Discrepancy in BRAF status among patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: A meta-analysis

Advancements and Challenges in Personalized Therapy for BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review

Over the past several decades, advancements in the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma have led to the development of BRAF inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, anti-PD-1 therapy, and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Although these therapies have shown substantial efficacy in clinical trials, their sustained effectiveness is often challenged by the tumor microenvironment, which is a highly heterogeneous and complex milieu of immunosuppressive cells that affect tumor progression. The era of personalized medicine holds substantial promise for the tailoring of treatments to individual genetic profiles. However, tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms contribute to the resistance to immunotherapy. Despite these challenges, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, as exemplified by lifileucel, has demonstrated notable efficacy against BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Additionally, early response biomarkers, such as COX-2 and MMP2, along with FDG-PET imaging, offer the potential to improve personalized immunotherapy by predicting patient responses and determining the optimal treatment duration. Future efforts should focus on reducing the T-cell harvesting periods and costs associated with TIL therapy to enhance efficiency and accessibility.

Genetic Concordance in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma and Matched Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Studying primary melanoma and its corresponding metastasis has twofold benefits. Firstly, to better understand tumor biology, and secondly, to determine which sample should be examined in assessing drug targets. This study systematically analyzed all the literature on primary melanoma and its matched metastasis. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched multiple medical databases for relevant publications from January 2000 to December 2022, assessed the quality of the primary-level studies using the QUIPS tool, and summarized the concordance rate of the most reported genes using the random-effects model. Finally, we evaluated the inter-study heterogeneity using the subgroup analysis. Thirty-one studies investigated the concordance of BRAF and NRAS in 1220 and 629 patients, respectively. The pooled concordance rate was 89.4% [95% CI: 84.5; 93.5] for BRAF and 97.8% [95% CI: 95.8; 99.4] for NRAS. When high-quality studies were considered, only BRAF mutation status consistency increased. Five studies reported the concordance status of c-KIT (93%, 44 patients) and TERT promoter (64%, 53 patients). Lastly, three studies analyzed the concordance of cancer genes involved in the signaling pathways, apoptosis, and proliferation, such as CDKN2A (25%, four patients), TP53 (44%, nine patients), and PIK3CA (20%, five patients). Our study found that the concordance of known drug targets (mainly BRAF) during melanoma progression is higher than in previous meta-analyses, likely due to advances in molecular techniques. Furthermore, significant heterogeneity exists in the genes involved in the melanoma genetic makeup; although our results are based on small patient samples, more research is necessary for validation.

Dynamic ctDNA Mutational Complexity in Patients with Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis promises to improve the clinical care of people with cancer, address health inequities and guide translational research. This observational cohort study used ctDNA to follow 29 patients with advanced-stage cutaneous melanoma through multiple cycles of immunotherapy.

METHOD

A melanoma-specific ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and mass spectrometry analysis were used to identify ctDNA mutations in longitudinal blood plasma samples from Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) patients receiving immunotherapy for melanoma. These technologies were used in conjunction to identify the breadth and complexity of tumour genomic information that ctDNA analysis can reliably report.

RESULTS

During the course of immunotherapy treatment, a high level of dynamic mutational complexity was identified in blood plasma, including multiple BRAF mutations in the same patient, clinically relevant BRAF mutations emerging through therapy and co-occurring sub-clonal BRAF and NRAS mutations. The technical validity of this ctDNA analysis was supported by high sample analysis-reanalysis concordance, as well as concordance between different ctDNA measurement technologies. In addition, we observed > 90% concordance in the detection of ctDNA when using cell-stabilising collection tubes followed by 7-day delayed processing, compared with standard EDTA blood collection protocols with rapid processing. We also found that the undetectability of ctDNA at a proportion of treatment cycles was associated with durable clinical benefit (DCB).

CONCLUSION

We found that multiple ctDNA processing and analysis methods consistently identified complex longitudinal patterns of clinically relevant mutations, adding support for expanded clinical trials of this technology in a variety of oncology settings.

Computer-Assisted Annotation of Digital H&E/SOX10 Dual Stains Generates High-Performing Convolutional Neural Network for Calculating Tumor Burden in H&E-Stained Cutaneous Melanoma

