Radium-223 in combination with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: a phase 1 dose escalation/randomised phase 2a trial

Bone-Targeting Radionuclides in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Review on Radium-223 Chloride (Alpharadin) in Combination with Other Therapies

Recent advances have broadened the range of therapeutic options for mCRPC, with several new treatments, including novel hormonal therapies (enzalutamide, abiraterone), chemotherapeutic agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), immunotherapies (sipuleucel-T), and bone targeting radiopharmaceuticals (radium-223) showing improved clinical outcomes and receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. These new treatments provide new avenues for improving patient survival and quality of life. Radium-223, a targeted alpha-emitter, specifically targets bone metastases, offering palliative benefits and a potential increase in life expectancy. The integration of radium-223 with other treatments shows promise for managing mCRPC. However, the optimal sequencing and combination of radium-223 with other therapies are still being explored, with various clinical trials investigating new therapeutic approaches. The integration of these therapies, especially to provide more effective, personalized treatment strategies, requires further investigation. A thorough literature review was conducted on current treatments for mCRPC, including chemotherapeutic agents, oral hormonal therapies targeting the androgen receptor axis, immunotherapies, and radium-223. Ongoing clinical trials investigating radium-233 in the context of other therapies for the treatment of mCRPC patients were also reviewed. Further studies should focus on determining the optimal sequencing and dosing and identifying biomarkers that predict treatment response to enhance outcomes of mCRPC patients. This review underlines the rational strategies of combining radium-223 with other therapies, investigating their impact on bone in terms of delaying skeletal-related events, and managing bone disease progression in mCRPC patients.

Combination Strategies and Targeted Radionuclide Therapies

Combination models utilising treatments from two or more therapeutic classes are well established in cancer care. In the new era of theranostic (theragnostic) medicine there is an ongoing need to identify and refine novel combination strategies to optimise multidisciplinary care for conditions commonly encountered in nuclear medicine such as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), prostate cancer (PCa), and thyroid cancer, along with seeking advancements in molecular imaging and therapy techniques for other tumour streams. This concise review explores the background of theranostic monotherapy, established approaches to combination strategies in theranostics, and emerging targeted radionuclide therapies in use or under active investigation, with a focus on Australian-led studies.

Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy for Bone Metastases

Radiopharmaceutical approaches for targeting bone metastasis have traditionally focused on palliation of pain. Several agents have been clinically used over the last several decades and have proven value in pain palliation providing pain relief and improving quality of life. The role is well established across several malignancies, most commonly used in osteoblastic prostate cancer patients. These agents have primarily based on targeting and uptake in bone matrix and have mostly included beta emitting isotopes. The advent alpha emitter and FDA approval of 223Ra-dichloride has created a paradigm shift in clinical approach from application for pain palliation to treatment of bone metastasis. The approval of 223Ra-dichloride given the survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer patients, led to predominant use of this alpha emitter in prostate cancer patients. With rapid development of radiopharmaceutical therapies and approval of other targeted agents such as 177Lu-PSMA the approach to treatment of bone metastasis has further evolved and combination treatments have increasingly been applied. Novel approaches are needed to improve and expand the use of such therapies for treatment of bone metastasis. Combination therapies with different targeting mechanisms, combining chemotherapies and cocktail of alpha and beta emitters need further exploration.

Safety and effectiveness of the radium-223-taxane treatment sequence in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a global observational study (REASSURE)

BACKGROUND

Radium-223 and taxane chemotherapy each improve survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Whether the radium-223-taxane sequence could extend survival without cumulative toxicity was explored.

METHODS

The global, prospective, observational REASSURE study (NCT02141438) assessed real-world safety and effectiveness of radium-223 in patients with mCRPC. Using data from the prespecified second interim analysis (data cutoff, March 20, 2019), hematologic events and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients who were chemotherapy-naive at radium-223 initiation and subsequently received taxane chemotherapy starting ≤90 days ("immediate") or >90 days ("delayed") after the last radium-223 dose.

