1
|
Acosta Roa AM, Skingen VE, Rekstad BL, Undseth C, Rusten E, Hernes E, Guren MG, Malinen E. Stability of metabolic tumor volume may enable radiotherapy dose painting in anal cancer. Phys Med 2023; 114:103151. [PMID: 37813051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the variability of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT-based metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in anal cancers during fractionated chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and assess the impact of this variability on dosimetric accuracy in MTV-targeted dose painting. METHODS Eleven patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma who received fractionated chemoradiotherapy with curative intent were included. 18F-FDG PET/CT images were acquired at pre- and mid-treatment. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured manually on both image series. The MTV was generated from the PET images by thresholding. Treatment plans were retrospectively optimized for both image series using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Standard plans prescribed 48.6 Gy, 54 Gy and 57.5 Gy in 27 fractions to elective regions, lymph node metastases and primary tumor, respectively. Dose painting plans included an extra dose level of 65 Gy to the MTV. Pre-treatment plans were transferred and re-calculated at mid-treatment basis. RESULTS MTV decreased from pre- to mid-treatment in 10 of the 11 patients. On average, 71 % of MTVmid overlapped with MTVpre. The median and mean doses to the MTV were robust against anatomical changes, but the transferred dose painting plans had lower D98% values than the original and re-optimized plans. No major differences were found between standard and dose painting plans for OARs. CONCLUSIONS Despite volumetric changes in the MTV, adequate dose coverage was observed in most dose painting plans. The findings indicate little or no need for adaptive dose painting at mid-treatment. Dose painting appears to be a safe treatment alternative with similar dose sparing of OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vilde Eide Skingen
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Espen Rusten
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivor Hernes
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vendrely V, Ronchin P, Minsat M, Le Malicot K, Lemanski C, Mirabel X, Etienne PL, Lièvre A, Darut-Jouve A, de la Fouchardière C, Giraud N, Breysacher G, Argo-Leignel D, Thimonnier E, Magné N, Abdelghani MB, Lepage C, Aparicio T. Panitumumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally-advanced anal canal carcinoma: Results of the FFCD 0904 phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109742. [PMID: 37315583 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Standard treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA)is 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This phase II study (EudraCT: 2011-005436-26) assessed the tolerance and complete response (CR) rate at 8 weeks of panitumumab (Pmab) combined with MMC-5FU-based CRT. METHODS Patients with locally advanced tumors without metastases (T2 > 3 cm, T3-T4, or N + whatever T stage) were treated with IMRT up to 65 Gy and concomitant CT according to the doses defined by a previous phase I study (MMC: 10 mg/m2; 5FU: 400 mg/m2; Pmab: 3 mg/kg). The expected CR rate was 80%. RESULTS Forty-five patients (male: 9, female: 36; median age: 60.1 [41.5-81]) were enrolled in 15 French centers. The most common related grade 3-4 toxicities observed were digestive (51.1%), hematologic (lymphopenia: 73.4%; neutropenia: 11.1%), radiation dermatitis (13.3%), and asthenia (11.1%) with RT interruption in 14 patients. One patient died because of mesenteric ischemia during the CRT, possibly related to treatment. In ITT analysis, the CR rate at 8 weeks after CRT was 66.7% [90%CI: 53.4-78.2]. Median follow-up was 43.6 months [IC 95%: 38.61-47.01]. Overall survival, recurrence-free and colostomy-free survival at 3 years were 80% [95%CI: 65.1-89], 62.2% [IC95%: 46.5-74.6] and 68.8 % [IC95%: 53.1-80.2] respectively. CONCLUSION Panitumumab in combination with CRT for locally advanced SCCA failed to meet the expected CR rate and exhibited a poor tolerance. Furthermore, late RFS, CFS, and OS did not suggest any outcome improvement to justify further clinical trials. CLINICALTRIALS gov identifier: NCT01581840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Vendrely
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; BRIC (BoRdeaux Institute of OnCology), UMR1312, INSERM, University of Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | | | | | - Karine Le Malicot
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, University of Burgundy, Biostatistics, Dijon, France, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, Dijon, France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Astrid Lièvre
- Gastroenterology Department, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes 1 University, Inserm U1242 COSS (Chemistry Oncogenesis Stress Signaling), Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Magné
- Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | | | - Côme Lepage
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nilsson MP, Undseth C, Albertsson P, Eidem M, Havelund BM, Johannsson J, Johnsson A, Radu C, Serup-Hansen E, Spindler KL, Zakrisson B, Guren MG, Kronborg C. Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:897-906. [PMID: 37504978 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2240490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Background: To date, anal cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy to similar volumes despite a marked difference in risk profile based on tumor location and stage. A more individualized approach to delineation of the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) could potentially provide better oncological outcomes as well as improved quality of life. The aim of the present work was to establish Nordic Anal Cancer (NOAC) group guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer.Methods: First, 12 radiation oncologists reviewed the literature in one of the following four areas: (1) previous delineation guidelines; (2) patterns of recurrence; (3) anatomical studies; (4) common iliac and para-aortic recurrences and delineation guidelines. Second, areas of controversy were identified and discussed with the aim of reaching consensus.Results: We present consensus-based recommendations for CTVe delineation in anal cancer regarding (a) which regions to include, and (b) how the regions should be delineated. Some of our recommendations deviate from current international guidelines. For instance, the posterolateral part of the inguinal region is excluded, decreasing the volume of irradiated normal tissue. For the external iliac region and the cranial border of the CTVe, we agreed on specifying two different recommendations, both considered acceptable. One of these recommendations is novel and risk-adapted; the external iliac region is omitted for low-risk patients, and several different cranial borders are used depending on the individual level of risk.Conclusion: We present NOAC consensus guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer, including a risk-adapted strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Per Albertsson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, and Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Monika Eidem