Deep learning for the analysis of H&E stains requires a large annotated training set. This may form a labor-intensive task involving highly skilled pathologists. We aimed to optimize and evaluate computer-assisted annotation based on digital dual stains of the same tissue section. H&E stains of primary and metastatic melanoma (N = 77) were digitized, re-stained with SOX10, and re-scanned. Because images were aligned, annotations of SOX10 image analysis were directly transferred to H&E stains of the training set. Based on 1,221,367 annotated nuclei, a convolutional neural network for calculating tumor burden (CNN_TB) was developed. For primary melanomas, precision of annotation was 100% (95%CI, 99% to 100%) for tumor cells and 99% (95%CI, 98% to 100%) for normal cells. Due to low or missing tumor-cell SOX10 positivity, precision for normal cells was markedly reduced in lymph-node and organ metastases compared with primary melanomas (p < 0.001). Compared with stereological counts within skin lesions, mean difference in tumor burden was 6% (95%CI, -1% to 13%, p = 0.10) for CNN_TB and 16% (95%CI, 4% to 28%, p = 0.02) for pathologists. Conclusively, the technique produced a large annotated H&E training set with high quality within a reasonable timeframe for primary melanomas and subcutaneous metastases. For these lesion types, the training set generated a high-performing CNN_TB, which was superior to the routine assessments of pathologists.

The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor ITF2357 (Givinostat) Targets Oncogenic BRAF in Melanoma Cells and Promotes a Switch from Pro-Survival Autophagy to Apoptosis

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACI) are epigenetic compounds that have been widely considered very promising antitumor agents. Here, we focus on the effects of the pan-HDAC inhibitor ITF2357 (Givinostat) in comparison with SAHA (Vorinostat) in melanoma cells bearing BRAF V600E oncogenic mutation. Our results indicate both ITF2357 and SAHA dose-dependently reduce the viability of BRAF-mutated SK-MEL-28 and A375 melanoma cells. The comparison of IC50 values revealed that ITF2357 was much more effective than SAHA. Interestingly, both inhibitors markedly decreased oncogenic BRAF protein expression levels, ITF2357 being the most effective compound. Moreover, the BRAF decrease induced by ITF2357 was accompanied by a decrease in the level of phospho-ERK1/2. The inhibitor of upstream MEK activity, U0126, reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation and dramatically potentiated the antitumor effect of ITF2357, exacerbating the reduction in the BRAF level. ITF2357 stimulated an early pro-survival autophagic response, which was followed by apoptosis, as indicated by apoptotic markers evaluation and the protective effects exerted by the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VADfmk. Overall, our data indicate for the first time that ITF2357 targets oncogenic BRAF in melanoma cells and induces a switch from autophagy to classic apoptosis, thus representing a possible candidate in melanoma targeted therapy.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumor and causes 90% of skin cancer mortality. A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on CM diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and shall always be confirmed with dermatoscopy. If a melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermatoscopy and full body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early melanoma. Where available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma shall be classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Thin melanomas up to 0.8 mm tumor thickness do not require further imaging diagnostics. From stage IB onwards, examinations with lymph node sonography are recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIC onwards whole-body examinations with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) in combination with brain magnetic resonance imaging are recommended. From stage III and higher, mutation testing is recommended, particularly for BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to provide a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. There is no evidence to define the frequency and extent of examinations. A stage-based follow-up scheme is proposed which, according to the experience of the guideline group, covers the optimal requirements, but further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2024.

BRAF Immunoexpression Can Be Intralesionally Heterogeneous but BRAF V600E Mutation Status Is Intralesionally Homogeneous and Interlesionally Concordant in Melanoma: A Study of 140 Lesions From 98 Patients

ABSTRACT

This study sought to confirm the homogeneity of BRAF V600E mutation status in melanoma. BRAF immunohistochemistry was performed on 102 lesions from 60 patients of melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation and 38 negative-control melanoma lesions from 38 patients, both of which were confirmed by real-time PCR or the MassARRAY System. In the positive-control lesions, 9 lesions from 7 patients with preceding BRAF-inhibitor therapy were included. Of the 102 BRAF-mutant lesions, 101 (99.0%) showed diffuse BRAF immunoexpression, but 39 (38.2%) of them showed various heterogeneous intensities. The heterogeneous intensity of immunostaining was due to necrosis (n = 10), minimal or clear cytoplasm (n = 5), tissue crush (n = 8), insufficient fixation (n = 24), or technical error (n = 4). Only 1 lesion (1.0%) with nondiffuse immunoexpression harbored 80% weakly BRAF-positive tumor area and 20% BRAF-negative area with tissue damage. Sanger sequencing performed on the weak or negative regions in 7 lesions revealed BRAF V600E mutation in all the tested lesions. By contrast, all 38 negative-control lesions demonstrated no BRAF immunoexpression. This study demonstrated intralesional homogeneity and interlesional concordance for BRAF V600E mutation status and intralesional frequent heterogeneity for BRAF immunoexpression. The abovementioned 5 phenomena caused substantial reduction in BRAF immunostaining intensity. In 9 lesions within this study, BRAF immunoexpression and BRAF V600E point mutation status were not affected by preceding BRAF inhibitor therapy. Our data would also support the position that it does not matter whether we select primary or metastatic samples for BRAF mutation analysis.

