1
|
Turner BM, Finkelman BS, Hicks DG, Numbereye N, Moisini I, Dhakal A, Skinner K, Sanders MAG, Wang X, Shayne M, Schiffhauer L, Katerji H, Zhang H. The Rochester Modified Magee Algorithm (RoMMa): An Outcomes Based Strategy for Clinical Risk-Assessment and Risk-Stratification in ER Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients Being Considered for Oncotype DX ® Testing. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030903. [PMID: 36765860 PMCID: PMC9913115 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multigene genomic profiling has become the standard of care in the clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of ER+, HER2- breast cancer (BC) patients, with Oncotype DX® (ODX) emerging as the genomic profile test with the most support from the international community. The current state of the health care economy demands that cost-efficiency and access to testing must be considered when evaluating the clinical utility of multigene profile tests such as ODX. Several studies have suggested that certain lower risk patients can be identified more cost-efficiently than simply reflexing all ER+, HER2- BC patients to ODX testing. The Magee equationsTM use standard histopathologic data in a set of multivariable models to estimate the ODX recurrence score. Our group published the first outcome data in 2019 on the Magee equationsTM, using a modification of the Magee equationsTM combined with an algorithmic approach-the Rochester Modified Magee algorithm (RoMMa). There has since been limited published outcome data on the Magee equationsTM. We present additional outcome data, with considerations of the TAILORx risk-stratification recommendations. METHODS 355 patients with an ODX recurrence score, and at least five years of follow-up or a BC recurrence were included in the study. All patients received either Tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. None of the patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence in similar risk categories (very low risk, low risk, and high risk) between the average Modified Magee score and ODX recurrence score with the chi-square test of independence (p > 0.05) or log-rank test (p > 0.05). Using the RoMMa, we estimate that at least 17% of individuals can safely avoid ODX testing. CONCLUSION Our study further reinforces that BC patients can be confidently stratified into lower and higher-risk recurrence groups using the Magee equationsTM. The RoMMa can be helpful in the initial clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of BC patients, providing increased opportunities for cost savings in the health care system, and for clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification in less-developed geographies where multigene testing might not be available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley M. Turner
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(585)-275-2228; Fax: +1-(585)-341-6725
| | - Brian S. Finkelman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| | - David G. Hicks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| | - Numbere Numbereye
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| | - Ioana Moisini
- M. Health Fairview Ridges, Burnsville, MN 55337, USA
| | - Ajay Dhakal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Kristin Skinner
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Mary Ann G. Sanders
- Norton Healthcare, University of Louisville Department of Pathology, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| | - Michelle Shayne
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Linda Schiffhauer
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| | - Hani Katerji
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| | - Huina Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Low correlation between Ki67 assessed by qRT-PCR in Oncotype Dx score and Ki67 assessed by Immunohistochemistry. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3617. [PMID: 35256657 PMCID: PMC8901910 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07593-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancers expressing high levels of Ki67 are associated with poor outcomes. Oncotype DX test was designed for ER+/HER2- early-stage breast cancers to help adjuvant chemotherapy decision by providing a Recurrent Score (RS). RS measures the expression of 21 specific genes from tumor tissue, including Ki67. The primary aim of this study was to assess the agreement between Ki67RNA obtained with Oncotype DX RS and Ki67IHC. Other objectives were to analyze the association between the event free survival (EFS) and the expression level of Ki67RNA; and association between RS and Ki67RNA. Herein, we report a low agreement of 0.288 by Pearson correlation coefficient test between Ki67IHC and Ki67RNA in a cohort of 98 patients with early ER+/HER2- breast cancers. Moreover, Ki67RNAhigh tumors were significantly associated with the occurrence of events (p = 0.03). On the other hand, we did not find any association between Ki67IHC and EFS (p = 0.26). We observed a low agreement between expression level of Ki67RNA and Ki67 protein labelling by IHC. Unlike Ki67IHC and independently of the RS, Ki67RNA could have a prognostic value. It would be interesting to better assess the prognosis and predictive value of Ki67RNA measured by qRT-PCR. The Ki67RNA in medical routine could be a good support in countries where Oncotype DX is not accessible.
Collapse
|
3
|
Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Breast Cancer Patients With 1-3 Positive Nodes: A Prospective Clinical Utility Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e74-e79. [PMID: 34690081 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is emerging in node-positive estrogen receptor (ER)+ HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), particularly as initial data from the RxPONDER trial are now available. We investigated the impact of the RS result on adjuvant treatment decisions in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective, multi-center study enrolled patients with ER+, HER2-negative BC and 1 to 3 positive nodes (microscopic [N1mi] or macroscopic [N1]). Treating oncologists documented treatment recommendations/plan before and after knowing the RS result. Sample size was determined assuming an overall treatment change rate (from chemohormonal therapy [CHT] to hormone therapy [HT] and vice-versa) of ≥30%. RESULTS The study included 84 patients across 5 regional cancer centers, of whom 82 underwent 21-gene testing (77%, N1 disease; 63% grade 2 tumors). Of the RS-tested patients, 60%, 33%, and 7% had RS 0 to 17, 18 to 30, and 31 to 100, respectively. In 43 patients (52%), treatment changed post-RS: 40 patients (49%) from CHT to HT and 3 patients (4%) from HT to CHT. The net change was a 45% reduction in chemotherapy use. Treatment recommendation changes were consistent with the RS result. In RS 0 to 17 patients, the only documented change was from CHT to HT (27 patients). In RS 18-30 patients, change was noted in both directions (CHT-to-HT, 13 patients; HT-to-CHT, 3 patients). No treatment change was reported for the RS 31 to 100 patients, all of whom were recommended CHT pre-testing. CONCLUSION Our results support the clinical utility of the RS assay in ER+ HER2-negative BC with 1 to 3 positive nodes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gomez HL, Bargallo-Rocha JE, Billinghurst RJ, Núñez De Pierro AR, Coló FA, Gil LLB, Allemand C, McLean IL, Lema-Medina M, Herazo-Maya F, Terrier FJ, Cwilich RG, Leon M, Falcon SG, Castaño RE, Oliveira SC, Jakubowski DM, Chao C. Practice-Changing Use of the 21-Gene Test for the Management of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Latin America. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:1364-1373. [PMID: 34506221 PMCID: PMC8440019 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We present a physician survey of the impact of 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score test results on treatment decisions in clinical practice in Latin America. METHODS This prospective survey enrolled consecutive patients at 14 sites in Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru who had routine 21-gene testing. Physician surveys captured patient and tumor characteristics and treatment decisions before and after 21-gene test results. The survey spanned the period before and after Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) results reported (June 2018). Overall net percent change in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations was estimated, and asymptotic 95% CIs with continuity correction were calculated. The proportion with a change between pretest treatment recommendation and actual treatment received was calculated overall and by Recurrence Score groups per TAILORx. RESULTS Between March 2015 and December 2019, the survey was completed for 647 patients; 20% were node-positive. The mean patient age was 54 years (24-85 years); 55% were postmenopausal; 17%, 63%, and 20% had grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively; and 30% had tumors > 2 cm. Recurrence Score (RS) results were as follows: 20% RS 0-10, 56% RS 11-25, and 24% RS 26-100. Overall, chemotherapy recommendations fell by a relative proportion of 39% (95% CI, 33.4 to 44.3) after 21-gene testing (33% decrease in node-negative and 55% decrease in node-positive). Among node-negative patients, the relative decrease in chemotherapy recommendations was 28% (95% CI, 18.9 to 39.5) before TAILORx and 36% (95% CI, 28.4 to 43.7) after. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this large survey of 21-gene test practice patterns was the first conducted in Latin America and showed the relevance of 21-gene testing in low- and medium-resource countries to minimize chemotherapy overuse and underuse in breast cancer. The results showed substantial reductions in chemotherapy use overall—especially after TAILORx reported—indicating the practice-changing potential of that study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry L Gomez
- Oncosalud-AUNA, Lima, Peru.,Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Francisco J Terrier
- Breast-Clínica de la Mama y Hospital Italiano de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Calvin Chao