RESULTS

Following radium-223 therapy, 182 patients received docetaxel (172 [95%]) and/or cabazitaxel (44 [24%]); 34 patients (19%) received both. Seventy-three patients (40%) received immediate chemotherapy and 109 patients (60%) received delayed chemotherapy. Median time from last radium-223 dose to first taxane cycle was 3.6 months (range, 0.3-28.4). Median duration of first taxane was 3.7 months (range, 0-22.0). Fourteen patients (10 in the immediate and four in the delayed subgroup) had grade 3/4 hematologic events during taxane chemotherapy, including neutropenia in two patients in the delayed subgroup and thrombocytopenia in one patient in each subgroup. Median OS was 24.3 months from radium-223 initiation and 11.8 months from start of taxane therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world clinical practice settings, a heterogeneous population of patients who received sequential radium-223-taxane therapy had a low incidence of hematologic events, with a median survival of 1 year from taxane initiation. Thus, taxane chemotherapy is a feasible option for those who progress after radium-223.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02141438.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Radium-223 and chemotherapy are treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer, which increase survival but may affect production of blood cells as a side effect. We wanted to know what would happen if patients received chemotherapy after radium-223. Among the 182 men treated with radium-223 who went on to receive chemotherapy, only two men had severe side effects affecting white blood cell production (neutropenia) during chemotherapy. On average, the 182 men lived for 2 years after starting radium-223 and 1 year after starting chemotherapy. In conclusion, patients may benefit from chemotherapy after radium-223 treatment without increasing the risk of side effects.

AlphaBet: Combination of Radium-223 and [17 7Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (clinical trial protocol)

BACKGROUND

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA is a radioligand therapy used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Despite a survival benefit, the responses for many patients receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA are not durable, and all patients eventually develop progressive disease. The bone marrow is the most common site of progression. Micrometastases in this area likely receive an inadequate dose of radiation, as the emitted beta-particles from 177Lu travel an average range of 0.7 mm in soft tissue, well beyond the diameter of micrometastases. Radium-223 (223Ra) is a calcium-mimetic and alpha-emitting radionuclide approved for use in men with mCRPC with bone metastases. The range of emitted alpha particles in soft tissue is much shorter (≤100 μm) with high linear energy transfer, likely more lethal for osseous micrometastases. We anticipate that combining a bone-specific alpha-emitter with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA will improve eradication of micrometastatic osseous disease, and thereby lead to higher and longer responses.

METHODS

This is a single-center, single-arm phase I/II trial evaluating the combination of 223Ra and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in men with mCRPC. Thirty-six patients will receive 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, concurrently with 223Ra in escalating doses (28 kBq/kg - 55kBq/kg), both given intravenously every six weeks for up to six cycles. Eligible patients will have at least two untreated bone metastases visible on bone scintigraphy, and PSMA-positive disease on PSMA PET scan. Patients must have adequate bone marrow and organ function and be willing to undergo tumor biopsies. Patients with discordant disease visible on FDG PET scan (defined as FDG positive disease with minimal or no PSMA expression and no uptake on bone scan) will be excluded. Other key exclusion criteria include the presence of diffuse marrow disease, prior treatment with 223Ra or [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, or more than one prior line of chemotherapy for prostate cancer. The co-primary objectives of this study are to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 223Ra when combined with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and the 50% PSA response rate.

CONCLUSION

The AlphaBet trial is a phase I/II study combining 223Ra with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC. We aim to enroll the first patient in Q3 2022, and recruitment is anticipated to continue for 24 months.

STUDY REGISTRATION

NCT05383079.

The global status of research in prostate cancer bone metastasis: A bibliometric and visualized analysis

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a serious threat to the health of elderly aged groups. It is very important to understand the occurrence and development of PCa for early diagnosis, treatment and metastasis control. This study aims to elucidate the international frontier research direction and literature distribution through bibliometric and visual analyses of PCa bone metastasis.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Web of Science core collection database, which collected 2,246 papers related to PCa bone metastasis from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. The collected data were analyzed using the VOSviewer software for citation, co-authorship, co-citation, bibliometric coupling, and co-occurrence.

Results

Over the past decade, published papers have increased annually. The United States of America has published 890 papers with 29,161 citations, far more than any other country, and it has the most extensive collaboration with other countries. For example, 33 articles by Saad Fred were cited 2,721 times, and 91 articles from the University of Texas MD Anderson CANC CTR were cited 3,037 times, the most cited author and organization. Peng Xinsheng and Duke UNIV comprise the most active collaborative author and organization, respectively. The most co-cited journal was CANCER RES, with 3,195 citations. Studies of PCa bone metastasis can be divided into four categories: “basic research,” “auxiliary diagnosis and treatment,” “clinical trial,” and “prognosis.”

Conclusion

Our results provide a comprehensive overview of the research priorities and future directions of PCa bone metastasis, which can further accurately guide researchers in diagnosis, treatment, and personalized prevention.

