Randomised phase II study of docetaxel plus vandetanib versus docetaxel followed by vandetanib in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: SWOG S0904

In Silico Approach to Molecular Profiling of the Transition from Ovarian Epithelial Cells to Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Tumors for Targeted Therapeutic Insights

This paper aims to elucidate the differentially coexpressed genes, their potential mechanisms, and possible drug targets in low-grade invasive serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSC) in terms of the biologic continuity of normal, borderline, and malignant LGSC. We performed a bioinformatics analysis, integrating datasets generated using the GPL570 platform from different studies from the GEO database to identify changes in this transition, gene expression, drug targets, and their relationships with tumor microenvironmental characteristics. In the transition from ovarian epithelial cells to the serous borderline, the FGFR3 gene in the "Estrogen Response Late" pathway, the ITGB2 gene in the "Cell Adhesion Molecule", the CD74 gene in the "Regulation of Cell Migration", and the IGF1 gene in the "Xenobiotic Metabolism" pathway were upregulated in the transition from borderline to LGSC. The ERBB4 gene in "Proteoglycan in Cancer", the AR gene in "Pathways in Cancer" and "Estrogen Response Early" pathways, were upregulated in the transition from ovarian epithelial cells to LGSC. In addition, SPP1 and ITGB2 genes were correlated with macrophage infiltration in the LGSC group. This research provides a valuable framework for the development of personalized therapeutic approaches in the context of LGSC, with the aim of improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Furthermore, the main goal of the current study is a preliminary study designed to generate in silico inferences, and it is also important to note that subsequent in vitro and in vivo studies will be necessary to confirm the results before considering these results as fully reliable.

Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Many women, and other females, with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Drugs that inhibit angiogenesis (development of new blood vessels), essential for tumour growth, control cancer growth by denying blood supply to tumour nodules.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (from 1990 to 30 September 2022). We searched clinical trials registers and contacted investigators of completed and ongoing trials for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with standard chemotherapy, other types of anti-cancer treatment, other angiogenesis inhibitors with or without other treatments, or placebo/no treatment in a maintenance setting, in women with EOC.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events (grade 3 and above) and hypertension (grade 2 and above).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 50 studies (14,836 participants) for inclusion (including five studies from the previous version of this review): 13 solely in females with newly-diagnosed EOC and 37 in females with recurrent EOC (nine studies in platinum-sensitive EOC; 19 in platinum-resistant EOC; nine with studies with mixed or unclear platinum sensitivity). The main results are presented below.  Newly-diagnosed EOC Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.07; 2 studies, 2776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is very uncertain for PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05; 2 studies, 2746 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the combination results in a slight reduction in global QoL (mean difference (MD) -6.4, 95% CI -8.86 to -3.94; 1 study, 890 participants; high-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26; 1 study, 1485 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 4.27, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.60; 2 studies, 2707 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to block VEGF receptors (VEGF-R), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; 2 studies, 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increase PFS slightly (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00; 2 studies, 2466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination likely reduces QoL slightly (MD -1.86, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.26; 1 study, 1340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but it increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55; 1 study, 188 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 3) (RR 6.49, 95% CI 2.02 to 20.87; 1 study, 1352 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Recurrent EOC (platinum-sensitive) Moderate-certainty evidence from three studies (with 1564 participants) indicates that bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02), but likely improves PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.63) compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination may result in little to no difference in QoL (MD 0.8, 95% CI -2.11 to 3.71; 1 study, 486 participants; low-certainty evidence), but it increases the rate of any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.11, 1.07 to 1.16; 3 studies, 1538 participants; high-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common in arms with bevacizumab (RR 5.82, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.83; 3 studies, 1538 participants).  TKIs with chemotherapy may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; 1 study, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence), likely increase PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; 1 study, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on QoL (MD 6.1, 95% CI -0.96 to 13.16; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common with TKIs (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.10). Recurrent EOC (platinum-resistant) Bevacizumab with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance increases OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 5 studies, 778 participants; high-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.58; 5 studies, 778 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 3.11, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.27; 2 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of bowel fistula/perforation (grade ≥ 2) may be slightly higher with bevacizumab (RR 6.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 55.09; 2 studies, 436 participants). Evidence from eight studies suggest TKIs with chemotherapy likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 940 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with low-certainty evidence that it may increase PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; 940 participants), and may result in little to no meaningful difference in QoL (MD ranged from -0.19 at 6 weeks to -3.40 at 4 months). The combination increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.49; 3 studies, 402 participants; high-certainty evidence). The effect on bowel fistula/perforation rates is uncertain (RR 2.74, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.75; 5 studies, 557 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab likely improves both OS and PFS in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC. In platinum-sensitive relapsed disease, bevacizumab and TKIs probably improve PFS, but may or may not improve OS. The results for TKIs in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC are similar. The effects on OS or PFS in newly-diagnosed EOC are less certain, with a decrease in QoL and increase in adverse events. Overall adverse events and QoL data were more variably reported than were PFS data. There appears to be a role for anti-angiogenesis treatment, but given the additional treatment burden and economic costs of maintenance treatments, benefits and risks of anti-angiogenesis treatments should be carefully considered.