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
| | - Birgitte Mayland Havelund
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jakob Johannsson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Eva Serup-Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Björn Zakrisson
- Department of radiation sciences - oncology, Umeå University
| | - Marianne G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish, Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Anal Cancer and Future Strategies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:1073-1085. [PMID: 35666353 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00939-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Despite being markedly sensitive to chemoradiotherapy, patients with locally advanced (T3-4 and/or node-positive) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) still present high rates of disease recurrence, which is characterized by meaningful morbidity and mortality. Abdominoperineal resection as salvage surgery may be considered for patients with local recurrence, but with an important negative impact in the quality of life. Systemic therapy of advanced SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Palliative chemotherapy for the management of unresectable or metastatic disease yields approximately 60% of objective response rate; however, it still portends a grim prognosis. Based on the recently published InterAACT trial, carboplatin plus paclitaxel has become the standard of care of advanced disease; modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) may also be considered for fit patients amenable to intensive therapy. There are no FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of chemorefractory patients. Nevertheless, both nivolumab and pembrolizumab may be considered for these patients with promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression or other predictive biomarkers. It is estimated that approximately 1 out of 5 patients with SCCA will derive large benefit from PD-1 inhibitors, which may produce considerable durations of response. Ongoing clinical trials exploring the combination of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line therapy, combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches, such as adoptive T cell therapies, are eagerly awaited and may bring practice-changing results in the next few years for the treatment of this challenging disease.
Collapse
|
5
|
Exploring hypoxic biology to improve radiotherapy outcomes. Expert Rev Mol Med 2022; 24:e21. [DOI: 10.1017/erm.2022.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
6
|
Nilsson MP, Gunnlaugsson A, Johnsson A, Scherman J. Dosimetric and Clinical Predictors for Acute and Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity Following Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:e35-e44. [PMID: 34598844 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To analyse dosimetric and clinical predictors for acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity following chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with locally advanced (T2 ≥4 cm - T4 or N+) anal cancer were selected from an institutional database (n = 114). All received intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Gastrointestinal toxicity was retrospectively graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and bowel cavity, small bowel and large bowel were contoured. Dosimetric and clinical variables were tested for associations with acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity and late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity using the Mann-Whitney test, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and logistic regression. RESULTS The median follow-up was 40 months. Acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 51 (44.7%) of the patients; late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 36 of the patients (39.6% of 91 patients with >1 year recurrence-free follow-up). Bowel cavity V30Gy was the best dosimetric predictor for acute gastrointestinal toxicity (AUC 0.633; P = 0.02). Large bowel V20Gy was the best dosimetric predictor for late gastrointestinal toxicity (AUC 0.698; P = 0.001) but showed no association with acute gastrointestinal toxicity. In multivariate logistic regression, increasing age was significantly associated with acute gastrointestinal toxicity; smoking and large bowel V20Gy were significantly associated with late gastrointestinal toxicity. Patients who experienced acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity were not at an increased risk of late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity (odds ratio 1.3; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS Factors of importance for acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity were not the same. Bowel cavity V30Gy is a good metric to use for the prediction of acute gastrointestinal toxicity, but the results of our study indicate that individual large and small bowel loops need to be contoured for better prediction of late gastrointestinal toxicity. The role of the large bowel as an important organ at risk for late gastrointestinal toxicity merits further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - A Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, Franco P, Johnsson A, Segelov E, Deutsch E, Rao S, Spindler KLG, Arnold D. Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:279-287. [PMID: 34645589 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, AOU ''Maggiore della Carità,'' Novara, Italy