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giorgi Rossi P, Lebeau A, Canelo-Aybar C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Quinn C, Langendam M, Mcgarrigle H, Warman S, Rigau D, Alonso-Coello P, Broeders M, Graewingholt A, Posso M, Duffy S, Schünemann HJ. Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1503-1512. [PMID: 33597715 PMCID: PMC8076250 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Predicting the risk of recurrence and response to chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer is crucial to optimise adjuvant treatment. Despite the common practice of using multigene tests to predict recurrence, existing recommendations are inconsistent. Our aim was to formulate healthcare recommendations for the question “Should multigene tests be used in women who have early invasive breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy?” Methods The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Guidelines Development Group (GDG), a multidisciplinary guideline panel including experts and three patients, developed recommendations informed by systematic reviews of the evidence. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Four multigene tests were evaluated: the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS), the 70-gene signature (70-GS), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (PAM50-RORS), and the 12-gene molecular score (12-MS). Results Five studies (2 marker-based design RCTs, two treatment interaction design RCTs and 1 pooled individual data analysis from observational studies) were included; no eligible studies on PAM50-RORS or 12-MS were identified and the GDG did not formulate recommendations for these tests. Conclusions The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 21-RS for lymph node-negative women (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence), recognising that benefits are probably larger in women at high risk of recurrence based on clinical characteristics. The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 70-GS for women at high clinical risk (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), and recommends not using 70-GS in women at low clinical risk (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health, PhD Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. .,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Health Technology Assessment Agency, Avenida Monforte de Lemos 5, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sue Warman
- Havyatt Lodge, Havyatt Road, Langford, North Somerset, UK
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireille Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McGRADE Centres; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nichols BS, Chelales E, Wang R, Schulman A, Gallagher J, Greenup RA, Geradts J, Harter J, Marcom PK, Wilke LG, Ramanujam N. Quantitative assessment of distant recurrence risk in early stage breast cancer using a nonlinear combination of pathological, clinical and imaging variables. JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS 2020; 13:e201960235. [PMID: 32573935 PMCID: PMC8521784 DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201960235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Use of genomic assays to determine distant recurrence risk in patients with early stage breast cancer has expanded and is now included in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. Algorithmic alternatives using standard clinical and pathology information may provide equivalent benefit in settings where genomic tests, such as OncotypeDx, are unavailable. We developed an artificial neural network (ANN) model to nonlinearly estimate risk of distant cancer recurrence. In addition to clinical and pathological variables, we enhanced our model using intraoperatively determined global mammographic breast density (MBD) and local breast density (LBD). LBD was measured with optical spectral imaging capable of sensing regional concentrations of tissue constituents. A cohort of 56 ER+ patients with an OncotypeDx score was evaluated. We demonstrated that combining MBD/LBD measurements with clinical and pathological variables improves distant recurrence risk prediction accuracy, with high correlation (r = 0.98) to the OncotypeDx recurrence score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon S. Nichols
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Erika Chelales
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Roujia Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amanda Schulman
- Department of Surgery, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer Gallagher
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rachel A. Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joseph Geradts
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Josephine Harter
- Department of Pathology, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Paul K. Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lee G. Wilke
- Department of Surgery, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Nirmala Ramanujam
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harnan S, Tappenden P, Cooper K, Stevens J, Bessey A, Rafia R, Ward S, Wong R, Stein RC, Brown J. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-328. [PMID: 31264581 DOI: 10.3310/hta23300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer and its treatment can have an impact on health-related quality of life and survival. Tumour profiling tests aim to identify whether or not women need chemotherapy owing to their risk of relapse. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the tumour profiling tests oncotype DX® (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA), MammaPrint® (Agendia, Inc., Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Prosigna® (NanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), EndoPredict® (Myriad Genetics Ltd, London, UK) and immunohistochemistry 4 (IHC4). To develop a health economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of these tests compared with clinical tools to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services. DESIGN A systematic review and health economic analysis were conducted. REVIEW METHODS The systematic review was partially an update of a 2013 review. Nine databases were searched in February 2017. The review included studies assessing clinical effectiveness in people with oestrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, stage I or II cancer with zero to three positive lymph nodes. The economic analysis included a review of existing analyses and the development of a de novo model. RESULTS A total of 153 studies were identified. Only one completed randomised controlled trial (RCT) using a tumour profiling test in clinical practice was identified: Microarray In Node-negative Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy (MINDACT) for MammaPrint. Other studies suggest that all the tests can provide information on the risk of relapse; however, results were more varied in lymph node-positive (LN+) patients than in lymph node-negative (LN0) patients. There is limited and varying evidence that oncotype DX and MammaPrint can predict benefit from chemotherapy. The net change in the percentage of patients with a chemotherapy recommendation or decision pre/post test ranged from an increase of 1% to a decrease of 23% among UK studies and a decrease of 0% to 64% across European studies. The health economic analysis suggests that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the tests versus current practice are broadly favourable for the following scenarios: (1) oncotype DX, for the LN0 subgroup with a Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) of > 3.4 and the one to three positive lymph nodes (LN1-3) subgroup (if a predictive benefit is assumed); (2) IHC4 plus clinical factors (IHC4+C), for all patient subgroups; (3) Prosigna, for the LN0 subgroup with a NPI of > 3.4 and the LN1-3 subgroup; (4) EndoPredict Clinical, for the LN1-3 subgroup only; and (5) MammaPrint, for no subgroups. LIMITATIONS There was only one completed RCT using a tumour profiling test in clinical practice. Except for oncotype DX in the LN0 group with a NPI score of > 3.4 (clinical intermediate risk), evidence surrounding pre- and post-test chemotherapy probabilities is subject to considerable uncertainty. There is uncertainty regarding whether or not oncotype DX and MammaPrint are predictive of chemotherapy benefit. The MammaPrint analysis uses a different data source to the other four tests. The Translational substudy of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (TransATAC) study (used in the economic modelling) has a number of limitations. CONCLUSIONS The review suggests that all the tests can provide prognostic information on the risk of relapse; results were more varied in LN+ patients than in LN0 patients. There is limited and varying evidence that oncotype DX and MammaPrint are predictive of chemotherapy benefit. Health economic analyses indicate that some tests may have a favourable cost-effectiveness profile for certain patient subgroups; all estimates are subject to uncertainty. More evidence is needed on the prediction of chemotherapy benefit, long-term impacts and changes in UK pre-/post-chemotherapy decisions. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017059561. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Harnan
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Paul Tappenden
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katy Cooper
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Stevens
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alice Bessey
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rachid Rafia
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sue Ward
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert C Stein
- University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.,Research Department of Oncology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Janet Brown
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Association of 21-Gene Assay (OncotypeDX) Testing and Receipt of Chemotherapy in the Medicare Breast Cancer Patient Population Following Initial Adoption. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20:487-494.e1. [PMID: 32653473 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective was to investigate why early studies regarding adoption of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay did not show an initial reduction in the number of patients with breast cancer receiving real-world chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We addressed 2 sources of confounding suspected in previous studies: (1) the early time frame during the initial adoption phase of the RS assay, and (2) suspected selective, increased administration to patients more likely to have been chemotherapy candidates. To address selective use during initial adoption, we used updated SEER-Medicare data from 2004 and 2011. To address individual selection bias, we examined whether RS test utilization was negatively associated with rates of local chemotherapy use assessed at the hospital referral region level using conventional ordinary least squares and instrumental variable approaches to adjust for selection bias. RESULTS A total of 26,009 patients met inclusion criteria. Assay use was associated with a decrease in absolute percentage use of chemotherapy of 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-5.7%), which was even more pronounced in sensitivity analyses limited to later study years (2008-2011), with a decrease of 6.8% (95% CI, 5.3%-8.3%). Instrumental variable models yielded similar point estimates but were insufficiently powered to draw conclusions. CONCLUSION Receipt of the 21-gene assay was associated with decreased utilization of chemotherapy by 2008.
