4 patients (12.1%) with the largest residual tumor less than 0.5, and 3 patients (9.1%) with 0.5 cm to less than 1.0 cm residual disease. The rectosigmoid resection was the most common surgical procedure (n = 27). The risk of relapse was significantly higher in subjects who had the macroscopic residual tumor left during the primary operation (57.1 vs. 11.5%, P = 0.035). A primary bowel tumor size was another predictor of relapse. The maximum tumor diameter was significantly larger (14.9 ± 6.7 cm vs. 10.3 ± 4.7 cm, P = 0.047) in patients who developed the relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

As presented in the article, our outcomes and other authors' observations indicate that debulking surgery with bowel resection in patients with advanced ovarian cancer brings good results. Complications connected with bowel surgery are to be accepted. The interesting thing is that a primary bowel tumor size was a predictor of relapse.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Small Peritoneal Implants in "Potentially" Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer

Introduction. MRI is established modality for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancies. Advances in MRI technology, including DW imaging, could lead to the further increase in the sensitivity of MRI for the detection of peritoneal metastases. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of DW imaging for detection of peritoneal metastatic disease in patients suspected of having potentially early ovarian cancer and secondly to evaluate ADC values of peritoneal implants. Materials and Methods. The prospective study group consisted of 26 women with sonographic or/and CT diagnosis of suspected ovarian tumor. Based on the results of the above imaging, in none of them was extraovarian spread of disease or ascites recognized. All patients underwent MRI with DW imaging. Results. Overall, 18 extraovarian peritoneal lesions were found on DW images in 10 from 26 examined patients. All implants had diameter ≤10 mm. The presence of all lesions diagnosed by MRI was confirmed intraoperatively. Histopathologic findings in 17 proofs confirmed ovarian cancer. PPV was 94%. On all DW images (with b values of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, and 1200 s/mm²) the mean signal intensities of peritoneal lesions were significantly higher than the mean signal intensities of normal adjacent tissue (p = 0.000001).

Observed-to-expected ratio for adherence to treatment guidelines as a quality of care indicator for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To develop an observed-to-expected ratio (O/E) for adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) ovarian cancer treatment guidelines as a risk-adjusted hospital measure of quality care correlated with disease-specific survival.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with stages I-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were identified from the California Cancer Registry (1/1/96-12/31/06). Using a fit logistic regression model, O/E for guideline adherence was calculated for each hospital and distributed into quartiles stratified by hospital annual case volume: lowest O/E quartile or annual hospital case volume <5, middle two O/E quartiles and volume ≥5, and highest O/E quartile and volume ≥5. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to characterize the independent effect of hospital O/E on ovarian cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 18,491 patients were treated at 405 hospitals; 37.3% received guideline adherent care. Lowest O/E hospitals (n=285) treated 4661 patients (25.2%), mean O/E=0.77±0.55 and median survival 38.9months (95%CI=36.2-42.0months). Intermediate O/E hospitals (n=85) treated 8715 patients (47.1%), mean O/E=0.87±0.17 and median survival of 50.5months (95% CI=48.4-52.8months). Highest O/E hospitals (n=35) treated 5115 patients (27.7%), mean O/E=1.34±0.14 and median survival of 53.8months (95% CI=50.2-58.2months). After controlling for other variables, treatment at highest O/E hospitals was associated with independent and statistically significant improvement in ovarian cancer-specific survival compared to intermediate O/E (HR=1.06, 95% CI=1.01-1.11) and lowest O/E (1.16, 95% CI=1.10-1.23) hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculation of hospital-specific O/E for NCCN treatment guideline adherence, combined with minimum case volume criterion, as a measure of ovarian cancer quality of care is feasible and is an independent predictor of survival.

Reappraisal of mechanical exfoliating cytology for the detection of peritoneal dissemination during the surgical staging of epithelial ovarian carcinomas and borderline tumours

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the usability of peritoneal swabbing cytology (PSC) with cotton swabs as an effective method for the detection of peritoneal metastasis during the staging laparotomy of epithelial ovarian carcinomas and borderline tumours (EOC/BT).

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred and ninety-two patients with EOC/BT who underwent laparotomy at the Yokohama City University Hospital from 2004 to 2010 were analysed retrospectively. The positive rates of the PSC and ascites/peritoneal-wash cytology (A/PWC) were compared.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Both A/PWC and PSC were performed during laparotomy (n = 140). The rate of metastasis detection with A/PWC was significantly higher than with PSC (50.0 vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001 by χ(2) test). The superior detection ability of A/PWC was observed regardless of the presence of macroscopic peritoneal metastasis in 56 cases with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis, with A/PWC detecting 80.3% of cases versus PSC detecting 37.5% (p = 0.013). In 84 cases without macroscopic peritoneal metastasis, A/PWC detected 29.8% of cases versus 9.5% with PSC (p = 0.003). Our results suggest that PSC is insufficient to evaluate the peritoneal metastasis for the surgical staging of EOC/BT. Other procedures such as subdiaphragmatic A/PWC should be included when possible to maximize the accuracy of diagnosis.

