Effect of time to sentinel-node biopsy on the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma

The effect of surgical timing in nonmetastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus guidelines on the best timing to perform Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in high-risk melanoma patients. We aimed to understand the impact of surgical timing on nodal upstaging in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 for patients with T2-T4, N0, M0 melanomas, who underwent melanoma excision and nodal surgery. We included patients who underwent surgery within 2-19 weeks postdiagnosis. We aimed to determine the association of surgical delay (weeks) with nodal positivity.

RESULTS

A total of 53 355 patients were included, of whom 20.9% had positive lymph nodes. Patients underwent surgery at a median of 5 (4-7) weeks after diagnosis. The rate of positive nodes increased with increased weeks to surgery (line of best-fit slope = 0.38). Multivariable regression analysis identified an association between time to surgery and nodal positivity (2.4% increased risk per week, p < 0.05). Our analysis showed significantly increased likelihood of nodal positivity beginning 9 weeks after diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with T2-3 tumors had a significant increase in nodal positivity with increased time to surgery (OR = 1.03 per week, p < 0.001). However, no significant trend in nodal positivity was identified for patients with T4 melanomas (OR = 1.01 per week, p = 0.596).

CONCLUSION

Surgery within 9 weeks of melanoma diagnosis was not associated with increased likelihood of nodal positivity. These data can guide clinical conversations regarding the importance of surgical timing for melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node assessment in melanoma: current state and future directions

Assessment of sentinel lymph node status is an important step in the evaluation of patients with melanoma for both prognosis and therapeutic management. Pathologists have an important role in this evaluation. The methodologies have varied over time, from the evaluation of dimensions of metastatic burden to determination of the location of the tumour deposits within the lymph node to precise cell counting. However, no single method of sentinel lymph node tumour burden measurement can currently be used as a sole independent predictor of prognosis. The management approach to sentinel lymph node-positive patients has also evolved over time, with a more conservative approach recently recognised for selected cases. This review gives an overview of past and current status in the field with a glimpse into future directions based on prior experiences and clinical trials.

Impact of the time interval between primary melanoma excision and sentinel node biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obtaining a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) specimen is a standard staging procedure in the management of cutaneous melanoma. However, there is no consensus on the safe time interval between the primary melanoma biopsy procedure and the SLNB procedure.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the association between time from biopsy to SLNB and patients' outcomes for melanoma.

METHODS

We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis based on the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies were included. Nine thousand seven hundred five patients were identified, of which 4383 underwent a SNLB procedure at a time interval defined as early and 4574 at an interval defined as late. A combined hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.68) was determined, and there was high heterogeneity (I² = 83%; P = .002) of the SLNB time interval on melanoma-specific survival. The combined HR for disease-free survival was 1.05 (95% CI 0.95-1.15), with low heterogeneity (I² = 9%; P = .36). Regarding overall survival, a combined HR of 1.25 (95% CI 0.92-1.70) was found, with low heterogeneity (I² = 37%; P = .2).

LIMITATIONS

There is heterogeneity between some studies.

CONCLUSION

There are no significant differences in patient outcome between a short interval versus a long interval between the primary biopsy procedure and obtaining a SNLB specimen.

Does very early timing of lymph node surgery after resection of the primary tumour improve the clinical outcome of patients with melanoma?

BACKGROUND

In patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM), the time span between resection of the primary tumour and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as well as the subsequent interval between SLNB and complete lymph node dissection (CLND) varies greatly.

AIM

To determine whether very early timing of SLNB after resection of the primary tumour, or timing of CLND after SLNB affect the clinical outcome of patients with CM, compared with longer time intervals.

METHODS

We compared the time spans between complete resection of the primary tumour and SLNB, and the interval between SLNB and CLND in a cohort of 896 patients with melanoma who had undergone SLNB. An interval between primary resection and SLNB or between SLNB and CLND of up to 7 days was classified as very early (VE-SLNB and VE-CLND, respectively). This time span was compared with intervals of > 7 days. Univariate and multivariate statistics were performed.

RESULTS

VE-SLNB was significantly associated with the presence of micrometastases. However, this was probably due to tumour thickness being significantly higher in patients with VE-SLNB compared with patients with later SLNB. Importantly, VE-SLNB was not significantly associated with disease relapse and VE-CLND was not associated with melanoma-specific death.

CONCLUSIONS

VE-SLNB and VE-CLND neither improved nor worsened the clinical outcome of patients. Thus, timing of SLNB and CLND has no influence on the overall clinical outcome of patients with melanoma. Our findings support the rational planning of lymph node surgery after resection of the primary tumour and provide help for effective patient counselling.

Timing of sentinel node biopsy independently predicts disease-free and overall survival in clinical stage I-II melanoma patients: A multicentre study of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI)

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) still remains a key procedure to appropriately stage melanoma patients and to select those who are candidate to novel treatments with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. The impact of timing of SNB on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) is still unclear.

