Prognostic factors in young ovarian cancer patients: An analysis of four prospective phase III intergroup trials of the AGO Study Group, GINECO and NSGO

Prognostic factors in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer: the Young Ovarian Cancer-Care (YOC-Care) study

OBJECTIVE

To determine oncological outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in women aged <45 years with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was performed of patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer aged <45 years between January 2010 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 998 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer from 55 different institutions in Spain were collected. The median age of the study population was 40.8 years (range 35.6-43.4). The grouped International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage distribution was 508 (50.9%) patients in initial stages (I and II) and 490 (49.1%) with advanced stages (III and IV). Three hundred and twenty-five (32.6%) patients presented with recurrent disease after a median follow-up of 33.1 months (range 16.1-66.4). The type of staging surgery (incomplete vs complete), type of initial treatment modality (primary cytoreduction vs interval surgery), and amount of residual disease were all significantly associated with overall survival. Tumor rupture was noted in 288 (27.9%) cases, but it was not associated with oncologic outcomes (p=0.11 for overall survival). In the multivariate analysis, the response based on radiological findings (HR 3.24, 95% CI 2.14 to 4.91 for partial response; HR 6.93, 95% CI 4.79 to 10.04 for progression), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.94), and FIGO stage (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.02) were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with worse oncologic outcomes (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The partial and progression radiology-based response after chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and advanced FIGO stage are independent prognostic factors associated with worse oncological outcomes in women aged <45 years with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer in younger age versus older age groups: Survival and clinicopathological features

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the survivals and clinicopathological features of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in younger age patients and to determine the impact of age on survival.

METHODS

EOC patients aged ≤40 years were matched to patients aged >40 years at a 1:4 ratio. Disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinicopathological and treatment features were compared between patients aged ≤40 and >40 years.

RESULTS

A total of 763 EOC patients were reviewed. During a median follow-up period of 41 (range, 1-195) months, EOC patients aged ≤40 and >40 years did not show any statistically significant difference in median DSS (120 versusversus 84.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.58, 1.06); however, the median PFS was better in patients aged ≤40 years (median PFS not reached versusversus 41 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.5, 0.85). Age ≤40 years was an independent favorable prognostic factor for DSS at 3 years after diagnosis. In contrast, younger age was an independent poor prognostic factor prior to this time point. EOC patients aged ≤40 years exhibited a significantly higher rate of early-stage disease, a higher proportion of mucinous subtype, and lower cancer antigen-125 level.

CONCLUSION

Overall, EOC patients in the younger age group were associated with more favorable prognostic factors and showed better PFS, but not DSS, than those in the older age group. Younger age was identified as an unfavorable prognostic factor within 3 years of diagnosis and became a favorable prognostic factor after 3 years.

LncRNA IDH1-AS1 sponges miR-518c-5p to suppress proliferation of epithelial ovarian cancer cell by targeting RMB47

Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) IDH1 antisense RNA 1 ( IDH1-AS1) is involved in the progression of multiple cancers, but its role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the expression levels of IDH1-AS1 in EOC cells and normal ovarian epithelial cells by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). We first evaluated the effects of IDH1-AS1 on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of EOC cells through cell counting kit-8, colony formation, EdU, transwell, wound-healing, and xenograft assays. We then explored the downstream targets of IDH1-AS1 and verified the results by a dual-luciferase reporter, qPCR, rescue experiments, and Western blotting. We found that the expression levels of IDH1-AS1 were lower in EOC cells than in normal ovarian epithelial cells. High IDH1-AS1 expression of EOC patients from the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database indicated a favorable prognosis, because IDH1-AS1 inhibited cell proliferation and xenograft tumor growth of EOC. IDH1-AS1 sponged miR-518c-5p whose overexpression promoted EOC cell proliferation. The miR-518c-5p mimic also reversed the proliferation-inhibiting effect induced by IDH1-AS1 overexpression. Furthermore, we found that RNA binding motif protein 47 (RBM47) was the downstream target of miR-518c-5p, that upregulation of RBM47 inhibited EOC cell proliferation, and that RBM47 overexpressing plasmid counteracted the proliferation-promoting effect caused by the IDH1-AS1 knockdown. Taken together, IDH1-AS1 may suppress EOC cell proliferation and tumor growth via the miR-518c-5p/RBM47 axis.