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia and Department of Oncology, Monash Health Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Slørdahl KS, Klotz D, Olsen JÅ, Skovlund E, Undseth C, Abildgaard HL, Brændengen M, Nesbakken A, Larsen SG, Hanekamp BA, Holmboe L, Tvedt R, Sveen A, Lothe RA, Malinen E, Kaasa S, Guren MG. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:921-930. [PMID: 33966592 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1918763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare malignancy with rising incidence, associated with human papilloma virus (HPV). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the preferred treatment. The purpose was to investigate treatment failure, survival and prognostic factors after CRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective observational study from a large regional centre, 141 patients were included from 2013 to 2017, and 132 were eligible for analysis. The main inclusion criteria were SCCA, planned radiotherapy, and performance status (ECOG) ≤2. Patient characteristics, disease stage, treatment, and treatment response were prospectively registered. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and locoregional treatment failure after CRT were analysed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with Cox`s proportional hazards model. RESULTS Median follow-up was 54 (range 6-71) months. Eighteen patients (14%) had treatment failures after CRT; of these 10 (8%) had residual tumour, and 8 (6%) relapse as first failure. The first treatment failure was locoregional (11 patients), distant (5 patients), and both (2 patients). Salvage abdomino-perineal resection was performed in 10 patients, 2 had resections of metastases, and 3 both. DFS was 85% at 3 years and 78% at 5 years. OS was 93% at 3 years and 86% at 5 years. In analyses adjusted for age and gender, HPV negative tumours (HR 2.5, p = 0.024), N3 disease (HR 2.6, p = 0.024), and tumour size ≥4 cm (HR 2.4, p = 0.038) were negative prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION State-of-the-art chemoradiotherapy for SCCA resulted in excellent outcomes, and improved survival compared with previous national data, with <15% treatment failures and a 3-year DFS of >80%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathinka S. Slørdahl
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dagmar Klotz
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan-Åge Olsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Morten Brændengen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Gunnar Larsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bettina A. Hanekamp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Laila Holmboe
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Tvedt
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sauter M, Lombriser N, Bütikofer S, Keilholz G, Kranzbühler H, Heinrich H, Rogler G, Vavricka SR, Misselwitz B. Improved treatment outcome and lower skin toxicity with intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. 3D conventional radiotherapy in anal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:356-367. [PMID: 31980834 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01534-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment for anal carcinoma (ACa). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been introduced, allowing focused irradiation of the tumor area. Whether physical benefits of IMRT translate to clinical benefits has not been sufficiently demonstrated. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 82 patients with newly diagnosed ACa. Patients treated with IMRT were compared with previous patients treated with conventional three-dimensional computational radiotherapy (3D-CRT). The influence of IMRT on complete remission and acute and chronic side effects was analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS 39/40 patients treated with IMRT were in complete remission after 1 year compared to 31/39 patients treated with 3D-CRT (p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis confirmed tumor T stage as well as lack of IMRT treatment as risk factors for persistent tumor at 6 months. No significant benefits of IMRT were apparent at later timepoints (median follow up 52 months, IQR: 31.5-71.8 months). Patients treated with IMRT had a significantly lower degree of skin toxicity (median 2 vs. 3 in a scale ranging from 0 to 3, p = 0.00092). Rates of hematological toxicity/proctitis were not reduced and rates of acute diarrhea increased (p = 0.034). Median length of hospitalization tended to be shorter in patients treated with IMRT (n. s.). CONCLUSION We present a real-world experience of shifting radiation technique from conventional 3D-CRT to IMRT. IMRT patients had better tumor control at 1 year and lower degrees of skin toxicity. Our data indicate that IMRT can enable therapies with lower side effects with equal or better oncological results for patients with ACa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sauter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland. .,University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Clarunis, Basel, Switzerland. .,Division of Gastroenterology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | - Simon Bütikofer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Georg Keilholz
- Division of Radio-Oncology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Henriette Heinrich
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.,Division of Gastroenterology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Clarunis, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhihong Y, Ye Y, Pejhan A, Nasr A, Nourbakhsh N, Tayebee R. A theoretical study on the pure and doped ZnO nanoclusters as effective nanobiosensors for
5‐
fluorouracil anticancer drug adsorption. Appl Organomet Chem 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Zhihong
- Department of Oncology, Henan Province Hospital of TCMThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of TCM Zhengzhou City Henan Province 450000 China
| | - Y. Ye
- Department of UltrasoundShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University Shandong Province Jinan 250012 China
| | - A. Pejhan
- Cellular and Molecular Research CenterSabzevar University of Medical Sciences Sabzevar Iran
| | - A.H. Nasr
- Department of Chemistry, School of SciencesHakim Sabzevari University Sabzevar 96179‐76487 Iran
| | - N. Nourbakhsh
- Department of Chemistry, School of SciencesHakim Sabzevari University Sabzevar 96179‐76487 Iran
| | - R. Tayebee