Collapse
|
9
|
Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score®: A Review of its Use in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Mol Diagn Ther 2020; 24:621-632. [DOI: 10.1007/s40291-020-00482-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
10
|
Goldstein DA, Mayer C, Shochat T, Reinhorn D, Moore A, Sarfaty M, Yerushalmi R, Goldvaser H. The concordance of treatment decision guided by OncotypeDX and the PREDICT tool in real-world early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Med 2020; 9:4603-4612. [PMID: 32372569 PMCID: PMC7333833 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decision‐making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early‐stage breast cancer can be guided by genomic assays such as OncotypeDX. The concordance of expected clinical decisions guided by OncotypeDX and prognostication online tools such as PREDICT is unknown. Methods We performed a retrospective single‐center cohort study comprising all women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, node negative disease, whose tumors were sent for OncotypeDX analysis. Expected decision on adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated using OncotypeDX and using PREDICT. The concordance between these two tools was calculated. The impact on concordance of prespecified features was assessed, including age, tumor size, intensity of ER and progesterone receptor (PR), grade, Ki67 and perineural and lymphovascular invasion. Results A total of 445 women were included. Overall concordance was 75% (K = 0.284). The concordance was significantly higher for grade 1 disease compared to grade 2‐3 (93% vs 72%, P < .001), tumor ≤ 1 cm compared to >1 cm (85% vs 72%, P = .009), PR positive compared to PR negative (78% vs 58%, P < .001) and ki67 < 10% compared to ≥10% (92% vs 63%, P < .001). The intensity of ER and the presence of perineural or lymphovascular invasion had no significant impact on concordance. Conclusions Compared to PREDICT, using OncotypeDx in node negative, ER positive disease is expected to change the clinical decision in a quarter of patients. The concordance between OncotypeDx and PREDICT is influenced by pathological features. In patients with very low risk, treatment decisions may be made based solely on clinical risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Goldstein
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Chen Mayer
- Department of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Tzippy Shochat
- Statistical Consulting Unit, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel
| | - Daniel Reinhorn
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Assaf Moore
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michal Sarfaty
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rinat Yerushalmi
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hadar Goldvaser
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Willemsma K, Yip W, LeVasseur N, Dobosz K, Illmann C, Baxter S, Lohrisch C, Simmons CE. Impact of Recurrence Score on type and duration of chemotherapy in breast cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 27:e86-e92. [PMID: 32489257 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background The use of Oncotype dx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.) testing has been shown to change treatment decisions in approximately 30% of breast cancer (bca) cases, but research on how Recurrence Score testing has affected the type of chemotherapy offered is limited. We sought to determine if the availability of Oncotype dx testing resulted in a change to the type and duration of chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive bca. Methods In a population-based cohort study, patients treated in the 2 years before the availability of Oncotype dx testing were compared with patients treated in the 2 years after testing availability. Charts were audited and divided into 2 groups: pre-Oncotype dx and post-Oncotype dx. The groups were compared for differences in duration of chemotherapy (12 weeks vs. >12 weeks), types of agents used (anthracycline vs. non-anthracycline), and myelosuppressive potential of the chosen regimen. Results Of 834 patients who fulfilled the enrolment criteria, 360 fell into the pre-Oncotype dx era, and 474, into the post-Oncotype dx era. An increase of 11.2 percentage points, to 69.5% from 58.3%, was observed in the proportion of patients receiving short-course compared with long-course chemotherapy (p = 0.068). The proportion of patients prescribed anthracycline-containing regimens declined in the post-Oncotype dx era (47.7% pre vs. 32.2% post, p = 0.016). The selection of more-myelosuppressive chemotherapy protocols increased in the post-Oncotype dx era (67.4% pre vs. 78.8% post, p = 0.044). Conclusions In the present study, the availability of Oncotype dx testing was observed to influence the choice of chemotherapy type in the setting of early-stage bca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Willemsma
- Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
| | - W Yip
- Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
| | | | - K Dobosz
- Cancer Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - C Illmann
- Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Robertson SJ, Pond GR, Hilton J, Petkiewicz SL, Ayroud Y, Kos Z, Gravel DH, Stober C, Vandermeer L, Arnaout A, Clemons M. Selecting Patients for Oncotype DX Testing Using Standard Clinicopathologic Information. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20:61-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
13
|
Wu SG, Zhang WW, Wang J, Lian CL, Sun JY, Chen YX, He ZY. Progesterone receptor status and tumor grade predict the 21-gene recurrence score of invasive lobular breast cancer. Biomark Med 2019; 13:1005-1012. [PMID: 31234641 DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2019-0209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess the association between established clinicopathological variables and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) stratification of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. Materials & methods: We identified 9030 ILC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Results: Older age, higher grade tumor and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative disease were independent predictors of high-risk RS stratification. Among patients with PR-positive tumors, 3, 6 and 15% with well-differentiated (G1), moderately-differentiated (G2) and poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3) disease were in the high-risk cohort, respectively. In patients with PR-negative tumors: 16, 24 and 41% of patients with G1, G2 and G3 disease were in the high-risk cohort, respectively. Conclusion: The 21-gene RS testing may not be necessary for patients with PR+/G1-2 ILC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, 361003, PR China
| | - Wen-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong, 510060, PR China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, 361003, PR China
| | - Chen-Lu Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, 361003, PR China
| | - Jia-Yuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong, 510060, PR China
| | - Yong-Xiong Chen
- Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Medical College, Xiamen University, Fujian, 361005, PR China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong, 510060, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Robertson SJ, Ibrahim MFK, Stober C, Hilton J, Kos Z, Mazzarello S, Ramsay T, Fergusson D, Vandermeer L, Mallick R, Arnaout A, Dent SF, Segal R, Sehdev S, Gertler S, Hutton B, Clemons M. Does integration of Magee equations into routine clinical practice affect whether oncologists order the Oncotype DX test? A prospective randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 2019; 25:196-204. [PMID: 30672056 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The three Magee Equations provide an estimate of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using commonly available clinicopathologic information (tumour size, grade, oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki67). We assessed whether integration of Magee Equations into routine clinical practice affected the frequency of Oncotype DX requests. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed, node negative, hormone receptor positive, and HER2 negative invasive breast cancer were randomized to undergo a Magee calculation or not. At the first clinic assessment, the oncologist was provided with all routinely available clinicopathologic information (including Ki67) either with or without the results of Magee Equations. Primary outcome was frequency of Oncotype DX ordering. Secondary outcomes included frequency of chemotherapy use, time to commencement of radiotherapy, or systemic therapy. Physician comfort with systemic therapy choices and the use of Ki67 and Magee Equations was also assessed. RESULTS Data from 175 randomized patients was available, 84 patients (48%) with and 91 (52%) without calculated Magee Equations. Oncotype DX was ordered in 10 (12.05%) and 13 (14.44%) (RR 0.83, 0.39-1.80; P = 0.64) in the Magee and no Magee groups, respectively. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the randomized groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Availability of both Ki67 and Magee Equations was associated with increased physician comfort around systemic treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS In a practice where Ki67 is routinely available, addition of Magee Equations into routine clinic practice was not associated with a reduction in Oncotype DX use. Availability of both Ki67 and Magee Equations did however increase physician comfort with systemic therapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan J Robertson
- Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mohammed F K Ibrahim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Carol Stober
- Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - John Hilton
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sasha Mazzarello
- Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tim Ramsay
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dean Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ranjeeta Mallick
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Angel Arnaout
- Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Susan F Dent
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Roanne Segal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sandeep Sehdev
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Stan Gertler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Curtit E, Vannetzel JM, Darmon JC, Roche S, Bourgeois H, Dewas S, Catala S, Mereb E, Fanget CF, Genet D, Forest AM, Bernier C, Pivot X. Results of PONDx, a prospective multicenter study of the Oncotype DX ® breast cancer assay: Real-life utilization and decision impact in French clinical practice. Breast 2019; 44:39-45. [PMID: 30634106 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy shows clear benefits in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Its benefits are less universal in BCs expressing hormone receptors. The 21-gene Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score test was designed for HR+, HER2- early-stage BC before decision on adjuvant chemotherapy. Its validity and utility was demonstrated prospectively across multiple studies. The observational study PONDx characterized the use of Oncotype DX® Breast in routine practice in France and evaluated its decision impact. Of 882 ER-positive BC patients (67% postmenopausal), most (79%) had N0/Nmic node involvement, grade 2 tumors (68%), tumor size 1-5 cm (88%), and ductal histology (78%). BCs with histopathologically elevated recurrence risk included grade 3: 18%; N1: 21%; Ki67 > 20%: 31%. Recurrence Score results by prognostic category were: <18: 54%, 18-30: 36%; >30: 10%. Compared to recommendations before individual availability of the score, results prompted net absolute reductions in chemotherapy recommendations of 36% (total population), and 29% (grade 3 and/or Ki67 > 20% histologies). Decisions reflected prognostic implications: in the Recurrence Score <18 category, 95% of patients received recommendations of hormonal therapy only, in the >30 category, 97.5% were recommended additional chemotherapy; 95% followed the final recommendations of their physicians. The Recurrence Score provides independent predictive and prognostic information in ER + N0/N1 early BC, including high-risk subgroups. PONDx further characterizes the population where the test is beneficial in real-life use and fits current clinical needs. Oncotype DX® Breast enables relevant net reductions in chemotherapy use, sparing patients from serious toxicities. Its therapeutic implications are highly accepted by physicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa Curtit
- Institut Régional Fédératif du Cancer pour la Région Franche-Comté, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Pôle Cancero-Biologie, 2 Bd Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
| | | | - Jean-Claude Darmon
- ICA-Polyclinique Urbain V, 95 Chemin du Pont des Deux Eaux, 84000, Avignon, France.