Molecular methods for increasing the effectiveness of ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review

Background: The aim of the current study is to analyze and summarize the latest research on improving therapy in ovarian cancer. Materials & methods: Data analysis was based on a review of publications from 2011 to 2021 in the PubMed database with use of the search terms including 'EGFR ovarian cancer', 'folate receptor inhibitors ovarian cancer', 'VEGF ovarian cancer', 'PDGF ovarian cancer' and 'CTLA-4 ovarian cancer'. Results: 6643 articles were found; 238 clinical trials and randomized control trials were analyzed; 122 studies were rejected due to inconsistency with the topic of the work. Conclusion: Extensive research on the treatment of ovarian cancer increases the chance of developing the most effective therapy suited to the individual needs of the patient.

Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies

In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.

Clinical benefit of systemic therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer-ESMO-MCBS scores

BACKGROUND

Licensed systemic treatment options for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer are platinum-based chemotherapy and maintenance treatment with bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. For platinum-resistant disease, several non-platinum options are available. We aimed to assess the clinical benefit of these treatments according to the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out including all studies evaluating systemic treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, from 1990 onwards. Randomised trials with an adequate comparator and design showing a statistically significant benefit of the study arm were independently scored by two blinded observers using the ESMO-MCBS.

RESULTS

A total of 1127 papers were identified, out of which 61 reported results of randomised trials of sufficient quality. Nineteen trials showed statistically significant results and the studied treatments were graded according to ESMO-MCBS. Only three treatments showed substantial benefit (score of 4 on a scale of 1-5) according to the ESMO-MCBS: platinum-based chemotherapy with paclitaxel in the platinum-sensitive setting and the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in the platinum-resistant setting. The WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib (not licensed) also scores a 4, based on a recent small phase II study. Assessment of quality-of-life data and toxicity using the ESMO-MCBS showed to be complex, which should be taken into account in using this score for clinical decision making.

CONCLUSION

Only a few licensed systemic therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer show substantial clinical benefit based on ESMO-MCBS scores. Trials demonstrating overall survival benefit are sparse.

Strategic Combination Therapies for Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. The dismal survival rate is partially due to recurrence after standardized debulking surgery and first-line chemotherapy. In recent years, targeted therapies, including antiangiogenic agents or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, represent breakthroughs in the treatment of ovarian cancer. As more therapeutic agents become available supplemented by a deeper understanding of ovarian cancer biology, a range of combination treatment approaches are being actively investigated to further improve the clinical outcomes of the disease. These combinations, which involve DNA-damaging agents, targeted therapies of signaling pathways and immunotherapies, simultaneously target multiple cancer pathways or hallmarks to induce additive or synergistic antitumor activities. Here we review the preclinical data and ongoing clinical trials for developing effective combination therapies in treating ovarian cancer. These emerging therapeutic modalities may reshape the treatment landscape of the disease.

Long-term progression-free survival of apatinib monotherapy for relapsed ovarian cancer: a case report and literature review

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy, which poses a great threat to female health. Anti-angiogenic therapy could bring clinical benefit for patients with ovarian cancer. Apatinib, an oral small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, has shown notable therapeutic effect in a wide variety of tumors. We report a woman with advanced ovarian cancer who received apatinib at 250 mg/day after failure of multiple-line treatment regimens, followed by discussion through review of literature. The patient has quite a long progression-free survival time of 24 months, with a satisfactory quality of life. Apatinib monotherapy may provide an additional option for advanced ovarian cancer，but it still needs further observation and exploration.