ASTRO's Framework for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Curriculum Development for Trainees

In 2017, the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) board of directors prioritized radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) as a leading area for new therapeutic development, and the ASTRO RPT workgroup was created. Herein, the workgroup has developed a framework for RPT curriculum development upon which education leaders can build to integrate this modality into radiation oncology resident education. Through this effort, the workgroup aims to provide a guide to ensure robust training in an emerging therapeutic area within the context of existing radiation oncology training in radiation biology, medical physics, and clinical radiation oncology. The framework first determines the core RPT knowledge required to select patients, prescribe, safely administer, and manage related adverse events. Then, it defines the most important topics for preparing residents for clinical RPT planning and delivery. This framework is designed as a tool to supplement the current training that exists for radiation oncology residents. The final document was approved by the ASTRO board of directors in the fall of 2021.

PARP Inhibitors and Radiometabolic Approaches in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: What’s Now, What’s New, and What’s Coming?

Simple Summary

Prostate cancer still represents an important health problem in men, considering its high frequency. Over the last decade, novel treatment options have emerged, leading to notable clinical benefits. These recent scientific acquisitions are creating the basis to widen the treatment scenario of this tumor, evolving from targeting the androgen receptor axis or the traditional chemotherapy approach.

Abstract

In recent years, the advances in the knowledge on the molecular characteristics of prostate cancer is allowing to explore novel treatment scenarios. Furthermore, technological discoveries are widening diagnostic and treatment weapons at the clinician disposal. Among these, great relevance is being gained by PARP inhibitors and radiometabolic approaches. The result is that DNA repair genes need to be altered in a high percentage of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, making these patients optimal candidates for PARP inhibitors. These compounds have already been proved to be active in pretreated patients and are currently being investigated in other settings. Radiometabolic approaches combine specific prostate cancer cell ligands to radioactive particles, thus allowing to deliver cytotoxic radiations in cancer cells. Among these, radium-223 and lutetium-177 have shown promising activity in metastatic pretreated prostate cancer patients and further studies are ongoing to expand the applications of this therapeutic approach. In addition, nuclear medicine techniques also have an important diagnostic role in prostate cancer. Herein, we report the state of the art on the knowledge on PARP inhibitors and radiometabolic approaches in advanced prostate cancer and present ongoing clinical trials that will hopefully expand these two treatment fields.

Radium-223 plus Enzalutamide Versus Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer: Final Safety and Efficacy Results

LESSONS LEARNED

Long-term safety of radium-223 with enzalutamide was confirmed in this clinical trial. PSA-PFS2 was prolonged with the combination compared with enzalutamide alone.

BACKGROUND

Previously, we showed the combination of radium-223 and enzalutamide to be safe and associated with improved efficacy based on a concomitant decline in serum bone metabolism markers compared with enzalutamide alone in a phase II trial of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [1].

METHODS

Secondary endpoints were not included in our initial report, and we include them herein, after a median follow-up of 22 months. These objectives included long-term safety, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-progression-free survival (PFS), and radiographic progression-free survival; PSA-PFS2 (time from start of protocol therapy to PSA progression on subsequent therapy); time to next therapy (TTNT); and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed using the R statistical package v.4.0.2 (https://www.r-project.org). Statistical significance was defined as p < .05.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients (median age, 68 years), 35 received the combination and 12 enzalutamide alone. After a median follow-up of 22 months, final safety results did not show any increase in fractures or other adverse events in the combination arm. PSA-PFS2 was significantly improved, and other efficacy parameters were numerically improved in the combination over the enzalutamide arm.

CONCLUSION

The combination of enzalutamide and radium-223 was found to be safe and associated with promising efficacy in men with mCRPC. These hypothesis-generating results portend well for the ongoing phase III PEACE III trial in this setting.

Why bother with alpha particles?

The approval of 223RaCl2 for cancer therapy in 2013 has heralded a resurgence of interest in the development of α-particle emitting radiopharmaceuticals. In the last decade, over a dozen α-emitting radiopharmaceuticals have entered clinical trials, spawned by strong preclinical studies. In this article, we explore the potential role of α-particle therapy in cancer treatment. We begin by providing a background for the basic principles of therapy with α-emitters, and we explore recent breakthroughs in therapy with α-emitting radionuclides, including conjugates with small molecules and antibodies. Finally, we discuss some outstanding challenges to the clinical adoption of α-therapies and potential strategies to address them.

Dosimetry in Clinical Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Cancer: Practicality Versus Perfection in Current Practice

The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration-labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.

Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies

In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.

Highlighting recent treatment advances in metastatic prostate cancer: expanding the treatment arsenal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Present highlights from recent research examining the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although debate remains about the optimal sequencing of docetaxel and novel androgen directed therapies in addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of men with new metastatic prostate cancer, the novel LHRH antagonist relugolix seems poised to become an appealing option in a choice of initial ADT. Novel radioisotopes, genomically selected therapies, and immune therapy combinations show progress in opening up new treatment options for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

SUMMARY

Although no clear consensus has emerged, evolving data continue to refine the selection of systemic therapies in treatment naïve metastatic prostate cancer. With potentially less cardiotoxic androgen deprivation therapies, novel radioisotopes, targeted pharmaceuticals, and immune therapy combinations, progress appears to be on the horizon in improving outcomes for men with advanced prostate cancer.

Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223 in community compared to academic settings

BACKGROUND

The most common site of disease in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the bone. The ALSYMPCA study demonstrated that radium-223 significantly improved overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. However, administration requires a multidisciplinary approach and an infrastructure that supports coordination of care, which may differ by practice site. We aimed to evaluate practice patterns and treatment outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated at a community practice (CP) compared with those treated at an academic center (AC).

METHODS

This retrospective review included 200 adult mCRPC patients receiving radium-223 between January 2014 and June 2017. The primary endpoint, OS, was estimated from the date of radium-223 initiation. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of baseline characteristics, reasons for initiation and discontinuation of radium-223, and treatment sequencing. A subset analysis of OS based on the number of radium-223 doses and on sequencing of radium-223 either before or after chemotherapy was also conducted.

RESULTS

Most patients were treated at a CP (57%). Patients treated at CP sites were significantly older (74.9 vs. 71.9 years; p = .031) and had more comorbidities (Klabunde score 1.1 vs. 0.7; p = .020) than those in an AC but initiated treatment within a shorter period of time from diagnosis of mCRPC (1.3 vs. 1.9 years; p < .001) and received a greater mean number of radium-223 doses (5.4 vs. 4.8; p = .001). There were no observed differences in OS between CPs versus ACs (21.6 vs. 20.7 months; p = .306). Overall, patients who received 5-6 doses versus 1-4 doses of radium-223 had a longer median OS (23.3 vs. 6.4 months; p < .001). The most common reason for discontinuation in patients who did not complete treatment was disease progression. Overall, 43% of patients received radium-223 monotherapy and 57% concurrently with other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients received radium-223 concurrently with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and were able to complete 5-6 doses of radium-223. Despite differences in the populations and treatment patterns, no survival differences between patients treated in ACs versus CPs were observed. Additional real-world data are needed to validate these findings.

Immune Checkpoints, Inhibitors and Radionuclides in Prostate Cancer: Promising Combinatorial Therapy Approach

Emerging research demonstrates that co-inhibitory immune checkpoints (ICs) remain the most promising immunotherapy targets in various malignancies. Nonetheless, ICIs have offered insignificant clinical benefits in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) especially when they are used as monotherapies. Current existing PCa treatment initially offers an improved clinical outcome and overall survival (OS), however, after a while the treatment becomes resistant leading to aggressive and uncontrolled disease associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Concurrent combination of the ICIs with radionuclides therapy that has rapidly emerged as safe and effective targeted approach for treating PCa patients may shift the paradigm of PCa treatment. Here, we provide an overview of the contextual contribution of old and new emerging inhibitory ICs in PCa, preclinical and clinical studies supporting the use of these ICs in treating PCa patients. Furthermore, we will also describe the potential of using a combinatory approach of ICIs and radionuclides therapy in treating PCa patients to enhance efficacy, durable cancer control and OS. The inhibitory ICs considered in this review are cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed cell death 1 (PD1), V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), T cell Immunoglobulin Domain and Mucin Domain 3 (TIM-3), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), B7 homolog 3 (B7-H3) and B7-H4.

Sequencing radium 223 and other life-prolonging agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

Background: Radium 223 (RA223) is currently administered as part of a therapeutic sequence with the other life-prolonging agents (LPAs) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients & methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who had received at least three LPAs including RA223. Results: Median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line treatment was 39.8 months, with the patients who completed all six planned courses of RA223 having a longer OS than those who did not (53.2 vs 29.5 months; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our study confirms the activity of RA223 regardless of the treatment line in which it is administered and suggests that patient selection plays a central role in maximizing this activity.

The Radiobiology of Radiopharmaceuticals

Radiopharmaceutical therapy or targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a well-established class of cancer therapeutics that includes a growing number of FDA-approved drugs and a promising pipeline of experimental therapeutics. Radiobiology is fundamental to a mechanistic understanding of the therapeutic capacity of these agents and their potential toxicities. However, the field of radiobiology has historically focused on external beam radiation. Critical differences exist between TRT and external beam radiotherapy with respect to dosimetry, dose rate, linear energy transfer, duration of treatment delivery, fractionation, range, and target volume. These distinctions simultaneously make it difficult to extrapolate from the radiobiology of external beam radiation to that of TRT and pose considerable challenges for preclinical and clinical studies investigating TRT. Here, we discuss these challenges and explore the current understanding of the radiobiology of radiopharmaceuticals.