- Department of Chemistry, School of SciencesHakim Sabzevari University Sabzevar 96179‐76487 Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Feliu J, Garcia-Carbonero R, Capdevila J, Guasch I, Alonso-Orduna V, Lopez C, Garcia-Alfonso P, Castanon C, Sevilla I, Cerezo L, Conill C, Quintana-Angel B, Sanchez ME, Ghanem I, Martin-Richard M, Lopez-Gomez M, Leon A, Caro M, Fernandez T, Maurel J. VITAL phase 2 study: Upfront 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C, panitumumab and radiotherapy treatment in nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (GEMCAD 09-02). Cancer Med 2019; 9:1008-1016. [PMID: 31851776 PMCID: PMC6997048 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim VITAL, a phase II single‐arm study, aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of panitumumab addition to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU), mitomycin‐C (MMC) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC). Methods Adult, treatment‐naïve SCCAC patients (Stage T2‐T4, any N, M0) and ECOG‐PS ≤2, received panitumumab (6 mg/kg, day 1 and Q2W; 8 weeks), 5‐FU (1000 mg/m2/d, days 1‐4 and 29‐32), MMC (10 mg/m2, days 1 and 29) and RT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) to the primary tumor and mesorectal, iliac and inguinal lymph nodes, plus 10‐15 Gy boost dose to the primary tumor and affected lymph nodes. The primary objective was disease free survival rate (DFS) at 3‐years (expected 3‐year DFS rate: 73.7 ± 12%). Results Fifty‐eight patients (31 women; median age: 59 years; ECOG‐PS 0‐1:98%; TNM II [29%] (T2 or T3/N0/M0)/IIIA (T1‐T3/N1/M0 or T4/N0/M0) [21%]/IIIB (T4/N1/M0 or any T/N2 or N3/M0) [47%]/nonevaluable [4%]) were included. The median follow‐up was 45 months. The 3‐year DFS rate was 61.1% (95% CI: 47.1, 72.4). The 3‐year overall survival rate was 78.4% (95% CI: 65.1, 87.1). Eighteen patients (31.0%) required a colostomy within 2 years posttreatment. Grade 3‐4 toxicities were experienced by 53 (91%) patients. Most common grade 3‐4 treatment‐related events were radiation skin injury (40%) and neutropenia (24%). No toxic deaths occurred. Improved efficacy in colostomy‐free survival and complete response rate was observed in human papilloma virus positive patients. Conclusions Panitumumab addition to MMC‐5FU regimen in SCCAC patients increases toxicity and does not improve patients’ outcomes. RT plus MMC‐5FU remains the standard of care for localized SCCAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, CIBERONC, Catedra UAM-AMGEN, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,Department of Medical Oncology, imas12, UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Guasch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Althaia-Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - Vicente Alonso-Orduna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Aragon, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carlos Lopez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Pilar Garcia-Alfonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Castanon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Virgen Blanca, Leon, Spain
| | - Isabel Sevilla
- Investigacion Clinica y Traslacional en Cancer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas de Malaga (IBIMA), Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
| | - Laura Cerezo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carles Conill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Begona Quintana-Angel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Maria E Sanchez
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Department of Medical Oncology, CIBERONC, Catedra UAM-AMGEN, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Martin-Richard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Lopez-Gomez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Leon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monica Caro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO Badalona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Teresa Fernandez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumours Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lerner J, Michel M, Dasanu CA. Relapsed refractory metastatic squamous cell cancer of anal canal in a patient with retroviral infection responding to cetuximab. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019; 26:1025-1028. [PMID: 31684821 DOI: 10.1177/1078155219884605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conventional first-line therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of anal canal is definitive chemoradiotherapy with a curative intent. Due to the efficacy of treatment for locoregional disease and rarity of metastatic anal carcinoma, clinical trial data for treatment of metastatic disease is lacking. CASE REPORT Herein, we describe a patient with relapsed, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated with cetuximab as the third-line therapy. Management and outcome: The patient responded to this pharmacological agent, meeting the definition of a partial response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). DISCUSSION EGFR inhibitors are potential avenues for the subsequent lines of therapy in metastatic or relapsed/refractory anal cancer. Prospective clinical trials of cetuximab alone or in combination with other agents are warranted in this setting in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaren Lerner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eisenhower Health, Rancho Mirage, USA
| | - Miguel Michel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eisenhower Health, Rancho Mirage, USA
| | - Constantin A Dasanu
- Eisenhower Lucy Curci Cancer Center, Rancho Mirage, USA.,UC San Diego Health, San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peiffert D. [Anal channel cancer: customization of dose, volume and breaching]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:773-777. [PMID: 31471250 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The conservative treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of anal canal by irradiation is recommended as first indication. Despite its rarity, significant improvements were obtained by retrospective or prospective clinical studies these 20 past years, evaluating concomitant chemotherapy and IMRT. Nevertheless, the individualisation of the treatment, over dose distribution, has poor data available. Fractionation remains classic (1.8-2.0Gy/Fr), but the optimal dose level remains under discussion. The strategy concerning the volumes and doses for the prophylactic volumes remains under discussion. This paper will describe the data published, and the recommendations of working Groups, and the main options under evaluation. To conclude, today only the absence of gap is recommended, the benefit of a one-step schedule reducing the treatment time, then increasing local control and survival, but personalised schedules remain under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Peiffert
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Theoretical study of gallium nitride nanocage as a carrier for 5-fluorouracil anticancer drug. J Mol Model 2019; 25:265. [DOI: 10.1007/s00894-019-4147-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
15
|