Material and methods

The study was conducted at 6 Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) centres and included 8953 consecutive clinical stage I-II melanoma patients who were diagnosed, treated, and followed up between November 1997 and March 2018. All patients were prospectively included in dedicated IMI database. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate how baseline characteristics and time interval until SNB are related to DFS and OS.

Results

Considering the whole population, at multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, gender, Breslow thickness, site, ulceration, and the SNB status, a delay in the timing of SNB was associated with a better DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR, delayed versus early SNB] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97–0.99, p < 0.001) and OS (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.99, p = 0.001). Specifically, in patients with a negative SNB status, a beneficial impact of delayed SNB (i.e. at least 32 days after primary excision) was confirmed for DFS (aHR 0.70, 95%CI 0.63–0.79, p < 0.001) and OS (aHR 0.69, 95%CI 0.61–0.78, p < 0.001), whereas in those with a positive SNB status, DFS (aHR 0.96, 95%CI 0.84–1.09, p = 0.534) and OS (aHR 0.94 95%CI 0.81–1.08, p = 0.374) were not significantly different in patients with early or delayed SNB.

Conclusions

Our study does not support a strict time interval for SNB. These results may be useful for national guidelines, for counselling patients and reducing the number of high urgency referrals.

Does the time interval between sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection affect outcome in malignant melanoma? A retrospective cohort study

Nodal clearance was recommended after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) despite further metastases to the regional lymph node basin being found in only 6-21% in the literature. This retrospective study was conducted to determine the role of the time interval between excision of primary melanoma and confirmed metastasis in the sentinel lymph node biopsy as well as the one between positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB-positive patients) and subsequent completion lymph node dissection (CLND) on the presence of metastases. The monocentric analysis included 121 patients with a history of completion lymph node dissection after positive SLNB from January 2005 to October 2013. Additional metastases in the regional lymph node basin (non-sentinels) were found in 14.05% (n = 17). Significant risk factors for the presence of metastases in CLND were the time between confirmed primary tumour to metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) (p = 0.0034), N-category of TNM-classification (p = 0.0066) and independent of thickness of primary tumour (p = 0.11). If SLNB was performed up to forty-three days after confirmed primary melanoma, subsequent lymph node dissection was positive in less than 9.1%. When SLNB was performed with a delay of more than 80 days, all patients had metastases in the CLND specimens. Our data analysis suggests that delays in subsequent procedures of SLNB after diagnosis of primary melanoma may have a greater impact on positivity of non-sentinel lymph nodes than previously assumed. Our retrospective analysis may indicate the reconsideration of time schedule in the management of primary melanoma to potentially avoid local relapse in the draining lymph node region after positive SLNB.

Melanoma of the Foot Is Associated With Advanced Disease and Poorer Survival

The purpose of the present study was to review the outcomes and assess the prognostic factors associated with foot melanoma. We hypothesized that primary melanoma of the foot would be more likely to present at an advanced stage and be associated with poorer outcomes. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between patients' demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics and deaths within 5 years. Categorical data were summarized as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. On univariate analysis, the significant prognostic variables found included Breslow thickness, ulceration, sentinel node positivity, and localized presentation on the toe. Age, sex, and race were not prognostically significant in this model. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis resulted in a model of foot melanoma with ulceration and location on the toe as independent prognostic variables. The 5-year survival rate for melanoma of the toe was 50%. The results of the present study have shown that physicians should have a low threshold to biopsy suspicious lesions of the foot and ankle. Advanced disease and poorer survival were noted with toe melanoma. An ulcerative lesion of the foot was also associated with poorer survival.

Use of Lymph Node Ultrasound Prior to Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in 384 Patients with Melanoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Locoregional lymph node ultrasound is not typically included in guidelines as part of the staging process prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The objective of the present study was to make a clinical and economic analysis of lymph node ultrasound prior to SLNB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 384 patients with clinical stage I-II primary melanoma who underwent locorregional lymph node ultrasound (with or without ultrasound-guided biopsy) prior to SLNB between 2004 and 2015. We evaluated the reliability and cost-effectiveness of the strategy.

RESULTS

Use of locorregional lymph node ultrasound avoided SLNB in 23 patients (6%). Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 76% for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes that were not clinically palpable. False negatives were significantly more common in patients aged over 60 years and in tumors with a thickness of less than 2mm. The staging process using SLNB and ultrasound with ultrasound-guided biopsy produced an increase of €16.30 in the unit price. Our cost-effectiveness analysis identified the staging protocol with ultrasound and SLNB as the dominant strategy, with a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than the alternative, consisting of SLNB alone (8,095.24 vs. €28,605.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnostic staging of melanoma prior to SLNB is a useful and cost-effective tool. This procedure does not substitute SLNB, though it does allow to avoid SLNB in a not insignificant proportion of patients.

