1
|
Lodde GC, Zhao F, Herbst R, Terheyden P, Utikal J, Pföhler C, Ulrich J, Kreuter A, Mohr P, Gutzmer R, Meier F, Dippel E, Weichenthal M, Jansen P, Kowall B, Galetzka W, Hörst F, Kleesiek J, Hellwig B, Rahnenführer J, Rajcsanyi L, Peters T, Hinney A, Placke JM, Sucker A, Paschen A, Becker JC, Livingstone E, Zimmer L, Tasdogan A, Roesch A, Hadaschik E, Schadendorf D, Griewank K, Ugurel S. Early versus late response to PD-1-based immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 210:114295. [PMID: 39213786 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) currently is the most effective treatment to induce durable responses in metastatic melanoma. The aims of this study are the characterization of patients with early, late and non-response to ICI and analysis of survival outcomes in a real-world patient cohort. METHODS Patients who received PD-1-based immunotherapy for non-resectable stage-IV melanoma in any therapy line were selected from the prospective multicenter real-world DeCOG study ADOREG-TRIM (NCT05750511). Patients showing complete (CR) or partial (PR) response already during the first 3 months of treatment (Early Responders, EarlyR) were compared to patients showing CR/PR at a later time (Late Responders, LateR), a stable disease (SD) and to patients showing progressive disease (Non-Responders, NonR). RESULTS Of 522 patients, 8.2 % were EarlyR (n = 43), 19.0 % were LateR (n = 99), 37.0 % had a SD (n = 193) and 35.8 % were NonR (n = 187). EarlyR, LateR and SD patients had comparable baseline characteristics. Multivariate logbinomial regression analyses adjusted for age and sex revealed positive tumor PD-L1 (RR=1.99, 95 %-CI=1.14-3.46, p = 0.015), and normal serum CRP (RR=1.59, 95 %-CI=0.93-2.70, p = 0.036) as independently associated with the achievement of an early response compared to NonR. The median progression-free and overall survival was 46.0 months (95 % CI 19.1; NR) and 47.8 months (95 %-CI 36.9; NR) for EarlyR, NR (95 %-CI NR; NR) for LateR, 8.1 months (7.0; 10.4) and 35.4 months (29.2; NR) for SD, and 2.0 months (95 %-CI 1.9; 2.1) and 6.1 months (95 %-CI 4.6; 8.8) for NonR patients. CONCLUSION Less than 10 % of metastatic melanoma patients achieved an early response during the first 3 months of PD-1-based immunotherapy. Early responders were not superior to late responders in terms of response durability and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Fang Zhao
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Rudolf Herbst
- Department of Dermatology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
| | | | - Jochen Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Allergology, University Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
| | - Jens Ulrich
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, Quedlinburg, Germany.
| | - Alexander Kreuter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, HELIOS St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen, University Witten/Herdecke, Oberhausen, Germany.
| | - Peter Mohr
- Dermatological Center Buxtehude, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany.
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology Ludwigshafen, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Bernd Kowall
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Galetzka
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Fabian Hörst
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany.
| | - Jens Kleesiek
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany.
| | - Birte Hellwig
- Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
| | - Jörg Rahnenführer
- Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
| | - Luisa Rajcsanyi
- Section for Molecular Genetics of Mental Disorders, University Hospital Essen, Essen Essen, Germany Center for Translational Neuro, and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Triinu Peters
- Section for Molecular Genetics of Mental Disorders, University Hospital Essen, Essen Essen, Germany Center for Translational Neuro, and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Anke Hinney
- Section for Molecular Genetics of Mental Disorders, University Hospital Essen, Essen Essen, Germany Center for Translational Neuro, and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jan-Malte Placke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Antje Sucker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Annette Paschen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Jürgen C Becker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany; Translational Skin Cancer Research, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Germany.
| | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Alpaslan Tasdogan
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Alexander Roesch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Eva Hadaschik
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Klaus Griewank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Essen, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kazdin AE. Expanding the scope, reach, and impact of evidence-based psychological treatments. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2022; 76:101744. [PMID: 35738691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The development and evaluation of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for mental disorders represent an enormous advance with continued progress designed to understand the techniques and increase their use in clinical practice. This article suggests ways of expanding research along several fronts including the extension of the types of randomized controlled trials that are conducted, the use of more diverse samples to encompass different cultures and countries, the expansion of assessments to better reflect client functioning in everyday life, consideration of the impact of treatments for mental disorders on physical health, the careful evaluation of exceptional responders, the use of mixed-methods research, and the development of versions of EBTs that can be scaled. EBTs have been studied in well-controlled settings and extended to clinical settings, albeit less often. The least attention has been accorded their evaluation on a large scale to reach a greater portion of people in need of services but who do not receive any treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan E Kazdin
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06520-8205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sytov A, Brenin C, Millard T, Showalter S, Dillon P. Long-Term Non-progression in Metastatic Breast Cancer Beyond 5 Years: Case Series and Review. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00410-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of review
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was traditionally viewed as homogeneously progressive and incurable among all comers, but there is new evidence that MBC harbors a range of tumor molecular/immune subtypes and degrees of aggressiveness. Thus, MBC is not rapidly fatal in all affected patients.
Recent findings
A small subset of patients will attain long-term disease control, or undetectable disease, and will enjoy a prolonged survival with little disability from their disease or treatment. Though the term is controversial, some patients with long-term non-detectable disease may effectively be considered “cured”. To best advise treatment options in these patients, it is imperative to identify patients most likely to benefit from aggressive treatment.
Summary
In this review, we delineate the clinical, pathologic, and disease characteristics associated with long-term non-progression in MBC. We include a single institution case series of long-term non-progressive MBC patients and their characteristics as an example of the frequency of this sub-population of MBC. Future prospective trials are warranted to examine the utility of clinical characteristics as predictors of long-term survival in MBC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Correale P, Pentimalli F, Baglio G, Krstic-Demonacos M, Saladino RE, Giordano A, Mutti L. Is There Already a Need of Reckoning on Cancer Immunotherapy? Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:638279. [PMID: 33841155 PMCID: PMC8033763 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.638279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Correale
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Oncology Department, Grand Metropolitan Hospital ‘Bianchi Melacrino Morelli’, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Francesca Pentimalli
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Giovanni Baglio
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Marjia Krstic-Demonacos
- Biomedical Research Center, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Rita Emilena Saladino
- Tissue Typing Unit, Grand Metropolitan Hospital ‘Bianchi Melacrino Morelli’, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Antonio Giordano
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Sonis
- Divisions of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Alessandro Villa
- Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joel Epstein
- City of Hope Comprehensive Center, Duarte, CA, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Conley BA, Staudt L, Takebe N, Wheeler DA, Wang L, Cardenas MF, Korchina V, Zenklusen JC, McShane LM, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Lubensky I, O’Sullivan-Coyne G, Kohn E, Little RF, White J, Malik S, Harris LN, Mann B, Weil C, Tarnuzzer R, Karlovich C, Rodgers B, Shankar L, Jacobs PM, Nolan T, Berryman SM, Gastier-Foster J, Bowen J, Leraas K, Shen H, Laird PW, Esteller M, Miller V, Johnson A, Edmondson EF, Giordano TJ, Kim B, Ivy SP. The Exceptional Responders Initiative: Feasibility of a National Cancer Institute Pilot Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:27-37. [PMID: 32339229 PMCID: PMC7781457 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor molecular profiling from patients experiencing exceptional responses to systemic therapy may provide insights into cancer biology and improve treatment tailoring. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of identifying exceptional responders retrospectively, obtaining pre-exceptional response treatment tumor tissues, and analyzing them with state-of-the-art molecular analysis tools to identify potential molecular explanations for responses. METHODS Exceptional response was defined as partial (PR) or complete (CR) response to a systemic treatment with population PR or CR rate less than 10% or an unusually long response (eg, duration >3 times published median). Cases proposed by patients' clinicians were reviewed by clinical and translational experts. Tumor and normal tissue (if possible) were profiled with whole exome sequencing and, if possible, targeted deep sequencing, RNA sequencing, methylation arrays, and immunohistochemistry. Potential germline mutations were tracked for relevance to disease. RESULTS Cases reflected a variety of tumors and standard and investigational treatments. Of 520 cases, 476 (91.5%) were accepted for further review, and 222 of 476 (46.6%) proposed cases met requirements as exceptional responders. Clinical data were obtained from 168 of 222 cases (75.7%). Tumor was provided from 130 of 168 cases (77.4%). Of 117 of the 130 (90.0%) cases with sufficient nucleic acids, 109 (93.2%) were successfully analyzed; 6 patients had potentially actionable germline mutations. CONCLUSION Exceptional responses occur with standard and investigational treatment. Retrospective identification of exceptional responders, accessioning, and sequencing of pretreatment archived tissue is feasible. Data from molecular analyses of tumors, particularly when combining results from patients who received similar treatments, may elucidate molecular bases for exceptional responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lou Staudt
- Center for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David A Wheeler
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria F Cardenas
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Viktoriya Korchina
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul M Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Irina Lubensky
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Elise Kohn
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey White
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shakun Malik
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bhupinder Mann
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carol Weil
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roy Tarnuzzer
- Center for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chris Karlovich
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brian Rodgers
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paula M Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tracy Nolan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sean M Berryman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Julie Gastier-Foster
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Jay Bowen
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Kristen Leraas
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Hui Shen
- Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | | | - Manel Esteller
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | - Elijah F Edmondson
- Pathology and Histology Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | | | - Benjamin Kim
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jentzsch V, Davis JAA, Djamgoz MBA. Pancreatic Cancer (PDAC): Introduction of Evidence-Based Complementary Measures into Integrative Clinical Management. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3096. [PMID: 33114159 PMCID: PMC7690843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The most common form of pancreatic cancer is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which comprises some 85% of all cases. Currently, this is the fourth highest cause of cancer mortality worldwide and its incidence is rising steeply. Commonly applied clinical therapies offer limited chance of a lasting cure and the five-year survival rate is one of the lowest of the commonly occurring cancers. This review cultivates the hypothesis that the best management of PDAC would be possible by integrating 'western' clinical medicine with evidence-based complementary measures. Protecting the liver, where PDAC frequently first spreads, is also given some consideration. Overall, the complementary measures are divided into three groups: dietary factors, nutraceutical agents and lifestyle. In turn, dietary factors are considered as general conditioners, multi-factorial foodstuffs and specific compounds. The general conditioners are alkalinity, low-glycemic index and low-cholesterol. The multi-factorial foodstuffs comprise red meat, fish, fruit/vegetables, dairy, honey and coffee. The available evidence for the beneficial effects of the specific dietary and nutraceutical agents was considered at four levels (in order of prominence): clinical trials, meta-analyses, in vivo tests and in vitro studies. Thus, 9 specific agents were identified (6 dietary and 3 nutraceutical) as acceptable for integration with gemcitabine chemotherapy, the first-line treatment for pancreatic cancer. The specific dietary agents were the following: Vitamins A, C, D and E, genistein and curcumin. As nutraceutical compounds, propolis, triptolide and cannabidiol were accepted. The 9 complementary agents were sub-grouped into two with reference to the main 'hallmarks of cancer'. Lifestyle factors covered obesity, diabetes, smoking, alcohol and exercise. An integrative treatment regimen was devised for the management of PDAC patients. This involved combining first-line gemcitabine chemotherapy with the two sub-groups of complementary agents alternately in weekly cycles. The review concludes that integrated management currently offers the best patient outcome. Opportunities to be investigated in the future include emerging modalities, precision medicine, the nerve input to tumors and, importantly, clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Jentzsch
- Department of Life Sciences, Neuroscience Solutions to Cancer Research Group, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (V.J.); (J.A.A.D.)
- Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - James A. A. Davis
- Department of Life Sciences, Neuroscience Solutions to Cancer Research Group, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (V.J.); (J.A.A.D.)
| | - Mustafa B. A. Djamgoz
- Department of Life Sciences, Neuroscience Solutions to Cancer Research Group, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (V.J.); (J.A.A.D.)