Vendrely V, Lemanski C, Gnep K, Barbier E, Hajbi FE, Lledo G, Dahan L, Terrebonne E, Manfredi S, Mirabel X, Mammar V, Cowen D, Lepage C, Aparicio T. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in combination with chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: Results of a phase I dose-escalation study with panitumumab (FFCD 0904). Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:84-89. [PMID: 31185328 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Standard treatment of epidermoid anal cancer is 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This phase I study aims to evaluate the addition of panitumumab (Pmab) to CRT and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Pmab and 5-FU in combination with CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Immunocompetent patients with locally advanced tumour without metastases (Stage T2, T3 or T4, whatever N stage; Stage N1-N3 whatever T stage) followed two RT periods (45 Gy in 5 weeks and 20 Gy in 2 weeks, separated by a 2-week break) with concomitant CT sessions of 5FU/MMC at RT weeks 1, 5 and 8. Pmab was administered on RT weeks 1, 3, 5, 8 and 10 according to a predefined dose escalation schedule. RESULTS Ten patients were enroled. One was excluded due to unmet dose constraints respect. Three patients received dose level (DL) 0 (Pmab 3 mg/kg + 5FU 600 mg/m2/day) and six received DL-1 (Pmab 3 mg/kg + 5FU 400 mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in all patients at DL 0 and 2 at DL-1. Most common grade 3-4 toxicities observed at DL 0 were haematologic (100%), dermatitis (67%), and anaemia (67%). No death occurred. Four months after ending CRT, five and two patients had a local complete response and a partial response, respectively. One patient had a colostomy with abdomino-perineal amputation due to a tumour recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The MTD is 5FU at 400 mg/m2/day, MMC at 10 mg/m2 and Pmab at 3 mg/kg. The effect of the MTD on tumour response is evaluated in the phase 2 study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emilie Barbier
- Biostatistics, FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Come Lepage
- EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eng C, Messick C, Glynne-Jones R. The Management and Prevention of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:216-225. [PMID: 31099616 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Our aim is to discuss the current established management of care and associated prevention strategies of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA). In general, the development of SCCA is commonly linked to a prior history of HPV. Unfortunately, HPV vaccination continues to be underutilized in the United States versus other countries. Increased acknowledgment of the importance of HPV vaccination as an anticancer vaccine should be encouraged. The present standard of care is primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which results in a high level of disease control for small, early-stage SCCA. More advanced cancers still fare poorly with this treatment, and the disease relapses locoregionally in the majority of cases (30%-50% of patients), resulting in an abdominoperineal resection. Current treatment recommendations are associated with substantial morbidity; alternative radiation doses and/or novel combinations of agents with CRT are needed to improve quality of life and oncologic outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard of care for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic disease, with a possible new treatment paradigm of carboplatin/weekly paclitaxel. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibition appears to have a promising role in the setting of patients with refractory disease. Several clinical trials with immunotherapeutic and vaccine approaches for locally advanced and metastatic anal cancer are ongoing, as are HPV-agnostic umbrella trials. Whenever possible, clinical trial enrollment is always encouraged for further therapeutic development in the setting of a rare cancer, given the potentially substantial global impact for other HPV-associated malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Eng
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Craig Messick
- 2 Surgical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- 3 East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jacome AA, Eng C. Experimental and investigational drugs for the treatment of anal cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2018; 27:941-950. [PMID: 30381968 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1543659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is a rare malignancy, but its incidence rates have been increasing in the last decade. Studies have demonstrated that up to 47% of patients with locally advanced disease have high-risk features for treatment failure. The potential high rates of recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease and the lack of established care for metastatic disease have created an urgent need for the evaluation of new drugs that will ultimately improve the efficacy of treatment. AREAS COVERED This review presents results of recent phase-I and -II clinical trials which evaluate novel therapeutic modalities. The review also describes the findings of comprehensive genomic profiling studies which provide insights for promising therapeutics. EXPERT OPINION HPV vaccination is underutilized in the United States and as a result, HPV-associated malignancies are likely to continue for several decades; however, pivotal breakthroughs may create a foundation for distinctive treatment approaches for other HPV-associated malignancies for which no other standard of care exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre A Jacome
- a Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- a Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Determinants for local tumour control probability after radiotherapy of anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:380-386. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
19
|
Fish R, Sanders C, Ryan N, der Veer SV, Renehan AG, Williamson PR. Systematic review of outcome measures following chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer (CORMAC). Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:371-382. [PMID: 29566456 PMCID: PMC5969105 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM Six Phase III randomized trials have determined the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), but outcomes reported in these trials varied widely, hindering evidence synthesis. To improve reporting in all future trials, we aim to develop a core outcomes set (COS). As the first stage of COS development, we undertook a systematic review to summarize the outcomes reported in studies evaluating chemoradiotherapy for ASCC. METHOD Systematic literature searches identified studies evaluating radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for ASCC. Outcomes and accompanying definitions were extracted verbatim and categorized into domains. RESULTS From 5170 abstracts, we identified 95 eligible studies, reporting 1192 outcomes and 533 unique terms. We collapsed these terms into 86 standardized outcomes and five domains: survival; disease activity; life impact [including quality of life (QoL)]; delivery of care; and toxicity. The most commonly reported domains were survival and disease activity, reported in 74 (86%) and 54 (62%) studies, respectively. No outcome was reported in every publication. Over half (43/86) of the standardized outcome terms were reported in fewer than five studies, and 21 (25%) were reported in a single study only. There was wide variation in definitions of disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival and progression-free survival (PFS). Anal continence was reported in only 35 (41%) studies. CONCLUSION Outcomes reported in studies evaluating chemoradiotherapy for ASCC were heterogenous and definitions varied widely. Outcomes likely to be important to patients, such as ano-rectal function, toxicity and QoL, have been neglected. A COS for future trials will address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Fish
- Division of Cancer SciencesSchool of Medical SciencesFaculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
- Peritoneal and Colorectal Oncology CentreChristie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - C. Sanders
- Centre for Primary CareUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - N. Ryan
- Division of Cancer SciencesSchool of Medical SciencesFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Fifth Floor ‐ ResearchSt Mary's HospitalUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - S. Van der Veer
- Centre for Health InformaticsInformatics, Imaging and Data ScienceSchool of Health SciencesFaculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics ResearchHealth eResearch CentreUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - A. G. Renehan
- Division of Cancer SciencesSchool of Medical SciencesFaculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
- Peritoneal and Colorectal Oncology CentreChristie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - P. R. Williamson
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology ResearchDepartment of BiostatisticsUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ludmir EB, Kachnic LA, Czito BG. Evolution and Management of Treatment-Related Toxicity in Anal Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018; 26:91-113. [PMID: 27889040 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past several decades, clinical trials have demonstrated improved disease-related outcomes in the definitive treatment of anal cancer. Although treatment with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy results in high rates of cure, significant acute and late toxicities are seen. This review focuses on the evolution of treatment-related toxicity for anal cancer. Management of these adverse effects is reviewed, as are future directions in anal cancer treatment and their impact on toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1422, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Suite B1034, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Casadei Gardini A, Passardi A, Fornaro L, Rosetti P, Valgiusti M, Ruscelli S, Monti M, Casadei C, Pagan F, Frassineti GL. Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: A new strategies with anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 123:52-56. [PMID: 29482779 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC) is increasing in both sexes but the standard treatment remains that of 20 years ago. However, interesting data have recently emerged on the use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents and immunotherapy in advanced disease. Thus, new avenues of research are opening up that will hopefully lead to more effective therapeutic strategies. We provide an overview of the latest studies published on this tumor and discuss the possible future therapeutic options for combination therapy, anti-EGFR treatment and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy.
| | - A Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - L Fornaro
- Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - P Rosetti
- Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Valgiusti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - S Ruscelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - M Monti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - C Casadei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - F Pagan
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli, 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - G L Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rusten E, Rekstad BL, Undseth C, Al-Haidari G, Hanekamp B, Hernes E, Hellebust TP, Malinen E, Guren MG. Target volume delineation of anal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:147. [PMID: 28874205 PMCID: PMC5585969 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0883-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare target volume delineation of anal cancer using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to inter-observer and inter-modality variability. Methods Nineteen patients with anal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy were prospectively included. Planning computed tomography (CT) images were co-registered with 18F–fluorodexocyglucose (FDG) PET/CT images and T2 and diffusion weighted (DW) MR images. Three oncologists delineated the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) according to national guidelines and the visible tumor tissue (GTVT). MRI and PET based delineations were evaluated by absolute volumes and Dice similarity coefficients. Results The median volume of the GTVs was 27 and 31 cm3 for PET and MRI, respectively, while it was 6 and 11 cm3 for GTVT. Both GTV and GTVT volumes were highly correlated between delineators (r = 0.90 and r = 0.96, respectively). The median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.75 when comparing the GTVs based on PET/CT (GTVPET) with the GTVs based on MRI and CT (GTVMRI). The median Dice coefficient was 0.56 when comparing the visible tumor volume evaluated by PET (GTVT_PET) with the same volume evaluated by MRI (GTVT_MRI). Margins of 1–2 mm in the axial plane and 7–8 mm in superoinferior direction were required for coverage of the individual observer’s GTVs. Conclusions The rather good agreement between PET- and MRI-based GTVs indicates that either modality may be used for standard target delineation of anal cancer. However, larger deviations were found for GTVT, which may impact future tumor boost strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Espen Rusten
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Medical Physics, Box 4953 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, PO, Norway.