| | - Sophie Roche
- Centre Jean Bernard, 9 Rue Beauverger, 72000, Le Mans, France.
| | | | - Sylvain Dewas
- Centre Bourgogne - Polyclinique du Bois, 44 Avenue Marx Dormoy, 59000, Lille, France.
| | - Stéphanie Catala
- Centre Catalan d'Oncologie, 80 Rue Pascal Marie Agasse, 66000, Perpignan, France.
| | - Emile Mereb
- Hôpital Manchester - Centre Hospitalier de Charleville-Mézières, 45 Avenue de Manchester, Charleville-Mézières, France.
| | - Charlotte Furtos Fanget
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108bis Avenue Albert Raimond, 42270, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
| | - Dominique Genet
- Clinique François Chenieux, 18 Rue du Général Catroux, 87000, Limoges, France.
| | - Anne-Marie Forest
- Centre Hospitalier de Montluçon 18, Avenue du 8 Mai 1945, 03113, Montluçon, France.
| | - Céline Bernier
- 3C Sud Ile de France, Centre de Coordination en Cancérologie Inter-établissements, Centre Hospitalier de Bligny, 91640, Briis-sous-Forges, France.
| | - Xavier Pivot
- Institut Régional du Cancer, 3 Rue de la Porte de l'hôpital, 67065, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cheng V, Markarian A, de Lemos ML, Schaff K. Evaluation of the role of pharmacy technicians in reviewing the eligibility for Oncotype DX genomic test and the impact of the test on treatment plans in breast cancer patients. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2018; 25:1167-1173. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155218803703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
17
|
Wang SY, Dang W, Richman I, Mougalian SS, Evans SB, Gross CP. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1619-1627. [PMID: 29659329 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.5941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Prior studies examining cost effectiveness of the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX [ODX]) for women with hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer have yielded disparate results. We aimed to explore why these analyses may have yielded different conclusions. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of ODX. We examined the extent to which the structure of CEA modeling, the assumptions of the models, and the selection of input parameters influenced cost-effectiveness estimates. We also explored the prevalence of industry funding and whether industry funding was associated with study designs favoring ODX. Results We identified 27 analyses, 15 of which received industry funding. In 18 studies, the clinical characteristics (eg, tumor size and grade) commonly used to make chemotherapy decisions were not incorporated into simulation modeling; thus, these studies would favor ODX being cost effective and might not reflect clinical practice. Most studies ignored the heterogeneous effect of ODX on chemotherapy use; only five studies assumed that ODX would increase chemotherapy use for clinically low-risk patients but decrease chemotherapy use for clinically high-risk patients. No study used population-based joint distributions of ODX recurrence score and tumor characteristics, and 12 studies inappropriately assumed that chemotherapy would increase distant recurrence for the low recurrence score group; both approaches overestimated the benefits of ODX. Industry-funded studies tended to favor ODX; all five studies that reported ODX as being cost saving were industry funded. In contrast, two studies that reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio > $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year were not funded by industry. Conclusion Although a majority of published analyses indicated that ODX is cost effective, they incorporated study designs that can increase the risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Yi Wang
- Shi-Yi Wang and Weixiong Dang, Yale University School of Public Health; Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale Cancer Center; and Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Weixiong Dang
- Shi-Yi Wang and Weixiong Dang, Yale University School of Public Health; Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale Cancer Center; and Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ilana Richman
- Shi-Yi Wang and Weixiong Dang, Yale University School of Public Health; Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale Cancer Center; and Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Sarah S Mougalian
- Shi-Yi Wang and Weixiong Dang, Yale University School of Public Health; Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale Cancer Center; and Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Suzanne B Evans
- Shi-Yi Wang and Weixiong Dang, Yale University School of Public Health; Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale Cancer Center; and Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Cary P Gross
- Shi-Yi Wang and Weixiong Dang, Yale University School of Public Health; Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale Cancer Center; and Shi-Yi Wang, Ilana Richman, Sarah S. Mougalian, Suzanne B. Evans, and Cary P. Gross, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Siow ZR, De Boer RH, Lindeman GJ, Mann GB. Spotlight on the utility of the Oncotype DX ® breast cancer assay. Int J Womens Health 2018; 10:89-100. [PMID: 29503586 PMCID: PMC5827461 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s124520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncotype DX® assay was developed to address the need for optimizing the selection of adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer. It has ushered in the era of genomic-based personalized cancer care for ER-positive primary breast cancer and is now widely utilized in various parts of the world. Together with several other genomic assays, Oncotype DX has been incorporated into clinical practice guidelines on biomarker use to guide treatment decisions. The Oncotype DX result is presented as the recurrence score which is a continuous score that predicts the risk of distant disease recurrence. The assay, which provides information on clinicopathological factors, has been validated for use in the prognostication and prediction of degree of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative early breast cancers. Clinical studies have consistently shown that the Oncotype DX has a significant impact on decision making in adjuvant therapy recommendations and appears to be cost-effective in diverse health care settings. In this article, we provide an overview of the validation and clinical impact studies for the Oncotype DX assay. We also discuss its potential use in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as the more recent prospective validation trials, and the economic and utility implications of studies that use a lower cutoff score to define low-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Rong Siow
- ACRF Stem Cells and Cancer Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.,Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital
| | - Richard H De Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.,Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- ACRF Stem Cells and Cancer Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.,Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.,Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mittmann N, Earle CC, Cheng SY, Julian JA, Rahman F, Seung SJ, Levine MN. Population-Based Study to Determine the Health System Costs of Using the 21-Gene Assay. J Clin Oncol 2017; 36:238-243. [PMID: 29193984 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.74.2577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The 21-gene assay Oncotype Dx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA) test is used to aid the decision about chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received endocrine therapy. Economic studies to support test adoption used decision-analytic models with assumptions and data derived from disparate sources. The objective was to evaluate whether the 21-gene assay test resulted in an overall cost expense or saving to the health system. Patients and Methods One thousand participants enrolled in a field evaluation study, were linked to population-level health system administrative databases, and were observed for 20 months. The cost for the cohort, which included the cost of the test, subsequent treatments received, and health care encounters, was determined. The cost in the absence of the test was compared with the pretest recommendation about chemotherapy from the field study for a base case and under scenarios that reflected different adjuvant chemotherapy use. Overall health system costs and incremental costs were calculated. Results The 21-gene assay resulted in a net decrease in chemotherapy use of 23%. For the base case incremental analysis, the actual overall health system cost of this cohort, including the cost of 21-gene assay, was $29.2 million compared with $26.2 million in the absence of the test-an increase of $3.1 million. For three of the four scenario analyses, the actual overall cost to the health system exceeded the estimated cost in the absence of the test. Results showed that, when at least half of the population received adjuvant chemotherapy, the cost increased to $30.2 million. Conclusion The use of real-world administrative data showed that, despite lower rates of chemotherapy use, the 21-gene assay test results in an overall incremental cost to the health care system in the short-term under most assumptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Mittmann
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig C Earle
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Y Cheng
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jim A Julian
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farah Rahman
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Soo Jin Seung
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark N Levine
- Nicole Mittmann, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Cancer Care Ontario, and University of Toronto; Craig C. Earle, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Craig C. Earle, Stephanie Y. Cheng, and Farah Rahman, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Soo Jin Seung, Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto; and Jim A. Julian and Mark N. Levine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Blok EJ, Bastiaannet E, van den Hout WB, Liefers GJ, Smit VTHBM, Kroep JR, van de Velde CJH. Systematic review of the clinical and economic value of gene expression profiles for invasive early breast cancer available in Europe. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 62:74-90. [PMID: 29175678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Gene expression profiles with prognostic capacities have shown good performance in multiple clinical trials. However, with multiple assays available and numerous types of validation studies performed, the added value for daily clinical practice is still unclear. In Europe, the MammaPrint, OncotypeDX, PAM50/Prosigna and Endopredict assays are commercially available. In this systematic review, we aim to assess these assays on four important criteria: Assay development and methodology, clinical validation, clinical utility and economic value. We performed a literature search covering PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane, for studies related to one or more of the four selected assays. We identified 147 papers for inclusion in this review. MammaPrint and OncotypeDX both have evidence available, including level IA clinical trial results for both assays. Both assays provide prognostic information. Predictive value has only been shown for OncotypeDX. In the clinical utility studies, a higher reduction in chemotherapy was achieved by OncotypeDX, although the number of available studies differ considerably between tests. On average, economic evaluations estimate that genomic testing results in a moderate increase in total costs, but that these costs are acceptable in relation to the expected improved patient outcome. PAM50/prosigna and EndoPredict showed comparable prognostic capacities, but with less economical and clinical utility studies. Furthermore, for these assays no level IA trial data are available yet. In summary, all assays have shown excellent prognostic capacities. The differences in the quantity and quality of evidence are discussed. Future studies shall focus on the selection of appropriate subgroups for testing and long-term outcome of validation trials, in order to determine the place of these assays in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Blok
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W B van den Hout
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING AND EXPANDED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY TESTS TO GUIDE SELECTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:32-45. [PMID: 28486999 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this report was to assess the clinical effectiveness of two Gene expression profiling (GEP) and two expanded immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests compared with current prognostic tools in guiding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the evidence on clinical effectiveness of OncotypeDX, IHC4, MammaPrint, and Mammostrat, compared with current clinical practice using clinicopathological parameters, in women with early breast cancer was conducted. Ten databases were searched to include citations to May 2016. RESULTS Searches identified 7,064 citations, of which forty-one citations satisfied the criteria for the review. A narrative synthesis was performed. Evidence for OncotypeDX demonstrated the impact of the test on decision making and there was some support for OncotypeDX predicting chemotherapy benefit. There were relatively lower levels of evidence for the other three tests included in the analysis. MammaPrint, Mammostrat, and IHC4 tests were limited to a small number of studies. Limitations in relation to study design were identified for all tests. CONCLUSIONS The evidence base for OncotypeDX is considered to be the most robust. Methodological weaknesses relating to heterogeneity of patient cohorts and issues arising from the retrospective nature of the evidence were identified. Further evidence is required for all of the tests using prospective randomized controlled trial data.