Epidermal growth factor receptor blockers for the treatment of ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a previously published version of the review (Issue 10, 2011).Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the seventh most common cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Treatment consists of a combination of surgical debulking and platinum-based chemotherapy. Between 55% and 75% of women who respond to first-line therapy experience relapse within two years. Second-line chemotherapy is palliative and aims to reduce symptoms and prolong survival. Improved understanding about the molecular basis of EOC has led to the development of novel agents, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-EGFR antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and harmful effects of interventions that target the epidermal growth factor receptor in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE, and Embase up to October 2010. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, and reference lists of included studies, and we contacted experts in the field. This update includes further searches up to September 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-EGFR agents with or without conventional chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy alone or no treatment in women with histologically proven EOC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data, assessed risk of bias, and performed GRADE assessment.

MAIN RESULTS

From 6105 references obtained through the literature search and an additional 15 references derived from grey literature searches, we identified seven RCTs that met our inclusion criteria and included 1725 participants. Trial results show that after first-line chemotherapy is provided, maintenance treatment with erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)) probably makes little or no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.20; one study; 835 participants; low-certainty evidence) and may make little or no difference in progression-free survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.23; one study; 835 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Less than 50% of participants provided quality of life data, and study authors reported these results incompletely. The certainty of evidence is very low, but treatment may reduce quality of life compared to observation.Treatment with an EGFR TKI (vandetanib) for women with relapsed EOC may make little or no difference in overall survival (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.95; one study; 129 participants; low-certainty evidence) and may make little or no difference in progression-free survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.42; one study; 129 participants; very low-certainty evidence). In treating patients with relapse, giving EGFR TKI may slightly increase some toxicities, such as severe rash (risk ratio (RR) 13.63, 95% CI 0.78 to 236.87; one study; 125 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life data were not available for meta-analysis.Anti-EGFR antibody treatment in relapsed EOC may or may not make a difference to overall survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.18; four studies; 658 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may or may not have any effect on progression-free survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16; four studies; 658 participants; low-certainty evidence). Anti-EGFR antibody treatment may or may not increase side effects, including severe nausea and/or vomiting (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.89; three studies; 503 participants; low-certainty evidence), severe fatigue (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.73; I² = 0%; four studies; 652 participants; low-certainty evidence), and hypokalaemia (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.80 to 5.06; I² = 0%; three studies; 522 participants; low-certainty evidence). Severe diarrhoea rates were heterogeneous across studies (RR 2.87, 95% CI 0.59 to 13.89; four studies; 652 participants; low-certainty evidence), and subgroup analysis revealed that severe diarrhoea was more likely with pertuzumab (RR 6.37, 95% CI 1.89 to 21.45; I² = 0%; three studies; 432 participants; low-certainty evidence) than with seribantumab treatment (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.23; I² = 0%; one study; 220 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life data were incompletely reported, and we were unable to combine them in a meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that an anti-EGFR single-agent biological treatment (EGFR TKI or anti-EGFR antibody) makes little or no difference to survival, either as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy or in association with chemotherapy in recurrent cancer. Anti-EGFR therapy may increase some side effects and may or may not reduce quality of life.

Cardiovascular diseases in patients receiving small molecules with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor activity: A meta-analysis of approximately 29,000 cancer patients

Background

Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor activity improves survival of cancer patients. Cardiovascular complications are critical and it is unknown whether these require specific treatment strategies. We aimed to clarify the associated risk of cardiovascular adverse events in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Design

The design of this study was a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for randomised controlled trials published until January 2017 that assessed patients with different types of cancer treated with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors in addition to standard chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 29,252 patients from 71 randomised controlled trials were included. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment was associated with a higher cardiac ischaemia relative risk (relative risk = 1.69; 95% confidence interval: 1.12–2.57; p = 0.01), with the highest risks observed for sorafenib and patients with renal cancer. Risk of thrombocytopaenia (relative risk = 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.73–2.79; p < 0.001) was highest for regorafenib and patients with breast cancer. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was increased after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (relative risk = 2.53; 95% confidence interval:1.79 – 3.57; p < 0.001), with the highest risks reported for sunitinib and hepatocellular cancer. QT corrected interval prolongation (relative risk = 6.25; 95% confidence interval: 3.44–11.38; p < 0.001) and arterial hypertension (relative risk = 3.78; 95% confidence interval: 3.15-4.54; p < 0.001) were reported. The relative risks of arterial adverse events, cerebral ischaemia, venous adverse events and pulmonary embolism were similar across groups.