Do ethnic chinese older adults with epithelial ovarian cancer survive a poorer prognosis?

BACKGROUND

The risk of suffering epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) for women increases with age evidently, while the prognosis of older EOC patients remain unclear. Against the backdrop of the accelerate aging process in China, this paper investigates whether the older EOC patients have a lower overall survival probability than the younger patients based on the sample of ethnic Chinese population.

METHODS

A total of 323 ethnic Chinese patients diagnosed as epithelial ovarian cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We compared the overall survival probability between the younger group (< 70 years) and the older patients group (≥ 70 years). Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, comparisons among different subgroups were evaluated using log-rank tests, and independent prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

43 patients were (13.3%) in the older patients group and 280 (86.7%) in the younger group. The distribution patterns between two groups were significantly different with regard to marital status, histologic type and FIGO stage. The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the younger group than the older patients group (not reached vs. median 39 months, p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the age (The older vs. the younger, HR: 1.967, P = 0.007), primary tumor laterality (HR: 1.849, P = 0.009), and FIGO stage (III vs. I, HR: 3.588, P = 0.001; and IV vs. I, HR: 4.382, P = 0.001; respectively) remained as important risk factors while Histology (HGSOC vs. CCOC, HR: 0.479, P = 0.025; and LGSOC/MOC/EC vs. CCOC, HR: 0.390, P = 0.034; respectively) and the number of lymph node dissected more than 10 was a protective factor (HR: 0.397, P = 0.008). In an analysis of 104 pairs of patients matched on the basis of the propensity score, the older patients group had significantly lower overall mortality (HR = 2.561, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Ethnic Chinese Older EOC patients have a worse prognosis than the younger patients.

Residual Disease Threshold After Primary Surgical Treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Part 1: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We present a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) that is the precursor underpinning the Bayesian analyses that adjust for publication bias, presented in the same edition in AJT. The review assesses optimal cytoreduction for women undergoing primary advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) surgery.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

To assess the impact of residual disease (RD) after primary debulking surgery in women with advanced EOC. This review explores the impact of leaving varying levels of primary debulking surgery.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review and random-effects NMA for overall survival (OS) to incorporate direct and indirect estimates of RD thresholds, including concurrent comparative, retrospective studies of ≥100 adult women (18+ years) with surgically staged advanced EOC (FIGO stage III/IV) who had confirmed histological diagnoses of ovarian cancer. Pairwise meta-analyses of all directly compared RD thresholds was previously performed before conducting this NMA, and the statistical heterogeneity of studies within each comparison was evaluated using recommended methods.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

Twenty-five studies (n = 20,927) were included. Analyses demonstrated the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction to no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD), with a hazard ratio for OS of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.2) for <1 cm RD threshold versus NMRD. NMRD was associated with prolonged survival across all RD thresholds. Leaving NMRD was predicted to provide longest survival (probability of being best = 99%). The results were robust to sensitivity analysis including only those studies that adjusted for extent of disease at primary surgery (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.6). The overall certainty of evidence was moderate and statistical adjustment of effect estimates in included studies minimized bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm a strong association between complete cytoreduction to NMRD and improved OS. The NMA approach forms part of the methods guidance underpinning policy making in many jurisdictions. Our analyses present an extension to the previous work in this area.

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).