- Biotechnology Research Centre, Cyprus International University, Haspolat, Nicosia, TRNC, Mersin 10, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Colomer R, Mondejar R, Romero-Laorden N, Alfranca A, Sanchez-Madrid F, Quintela-Fandino M. When should we order a next generation sequencing test in a patient with cancer? EClinicalMedicine 2020; 25:100487. [PMID: 32775973 PMCID: PMC7397394 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Technical advances in genome sequencing and the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical oncology have paved the way for individualizing cancer patient therapy based on molecular profiles. When and how to use NGS testing in the clinic is at present an unsolved issue, although new research results provide evidence favoring this approach in some types of advanced cancer. Clinical research is evolving rapidly, from basket and umbrella trials to adaptative design precision oncology clinical studies, and genomic and molecular data often displace the classical clinical validation procedures of biomarkers. In this context, physicians must be aware of the clinical evidence behind these new biomarkers and NGS tests available, in order to use them in the right moment, and with a critical point of view. This review will present the status of currently available targeted drugs that can be effective based on actionable molecular alterations, and the NGS tests that are currently available, offering a practical guide for the application of Clinical Precision Oncology in the real world routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Colomer
- Departament of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Endowed Chair of Personalised Precision Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)-Fundación Instituto Roche, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Mondejar
- Departament of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Endowed Chair of Personalised Precision Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)-Fundación Instituto Roche, Spain
| | - Nuria Romero-Laorden
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Francisco Sanchez-Madrid
- Departament of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
- Endowed Chair of Personalised Precision Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)-Fundación Instituto Roche, Spain
- Immunology Division, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Quintela-Fandino
- Departament of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Universitario Quirón, Pozuelo de Alarcón – Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miller KC, Chintakuntlawar AV, Hilger C, Bancos I, Morris JC, Ryder M, Smith CY, Jenkins SM, Bible KC. Salvage Therapy With Multikinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy in Advanced Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma. J Endocr Soc 2020; 4:bvaa069. [PMID: 32666013 PMCID: PMC7326479 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Median overall survival is 12 to 15 months in patients with metastatic adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC). Etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin with or without the adrenolytic agent mitotane is considered the best first-line approach in this context, but has limited activity and no curative potential; additional salvage therapeutic options are needed. Methods Fifteen total patients with recurrent/metastatic ACC were treated with single-agent multikinase inhibitors (MKI) (n = 8), single-agent PD-1 inhibition (n = 8), or cytotoxic chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibition (n = 4) at our institution as later-line systemic therapies in efforts to palliate disease and attempt to achieve a therapeutic response when not otherwise possible using standard approaches. Results Two of 8 patients (25%) treated with single-agent MKI achieved a partial response (PR), including 1 PR lasting 23.5 months. Another 3 patients (38%) had stable disease (SD); median progression-free survival (PFS) with single-agent MKI was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8—not reached). On the other hand, 2 of 12 patients (17%) treated with PD-1 inhibitors (either alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy) attained SD or better, with 1 patient (8%) achieving a PR; median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI 0.6-2.7). Conclusions Our single-institution experience suggests that select ACC patients respond to late-line MKI or checkpoint inhibition despite resistance to cytotoxic agents. These treatments may be attractive to ACC patients with limited other therapeutic options. The use of MKI and immunotherapy in ACC warrants prospective investigation emphasizing parallel correlative studies to identify biomarkers that predict for response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Crystal Hilger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | - Irina Bancos
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | - John C Morris
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US.,Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | - Mabel Ryder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US.,Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | - Carin Y Smith
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | - Sarah M Jenkins
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| | - Keith C Bible
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mondaca S, Razavi P, Xu C, Offin M, Myers M, Scaltriti M, Hechtman JF, Bradley M, O'Reilly EM, Berger MF, Solit DB, Li BT, Abou-Alfa GK. Genomic Characterization of ERBB2-Driven Biliary Cancer and a Case of Response to Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine. JCO Precis Oncol 2019; 3:1900223. [PMID: 32923849 DOI: 10.1200/po.19.00223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), which include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC), have limited treatment options. We sought to comprehensively examine the clinical and molecular characteristics of BTCs with amplification or mutation of ERBB2. METHODS Demographic, outcome, and treatment response data were collected for patients with ERBB2-altered BTC identified by next-generation sequencing with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets from 2014 to 2018. RESULTS A total of 517 patients with BTC underwent next-generation sequencing (ICC, n = 313; EHC, n = 93; GBC, n = 111). Twenty-eight patients (5.4%) had ERBB2 alterations, including 2.7% with ERBB2 gene amplification, 2.3% with ERBB2 mutation, and 0.4% with concurrent amplification and mutation. The prevalence of ERBB2 gene alterations was significantly higher in GBC (12.6%) than in ICC (2.2%) and EHC (7.5%; P < .001). In ERBB2-amplified tumors, the median fold change was 6.4 (range, 2.1 to 19.7), while in ERBB2-mutant tumors, the most frequent mutated domain was the extracellular domain (32%), with all mutations in this region involving the S310 codon. Frequent co-altered genes in this cohort were TP53 (54%), PIK3CA (21%), and CDKN2A (18%); KRAS amplification/mutation was found in 7% of patients. One patient with ERBB2-amplified EHC who enrolled in a basket trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02675829) had a partial response to the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate ado-trastuzumab emtansine. CONCLUSION ERBB2 alterations are present in 5.4% of BTCs. When present, the degree of ERBB2 gene amplification is often high, and S310 codon mutations are the most common hotspot. These features, along with the presented case, support further development of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapy in ERBB2-mutant and/or -amplified BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Chongrui Xu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael Offin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Michael F Berger
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - David B Solit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Bob T Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Exceptional Responders in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Level Data. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:624-635. [PMID: 31313679 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to systematically review and analyze the available literature on "exceptional responders" in oncology. We hypothesize that survival or patients with an exceptional response may be predicted based on clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was used to find studies that reported oncology patients with an exceptional response. A total of 333 initial articles were screened, and 76 articles were included, accounting for 85 patients. The primary outcome was survival after exceptional response therapy (ERT). The secondary outcome was survival since diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for both outcomes with 17 covariates. RESULTS The median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 35-66 y), 51.8% were male individuals, 18 (21.2%) had lung cancer, and 1 patient (1%) met all National Cancer Institute criteria for exceptional response. The most common treatment resulting in exceptional response was a form of chemotherapy (49.2%) followed by targeted therapy (26.8%) and radiation therapy (7.7%). The median time from diagnosis to initiation of ERT was 7.92 months (interquartile range, 0-24.72 mo). On multivariate analysis of survival after initiation of ERT, there were no predictors of exceptional response. On multivariate analysis of survival since diagnosis, predictors of prolonged survival included time between diagnosis and ERT initiation (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.87; P=0.0124) and single prior surgery versus none (0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.98; P=0.04853). CONCLUSIONS There were no clinically apparent patient or treatment factors that predicted favorable survival following ERT; instead, reporting of exceptional response appears to be biased.
Collapse
|
12
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Morales J, Nunes B, Castanheira J, Oliveira C, Silva A, Vaz S, Costa D, Zelefsky M, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Phenotype-Oriented Ablation of Oligometastatic Cancer with Single Dose Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:593-603. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
13
|
Iyer G, Rosenberg JE. Lessons learned from exceptional responders. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2019.1578171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gopa Iyer
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan E. Rosenberg
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chatterjee N, Bivona TG. Polytherapy and Targeted Cancer Drug Resistance. Trends Cancer 2019; 5:170-182. [PMID: 30898264 PMCID: PMC6446041 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A current challenge in cancer treatment is drug resistance. Even the most effective therapies often fail to produce a complete and durable tumor response and ultimately give rise to therapy resistance and tumor relapse. However, how resistance arises in cancer remains incompletely understood. While drug resistance in cancer is thought to be driven by irreversible genetic mutations, emerging evidence also implicates reversible proteomic and epigenetic mechanisms in the development of drug resistance. Tumor microenvironment-mediated mechanisms and tumor heterogeneity can significantly contribute to cancer treatment resistance. Here, we discuss the diverse and dynamic strategies that cancers use to evade drug response, the promise of upfront combination and intermittent therapies and therapy switching in forestalling resistance, and epigenetic reprogramming to combat resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilanjana Chatterjee
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16(th) Street, Box 2140, Genentech Hall, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16(th) Street, Box 2140, Genentech Hall, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16(th) Street, Box 2140, Genentech Hall, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Trever G Bivona
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16(th) Street, Box 2140, Genentech Hall, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16(th) Street, Box 2140, Genentech Hall, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16(th) Street, Box 2140, Genentech Hall, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Remon J, Dienstmann R. Precision oncology: separating the wheat from the chaff. ESMO Open 2018; 3:e000446. [PMID: 30425845 PMCID: PMC6212683 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) test is growing in daily clinical practice. However, the real impact of this strategy in patients' outcome on a large scale remains uncertain. In this review, we summarise existing literature on this topic, limitations for broad NGS implementation, bottlenecks in genomic variant interpretation and the role of molecular tumour boards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Remon
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Integral Oncología Clara Campal Barcelona, HM-Delfos, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Dienstmann
- Hospital Vall d’Hebrón, Oncology Data Science (ODysSey) Group, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|