Conclusion

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors increase the risk of severe cardiovascular and particularly thrombotic adverse events. Specific treatment regimens when prescribing tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies appear desirable.

Systemic therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a clinical practice guideline

Objective

The purpose of this guideline is to recommend systemic therapy options for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers.

Methods

This document updates the recommendations published in the 2011 Optimal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer guideline from Cancer Care Ontario. Draft recommendations were formulated based on evidence obtained through a systematic review of phase ii and iii randomized controlled trials (rcts). The draft recommendations underwent internal review by clinical and methodology experts, and external review by clinical practitioners through a survey assessing the clinical relevance and overall quality of the guideline. Feedback from the internal and external reviews was integrated into the clinical practice guideline.

Results

The primary literature search yielded thirty-six primary research papers representing thirty rcts that met the eligibility criteria. The guideline provides recommendations for patients with serous tumour histologies and with recurrent, platinum-resistant, and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Conclusions

The body of evidence from trials that included olaparib and bevacizumab consistently shows a benefit in progression-free survival (pfs) without a corresponding benefit in overall survival (os). The Working Group for this guideline designated pfs, which is associated with symptom control, as a critical outcome. A finding of net benefit can therefore be concluded based on significant differences in pfs. However, that benefit is not without identified harms. Given the identified harms, patient involvement in the decision-making process must take into consideration the side effect profiles of olaparib and bevacizumab within the context of improved pfs but minimal change in os.

Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management of QT Prolongation Induced by Cancer Therapies: A Systematic Review

Background

The cardiovascular complications of cancer therapeutics are the focus of the burgeoning field of cardio‐oncology. A common challenge in this field is the impact of cancer drugs on cardiac repolarization (ie, QT prolongation) and the potential risk for the life‐threatening arrhythmia torsades de pointes. Although QT prolongation is not a perfect marker of arrhythmia risk, this has become a primary safety metric among oncologists. Cardiologists caring for patients receiving cancer treatment should become familiar with the drugs associated with QT prolongation, its incidence, and appropriate management strategies to provide meaningful consultation in this complex clinical scenario.

Methods and Results

In this article, we performed a systematic review (using Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines) of commonly used cancer drugs to determine the incidence of QT prolongation and clinically relevant arrhythmias. We calculated summary estimates of the incidence of all and clinically relevant QT prolongation as well as arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. We then describe strategies to prevent, identify, and manage QT prolongation in patients receiving cancer therapy. We identified a total of 173 relevant publications. The weighted incidence of any corrected QT (QTc) prolongation in our systematic review in patients treated with conventional therapies (eg, anthracyclines) ranged from 0% to 22%, although QTc >500 ms, arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death was extremely rare. The risk of QTc prolongation with targeted therapies (eg, small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors) ranged between 0% and 22.7% with severe prolongation (QTc >500 ms) reported in 0% to 5.2% of the patients. Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death were rare.

Conclusions

Our systematic review demonstrates that there is variability in the incidence of QTc prolongation of various cancer drugs; however, the clinical consequence, as defined by arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death, remains rare.

Risk of gastrointestinal events with newly approved (after 2011) vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

We performed a meta-analysis to systematically review the gastrointestinal (GI) events (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia) of five newly approved (after 2011) VEGFR-TKIs in cancer patients.

METHODS

The relevant studies of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients treated with cabozantinib, vandetanib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and axitinib were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-one randomized controlled trials and 10,860 patients were included. Current analysis suggested that the use of these agents increased the risk of all-grade and high-grade GI events, and the diarrhea was the most common GI events. The risk of all-grade and high-grade GI events varies significantly within drug types, tumor types, and VEGFR-TKIs-based regimens.

CONCLUSION

The available data suggested that the use of the five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs may increase risk of GI events in cancer patients. Physicians and patients should be aware of these risks and frequent monitoring and careful management should be emphasized when managing these VEGFR-TKIs.

Is ovarian cancer a targetable disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis and genomic data investigation

OBJECTIVES

The current gold-standard for the first-line treatment in IIIb/IV stages of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in some countries. In the era of personalized medicine, there is still uncertainty on the impact of several molecularly targeted agents, which have been investigated for the management of this disease. To shed light on the actual role of targeted therapy in EOC, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

METHODS

Clinical trials were selected by searching "Pubmed" database and abstracts from major cancer meetings within the time-frame of January 2004-June 2015. The endpoints were survival outcome and response rate (RR). Hazard ratios (HRs) of survival outcomes, with confidence intervals and odds-ratios (ORs) of RR, were extracted from retrieved studies and used for current analysis. Meta-analysis was carried out by random effect model.