Collapse
|
22
|
Prognostic and predictive indicators in early-stage breast cancer and the role of genomic profiling: Focus on the Oncotype DX ® Breast Recurrence Score Assay. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:921-930. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
23
|
Pestalozzi BC, Tausch C, Dedes KJ, Rochlitz C, Zimmermann S, von Moos R, Winterhalder R, Ruhstaller T, Mueller A, Buser K, Borner M, Novak U, Nussbaum CU, Seifert B, Bigler M, Bize V, Vilei SB, Rageth C, Aebi S. Adjuvant treatment recommendations for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer by Swiss tumor boards using the 21-gene recurrence score (SAKK 26/10). BMC Cancer 2017; 17:265. [PMID: 28407750 PMCID: PMC5390385 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3261-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the effect of Recurrence Score® results (RS; Oncotype DX® multigene assay ODX) on treatment recommendations by Swiss multidisciplinary tumor boards (TB). Methods SAKK 26/10 is a multicenter, prospective cohort study of early breast cancer patients: Eligibility: R0-resection, ≥10% ER+ malignant cells, HER2–, pN0/pN1a. Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR) and non-low-risk (NLR) groups based on involved nodes (0 vs 1–3) and five additional predefined risk factors. Recommendations were classified as hormonal therapy (HT) or chemotherapy plus HT (CT + HT). Investigators were blinded to the statistical analysis plan. A 5%/10% rate of recommendation change in LR/NLR groups, respectively, was assumed independently of RS (null hypotheses). Results Two hundred twenty two evaluable patients from 18 centers had TB recommendations before and after consideration of the RS result. A recommendation change occurred in 45 patients (23/154 (15%, 95% CI 10–22%) in the LR group and 22/68 (32%, 95% CI 22–45%) in the NLR group). In both groups the null hypothesis could be rejected (both p < 0.001). Specifically, in the LR group, only 5/113 (4%, 95% CI 1–10%) with HT had a recommendation change to CT + HT after consideration of the RS, while 18/41 (44%, 95% CI 28–60%) of patients initially recommended CT + HT were subsequently recommended only HT. In the NLR group, 3/19 (16%, 95% CI 3–40%) patients were changed from HT to CT + HT, while 19/48 (40%, 95% CI 26–55%) were changed from CT + HT to HT. Conclusion There was a significant impact of using the RS in the LR and the NLR group but only 4% of LR patients initially considered for HT had a recommendation change (RC); therefore these patients could forgo ODX testing. A RC was more likely for NLR patients considered for HT. Patients considered for HT + CT have the highest likelihood of a RC based on RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Konstantin J Dedes
- Universitaetsspital Zuerich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stefan Aebi
- Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Markopoulos C, van de Velde C, Zarca D, Ozmen V, Masetti R. Clinical evidence supporting genomic tests in early breast cancer: Do all genomic tests provide the same information? Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 43:909-920. [PMID: 27639633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) has historically been treated as a single disease entity; however, in the last decade, insights into its molecular heterogeneity have underpinned the development/commercialisation of several genomic tools whose goal is to guide patient management in early BC. These include the Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score™ assay, MammaPrint®, Prosigna®, and EndoPredict®. Although these assays are similar in that they are all multigene assays reflecting risk of recurrence, they differ substantially in the technological platform used to measure gene expression; the number and identity of genes assessed; the patient populations used for development and validation; and the level of evidence supporting clinical utility. They also differ in the amount of evidence demonstrating their impact on treatment decisions and cost effectiveness in different countries. This review discusses these 4 assays, highlighting the clinical evidence that supports each of them, while focussing on the Recurrence Score assay. This assay has the greatest body of evidence supporting its clinical utility and decision impact/effectiveness, and currently is the only one validated as a predictor of response to adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone-receptor positive early BC patients treated with endocrine therapy and to be included as such in international/national BC treatment guidelines. The review also discusses ongoing prospective trials investigating the 4 assays, recent outcome studies, as well as analyses comparing different assays on the same tumour blocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Markopoulos
- Athens University Medical School, 8 Iassiou Street, 11521, Athens, Greece.
| | - C van de Velde
- Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D Zarca
- Institut Français du Sein, 15 rue Jean Nicot, 75007, Paris, France
| | - V Ozmen
- Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Bahçelievler Mahallesi, E-5 Yanyol, Kültür Sokak, No: 14, Metroport Busidence, Bahçelievler, İstanbul, 34180, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - R Masetti
- Surgical Breast Unit, Catholic University of Rome, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cost-utility analyses of drug therapies in breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 159:407-24. [PMID: 27572551 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3924-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The economic evaluation (EE) of health care products has become a necessity. Their quality must be high in order to trust the results and make informed decisions. While cost-utility analyses (CUAs) should be preferred to cost-effectiveness analyses in the oncology area, the quality of breast cancer (BC)-related CUA has been given little attention so far. Thus, firstly, a systematic review of published CUA related to drug therapies for BC, gene expression profiling, and HER2 status testing was performed. Secondly, the quality of selected CUA was assessed and the factors associated with a high-quality CUA identified. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE/EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify published CUA between 2000 and 2014. After screening and data extraction, the quality of each selected CUA was assessed by two independent reviewers, using the checklist proposed by Drummond et al. The analysis of factors associated with a high-quality CUA (defined as a Drummond score ≥7) was performed using a two-step approach. Our systematic review was based on 140 CUAs and showed a wide variety of methodological approaches, including differences in the perspective adopted, the time horizon, measurement of cost and effectiveness, and more specially health-state utility values (HSUVs). The median Drummond score was 7 [range 3-10]. Only one in two of the CUA (n = 74) had a Drummond score ≥7, synonymous of "high quality." The statistically significant predictors of a high-quality CUA were article with "gene expression profiling" topic (p = 0.001), consulting or pharmaceutical company as main location of first author (p = 0.004), and articles with both incremental cost-utility ratio and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as outcomes of EE (p = 0.02). Our systematic review identified only 140 CUAs published over the past 15 years with one in two of high quality. It showed a wide variety of methodological approaches, especially focused on HSUVs. A critical appraisal of utility values is necessary to better understand one of the main difficulties encountered by authors and propose areas for improvement to increase the quality of CUA. Since the last 5 years, there is a tendency toward an improvement in the quality of these studies, probably coupled with economic context, a better and widely spreading of recommendations and thus appropriation by medical practitioners. That being said, there is an urgent need for mandatory use of European and international recommendations to ensure quality of such approaches and to allow easy comparison.