Emerging Systemic Treatment Perspectives on Brain Metastases: Moving Toward a Better Outlook for Patients

The diagnosis of brain metastases has historically been a dreaded, end-stage complication of systemic disease. Additionally, with the increasing effectiveness of systemic therapies that prolong life expectancy and improved imaging tools, the incidence of intracranial progression is becoming more common. Within this context, there has been increasing attention directed at understanding the molecular underpinnings of intracranial progression. Exploring the unique features of brain metastases compared with their extracranial counterparts to identify aberrant signaling pathways, which can be targeted pharmacologically, may help lead to new treatments for this patient population. Additionally, critical discoveries outside the sphere of the central nervous system are increasingly being applied to brain metastases with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibition, becoming a prevalent treatment option for patients with brain metastases across multiple histologies. As novel treatment strategies are considered, they require thoughtful incorporation of agents that can cross the blood-brain barrier and can synergize with pre-existing agents through rational combinations. Lastly, as clinicians and scientists continue to understand key molecular features of these tumors, they will continue to influence the treatment algorithms that are developing for the management of these patients. Due to the complexity of treatment decisions for patients with brain metastases, an emerging tool is the utilization of multidisciplinary brain metastasis tumor boards to ensure optimal treatment decisions are made and that patients are provided access to applicable clinical trials. Looking to the future, the collective effort to understand the various tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors that promote central nervous system seeding and propagation will have the potential to change the clinical trajectory for these patients.

A Need for More Molecular Profiling in Brain Metastases

As local disease control improves, the public health impact of brain metastases (BrM) continues to grow. Molecular features are frequently different between primary and metastatic tumors as a result of clonal evolution during neoplasm migration, selective pressures imposed by systemic treatments, and differences in the local microenvironment. However, biomarker information in BrM is not routinely obtained despite emerging evidence of its clinical value. We review evidence of discordance in clinically actionable biomarkers between primary tumors, extracranial metastases, and BrM. Although BrM biopsy/resection imposes clinical risks, these risks must be weighed against the potential benefits of assessing biomarkers in BrM. First, new treatment targets unique to a patient's BrM may be identified. Second, as BrM may occur late in a patient's disease course, resistance to initial targeted therapies and/or loss of previously identified biomarkers can occur by the time of occult BrM, rendering initial and other targeted therapies ineffective. Thus, current biomarker data can inform real-time treatment options. Third, biomarker information in BrM may provide useful prognostic information for patients. Appreciating the importance of biomarker analyses in BrM tissue, including how it may identify specific drivers of BrM, is critical for the development of more effective treatment strategies to improve outcomes for this growing patient population.

A biomarker panel predicts recurrence-free survival in ulcerated primary cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Ulceration is an independent adverse prognostic factor in cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). There is, however, a need for additional prognostic markers to identify patients with ulcerated stage I-II CMM who have a high-risk for recurrence. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic impact of BRAF mutation, proliferation and presence of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in primary ulcerated CMM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have used a consecutive cohort consisting of 71 primary ulcerated CMM (T1b-T4b). BRAF mutation was detected using Cobas test and pyrosequencing. Protein expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 was analysed using immunohistochemistry. Presence of TILs was evaluated in representative hematoxylin-eosin stained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour sections.

RESULTS

Proportion of BRAF mutated alleles, proliferation and presence of TILs all had a statistically significant impact on recurrence free survival in univariate analyses (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.23-4.84, p = 0.011; HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.32-5.35, p = 0.006 respectively HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.98, p = 0.045). A trend test found a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of recurrence by including the three favourable factors (BRAF wildtype/low proportion of BRAF mutated alleles, low proliferation and high presence of TILs) (p = 0.0004). When at least two out of three factors were present there was a statistically significant association with longer recurrence free survival in the multivariate analysis (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.61, p = 0.001) when adjusted for Breslow thickness, an established independent prognostic marker for CMM.

CONCLUSION

Thus, this panel of markers could be an interesting novel concept for predicting the clinical outcome in patients with high-risk stage I-II ulcerated CMM.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Underpinnings of Melanoma Genesis, Progression, and Metastasis

Melanoma is a deadly skin cancer with rapidly increasing incidence worldwide. The discovery of the genetic drivers of melanomagenesis in the last decade has led the World Health Organization to reclassify melanoma subtypes by their molecular pathways rather than traditional clinical and histopathologic features. Despite this significant advance, the genomic and transcriptomic drivers of metastatic progression are less well characterized. This review describes the known molecular pathways of cutaneous and uveal melanoma progression, highlights recently identified pathways and mediators of metastasis, and touches on the influence of the tumor microenvironment on metastatic progression and treatment resistance. While targeted therapies and immune checkpoint blockade have significantly aided in the treatment of advanced disease, acquired drug resistance remains an unfortunately common problem, and there is still a great need to identify potential prognostic markers and novel therapeutic targets to aid in such cases.