Efficacy of a regional network for ovarian cancer care

OBJECTIVE

To study the influence of a regional collaboration in epithelial ovarian cancer care on staging procedures, debulking results, and survival.

METHODS

In an effort to optimize epithelial ovarian cancer treatment, a regional collaboration was introduced in the Netherlands in 2000. Gynecologic oncologists from the university center conducted surgery in community hospitals when ovarian cancer was considered based on the risk of malignancy index or clinical suspicion. The National Cancer Registry registered 1,554 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed in 11 participating Dutch hospitals between 1996 and 2010. Surgical procedures were compared during three periods (1996-1999, 2000-2004, and 2005-2009). Log-rank tests compared Kaplan-Meier survival curves of progression-free and overall survival before (1996-2000) and during the start of the collaboration (2001-2005).

RESULTS

Staging was adequate for 139 patients (23.0%) before collaboration, and this proportion increased during the study periods to 32.1% and 62.1% (P<.01), when gynecologic oncologists more often staged cancer in patients (36.7% compared with 54.7% and 80.6%; P<.01). For 1,197 patients with advanced stage disease (stage IIb or greater), the proportion of debulking procedures with an optimal (residual volume less than1 cm) as well as a complete result (no residuals) increased during the 14-year study period from 57.4% to 76.5% (P<.01) and from 24.1% to 43.4% (P<.01), respectively. Survival rates were similar before and during the start of the collaboration. In multivariable analysis, the treatment variables completeness of debulking, chemotherapy, and gynecologic oncologist attendance were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, as were age, stage, and tumor grade.

CONCLUSIONS

After regional collaboration, gynecologic oncologists attended more surgeries and surgical outcomes improved, but progress in survival could not be demonstrated. Regional collaboration improved care for ovarian cancer patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care

OBJECTIVES

To validate National Comprehensive Cancer Network ovarian cancer guideline adherence as a quality process measure associated with improved survival, and to identify structural health care characteristics predictive of adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2006 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care was defined by stage-appropriate surgical procedures and recommended chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics predictive of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline adherence and ovarian cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 13,321 patients were identified. Overall, 37.2% of patients received National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-adherent care. Guideline-adherent care was associated with high-volume hospitals (20 or more cases per year; 50.8% compared with 34.1%; P<.001) and high-volume physicians (10 or more cases per year; 47.6% compared with 34.5%; P<.001). After controlling for other factors, both low-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-2.01) and low-volume physicians (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32) were independently associated with deviation from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. On multivariable survival analysis, nonadherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care was associated with decreased disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.26-1.41). Both low-volume hospitals (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16) and low-volume physicians (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) were associated with decreased disease-specific survival after adjusting for National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-adherent care.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for treatment of ovarian cancer is correlated with improved survival and may be a useful process measure of quality cancer care. Ovarian cancer case volume correlates with a higher likelihood of recommended care and improved survival and may be a useful structural quality measure. Increased efforts to concentrate ovarian cancer care are warranted.

Quality of life of advanced ovarian cancer patients in the randomized phase III study comparing primary debulking surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The EORTC 55971 trial compared primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). The impact of both treatment arms on quality of life (QOL) is reported.

METHODS

Patients with stages IIIc or IV ovarian cancer completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 before treatment, at the third and sixth cycle of chemotherapy, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Data of 404 patients (N=201 PDS arm; N=203 IDS arm) were included in the QOL analysis. Between treatment arms no statistically significant differences were found in any of the QOL functioning scales. Patients showed a clinically relevant improvement (>10 points) on the global health/QOL, role functioning, emotional functioning and social functioning scales during and after treatment independent of the type of treatment. Clinically relevant differences from baseline to the follow-up assessments were noted for fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea indicating symptom control in both treatment arms. Institutions with good QOL compliance were associated with better outcomes. There was a statistical significant difference in the overall debulking status with 39.9% optimal debulking surgery in institutions with good QOL compliance compared to 19.9% in institutions with poor QOL compliance (p=0.0011). Overall survival (median 32.30 versus 23.29 months; p=0.0006) and progression free survival (median 12.35 versus 9.92 months; p=0.0002) were also significantly better.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival and QOL after NACT followed by surgery was similar to survival and QOL after PDS followed by chemotherapy. However, institutions with good QOL compliance had better survival outcomes.