Prognostic factors in head and neck melanoma according to facial aesthetic units

BACKGROUND

Head and neck melanoma is a clinical challenge. Indeed, cutaneous head and neck melanoma shows a worse prognosis in comparison to melanomas of other body sites. Although the emphasis on facial cosmetic preservation plays a pivotal role in comparison to other body areas, specific Facial Aesthetic Units (FAU) could also play a key role in the prognostic evaluation of the malignancy.

METHODS

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the general outcome and clinicopathological features of head and neck melanoma and to detect prognostic differences according to each FAU. The Kaplan-Meier product was used to calculate survival curves, while Cox proportional-hazard regression was performed to evaluate the predictive value of each FAU.

RESULTS

A total of 221 head and neck melanoma patients was included in our analysis. In the nasal FAU, we found a high rate of local recurrence, which affected significantly disease-free survival. The worse prognosis was observed in melanoma of the scalp, which showed a greater tendency to skip metastases in internal organs. Moreover, we found that scalp showed a low incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers, if compared to other FAU, highlighting that the scalp local milieu might play a more prominent role in melanoma biology than chronic UV exposition.

CONCLUSIONS

Although FAUs have an aesthetic function, they could also play a role in the evaluation and follow-up of melanoma.

Impact of Time Between Diagnosis and SLNB on Outcomes in Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Hypothetically, delay between melanoma diagnosis and SLNB could affect outcomes, either adversely by allowing growth and dissemination of metastases, or beneficially by allowing development of an anti-melanoma immune response. Available data are conflicting about the effect of SLNB delay on patient survival. Our objective was to determine whether delay between initial diagnosis and SLNB affects outcomes in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed query and analysis of a large prospectively maintained database of patients with primary cutaneous melanomas undergoing SLNB. An independent dataset from MSLT-1 (Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-1) was used for validation. Primary outcomes included disease-free survival and melanoma-specific survival.

RESULTS

Early and delayed SLNB were defined as less than 30 and 30 or more days from initial diagnosis, respectively. There were 2,483 patients that met inclusion criteria. Positive sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 17.4% (n = 432). Among all patients, 42% had SLNB 30 or more days after diagnosis and 37% of positive sentinel lymph nodes were at 30 or more days. No differences in sex, anatomic site, or histopathologic features were identified between the 2 groups. There was no difference in melanoma-specific survival or disease-free survival between those undergoing early or delayed SLNB. Examination of MSLT-1 trial data similarly demonstrated no difference in survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This, the largest study on this subject to date, found no adverse impact on long-term clinical outcomes of patients due to delay of SLNB beyond 30 days. The MSLT-1 data confirm this result. Patients can be reassured that if the operation is performed 30 or more days after diagnosis, it will not cause harm.

Timing of completion lymphadenectomy after positive sentinel node biopsy in patients with melanoma

Background

Nodal staging with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) provides prognostic information to patients with melanoma and their physicians. It is not known whether the timing of CLND is associated with survival outcome and/or CLND tumour load. This study investigated whether CLND timing is associated with CLND tumour load, disease-free survival (DFS) and/or melanoma-specific survival (MSS).

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients with SNB-positive melanoma from nine European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Melanoma Group centres undergoing surgery between 1993 and 2009 were examined. Patients were selected based on availability of CLND and follow-up data. The CLND interval was defined as the number of days between diagnosis and CLND. Patient and tumour characteristics were collected. Five-year DFS and MSS rates were calculated. Cox and logistic regression analysis were performed, adjusting for known prognostic/predictive indicators.

Results

A total of 784 patients were included in the study. Their median age was 51 (i.q.r. 40–62) years, and 418 patients (53·3 per cent) were men. Median Breslow thickness was 3·0 (i.q.r. 2·0–5·0) mm, and 148 patients (18·9 per cent) had a residual tumour load. Median CLND interval was 84 (i.q.r. 65–105) days. Five-year DFS and MSS rates were not significantly different for patients operated on with a median CLND interval of less than 84 days and those with an interval of at least 84 days (DFS: 54·2 versus 53·3 per cent respectively; MSS: 66·9 versus 65·1 per cent). In a multivariable Cox model, CLND interval was not a significant prognostic indicator. CLND interval was negatively correlated with identification of positive non-sentinel nodes, but following adjustment for known risk factors this effect was no longer found.

Conclusion

The time interval between diagnosis of melanoma and CLND did not influence CLND tumour load, DFS or MSS.

The effect of time to sentinel lymph node biopsy on cutaneous melanoma survival

BACKGROUND

Whether timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in cutaneous melanoma improves survival is not yet clear. The aim of this study was to investigate if the timing of SLNB influences long-term melanoma mortality.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective cohort study was conducted on 748 cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent excision of the SLN. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

After adjusting for sex, age, Breslow thickness, mitotic rate, ulceration, and histologic type, patients who underwent early SLNB (≤30 days) and resulted positive on final pathology had a 3 times decreased risk of melanoma mortality (hazard ratio = .29; 95%confidence interval = .11 to .77) in comparison to patients who underwent delayed SLNB (≥31 days) and resulted positive on final pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that early SLNB (≤30 days) improves melanoma survival.