Prolonged Exposition with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) May Provide Survival Benefit after Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) in Advanced Primary Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Background: The usage of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced gynecological cancers is increasing. Methods: Prospectively collected data of 85 advanced primary ovarian/fallopian tube cancer and peritoneal carcinoma patients of a single center were investigated. Results: A total 48, 37, 62, and 25 patients were enrolled into the HIPEC with/without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (upfront vs. interval) and into the 60 min and 90 min long HIPEC groups, respectively. Better overall survival (OS) was observed in the 90 min HIPEC group (p = 0.0330), compared to the 60 min HIPEC group. Neither OS (p = 0. 2410), disease-specific (p = 0. 3670), nor recurrence-free survival (p = 0.8240) differed between upfront and interval HIPEC. Higher peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) values were associated with worse disease-specific survival (p = 0.0724). Age (p = 0.0416), body mass index (p = 0.0044), PCI (p < 0.0001), the type (p = 0.0016) and duration (p = 0.0012) of HIPEC, and increased perioperative morbidity (p < 0.0041) had the greatest impact on OS. Conclusions: Increasing data support the value of HIPEC in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Ongoing prospective studies will definitively clarify the role and timing of this additional therapeutic approach.

Cost-utility analysis of risk-reducing strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers in Switzerland

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the most cost-effective of all prophylactic measures available in Switzerland for women not yet affected by breast and ovarian cancer who tested positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation.

METHODS

Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy (PBM), salpingo-oophorectomy (PBSO), combined PBM&PBSO and chemoprevention (CP) initiated at age 40 years were compared with intensified surveillance (IS). A Markov model with a life-long time horizon was developed from the perspective of the Swiss healthcare system using mainly literature-derived data to evaluate costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and survival. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% per year. Robustness of the results was tested with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

All prophylactic measures were found to be cost-saving with an increase in QALYs and life years (LYs) compared to IS. PBM&PBSO were found to be most cost-effective and dominated all other strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Lifetime costs averaged to 141,293 EUR and 14.5 QALYs per woman with a BRCA1 mutation under IS, versus 76,639 EUR and 19.2 QALYs for PBM&PBSO. Corresponding results for IS per woman with a BRCA2 mutation were 102,245 EUR and 15.5 QALYs, versus 60,770 EUR and 19.9 QALYs for PBM&PBSO. The results were found to be robust in sensitivity analysis; no change in the dominant strategy for either BRCA-mutation was observed.

CONCLUSION

All more invasive strategies were found to increase life expectancy and quality of life of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and were cost-saving for the Swiss healthcare system compared to IS.

Clinical significance of CD8-positive lymphocytes on tumor cell clusters of ascites cell block in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma

Background

The clinical significance of CD8‐positive (CD8⁺) lymphocytes on tumor cell clusters of ascites cell blocks in patients with ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) was investigated.

Methods

Among HGSC patients who underwent surgery from January 2014 to December 2019, 38 patients with ascites cell block were selected. Using these cell blocks and primary ovarian tumor tissue, the presence of CD8⁺ lymphocytes and the expression of PD‐L1 were examined immunohistochemically. Tumor cell clusters were defined as cell clumps consisting of more than 10 malignant cells in cell block. Cases with at least one CD8⁺ lymphocyte in tumor cell cluster were defined as positive CD8⁺ lymphocytes (Group A); others were defined as negative CD8⁺ lymphocytes (Group B). The tumor tissue CD8⁺ lymphocytes were counted mechanically. Clinicopathological features were retrospectively compared between the two groups.

Results

In total, 38 cases were identified: 25 (65.8%) in Group A and 13 (34.2%) in Group B. More cases in Group A were positive for CD4 (p < 0.01), PD‐L1 (p = 0.02), FoxP3 (p = 0.02) and had a higher number of CD8⁺ lymphocytes in the tissue (p = 0.03). Patients in Group A had better progression‐free survival (p < 0.01) and overall survival (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, Group A was an independent prognostic factor for both progression‐free survival (hazard ratio, 0.24; p < 0.01) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.21; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

The presence of CD8⁺ lymphocytes in tumor cell clusters of ascites was associated with the status of immune reaction in the tissue and prognosis in patients with HGSC and might be useful information of the immune‐associated therapy.