RESULTS

30 randomized trials for a total of 10,530 patients were selected and included in the final analysis. A benefit in terms of OS (pooled HR 0.915; 95%CI 0.840-0.997; p=0.043), particularly for anti-angiogenetic agents (HR 0.872; 95%CI 0.761-1.000; p=0.049), has been demonstrated for targeted therapy. Moreover, a significant advantage in platinum-resistant subgroup in term of PFS (HR 0.755; 95%CI 0.624-0.912; p=0.004) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first evidence that targeted therapy is potentially able to translate into improved survival of EOC patients, with a major role played by anti-angiogenetic drugs. The role of target therapy is underlined in the platinum-resistant setting that represents the "pain in the neck" in EOC management.

The Emerging Role of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

The present systematic review summarizes current evidence regarding the mechanisms of action, the efficacy, and the adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in ovarian cancer patients. Phase II and III clinical trials were sought in the PubMed database and in the Clinical Trials.gov registry through September 30, 2015. Seventy-five clinical trials regarding TKIs targeting mainly vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and sarcoma tyrosine kinase (Src) were yielded. The most promising results were noted with cediranib, nintedanib, and pazopanib. However, drawing universal conclusions about the potential integration of TKIs in ovarian cancer therapy remains elusive. Furthermore, emerging challenges and directions for the future research are critically discussed.

iRGD-Decorated Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Efficient Delivery of Vandetanib to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Preparation and in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation

Molecularly targeted agents that are designed to target specific lesions have been proven effective as clinical cancer therapies; however, most currently available therapeutic agents are poorly water-soluble and require oral administration, thereby resulting in low bioavailability and a high risk of side effects due to dose intensification. The rational engineering of systemically injectable medicines that encapsulate such therapeutic payloads may revolutionize anticancer therapies and remains an under-explored area of drug development. Here, the injectable delivery of a nanomedicine complexed with an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor, vandetanib (vanib), was explored using polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) to achieve the selective accumulation of drug payloads within tumor lesions. To demonstrate this concept, we used biodegradable amphiphilic block copolymer poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(D, L-lactic acid) (PEG-PLA) to nanoprecipitate this potent agent to form water-soluble NPs that are suitable for intravenous administration. NP-vanib induced cytotoxic activity by inhibiting the angiogenetic events mediated by VEGFR and EGFR kinases in tested cancer cells and inhibited the growth, tube formation and metastasis of HUVECs. The intravenously injection of NP-vanib into mice bearing HCC BEL-7402 xenografts more effectively inhibited the tumor than the oral administration of vanib. In addition, due to the modular design of these NPs, the drug-loaded particles can easily be decorated with iRGD, a tumor-homing and -penetrating peptide motif, which further improved the in vivo performance of these vanib-loaded NPs. Our results demonstrate that reformulating targeted therapeutic agents in NPs permits their systemic administration and thus significantly improves the potency of currently available, orally delivered agents.

Emerging therapies: angiogenesis inhibitors for ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have a high rate of recurrence, and overall survival remains at ∼ 25%. There is a need for new treatments that can increase progression free survival and quality of life. Recent clinical trials focus on angiogenesis, VEGFs, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors that play a role in recurrence, metastasis, and ascites in EOC.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes clinical rationale, mechanisms of action, and clinical data for angiogenesis inhibitors under evaluation in Phase II and III trials for EOC. Anti-angiogenesis agents reviewed in this paper include aflibercept, bevacizumab, cediranib, fosbretabulin, imatinib, nintedanib, pazopanib, saracatinib, sorafenib, sunitinib, and trebananib.

EXPERT OPINION

These agents have particular rationale for potential use in EOC due to the molecular changes associated with EOC tumorigenesis, namely a significant increase in angiogenic activity. Due to the costs and toxicities associated with anti-angiogenics, biomarker or molecular signature selection strategy for patients who will most benefit would be ideal but no such strategy has been validated to date.

An overview of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Initial treatment with surgery and chemotherapy has improved survival significantly. However, the disease progresses or recurs in most patients. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop more effective treatment strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of EOC, which is based on English peer-reviewed articles on MEDLINE and related abstracts presented at major conferences. The authors highlight the data from the published clinical trials in EOC patients who were treated with TKIs or TKI-based regimens.