Clinical governance network for clinical audit to improve quality in epithelial ovarian cancer management

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer. Several hospitals throughout the region provide primary treatment for these patients and it is well know that treatment quality is correlated to the hospital that delivers. The aim of this study was to investigate the management and treatment of EOC in a Region of the North Italy (Emilia-Romagna, Italy).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group made up of 11 physicians and 3 biostatisticians was formed in 2009 to perform clinical audits in order to identify quality indicators and to develop Region-wide workup in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM). The rationale was that, by setting up an oncogynecology network so as to achieve the best clinical practice, critical points would decrease or even be eliminated. Analysis of cases was based on the review of the medical records.

RESULTS

614 EOC patients treated between 2007 and 2008 were identified. We found only 2 high-volume hospitals (≥ 21 patients/year), 3 medium-volume hospitals (11-20 operated patients/year), and 7 low-volume hospitals (≤ 10 operated patients /year). Only 222 patients (76.3%) had a histological diagnosis, FIGO surgical staging was reported only in 206 patients (70.9%) but not all standard surgical procedures were always performed, residual disease were not reported in all patients. No standard number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in terms of treatments provided led the multidisciplinary group to identify reference centers, to promote centralization, to ensure uniform and adequate treatment to patients treated in regional centers and to promote a new audit involving all regional hospitals to a complete review of the all the EOC patients.

Surgical management of epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer affects approximately 21,880 women and accounts for over 13,000 deaths annually in the United States. Although survival rates have improved over the past several decades, directly as a result of advances in chemotherapy and surgery, ovarian cancer continues to have high mortality rates. Understanding the multiple roles of surgery throughout the disease course is the focus of this review.

Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: survey results from the members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the current opinion of the members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A link to a 21-item questionnaire, with questions about the management of patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, was sent 3 times to the ESGO members (N = 1177).

RESULTS

Of the 469 (40%) responding members, 70.2% believe there is sufficient evidence to use NACT followed by interval debulking for the treatment of stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer. On the basis of a multivariable logistic regression analysis, no relationships between the belief in evidence for NACT and practice type (P = 0.15) or level of experience (P = 0.41) were observed. Only 5.3% of respondents never use NACT, and 30% uses NACT in less than 10% of their patients. Optimal debulking, defined as "no macroscopic residual tumor," is reported in more than 60% of the patients by 20% of the respondents at primary debulking, and by 34.6% of the respondents when interval debulking is performed. Whether a patient can be optimally primarily debulked is impossible to determine preoperatively according to 51.1% of the respondents. Computed tomographic scan (79.4%) and clinical examination (72.5%) are regarded as the most important modalities to predict operability. Diagnostic laparoscopy is used by 46.3% of the respondents. The most important reasons for choosing NACT are bulky disease in the upper abdomen (64.7%) and stage IV disease (58.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Of the responding ESGO members, 70% believe there is sufficient evidence to treat patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer with NACT, and 30% uses NACT in less than 10% of their patients.

Uterine leiomyosarcoma diffusely express disialoganglioside GD2 and bind the therapeutic immunocytokine 14.18-IL2: implications for immunotherapy

Uterine leiomyosarcoma comprises <1 % of uterine malignancies and is known for its clinically aggressive course. Extrapelvic recurrences are common and often lethal. No adjuvant therapies have been shown to significantly improve overall survival, highlighting the need for new and novel therapies. Our objective was to determine whether GD2-specific immunocytokine therapy may be explored for the treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma. To do so, frozen tissue sections were obtained from the Gynecologic Oncology Group tumor bank and evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GD2 expression using both the parent mouse monoclonal antibody 14G2A and immunocytokine 14.18-IL2 generated from the 14G2A sequence. Immunoreactivity was detected by avidin-biotin complex with DAB substrate. Specimens were reviewed by a pathologist with light microscopy and classified as negative, 1+, 2+ or 3+, compared to human melanoma cells as positive control and tissue incubated in the absence of primary antibody as negative control. GD2 was diffusely present in all evaluable samples. 10 tumors (67 %) demonstrated 3+ IHC intensity for GD2, two tumors (13 %) demonstrated 2+ intensity, and 3 (20 %) tumors demonstrated 1+ intensity. Eleven cases had sufficient tissue to assess 14.18-IL2 binding. All 11 cases bound 14.18-IL2 in a pattern identical to the parent antibody. Uterine leiomyosarcoma diffusely express GD2 and bind the therapeutic immunocytokine 14.18-IL2. This warrants further exploration to determine whether immunocytokine therapy may have a clinical role in the management of these aggressive tumors.