| | | | | | | | - Bettina Hanekamp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivor Hernes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Cammelli S, Guido A, Ferioli M, Siepe G, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Ferrandina G. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for treatment of solid tumors: current insights. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:3755-3772. [PMID: 28794640 PMCID: PMC5538686 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s113119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim This article discusses the current use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques in clinical practice and reviews the available data from clinical outcome studies in different clinical settings. An overview of available literature about clinical outcomes with VMAT stereotactic/radiosurgical treatment is also reported. Materials and methods All published manuscripts reporting the use of VMAT in a clinical setting from 2009 to November 2016 were identified. The search was carried out in December 2016 using the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/Medline). The following words were searched: “volumetric arc therapy”[All Fields] OR “vmat”[All Fields] OR “rapidarc”[All Fields], AND “radiotherapy”[All Fields] AND “Clinical Trial”[All Fields]. Results Overall, 37 studies (21 prospective and 16 retrospective) fulfilling inclusion criteria and thus included in the review evaluated 2,029 patients treated with VMAT; of these patients, ~30.8% had genitourinary (GU) tumors (81% prostate, 19% endometrial), 26.2% head-and-neck cancer (H&NC), 13.9% oligometastases, 11.2% had anorectal cancer, 10.6% thoracic neoplasms (81% breast, 19% lung), and 7.0% brain metastases (BMs). Six different clinical scenarios for VMAT use were identified: 1) BMs, 2) H&NC, 3) thoracic neoplasms, 4) GU cancer, 5) anorectal tumor, and 6) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) performed by VMAT technique in the oligometastatic patient setting. Conclusion The literature addressing the clinical appropriateness of VMAT is scarce. Current literature suggests that VMAT, especially when used as simultaneous integrated boost or SBRT strategy, is an effective safe modality for all cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Campobasso
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Alessandra Guido
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome.,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Miles B, Safran HP, Monk BJ. Therapeutic options for treatment of human papillomavirus-associated cancers - novel immunologic vaccines: ADXS11-001. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2017; 4:10. [PMID: 28725449 PMCID: PMC5512733 DOI: 10.1186/s40661-017-0047-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Survival of patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancer is suboptimal despite the availability of various treatment modalities. The recently developed bacterial vector Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) activates innate and adaptive immune responses and is expected to offer immunologic advantages. Axalimogene filolisbac (AXAL or ADXS11-001) is a novel immunotherapeutic based on the live, irreversibly attenuated Lm fused to the nonhemolytic fragment of listeriolysin O (Lm-LLO) and secretes the Lm-LLO-HPV E7 fusion protein targeting HPV-positive tumors. Herein are reported the development and recent results of various clinical trials in patients with HPV-associated cervical, head and neck, and anal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Miles
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| | | | - Bradley J. Monk
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph’s Hospital, 2222 E. Highland Ave, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016 USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Doll CM, Moughan J, Klimowicz A, Ho CK, Kornaga EN, Lees-Miller SP, Ajani JA, Crane CH, Kachnic LA, Okawara GS, Berk LB, Roof KS, Becker MJ, Grisell DL, Ellis RJ, Sperduto PW, Marsa GW, Guha C, Magliocco AM. Significance of Co-expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Ki67 on Clinical Outcome in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: An Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 9811. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:554-562. [PMID: 28126304 PMCID: PMC5687248 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To measure co-expression of EGFR and Ki67 proteins in pretreatment tumor biopsies of anal cancer patients enrolled on NRG Oncology RTOG 9811, a phase III trial comparing 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C/radiation therapy (Arm A) versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin/radiation therapy (Arm B), and to correlate expression with clinical outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS EGFR and Ki67 co-expression was measured after constructing a tissue microarray using fluorescence immunohistochemistry and automated quantitative image analysis. The Ki67 score within EGFR high versus low areas (Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low) in each tumor core was analyzed at the median, quartiles, and as a continuous variable. Associations between the tumor markers and clinical endpoints (overall and disease-free survival, locoregional and colostomy failure, and distant metastases) were explored. RESULTS A total of 282 pretreatment tumors were analyzed from NRG Oncology RTOG 9811. Of evaluated specimens, 183 (65%, n=89, Arm A; n=94, Arm B) were eligible and analyzable. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or outcomes between analyzable and unanalyzable patient cases. Median follow-up was 6.0 years. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender, patients with Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low ≥median had worse overall survival (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.19, P=.0019). After adjusting for N stage and largest tumor dimension, patients with Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low ≥ median had a higher risk of a disease-free failure (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.92, P=.0078). Technical validation with an independent anal cancer patient cohort was performed and shows a very similar biomarker score distribution. CONCLUSIONS High Ki67ratio in EGFRhigh:low is associated with worse clinical outcome in this subset of patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiation on NRG Oncology RTOG 9811. Evaluation within a clinical trial will be required to determine whether patients with these tumor characteristics may specifically benefit from an EGFR-targeted therapeutic agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Moughan
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Clement K Ho
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Jaffer A Ajani
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gordon S Okawara
- McMaster University Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence B Berk
- Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), Miami Beach, Florida
| | - Kevin S Roof
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Inc, CCOP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Gerald W Marsa
- Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program CCOP, Toledo, Ohio
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M. Cetuximab in the Context of Current Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:699-701. [PMID: 28068173 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.70.9394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Rob Glynne-Jones and Mark Harrison, Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Harrison