EXPERT OPINION

EOC is responsive to most chemotherapeutic drugs and/or biological agents and represents an ideal disease model for investigating novel anti-cancer agents. Numerous small-molecule TKIs targeting the VEGFR, PARP, PI3K-AKT-mTOR, MAPK, Src, PKC, Wee1 and HER1/2 signaling pathways are currently being tested in clinical trials. Research is needed for devising regimens combining TKIs with other agents in an optimal timing schedule and for identifying potential biomarkers predictive of response and survival.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Events During Vandetanib Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials

Vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as an anticancer therapeutic agent, has adverse events associated with treatment resulting in noncompliance and withdrawal from the therapy. Here, we performed meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine relative risk (RR) and incidence of gastrointestinal events during vandetanib therapy in patients with cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed and summary incidence, RR, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of trials. Twenty-two trials with 6382 patients were included summary incidences of all-grade gastrointestinal events in patients with cancer were anorexia 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%), constipation 17% (95% CI, 13%-20%), diarrhea 46% (95% CI, 40%-53%), nausea 29% (95% CI, 25%-33%), and vomiting 17% (95% CI, 14%-21%). Incidences of vandetanib-associated gastrointestinal events stratified by tumor histology were statistically insignificant. Vandetanib was associated with a significant risk of all-grade diarrhea (RR 1.75, 95% CI, 1.42-2.16) and high-grade diarrhea (RR 1.94, 95% CI, 1.43-2.64) and significantly decreased risk of all-grade constipation (RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.71-0.91). Summary RR showed a significant risk of vandetanib-associated constipation (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.93) and diarrhea (all-grade: RR 1.68, 95% CI, 1.31-2.14 and high-grade: RR 1.57, 95% CI, 1.14-2.17) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. This study revealed a significantly increased risk of diarrhea and a reduced risk of constipation in patients with cancer receiving vandetanib, suggesting that appropriate and frequent clinical monitoring should be emphasized.

Nintedanib: examining the development and mechanism of action of a novel triple angiokinase inhibitor

Antiangiogenic agents are effective standard-of-care options in several malignancies, but are generally associated with only modest improvements in survival, as well as leading to additional toxicities. Furthermore, almost all patients develop acquired resistance to therapy, possibly due to the activation of alternative proangiogenic pathways. Here we discuss: the rationale for developing nintedanib, an agent that simultaneously inhibits signaling pathways activated by platelet-derived growth factor, FGF, as well as VEGF; how its distinctive inhibitory and pharmacokinetic profile could underlie promising efficacy and tolerability observed in Phase II trials in patients with relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer, advanced ovarian cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer; the ongoing Phase III program that is assessing nintedanib in these areas of major unmet medical need; and recent progress in the development of biomarkers that may predict response to nintedanib.

Addition of vandetanib to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. A randomized phase I/II study of the AGO Study Group (AGO-OVAR 2.13)

BACKGROUND

PLD is a standard treatment in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Vandetanib is an oral once daily administered inhibitor of VEGFR-, EGFR- and RET-signaling with activity in combination with chemotherapy in some solid tumours. We aimed to establish a feasible combination therapy of PLD and vandetanib in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients were treated with PLD 50 mg/m(2) q28 and vandetanib 100 mg/d po. It was planned to recruit at least 10 patients evaluable for toxicity over 2 treatment cycles. Primary endpoints were tolerability and safety; secondary endpoint was efficacy.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 15 registered patients started treatment and were evaluable for toxicity. Three patients (21%) stopped after first cycle (PD, withdrawal of consent, nausea/vomiting). The remaining 11 patients were treated for at least 2 cycles. Dose reductions of PLD and vandetanib were indicated in 4 (29%) and 5 patients (36%), respectively. The following G3/4 toxicities occurred per patient: 2 (14%) elevated liver enzymes G3, 2 (14%) neutropenia G3/4, 5 (36%) PPE G3/4, 2 (14%) mucositis G3. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor attributed side effects like hypertension or bowel perforations were not reported. Toxicity led to cessation of treatment in 4 patients (29%). Ten patients were evaluable for response: PR 1, SD 4. The median PFS was 6.7 months and median OS was 11.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PLD 50 mg/m(2)q28 and vandetanib 100 mg/d is feasible, but may be intolerable due to reported toxicity.