HE4 combined with MDCT imaging is a good marker in the evaluation of disease extension in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the expression of the biomarkers CA125 and HE4 combined with imaging, in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Forty-six women with EOC were included in the study all affected with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Twenty-two of 46 patients (group I) had peritoneal carcinomatosis with small implants in single or in multiple sites (score 1); 24/46 patients (group II) had macro-nodular implants and omental thickening (score 2). High levels of CA125 (350 ± 11, mean ± SEM) have been observed in 21/22 patients of group I, and a similar value (370 ± 13) has been observed in all patients belonging to group II. HE4 positivity values (350 ± 9) have been observed in all group I patients, whereas all patients belonging to group II showed a higher value of HE4 (600 ± 12). Statistically significant differences were observed between the HE4 levels observed in group I patients in comparison with group II patients (p < 0.0001). In addition, we expressed the extension of lymph nodal disease in three scores: L1-L2-L3, and a statistically significant correlation was observed between high HE4 levels and severity of lymph nodal disease L3 (p < 0.0001). The availability of biomarkers, particularly HE4, together with sophisticated imaging techniques, strengthens the clinical relevance of this study, for the follow-up of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Improved 5-year disease-free survival for FIGO stage I epithelial ovarian cancer patients without tumor rupture during surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of perioperative capsule rupture on disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with FIGO stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC I).

METHODS

This prospective population-based study enrolled all 279 patients with EOC I diagnosed in Norway between 2002 and 2004. All patients underwent primary surgery. The data were collected from notification reports to the Norwegian Cancer Registry and included medical, surgical and histopathological records. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to show differences in DFS and CSS. Cox regression analyses were used to show the effect of prognostic factors on survival, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Significantly more patients in the capsule rupture group (Cr group) had clear cell tumors (28%) than in the FIGO stage IA and IB (AB group: 14%) groups, and the FIGO stage IC (C group: 17%; p<0.05) group. Despite adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), these patients had a poor 5-year DFS, 94% in the non-AC group and 81% in the AC group (p<0.01). After five years of follow-up, there was a lower DFS among patients in the Cr group (79%) and the C group (81%), compared with patients in the AB group (91%; p<0.05). Independent prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis were grade, histological type, ascites, adhesions, performance status, CA125 and DNA ploidy. After correcting for the four most important prognostic factors (grade, histological type, ascites, and DNA ploidy), the HR for recurrence was 4.0 (95% CI 1.3-12.7; p<0.05) for the Cr group and 1.8 (95% CI 0.5-6.1; p=0.3) for the C group, compared with the AB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement was observed in the 5-year DFS for EOC I patients without tumor rupture during surgery compared with those with tumor rupture. Since AC did not improve the long-term DFS and CSS rates, it is of utmost importance that surgeons avoid tumor rupture during surgery.

Evaluation of intraoperative and postoperative complications related to lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer patients

Assessment of the regional lymph node status is an integral part of diagnostics for ovarian cancer patients. Due to the risk of complications, lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer patients, as a routine treatment procedure, is still a subject of controversy. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the frequency and nature of intraoperative and postoperative complications in ovarian cancer patients treated with surgery. In addition, a comparison of the frequency and nature of surgical complications between patients who underwent lymphadenectomy and those who did not was carried out. A retrospective analysis of 211 consecutive ovarian cancer patients treated with surgery with pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy (group I), and 258 ovarian cancer patients treated with surgery but without lymphadenectomy (group II) was carried out. All of the patients were treated with complementary chemotherapy. The frequency and nature of the intraoperative and postoperative complications were determined. The most frequent intraoperative complications in the two groups were haemorrhage, urinary system damage and digestive tract damage. The difference in the frequency and nature between the groups was not statistically significant (p=0.683). The most frequent postoperative complications were haemorrhage, intestinal junction dehiscence, eventrations, wound dehiscence, anaemia, wound healing complications and intestinal fistulas. Haemorrhage, eventrations and wound healing complications were more frequent in group I. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.002). Due to postoperative complications, reoperative procedures were necessary in two women in group II (0.78) and in 15 women (7.11%) in group I. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.000). In conclusion, the most frequent intraoperative complications were haemorrhage, urinary system damage and digestive tract damage. The frequency of complication was found to be similar in the two groups. A statistically significant higher rate of postoperative complications, such as haemorrhage, eventrations and wound healing complications was confirmed in the lymphadenectomy group.

Patterns of care in surgery for ovarian cancer in Europe

Quality of surgery is one of the most important determinants of the outcome in ovarian cancer patients. Surgery by a gynaecological oncologist in a specialised, high-volume environment and removal of all visible tumours are associated with a higher likelihood of favourable outcome for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Population-based studies in Europe however show that a substantial number of patients do not receive optimal surgical care. Less than half of the patients suffering from advanced-stage ovarian cancer are operated by a gynaecological oncologists. Also the proportion of patients operated in a high-volume or specialised hospital is lower than 50%. In a substantial number of patients, minimum standard procedures are not performed and optimal tumor debulking is not achieved. To improve the quality of care, efforts are needed to develop and implement robust evidence-based European guidelines, provide surgical training for gynaecological oncologists and establish comprehensive cancer networks with sufficient resources.