Collapse
|
26
|
21-Gene recurrence score decreases receipt of chemotherapy in ER+ early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCDB 2010-2013. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 159:315-26. [PMID: 27507245 PMCID: PMC5012154 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3926-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if receipt of chemotherapy was associated with utilization of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS assay) or with recurrence score (RS) in eligible patients. Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified female patients eligible for RS assay based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines: age 18–70, ER-positive and HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer diagnosed during 2010–2013. We excluded patients not meeting testing guidelines. Inclusion required result of RS in patients who underwent RS assay and status for receipt of chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression models and propensity matched analysis were used to determine associations between RS assay and RS with receipt of chemotherapy. Among 129,765 patients who were eligible, 74,778 underwent RS assay and had results available. Of these, 59.5 % (44,505) had low-risk, 32.0 % (23,920) had intermediate-risk, and 8.5 % (6353) had high-risk RS. Patients with intermediate- and high-risk RS were more likely to receive chemotherapy [OR 12.9 (CI 12.2–13.6), p <0.001 and OR 87.2 (CI 79.6–95.6), p <0.0001], respectively. In both low- and intermediate-risk groups, increasing RS score was significantly associated with increasing odds of receiving chemotherapy [OR 1.10 (CI 1.09–1.12), p <0.0001 and OR 1.26 (CI 1.25–1.27), p <0.0001, respectively, for each point increase in RS]. Receipt of chemotherapy was more likely in patients who did not undergo RS assay compared to those who did, OR 1.21 (CI 1.175–1.249) p <0.0001. The utilization of RS assay and the RS were both strongly associated with chemotherapy receipt. Patients eligible for chemotherapy, based on NCCN criteria, were more likely to receive chemotherapy if they did not undergo RS assay or they had a high RS.
Collapse
|
27
|
MacDonald KV, Bombard Y, Deal K, Trudeau M, Leighl N, Marshall DA. The influence of gene expression profiling on decisional conflict in decision making for early-stage breast cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2016; 61:85-93. [PMID: 27155447 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Revised: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with early-stage breast cancer, of whom only 15% will experience a recurrence, are often conflicted or uncertain about taking chemotherapy. Gene expression profiling (GEP) of tumours informs risk prediction, potentially affecting treatment decisions. We examined whether receiving a GEP test score reduces decisional conflict in chemotherapy treatment decision making. METHODS A general population sample of 200 women completed the decisional conflict scale (DCS) at baseline (no GEP test score scenario) and after (scenario with GEP test score added) completing a discrete choice experiment survey for early-stage breast cancer chemotherapy. We scaled the 16-item DCS total scores and subscores from 0 to 100 and calculated means, standard deviations and change in scores, with significance (p < 0.05) based on matched pairs t-tests. RESULTS We identified five respondent subgroups based on preferred treatment option; almost 40% did not change their chemotherapy decision after receiving GEP testing information. Total score and all subscores (uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, and effective decision) decreased significantly in the respondent subgroup who were unsure about taking chemotherapy initially but changed to no chemotherapy (n =33). In the subgroup of respondents (n = 25) who chose chemotherapy initially but changed to unsure, effective decision subscore increased significantly. In the overall sample, changes in total and all subscores were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS GEP testing adds value for women initially unsure about chemotherapy treatment with a decrease in decisional conflict. However, for women who are confident about their treatment decisions, GEP testing may not add value. Decisions to request GEP testing should be personalised based on patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen V MacDonald
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Room 3C62, Health Research Innovation Centre, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, Room 312, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1T8, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 209 Victoria Street, Room 312, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1T8, Canada
| | - Ken Deal
- DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada
| | - Maureen Trudeau
- University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Natasha Leighl
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Deborah A Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, McMaster University, Room 3C56, Health Research Innovation Centre, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Levine MN, Julian JA, Bedard PL, Eisen A, Trudeau ME, Higgins B, Bordeleau L, Pritchard KI. Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:1065-71. [PMID: 26598746 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.8503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on decision-making in a population-based cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with axillary node-negative or nodal micrometastases, estrogen receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer being considered for chemotherapy were eligible. All cancer treatment centers in Ontario, Canada, participated. Oncologists made a preliminary recommendation for endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy on the basis of Adjuvant! Online (AOL) risk estimation. Patients were asked for their preference regarding chemotherapy. After RSs were available, patients returned for final decision-making. Patient satisfaction was measured by using the decisional conflict scale. RESULTS Between January 2012 and July 2013, 1,000 patients were recruited. RSs were available for 979 patients. In 58% of patients, risk was categorized as low (RS, 0 to 18); in 33%, intermediate (RS, 19 to 30); and in 9%, high (RS, ≥ 31). Oncologists' recommendations pretest and post-test remained the same in 464 patients (48%), changed from unsure or chemotherapy to no chemotherapy in 365 (38%), and changed from unsure or no chemotherapy to chemotherapy in 143 (15%). After the test, oncologists recommended chemotherapy for 236 patients, 81% of whom received chemotherapy. Of 151 patients in whom risk was classified as intermediate by means of AOL, 41% were a low risk and 44% intermediate risk with RS. Of 298 patients at high risk with AOL, 16% had a high risk RS. None of 236 patients with grade I tumors had a high-risk RS. Mean total decisional conflict scale score significantly improved from pretest to post-test from 34 to 19 (P < .001). CONCLUSION The RS substantially influenced both oncologists' recommendations and patients' preferences for chemotherapy. The major effect was avoidance of chemotherapy when AOL indicated high or intermediate risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark N Levine
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jim A Julian
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen E Trudeau
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Higgins
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen I Pritchard
- Mark N. Levine, Jim A. Julian, and Louise Bordeleau, McMaster University, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Mark N. Levine and Jim A. Julian, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group and Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton; Philippe L. Bedard, Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, University of Toronto, Toronto; Phillipe L. Bedard, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Andrea Eisen, Maureen E. Trudeau, and Kathleen I. Pritchard, Odette Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre; Toronto; and Brian Higgins, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dreyfus C, Ballester M, Gligorov J, Agranat P, Antoine M, Tengher I, Bricou A. [Impact of the 21-gene assay in decision-making during multidisciplinary breast meeting: A French experience]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE 2015; 43:780-5. [PMID: 26584893 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2015] [Accepted: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX(®)) test is used to estimate the risk of recurrence and to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy at an early stage of endocrine responsive breast cancers, without HER2 overexpression or amplification. This test corresponds to a recurrence score (RS), classifying patients into three groups (low, intermediate or high risk). The objective of this two-center prospective study is to define the impact of Oncotype DX(®) in clinical practice. METHODS Between August 2013 and May 2015, an Oncotype DX(®) test was decided in multidisciplinary meeting, to certain patients with an indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for HR+ and HER2 negative cancers. The therapeutic changes after knowledge of RS were collected. An estimate of the economic impact was performed and a correlation between the RS and usual breast cancer prognostic markers was investigated. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients had a test, twenty-six (66.7%) of them have finally been no indication retaining chemotherapy. The economy obtained through the use of the test was estimated around 173,000euros. It has not been demonstrated correlation between the RS, the usual decisional and prognostic factors for breast cancer or with adjuvant! Online. CONCLUSIONS The RS has an additional decision value compared to other common decision criteria. Use of Oncotype DX(®) reduced in our experience the indications of adjuvant chemotherapy. The medical and economic impact could be significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dreyfus
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, université Paris XIII-Bobigny, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier, avenue du 14-Juillet, 93143 Bondy cedex, France
| | - M Ballester
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, Sorbonne université, AP-HP, Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Paris, France
| | - J Gligorov
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Sorbonne université, AP-HP, Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Paris, France
| | - P Agranat
- Service d'oncologie médicale, université Paris XIII-Bobigny, AP-HP, Avicenne, 125, rue de Stalingrad, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | - M Antoine
- Laboratoire d'anatomopathologie, Sorbonne université, AP-HP, Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Paris, France
| | - I Tengher
- Laboratoire d'anatomopathologie, université Paris XIII-Bobigny, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier, avenue du 14-Juillet, 93143 Bondy cedex, France
| | - A Bricou