Radiomics for the noninvasive prediction of the BRAF mutation status in patients with melanoma brain metastases

BACKGROUND

The BRAF V600E mutation is present in approximately 50% of patients with melanoma brain metastases and an important prerequisite for response to targeted therapies, particularly BRAF inhibitors. As heterogeneity in terms of BRAF mutation status may occur in melanoma patients, a wild-type extracranial primary tumor does not necessarily rule out a targetable mutation in brain metastases using BRAF inhibitors. We evaluated the potential of MRI radiomics for a noninvasive prediction of the intracranial BRAF mutation status.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with melanoma brain metastases from two university brain tumor centers (group 1, 45 patients; group 2, 14 patients) underwent tumor resection with subsequent genetic analysis of the intracranial BRAF mutation status. Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI was manually segmented and analyzed. Group 1 was used for model training and validation, group 2 for model testing. After radiomics feature extraction, a test-retest analysis was performed to identify robust features prior to feature selection. Finally, the best performing radiomics model was applied to the test data. Diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 45 patients (49%) in group 1, and 8 of 14 patients (57%) in group 2 had an intracranial BRAF V600E mutation. A linear support vector machine classifier using a six-parameter radiomics signature yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.92 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 88%) in the test data.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed radiomics classifier allows a noninvasive prediction of the intracranial BRAF V600E mutation status in patients with melanoma brain metastases with high diagnostic performance.

[BRAF mutation evolution in melanoma: Myth or reality?]

Knowledge of the BRAF mutational status has become essential for melanoma therapeutic management. B-Raf inhibitors are associated with significant overall survival in patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Although the BRAF mutation appears to be an early and driver mutation, some authors hypothesized that its expression was not stable during melanoma progression, suggesting a molecular heterogeneity. This argument is often used to explain discrepancy in molecular status among patients with melanoma, discrepancies that we occasionally met during our practice. We retrospectively compared BRAF mutational status on matched melanoma samples (primary & metastatic lesions), thus 150 samples from 56 patients were analysed through immunohistochemistry anti-BRAF, PCR-HRM and Sanger sequencing, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR. Seven cases presented an apparent tumor heterogeneity. The analysis of these discrepancies by a technique of increasing sensitivity made it possible to identify 1 false-negative result for the immunohistochemistry, 1 false-negative result for the NGS sequencing and 5 (3%) false-negative results by PCR-HRM SANGER. Our results are consistent with the most recent data, demonstrating the stability of the BRAF mutation during the course of melanoma. Immunohistochemistry shows excellent sensitivity for detecting the main BRAF mutation. In our study, the mutational heterogeneity was actually misleading, a result of imperfect sensitivity of some older molecular approaches.

Predictive Evaluation on Cytological Sample of Metastatic Melanoma: The Role of BRAF Immunocytochemistry in the Molecular Era

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous malignant melanoma is an aggressive neoplasm. In advanced cases, the therapeutic choice depends on the mutational status of BRAF. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) is often applied to the management of patients affected by melanoma, mainly for the diagnosis of metastases. The evaluation of BRAF mutational status by sequencing technique on cytological samples may be inconvenient, as it is a time and biomaterial-consuming technique. Recently, BRAF immunocytochemistry (ICC) was applied for the evaluation of BRAF V600E mutational status. Although it may be useful mainly in cytological samples, data about BRAF ICC on cytological samples are missing.

METHODS

We performed BRAF ICC on a series of 50 FNA samples of metastatic melanoma. BRAF molecular analysis was performed on the same cytological samples or on the corresponding histological samples. Molecular analysis was considered the gold standard.

RESULTS

BRAF ICC results were adequate in 49 out of 50 (98%) cases, positive in 15 out of 50 (30%) cases and negative in 34 out of 50 (68%) of cases. Overall, BRAF ICC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value results were 88.2%, 100%, 100% and 94.1%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of BRAF ICC results was perfect when molecular evaluation was performed on the same cytological samples. Hyperpigmentation represents the main limitation of the technique.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF ICC is a rapid, cost-effective method for detecting BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma metastases, applicable with high diagnostic performance to cytological samples. It could represent the first step to evaluate BRAF mutational status in cytological samples, mainly in poorly cellular cases.