Predictors of Survival Outcomes After Primary Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Lagos, Nigeria

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathologic predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following primary treatment in Lagos, Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from a retrospective cohort of 126 patients who received treatment for EOC between 2010 and 2018, we identified 83 patients with a complete clinical record for subsequent data analysis. Patients' demographics and updated 2-year follow-up status were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors of survivals following treatment in EOC patients.

RESULTS

The median PFS and OS were 12 and 24 months, respectively. After adjusting for covariates in the multivariate analysis, younger age ≤ 55 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.74; P = .01) and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I/II (HR = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.08; P = .01) were independent predictors of improved PFS, whereas being premenopausal (HR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.75; P = .02) was an independent predictor of reduced OS after 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PFS could be predicted by the age and FIGO stage of the disease, whereas menopausal status was predictive of OS in patients with EOC. This knowledge should form the basis for counseling patients with ovarian cancer during their primary treatment and lend support to the importance of aggressive follow-up and monitoring for the older, premenopausal patients and those with an advanced stage of epithelial ovarian cancer. However, robust longitudinal research should be carried out to provide additional reliable insight to this information.

Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives

AIM

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can be a devastating diagnosis in women of reproductive age who desire future fertility. However, in early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in appropriately selected patients.

METHODS

This is a narrative descriptive review of the recent literature on FSS for EOC from oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate following FSS performed for stage I EOC in published retrospective studies collectively is 13% but ranges from 5 to 29%, while mortality ranges from 0 to 18%. Five-year disease-free survival following FSS is over 90% but decreases with higher stage and grade. Recurrences following FSS are more likely to be localized with a more favorable prognosis compared to recurrences following radical surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in women with high-risk disease, and strategies to minimize gonadotoxicity during chemotherapy such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be considered. Oocyte, embryo and/or ovarian cryopreservation can also be offered to patients desiring future biologic children. Reproductive outcomes following FSS, including pregnancy and miscarriage rates, resemble those of the general population, with a chance of successful pregnancy of nearly 80%.

CONCLUSION

In retrospective data, FSS appears to be oncologically safe in stage IA and IC grade 1-2 non-clear cell EOC. In patients with grade 3 tumors or clear cell histology, treatment can be individualized, weighing a slightly higher risk of recurrence with fertility goals. A multidisciplinary approach with oncology and reproductive endocrinology may be of utility to help these patients achieve their fertility goals.

Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Ovarian Carcinoma

Ovarian cancer (OC) spread to retro-peritoneal lymph nodes is detected in about one out of two patients at primary diagnosis. Whether the histologic pattern of lymph node involvement i.e., intra-(ICG) or extracapsular (ECG) cancer growth may affect patients’ prognosis remains unknown. The aim of the current study was to analyze the prevalence of ECG and ICG in lymph node positive ovarian cancer. We further investigated whether ECG may be related to patients’ prognosis and whether biomarkers expressed in the primary tumor may predict the pattern of lymph node involvement. Lymph node samples stemming from 143 OC patients were examined for presence of ECG. Capsular extravasation was tested for statistical association with clinico-pathological variables. We further tested 27 biomarkers that had been determined in primary tumor tissue for their potential to predict ECG in metastatic lymph nodes. ECG was detected in 35 (24.5%) of 143 lymph node positive patients. High grade (p = 0.043), histologic subtype (p = 0.006) and high lymph node ratio (LNR) (p < 0.001) were positively correlated with presence of ECG. Both ECG (p = 0.024) and high LNR (p = 0.008) were predictive for shortened overall survival. A four-protein signature determined from the primary tumor tissue was associated with presence of concomitant extracapsular spread in lymph nodes of the respective patient. This work found extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis to be a common feature of lymph node positive ovarian cancer. Since ECG was positively associated with grade, LNR and shortened overall survival, we hypothesize that the presence of ECG may be interpreted as an indicator of tumor aggressiveness.

CLINICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PRE- AND POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH OVARIAN CARCINOMA

AIMS

To assess the impact of prognostic factors on the outcome of ovarian carcinoma (OC) and to determine the difference between pre and postmenopausal patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort, single centre study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One-hundred-sixty patients with stage IC-IV OC diagnosed between 2004-2016 were included. Treatment consisted in primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (n=127, 79.4%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (n=27, 16.9%) and chemotherapy alone (3.7%).

RESULTS

At diagnosis 62 patients (38.8%) were premenopausal. Most patients presented with advanced OC (stage III/IV, 63.1%). After a median follow-up of 60 months, median progression free survival (PFS) for all stages was 36 months and median overall survival (OS) was 96 months. Postmenopausal patients had a poorer oncologic outcome compared with pre-menopausal women (PFS 24 vs. 72 months, p=0.0001, HR=2.32). Other clinical prognostic factors identified were performance status 1 vs. 0 (p=0.0001), ascites (p=0.027). Pathology prognostic factors were tumour grade (G1 vs. G2 and G3, p=0.0001) and endometrioid subtype compared to serous (p=0.008). Patients with residual disease after surgery had an increased risk of recurrence and death (HR=6.1, p=0.0001 and HR=4.2, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Premenopausal patients had a better oncologic long-term outcome and stage, ascites, grading, residual disease, were independent prognostic factors.

Alofanib, an allosteric FGFR2 inhibitor, has potent effects on ovarian cancer growth in preclinical studies

SUMMAY

Purpose Early data suggest that combining FGFR2 inhibitors with platinum-containing cytotoxic agents for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer may yield increased antitumor activity. We investigated antitumor activity of alofanib (RPT835), a novel allosteric FGFR2 inhibitor, in ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo. Methods Equal amounts of ovarian cancer cell (SKOV3) lysates were analyzed for FGFR1-3 protein expression using Wes. To assess the efficacy of alofanib on FGF-mediated cell proliferation, SKOV3 cells were incubated and were treated with serially diluted alofanib. Basic FGF was added at a concentration of 25 ng/ml. Control wells were left untreated. Cell growth inhibition was determined using Promega's Cell Titer-Glo® assay. Immunocompromised mice were used for xenotransplantation of SKOV3 cancer cells. Seventy animals with measurable tumors were selected on day 10 and randomized into control groups (no treatment or chemotherapy alone (paclitaxel + carboplatin) and treatment groups (alofanib orally or intravenously (different dose levels) in combination with chemotherapy). Measurements of tumor volume (mm3) were performed by digital calipers every 3 days during 31 days after tumor inoculation. Number of tumor vessels and Ki-67 index were calculated. Results SKOV3 cells express FGFR1 and FGFR2 but not FGFR3. Basic FGF increased proliferation of the ovarian cancer cells in untreated control group (P = 0.001). Alofanib inhibited growth of FGFR2-expressing SKOV3 cells with GI50 value of 0.37 μmol/L. Treatment with alofanib in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin resulted in tumor growth delay phenotype in all treatment groups compared to control non-treatment groups. Compound exhibited a dose-dependent effect on tumor growth. Daily intravenous regimen of alofanib (total maximum dose per week was 350 mg/kg) demonstrated significant effect (inhibiting growth by 80 % and by 53 % in comparison with vehicle and chemotherapy group alone, respectively (P < 0.001). Alofanib decreased number of vessels in tumor (-49 %; P < 0.0001) and number of Ki-67-positive SKOV3 cells (-42 %, P < 0.05). There were tumor necrosis and cell degeneration in alofanib group. Conclusions We suggest that FGFR2 inhibition has potent effects on ovarian cancer growth in preclinical studies.