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, université Paris XIII-Bobigny, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier, avenue du 14-Juillet, 93143 Bondy cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Influence of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Chemotherapy Delivery in Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 16:59-62. [PMID: 26483315 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Revised: 08/27/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed an analysis to determine the relative contribution of the Oncotype DX (ODX) recurrence score (RS) results in adjuvant therapy delivery compared with traditional pathologic factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a retrospective review of women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer treated at the Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2006 to 2012 with available ODX results. We constructed separate logistic models with the clinicopathologic factors alone and also integrating RS and compared these models using the likelihood ratio test and c-statistic to determine whether integration of the RS will result in better prediction of chemotherapy (CTx) delivery. RESULTS We identified 431 women with a median age of 58 years. The RS was low (< 18), intermediate (18-30), and high (> 30) in 56%, 37%, and 7%, respectively. CTx was delivered to 30% of the patients. Age, differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and progesterone receptor (PR) positivity < 50% were associated with CTx delivery in multivariable logistic regression of clinicopathologic factors alone (P < .05). In the model integrating the RS, an intermediate or a high RS was the most influential factor for CTx delivery (odds ratio, 7.87 vs. 265.35, respectively; P < .0001). The PR results and grade were no longer significant (P = .74 and P = .06, respectively). The integration of the RS resulted in improved model fit and precision, indicated by the likelihood ratio test (ΔG2, 100.782; df = 2; P < .0001) and an improved c-statistic (0.720 vs. 0.856). CONCLUSION Gene expression profiling appears to account for a substantial amount of variability in CTx delivery in current practice. Further work is needed to ensure appropriate test usage and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
|
31
|
Economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on early-stage breast cancer in Ireland. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 153:573-82. [PMID: 26364296 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3555-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The 21-gene test is a validated multi-gene diagnostic test that predicts chemotherapy (CT) benefit in oestrogen receptor positive (ER+), lymph node-negative (N0) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts). Ireland was the first public health care system to reimburse this test in Europe. Study objectives were to assess the impact of this test on decision-making and to analyse the economic impact of testing. Between October 2011 and February 2013, a national, retrospective, cross-sectional observational study of ER+, N0 BC pts tested with the 21-gene test was conducted. Surveyed breast medical oncologists, provided the assumption for the decision impact analysis that grade (G) 1 pts would not have received CT before testing and G2/3 pts would have received CT before testing. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. 592 pts were identified; Low, intermediate and high recurrence score were identified in 53, 36 and 10 % pts, respectively. 384 (70 %) pts had G2, 129 (22 %) G3 and 76 (13 %) G1 tumours. Post testing, 345 pts (59 %) experienced a change in CT decision; 339 changed to hormone therapy alone and 6 advised to receive CT. 172 (30 %) pts received CT, 12 (3.9 %) of pts with low scores, 108 (50.9 %) of intermediate risk and 50 (90.9 %) of pts with high risk scores. Net reduction in CT use was 58 % and net savings achieved were €793,565. Since public reimbursement, the introduction of the 21-gene test has resulted in a significant reduction in chemotherapy administration and cost savings for the Irish public healthcare system.
Collapse
|
32
|
Augustovski F, Soto N, Caporale J, Gonzalez L, Gibbons L, Ciapponi A. Decision-making impact on adjuvant chemotherapy allocation in early node-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene assay: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 152:611-25. [PMID: 26126971 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3483-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Risk stratification based on results provided by a 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX(®)) in early stage breast cancer can help optimize hormone therapy (HT) and/or chemotherapy (CT) decisions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of decision impact (DI) and net change in CT use before and after assay results, both in the whole studies' population and by recurrence risk score (RS) strata. A systematic search of studies with prospective data collection reported physician's decision on treatment allocation in early stage node-negative breast cancer was performed. DI reflects the proportion of patients whose management was changed, and net change focuses on CT change. A random-effects model is reported. Fifteen studies (N = 2229) met our inclusion criteria: 50.09, 37.35, and 13.38 % of patients with low, intermediate, and high RS. Treatment decision changed in 29.5 % (95 % CI 26.29-32.86). Net reduction of CT use was 12 % (8-17 %). It was 16 % (12.00-19.00) in the low RS group, 0 % (-3.00 to 3.00) in the intermediate RS group, and increased by 2 % (-1.00 to 3.00) in the high RS group. Use of a 21-gene assay showed a significant impact on treatment decisions. From 100 women tested, 30 could have their treatment optimized, and 12 could avoid CT. Its main effects consist of sparing chemotherapy in low risk patients and slightly increasing it in the high risk category. DI could be higher in selected patient populations with greater uncertainty regarding initial treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Augustovski
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (1414), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gligorov J, Pivot XB, Jacot W, Naman HL, Spaeth D, Misset JL, Largillier R, Sautiere JL, de Roquancourt A, Pomel C, Rouanet P, Rouzier R, Penault-Llorca FM. Prospective Clinical Utility Study of the Use of the 21-Gene Assay in Adjuvant Clinical Decision Making in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Invasive Breast Cancer: Results From the SWITCH Study. Oncologist 2015; 20:873-9. [PMID: 26112003 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score assay is a validated assay to help decide the appropriate treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), early-stage breast cancer (EBC) in the adjuvant setting. The choice of adjuvant treatments might vary considerably in different countries according to various treatment guidelines. This prospective multicenter study is the first to assess the impact of the Oncotype DX assay in the French clinical setting. METHODS A total of 100 patients with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative EBC, and node-negative (pN0) disease or micrometastases in up to 3 lymph nodes (pN1mi) were enrolled. Treatment recommendations, physicians' confidence before and after knowing the Recurrence Score value, and physicians' perception of the assay were recorded. RESULTS Of the 100 patients, 95 were evaluable (83 pN0, 12 pN1mi). Treatment recommendations changed in 37% of patients, predominantly from chemoendocrine to endocrine treatment alone. The proportion of patients recommended chemotherapy decreased from 52% pretest to 25% post-test. Of patients originally recommended chemotherapy, 61% were recommended endocrine treatment alone after receiving the Recurrence Score result. For both pN0 and pN1mi patients, post-test recommendations appeared to follow the Recurrence Score result for low and high values. Physicians' confidence improved significantly. CONCLUSION These are the first prospective data on the impact of the Oncotype DX assay on adjuvant treatment decisions in France. Using the assay was associated with a significant change in treatment decisions and an overall reduction in chemotherapy use. These data are consistent with those presented from European and non-European studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Gligorov
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Xavier B Pivot
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - William Jacot
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Hervé L Naman
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Dominique Spaeth
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Louis Misset
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Rémy Largillier
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Loup Sautiere
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Anne de Roquancourt
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Christophe Pomel
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Roman Rouzier
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Frederique M Penault-Llorca
- APHP Tenon, IUC-UPMC, Sorbonne Université, Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France; University Hospital Jean Minjoz, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France; Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; APHP-St. Louis, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Research Unit EA 7285, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Baxter E, Gondara L, Lohrisch C, Chia S, Gelmon K, Hayes M, Davidson A, Tyldesley S. Using proliferative markers and Oncotype DX in therapeutic decision-making for breast cancer: the B.C. experience. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 22:192-8. [PMID: 26089718 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proliferative scoring of breast tumours can guide treatment recommendations, particularly for estrogen receptor (er)-positive, her2-negative, T1-2, N0 disease. Our objectives were to □ estimate the proportion of such patients for whom proliferative indices [mitotic count (mc), Ki-67 immunostain, and Oncotype dx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.) recurrence score (rs)] were obtained.□ compare the indices preferred by oncologists with the indices available to them.□ correlate Nottingham grade (ng) and its subcomponents with Oncotype dx.□ assess interobserver variation. METHODS All of the er-positive, her2-negative, T1-2, N0 breast cancers diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 (n = 5110) were linked to a dataset of all provincial breast cancers with a rs. A 5% random sample of the 5110 cancers was reviewed to estimate the proportion that had a mc, Ki-67 index, and rs. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the rs with ng subcomponent scores. Interobserver variation in histologic grading between outside and central review pathology reports was assessed using a weighted kappa test. RESULTS During 2007-2011, most cancers were histologically graded and assigned a mc; few had a Ki-67 index or rs. The ng and mc were significantly positively correlated with rs. The level of agreement in histologic scoring between outside and central pathology reports was good or very good. Very few cases with a low mc had a high rs (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with low ng and mc scores are unlikely to have a high rs, and thus are less likely to benefit from chemotherapy. In the context of limited resources, that finding can guide clinicians about when a rs adds the most value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Baxter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - L Gondara
- Department of Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - C Lohrisch
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - S Chia
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - K Gelmon
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - M Hayes
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - A Davidson