The BRAF P.V600E Mutation Status of Melanoma Lung Metastases Cannot Be Discriminated on Computed Tomography by LIDC Criteria nor Radiomics Using Machine Learning

Patients with BRAF mutated (BRAF-mt) metastatic melanoma benefit significantly from treatment with BRAF inhibitors. Currently, the BRAF status is determined on archival tumor tissue or on fresh tumor tissue from an invasive biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether radiomics can predict the BRAF status in a non-invasive manner. Patients with melanoma lung metastases, known BRAF status, and a pretreatment computed tomography scan were included. After semi-automatic annotation of the lung lesions (maximum two per patient), 540 radiomics features were extracted. A chest radiologist scored all segmented lung lesions according to the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) criteria. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of each feature for BRAF mutation status. A combination of various machine learning methods was used to develop BRAF decision models based on the radiomics features and LIDC criteria. A total of 169 lung lesions from 103 patients (51 BRAF-mt; 52 BRAF wild type) were included. There were no features with a significant discriminative value in the univariate analysis. Models based on radiomics features and LIDC criteria both performed as poorly as guessing. Hence, the BRAF mutation status in melanoma lung metastases cannot be predicted using radiomics features or visually scored LIDC criteria.

Recent advances in molecular targeted therapy for unresectable and metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma

The clinical outcome of BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma has been improved by both molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Long-term follow-up data reveal durable clinical responses in patients receiving first-line combinations of BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors, particularly those showing a complete response. Clinical outcomes are also associated with the lactate dehydrogenase levels and the number of metastatic organs. Although brain metastasis is frequently difficult to control, systemic therapy is preferred in cases with small and asymptomatic brain metastases associated with progressive extra-cranial disease. Control of intra-cranial disease with BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors is comparable with that of immune checkpoint inhibitors, although immune checkpoint inhibitors are superior to targeted therapies with respect to survival. The BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors regimen is well-tolerated, and toxicities are usually manageable and reversible, but differ according to the specific regimen used. Guidelines in the United States, Europe, and Japan recommend targeted therapy for patients who need early tumor responses. A meta-analysis of retrospective data shows that the baseline lactate dehydrogenase level is significantly higher in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors than in those treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting that clinicians tend to use BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors for more advanced disease. Since there is insufficient efficacy and safety data on the use of targeted therapies for acral and mucosal melanoma, a retrospective analysis may be useful. The combination of molecular targeted therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors is expected to elicit further improvement. The results of several trials using combination or sequential therapies will be available in the next few years.

BRAF Heterogeneity in Melanoma

OPINION STATEMENT

In the era of molecular targeted therapy, the accurate detection of BRAF mutation in melanoma has become increasingly important. With the advances of molecular analyses and immunohistochemistry, the presence of BRAF mutational heterogeneity in melanoma has been widely recognized. Although most patients with melanoma have a homogeneous BRAF mutation status because the BRAF mutation occurs at an early stage of melanoma development and acts as a driver gene mutation, BRAF mutational heterogeneity does exist, among different tumor sites of a single patient (intertumor heterogeneity) and/or even within a single tumor (intratumor heterogeneity). To summarize the published reports, about 10% of melanoma patients may show intertumorally discordant BRAF status and about 15% of BRAF-mutated melanomas may have intratumor BRAF heterogeneity, although the reported results vary strikingly among the studies and methods used. Considering the BRAF heterogeneity of melanoma, a single biopsy from a single tumor may not be sufficient to uncover the entire BRAF status of a patient. Multiple samples from different sites may be preferable to assess the indication of BRAF/MEK inhibitors, as recommended by the current clinical guidelines. The impact of BRAF heterogeneity on patient survival or the response to treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors is an interesting issue, but requires further investigation.

Identification of robust reference genes for studies of gene expression in FFPE melanoma samples and melanoma cell lines

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

There is an urgent need for novel diagnostic melanoma biomarkers that can predict increased risk of metastasis at an early stage. Relative quantification of gene expression is the preferred method for quantitative validation of potential biomarkers. However, this approach relies on robust tissue-specific reference genes. In the melanoma field, this has been an obstacle due to lack of validated reference genes. Accordingly, we aimed to identify robust reference genes for normalization of gene expression in melanoma. The robustness of 24 candidate reference genes was evaluated across 80 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanomas of different thickness, −/+ ulceration, −/+ reported cases of metastases and of different BRAF mutation status using quantitative real-time PCR. The expression of the same genes and their robustness as normalizers was furthermore evaluated across a number of melanoma cell lines. We show that housekeeping genes like GAPDH do not qualify as stand-alone normalizers of genes expression in melanoma. Instead, we have as the first identified a panel of robust reference genes for normalization of gene expression in melanoma tumors and cultured melanoma cells. We recommend using a geometric mean of the expression of CLTA, MRPL19 and ACTB for normalization of gene expression in melanomas and a geometric mean of the expression of CASC3 and RPS2 for normalization of gene expression in melanoma cell lines. Normalization, according to our recommendation will allow for quantitative validation of potential novel melanoma biomarkers by quantitative real-time PCR.