- Rob Glynne-Jones and Mark Harrison, Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Garg MK, Zhao F, Sparano JA, Palefsky J, Whittington R, Mitchell EP, Mulcahy MF, Armstrong KI, Nabbout NH, Kalnicki S, El-Rayes BF, Onitilo AA, Moriarty DJ, Fitzgerald TJ, Benson AB. Cetuximab Plus Chemoradiotherapy in Immunocompetent Patients With Anal Carcinoma: A Phase II Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group Trial (E3205). J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:718-726. [PMID: 28068178 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.1667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) is characterized by high locoregional failure (LRF) rates after sphincter-preserving definitive chemoradiation (CRT) and is typically associated with anogenital human papilloma virus infection. Because cetuximab enhances the effect of radiation therapy in human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, we hypothesized that adding cetuximab to CRT would reduce LRF in SCCAC. Methods Sixty-one patients with stage I to III SCCAC received CRT including cisplatin, fluorouracil, and radiation therapy to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (45 to 54 Gy) plus eight once-weekly doses of concurrent cetuximab. The study was designed to detect at least a 50% reduction in 3-year LRF rate (one-sided α, 0.10; power 90%), assuming a 35% LRF rate from historical data. Results Poor risk features included stage III disease in 64% and male sex in 20%. The 3-year LRF rate was 23% (95% CI, 13% to 36%; one-sided P = .03) by binomial proportional estimate using the prespecified end point and 21% (95% CI, 7% to 26%) by Kaplan-Meier estimate in a post hoc analysis using methods consistent with historical data. Three-year rates were 68% (95% CI, 55% to 79%) for progression-free survival and 83% (95% CI, 71% to 91%) for overall survival. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 32%, and 5% had treatment-associated deaths. Conclusion Although the addition of cetuximab to chemoradiation for SCCAC was associated with lower LRF rates than historical data with CRT alone, toxicity was substantial, and LRF still occurs in approximately 20%, indicating the continued need for more effective and less toxic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhur K Garg
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Joel Palefsky
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Richard Whittington
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Karin I Armstrong
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Nassim H Nabbout
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Bassel F El-Rayes
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Adedayo A Onitilo
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Daniel J Moriarty
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Thomas J Fitzgerald
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| | - Al B Benson
- Madhur K. Garg, Joseph A. Sparano, and Shalom Kalnicki, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; Fengmin Zhao, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Joel Palefsky, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Richard Whittington, Philadelphia VA Medical Center; Edith P. Mitchell, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Mary F. Mulcahy and Al B. Benson III, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Karin I. Armstrong, United Hospital, Woodbury, MN; Nassim H. Nabbout, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Adedayo A. Onitilo, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Daniel J. Moriarty, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; and Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Capelli L, Casadei Gardini A, Scarpi E, Frassineti GL, Saragoni L, Puccetti M, Scartozzi M, Giannini M, Tamberi S, Corbelli J, Ulivi P. No evidence of NRAS mutation in squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC). Sci Rep 2016; 6:37621. [PMID: 27886225 PMCID: PMC5122846 DOI: 10.1038/srep37621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is usually expressed in squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC) and anti-EGFR agents could represent a valid treatment strategy, also considering that KRAS and BRAF mutations are rare events in this type of cancer. However, no data are available on NRAS status in SCAC. In this study we analyzed NRAS status (exons 2–4) by Pyrosequencing in a case series of 50 SCAC patients previously characterized in our laboratory for KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations and HPV and HIV infections. We found no mutation in NRAS gene. These results confirm that since the principal anti-EGFR resistance mechanisms are almost absent in SCAC, anti-EGFR agents should be considered for the treatment of this type of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Capelli
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Luca Saragoni
- Pathology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Mario Scartozzi
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Tamberi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Degli Infermi Hospital, Faenza, Italy
| | - Jody Corbelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Degli Infermi Hospital, Faenza, Italy
| | - Paola Ulivi
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Glynne-Jones R, Saleem W, Harrison M, Mawdsley S, Hall M. Background and Current Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Oncol Ther 2016; 4:135-172. [PMID: 28261646 PMCID: PMC5315080 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-016-0024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, a summary of our current understanding of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) and the advances in our knowledge of SCCA regarding screening, prevention, the role of the immune system, current treatment and the potential for novel targets are discussed. The present standard of care in terms of treatment is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) concurrently with radiation, which results in a high level of disease control for small early cancers. Preservation of the anal sphincter is achieved in the majority, although anorectal function is often impaired. Although evidence from prospective studies to support a change in the treatment strategy is lacking, patients with HPV-negative SCCA appear to be less responsive to chemoradiation (CRT) and relapse more frequently. In contrast, HPV-positive tumours usually fare better, but oncological outcomes are modified by smoking and immune incompetence. There is current interest in escalating the radiotherapy dose for larger, more advanced tumours, and de-escalating treatment for HPV-positive tumours. The use of novel immunological treatments to target the underlying different molecular pathways of HPV-positive cancers is exciting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Waqar Saleem
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Suzy Mawdsley
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Marcia Hall
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vinayan A, Glynne-Jones R. Anal cancer - What is the optimum chemoradiotherapy? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30:641-53. [PMID: 27644911 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Revised: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5FU and Mitomycin C is the standard-of-care for squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Phase III trials combined radiation doses of 50-60 Gy with concurrent Fluoropyrimidines, Mitomycin C and Cisplatin in various doses and schedules. CRT is highly successful for early T1/T2 cancers, but results in appreciable late morbidities and still fails to control larger and node-positive tumours. Compliance to chemotherapy is important for local control. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), rotational IMRT, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have enabled smaller margins and highly conformal plans, resulting in decreased radiation doses to the organs at risk and ensuring a shorter overall treatment time. These advances offer the potential for integrating higher doses of radiation, escalation of the currently used drugs and the safe use of other more novel agents with acceptable toxicity. In this chapter potential novel approaches are discussed in the context of SCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vinayan
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK.
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|