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| | - S Tyldesley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Naoi Y, Noguchi S. Multi-gene classifiers for prediction of recurrence in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 2015; 23:12-18. [PMID: 25700572 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-015-0596-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Accurate prediction of recurrence risk is of vital importance for tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy for individual breast cancer patients. Although recurrence risk has been assessed by means of examination of histological data and biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki67), such conventional examinations are not accurate enough to select subsets of patients who are at sufficiently low risk of recurrence to be spared adjuvant chemotherapy without comprising the prognosis. In the past two decades or so, comprehensive gene expression analysis technology has rapidly developed and made it possible to construct recurrence prediction models for breast cancer based on multi-gene expression in tumor tissues. These models include MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, PAM50 ROR, GGI, EndoPredict, BCI, and Curebest 95GC. In clinical practice, these multi-gene classifiers are mostly used for ER-positive and node-negative breast cancer patients for whom deciding the indication of adjuvant chemotherapy based on conventional histological examination findings alone is often difficult. This article briefly reviews these multi-gene expression-based classifiers with special emphasis on Curebest™ 95GC, which was developed by us for ER-positive and node-negative breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuto Naoi
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E10 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Shinzaburo Noguchi
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E10 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Issa AM, Chaudhari VS, Marchant GE. The value of multigene predictors of clinical outcome in breast cancer: an analysis of the evidence. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2015; 15:277-86. [PMID: 25479414 PMCID: PMC4712951 DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2015.983476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multigene predictors are being used increasingly in early-stage breast cancer patients for prediction and prognosis. However, one consequence of the increased use of multigene predictors, and the heightened efforts toward their incorporation into routine clinical practice, is the potential for future malpractice litigation. It is, therefore, important to ascertain the strength of the evidence for using the different commercially available multigene predictor assays clinically. We evaluated the literature for evidence of clinical validity of four currently available gene signatures and to assess the influence of the 21-gene-expression assay on changes in treatment recommendations. METHODS A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2002 to March 2014 for multigene predictor assays was carried out, and a meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS The adjusted Cox hazard ratio average for studies that met the eligibility criteria was 3.538 (95% CI: 1.513-8.469). The 21-gene signature showed the highest stability in the estimation of likelihood of distant risk of recurrence. Using the recurrence scores resulted in changes in treatment recommendations in 31.8% of all patients in the studies. CONCLUSION This study may provide insight about the use of multigene predictors in clinical practice for prediction and prognosis of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalia M Issa
- Program in Personalized Medicine and Targeted Therapeutics, University of the Sciences, 600 South 43rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sheppard VB, O'Neill SC, Dilawari A, Horton S, Hirpa FA, Isaacs C. Patterns of 21-gene assay testing and chemotherapy use in black and white breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2014; 15:e83-92. [PMID: 25555816 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2014] [Revised: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In women with early stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer, the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay quantifies recurrence risk and predicts chemotherapy responsiveness. Recent data suggest that not all women with early-stage, HR(+) disease receive this testing. We examined sociodemographic, clinical, and attitudinal factors associated with RS testing receipt and the RS testing effect on chemotherapy use in black and white patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with newly diagnosed invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were recruited and interviewed to collect sociocultural and health care process data; clinical data were collected from charts. Of the sample (n = 359), 270 had HR(+) disease. Primary analysis focused on those with HR(+) node-negative disease (n = 143); secondary analyses included node-positive women. Logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with receipt of RS testing and chemotherapy. RESULTS Among women eligible for the 21-gene assay, 62 patients [43%] received RS testing. In multivariable analysis, older age (odds ratio, 1.04 per 1 year increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08) was associated with RS testing after adjustment for covariates. Chemotherapy use was 23%. In multivariable analysis, positive attitudes about chemotherapy and greater risk of recurrence were associated with chemotherapy use (P < .05). CONCLUSION Patterns of genomic testing might vary according to age. Efforts to understand factors associated with low testing rates will be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
| | - Suzanne C O'Neill
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Asma Dilawari
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Sara Horton
- Department of Oncology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Fikru A Hirpa
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Breast Cancer Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Oncology and Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yamauchi H, Nakagawa C, Yamashige S, Takei H, Yagata H, Yoshida A, Hayashi N, Hornberger J, Yu T, Chao C, Yoshizawa C, Nakamura S. Societal cost-effectiveness analysis of the 21-gene assay in estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph-node-negative early-stage breast cancer in Japan. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:372. [PMID: 25190451 PMCID: PMC4165904 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 08/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast-cancer incidence and mortality have been increasing in Japan. Japanese-specific clinical validity and utility data for the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay; Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, USA) are now available. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay for the guidance of adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph-node-negative, early-stage breast cancer patients, from the Japanese societal perspective. METHODS The recurrence risk group distribution by the 21-gene assay result and the assay's influence on adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations were obtained from a study of 104 patients. A state-transition cohort (Markov) model tracked time from surgery until distant recurrence and from distant recurrence to death. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit by 21-gene assay risk group was based on published clinical validation studies. Direct and indirect medical costs were obtained from the referral centers. Utilities associated with progression and chemotherapy-related adverse events were extracted from literature. Sensitivity analyses assessed the key drivers and robustness of the primary outcomes. RESULTS The 21-gene assay identified 48% of patients as low-risk, 36% as intermediate-risk, and 16% as high-risk. Total acute chemotherapy-related costs decreased by ¥154,066 due to less adjuvant chemotherapy usage. In the high-risk group, adjuvant chemotherapy use increased 18%, leading to survival benefits. Chemotherapy use overall decreased by 19%. Monitoring costs increased by ¥3,744 but recurrence costs declined by ¥46,113 per patient. Use of the 21-gene assay increased quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) by 0.241 per patient on average; the net cost per QALY gained was ¥636,752 ($6,368). CONCLUSIONS The 21-gene assay for women with estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph-node-negative, early-stage breast cancer is projected to be cost-effective in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideko Yamauchi
- />Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospitalcph, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chizuko Nakagawa
- />Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospitalcph, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Yamashige
- />Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takei
- />Division of Breast Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yagata
- />Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospitalcph, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Yoshida
- />Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospitalcph, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Hayashi
- />Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospitalcph, Tokyo, Japan
| | - John Hornberger
- />Cedar Associates LLC, Menlo Park, CA USA
- />School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Tiffany Yu
- />Cedar Associates LLC, Menlo Park, CA USA
| | | | | | - Seigo Nakamura
- />Department of Breast Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospitalcph, Tokyo, Japan
- />Department of Breast Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zanotti L, Bottini A, Rossi C, Generali D, Cappelletti MR. Diagnostic tests based on gene expression profile in breast cancer: from background to clinical use. Tumour Biol 2014; 35:8461-70. [DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2014] [Accepted: 07/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
40
|
Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2206-23. [PMID: 23917950 PMCID: PMC3755334 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2453] [Impact Index Per Article: 223.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Revised: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The 13th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (2013) Expert Panel reviewed and endorsed substantial new evidence on aspects of the local and regional therapies for early breast cancer, supporting less extensive surgery to the axilla and shorter durations of radiation therapy. It refined its earlier approach to the classification and management of luminal disease in the absence of amplification or overexpression of the Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene, while retaining essentially unchanged recommendations for the systemic adjuvant therapy of HER2-positive and 'triple-negative' disease. The Panel again accepted that conventional clinico-pathological factors provided a surrogate subtype classification, while noting that in those areas of the world where multi-gene molecular assays are readily available many clinicians prefer to base chemotherapy decisions for patients with luminal disease on these genomic results rather than the surrogate subtype definitions. Several multi-gene molecular assays were recognized as providing accurate and reproducible prognostic information, and in some cases prediction of response to chemotherapy. Cost and availability preclude their application in many environments at the present time. Broad treatment recommendations are presented. Such recommendations do not imply that each Panel member agrees: indeed, among more than 100 questions, only one (trastuzumab duration) commanded 100% agreement. The various recommendations in fact carried differing degrees of support, as reflected in the nuanced wording of the text below and in the votes recorded in supplementary Appendix S1, available at Annals of Oncology online. Detailed decisions on treatment will as always involve clinical consideration of disease extent, host factors, patient preferences and social and economic constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Goldhirsch
- International Breast Cancer Study Group, Division of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|