Isolation of extracellular vesicles improves the detection of mutant DNA from plasma of metastatic melanoma patients

Detection of BRAFV600E within cell free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising means to improve patients' stratification or enable BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) therapeutic monitoring in a minimally invasive manner. Here, we investigated whether extracellular vesicle-(EV)-associated-DNA (EV-DNA) has value as an alternative source of circulating BRAFV600E. To do so, we identified a clinical practice-compatible protocol for the isolation of EV-DNA and assessed BRAF gene status on plasma samples from metastatic melanoma patients at the beginning and during BRAFi therapy. This protocol uses a peptide with high affinity for EVs and it has been found to recover more mutant DNA from plasma than standard ultracentrifugation. Molecular analyses revealed that mutant DNA is largely unprotected from nuclease digestion, interacting with the outer side of the EV membrane or directly with the peptide. When used on clinical samples, we found that the protocol improves the detection of BRAFV600E gene copies in comparison to the reference protocol for ctDNA isolation. Taken together, these findings indicate that EVs are a promising source of mutant DNA and should be considered for the development of next-generation liquid biopsy approaches.

TERT, BRAF, and NRAS Mutational Heterogeneity between Paired Primary and Metastatic Melanoma Tumors

Mutational heterogeneity can contribute to therapeutic resistance in solid cancers. In melanoma, the frequencies of intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity are controversial. We examined mutational heterogeneity within individual patients with melanoma using multiplatform analysis of commonly mutated driver and nonpassenger genes. We analyzed paired primary and metastatic tumors from 60 patients and multiple metastatic tumors from 39 patients whose primary tumors were unavailable (n = 271 tumors). We used a combination of multiplex SNaPshot assays, Sanger sequencing, mutation-specific PCR, or droplet digital PCR to determine the presence of BRAFV600, NRASQ61, TERT-124C>T, and TERT-146C>T mutations. Mutations were detected in BRAF (39%), NRAS (21%), and/or TERT (78%). Thirteen patients had TERTmutant discordant tumors; seven of these had a single tumor with both TERT-124C>T and TERT-146C>T mutations present at different allele frequencies. Two patients had both BRAF and NRAS mutations; one had different tumors and the other had a single tumor with both mutations. One patient with a BRAFmutant primary lacked mutant BRAF in at least one of their metastases. Overall, we identified mutational heterogeneity in 18 of 99 patients (18%). These results suggest that some primary melanomas may be composed of subclones with differing mutational profiles. Such heterogeneity may be relevant to treatment responses and survival outcomes.

Attack of the Subclones: Accurate Detection of Mutational Heterogeneity in Bulk DNA from Tumors

Tumors are often polyclonal and are therefore heterogenous in their genomic and molecular profiles, which contributes to drug resistance and treatment failure. The methods used to detect these heterogenous differences in tumor samples are critical, but findings have been hindered by methodological inability to detect low-frequency subclones in bulk DNA. Chang et al. (2020) have addressed some of these methodological issues.

The Current State of Molecular Testing in the BRAF-Mutated Melanoma Landscape

The incidence of melanoma, among the most lethal cancers, is widespread and increasing. Metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis, representing about 90% of skin cancer mortality. The increased knowledge of tumor biology and the greater understanding of the immune system role in the anti-tumor response has allowed us to develop a more rational approach to systemic therapies. The discovery of activating BRAF mutations in half of all melanomas has led to the development of molecularly targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which dramatically improved outcomes of patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant melanoma. More recently, the results of clinical phase III studies conducted in the adjuvant setting led to the combined administration of BRAF and MEK inhibitors also in patients with resected high-risk melanoma (stage III). Therefore, BRAF mutation testing has become a priority to determine the oncologist's choice and course of therapy. In this review, we will report the molecular biology-based strategies used for BRAF mutation detection with the main advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly used diagnostic strategies. The timing of such molecular assessment in patients with cutaneous melanoma will be discussed, and we will also examine considerations and approaches for accurate and effective BRAF testing.

Virtual biopsy using MRI radiomics for prediction of BRAF status in melanoma brain metastasis

Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced melanoma and constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Between 40% and 60% of melanomas harbor BRAF mutations. Selective BRAF inhibitor therapy has yielded improvement in clinical outcome; however, genetic discordance between the primary lesion and the metastatic tumor has been shown to occur. Currently, the only way to characterize the genetic landscape of a brain metastasis is by tissue sampling, which carries risks and potential complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of radiomics analysis for non-invasive identification of BRAF mutation in patients with melanoma brain metastases, based on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. We applied a machine-learning method, based on MRI radiomics features for noninvasive characterization of the BRAF status of brain metastases from melanoma (BMM) and applied it to BMM patients from two tertiary neuro-oncological centers. All patients underwent surgical resection for BMM, and their BRAF mutation status was determined as part of their oncological work-up. Their routine preoperative MRI study was used for radiomics-based analysis in which 195 features were extracted and classified according to their BRAF status via a support vector machine. The BRAF status of 53 study patients, with 54 brain metastases (25 positive, 29 negative for BRAF mutation) was predicted with mean accuracy = 0.79 ± 0.13, mean precision = 0.77 ± 0.14, mean sensitivity = 0.72 ± 0.20, mean specificity = 0.83 ± 0.11 and with a 0.78 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for positive BRAF mutation prediction. Radiomics-based noninvasive genetic characterization is feasible and should be further verified using large prospective cohorts.

Japanese Dermatological Association Guidelines: Outlines of guidelines for cutaneous melanoma 2019

With consideration of the ongoing developments in treatment options for cutaneous melanoma, the Japanese Skin Cancer Society published the first guidelines for cutaneous melanoma in 2007 and later revised them in 2015. Here, we report on an English version of the 2019 Japanese Melanoma Guidelines. In this latest edition, all processes were carried out according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. A comprehensive published work search, systematic review and determination of recommendations in each clinical question were performed by a multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of dermatologists, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon, and a radiation oncologist. The advent of novel agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents, has drastically changed the nature of treatment for adjuvant and advanced-stage diseases among melanoma patients worldwide. Additionally, recent reports of clinical trials regarding surgical procedures and a better understanding of molecular biology and tumor immunology in clinical types of melanoma have had an impact on clinical practise. Based on these viewpoints, eight relevant clinical questions were raised in this report that aim to help clinicians select the appropriate therapeutic approach.

Intra- and Inter-Tumor BRAF Heterogeneity in Acral Melanoma: An Immunohistochemical Analysis

The current development of BRAF inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of unresectable melanoma. As the potential heterogeneity of BRAF mutations in melanoma has been reported, accurate detection of BRAF mutations are important. However, the genetic heterogeneity of acral melanoma-a distinct type of melanoma with a unique genetic background-has not fully been investigated. We conducted a retrospective review of our acral melanoma patients. Of the 196 patients with acral melanoma, we retrieved 31 pairs of primary and matched metastatic melanomas. We immunostained the 31 pairs with VE1, a BRAFV600E-mutation-specific monoclonal antibody. Immunohistochemistry with VE1 showed a high degree of sensitivity and specificity for detecting BRAFV600E mutations compared with the real-time polymerase chain reaction method. A total of nine primary (29.0%) and eight metastatic (25.8%) acral melanomas were positive for VE1. In three patients (9.7%), we observed a discordance of VE1 staining between the primary and metastatic lesions. Of note, VE1 immunohistochemical staining revealed a remarkable degree of intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity in acral melanoma. Our study reveals that VE1 immunostaining is a useful ancillary method for detecting BRAFV600E mutations in acral melanoma and allows for a clear visualization of intra- and inter-tumor BRAF heterogeneity.

Acral Lentiginous Melanomas Harbour Intratumor Heterogeneity in BRAF Exon 15, With Mutations Distinct From V600E/V600K

The choice of appropriate therapeutic strategies may be influenced by intratumor heterogeneity and makes cancer treatment considerably more challenging. We aimed to evaluate the heterogeneity of BRAF exon 15 mutations in different areas of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM). The entire exon 15 was sequenced in 4 different areas of paraffin-embedded samples from 26 patients with ALM. A total of 26 of 49 cases of ≥1 mm in depth of ALM identified by clinical, anatomical, and pathological data fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study. Tumors had a mean Breslow depth of 7.2 mm and an average mitotic index of 3 mitosis/mm. Mutations distinct from the common V600E and V600K were detected in 31%, and intratumor heterogeneity was observed in 31% of samples. Interestingly, 63.5% of all mutations had been previously associated with cancer. Most (62.5%) of the missense BRAF exon 15 mutations found in the ALM samples examined here were deemed "detrimental" for protein function according to at least 2 functional prediction programs, and 3 mutations (37.5%) were predicted to be "neutral," with no effect on protein function. BRAF exon 15 mutations were detected frequently in ALM and displayed heterogeneity, a finding to be further investigated.

Integrating clinical, molecular, proteomic and histopathological data within the tissue context: tissunomics

Malignant tumours show a marked degree of morphological, molecular and proteomic heterogeneity. This variability is closely related to microenvironmental factors and the location of the tumour. The activation of genetic alterations is very tissue‐dependent and only few tumours have distinct genetic alterations. Importantly, the activation state of proteins and signaling factors is heterogeneous in the primary tumour and in metastases and recurrences. The molecular diagnosis based only on genetic alterations can lead to treatments with unpredictable responses, depending on the tumour location, such as the tumour response in melanomas versus colon carcinomas with BRAF mutations. Therefore, we understand that the correct evaluation of tumours requires a system that integrates both morphological, molecular and protein information in a clinical and pathological context, where intratumoral heterogeneity can be assessed. Thus, we propose the term ‘tissunomics’, where the diagnosis will be contextualised in each tumour based on the complementation of the pathological, molecular, protein expression, environmental cells and clinical data.

A Three-dimensional Ex Vivo Viability Assay Reveals a Strong Correlation Between Response to Targeted Inhibitors and Mutation Status in Melanoma Lymph Node Metastases

Although clinical management of melanoma has changed considerably in recent years, intrinsic treatment resistance remains a severe problem and strategies to design personal treatment regimens are highly warranted. We have applied a three-dimensional (3D) ex vivo drug efficacy assay, exposing disaggregated cells from 38 freshly harvested melanoma lymph node metastases and 21 patient derived xenografts (PDXs) to clinical relevant drugs for 7 days, and examined its potential to evaluate therapy response. A strong association between Vemurafenib response and BRAF mutation status was achieved (P < .0001), while enhanced viability was seen in some NRAS mutated tumors. BRAF and NRAS mutated tumors responded comparably to the MEK inhibitor Cobimetinib. Based on the ex vivo results, two tumors diagnosed as BRAF wild-type by routine pathology examinations had to be re-evaluated; one was subsequently found to have a complex V600E mutation, the other a double BRAF mutation (V600E/K601 N). No BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms were identified, but PIK3CA and NF1 mutations were identified in two highly responsive tumors. Concordance between ex vivo drug responses using tissue from PDXs and corresponding patient tumors demonstrate that PDX models represent an indefinite source of tumor material that may allow ex vivo evaluation of numerous drugs and combinations, as well as studies of underlying molecular mechanisms. In conclusion, we have established a rapid and low cost ex vivo drug efficacy assay applicable on tumor tissue from patient biopsies. The 3D/spheroid format, limiting the influence from normal adjacent cells and allowing assessment of drug sensitivity to numerous drugs in one week, confirms its potential as a supplement to guide clinical decision, in particular in identifying non-responding patients.

Prevalence of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT mutations in Slovenian patients with advanced melanoma

Background

BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT mutations are characteristics of tumour tissues that influence on treatment decisions in metastatic melanoma patients. Mutation frequency and their correlation with histological characteristics in Slovenian population have not been investigated yet.

Patients and methods

In our retrospective analysis we analysed mutational status of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT in 230 pathological samples of patients who were intended to be treated with systemic therapy due to metastatic disease at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana between 2013 and 2016. We collected also histological characteristics of primary tumours and clinical data of patients and correlated them with mutational status of tumour samples.

Results

The study population consisted of 230 patients with a mean age 59 years (range 25−85). 141 (61.3%) were males and 89 (38.7%) females. BRAF mutations were identified in 129 (56.1%), NRAS in 31 (13.5%) and c-KIT in 3 (1.3%) tissue samples. Among the 129 patients with BRAF mutations, 114 (88.4%) patients had V600E mutation and 15 (11.6%) had V600K mutation. Patients with BRAF mutations tended to be younger at diagnosis (52 vs. 59 years, p < 0.05), patients with NRAS mutations older (61 vs. 55 years, p < 0.05). Number of c-KIT mutations were too low for any statistical correlation, but there was one out of 3 melanoma located in mucus membranes.

Conclusions

The analysis detected high rate of BRAF mutations, low NRAS mutations and low c-KIT mutations compared to previously published studies in Europe and North America. One of the main reasons for this observation is specific characteristics of study population.

Intratumor and Intertumor Heterogeneity in Melanoma

Melanoma is a cancer that exhibits one of the most aggressive and heterogeneous features. The incidence rate escalates. A high number of clones harboring various mutations contribute to an exceptional level of intratumor heterogeneity of melanoma. It also refers to metastases which may originate from different subclones of primary lesion. Such component of the neoplasm biology is termed intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity. These levels of tumor heterogeneity hinder accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. The increasing number of research on the topic reflects the need for understanding limitation or failure of contemporary therapies. Majority of analyses concentrate on mutations in cancer-related genes. Novel high-throughput techniques reveal even higher degree of variations within a lesion. Consolidation of theories and researches indicates new routes for treatment options such as targets for immunotherapy. The demand for personalized approach in melanoma treatment requires extensive knowledge on intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity on the level of genome, transcriptome/proteome, and epigenome. Thus, achievements in exploration of melanoma variety are described in details. Particularly, the issue of tumor heterogeneity or homogeneity given BRAF mutations is discussed.