The Role of Theranostics in Prostate Cancer

Theranostics in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has been developed to target bone and the tumor itself. Currently, bone-directed targeted alpha therapy with radium-223 (²²³Ra) is the only theranostic agent proven to prolong survival in men with mCRPC who have symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastases. The clinical utility and therapeutic success of ²²³Ra has encouraged the development of other tumor-targeting theranostic agents in mCRPC, primarily targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with radioligand therapy (RLT). There is increasing evidence of promising response rates and a low toxicity profile with ¹⁷⁷Lu-labeled PSMA RLT in patients with mCRPC. A phase III randomized study of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labeled PSMA RLT has completed accrual and is awaiting results as to whether the drug improves radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival in men with mCRPC receiving standard of care treatments. Additional early clinical trials are investigating the role of tumor-directed targeted alpha therapy with radiotracers such as ²²⁵Ac. In this article, we review the current status of theranostics in prostate cancer, discussing the challenges and opportunities of combination therapies with more conventional agents such as androgen receptor inhibitors, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.

Radiopharmaceuticals for Bone Metastases

As a single organ distributed diffusely throughout the body, bones represent both a unique challenge and unique opportunity for the treatment of symptomatic metastatic disease. While the multifocality of bone metastases often prevents effective complete treatment with focal radiotherapy, the similar pathophysiology of these diffuse sites of disease opens the door to targeted systemic therapy. The relatively rapid dose fall-off from beta- or alpha-emitting particles, if correctly and reliably targeted to osseous metastases, might reduce tumor burden and enhance pain control or improve survival. Radioisotopes have thus been studied keenly with the first generation of primarily beta-emitting radioisotopes, strontium-89 and samarium-153, which reached early FDA approval based on successful endpoints of pain control. More recently, an alpha-emitting therapy, radium-223, has demonstrated a successful endpoint of improved overall survival in patients with a burden of symptomatic, metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) confined to the bones. With this discovery, an additional survival-improving tool beyond systemic and hormonal agents was added to the treatment arsenal for mCRPC for suitable candidates. With an improved understanding of the optimization of hormonal and systemic therapies in the context of mCRPC, there is lingering uncertainty regarding the safety and efficacy of combinatorial use of alpha and beta-emitting therapies with the current generation of systemic agents. In this narrative review, we will highlight the current understanding of the relative utility and clinical paradigms involving alpha- and beta-emitting radioisotopes. We discuss fundamental mechanisms for antineoplastic activity, initial clinical trials validating their use, the use of concurrent antiresorptive therapies to provide bone protection, and ongoing clinical trials targeted at best utilization of these agents in the broader context of mCRPC treatment.

Assessing the quality of life of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases receiving [223Ra]RaCl2 therapy

[Ra]RaCl2 dichloride treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) and a delay in the time to the first symptomatic skeletal-related event. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of patients with mCRPC receiving [Ra]RaCl2 treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) validated questionnaire form.Thirty patients with mCRPC were included in this study. The patients were administered the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire at 5 time points: before [Ra]RaCl2 treatment, after the first cycle, after the third cycle, after the fifth cycle, and at the end of the treatment.Median age at diagnosis was 65.2 years (range, 49.1-75.5). There was a significant 25% drop in the median alkaline phosphatase levels: 101 U/L (range, 58-594) vs. 75 U/L (39-649) before and during treatment, respectively (P = .003). The median dose of [Ra]RaCl2 for all patients was 4.1 MBq (range, 3.35-6.55), and the majority of patients received 5 treatment cycles (range 3-6). Seventeen patients were alive at the end of treatment (56.7%). The median OS was 26 months (range, 19.8-32.2). All of the patients filled out the questionnaires at the first 3 time points; the fourth survey included 28 patients, and only 23 patients completed the fifth questionnaire. Compared to the baseline, only the scale "role functioning" showed a temporary worsening after the first therapy cycle (P = .03). In subsequent cycles, its mean value rose to initial levels. All other functional and symptom scales, as well as global health status, remained constant over all 5 time points and showed no significant changes (P > .05).[Ra]RaCl2 therapy does not adversely impair the health-related QoL of patients with mCRPC and bone metastasis. Only patients' role functioning worsened temporarily after the first therapy cycle but stabilized in subsequent treatment cycles.

Targeted Palliative Radionuclide Therapy for Metastatic Bone Pain

Bone metastasis develops in multiple malignancies with a wide range of incidence. The presence of multiple bone metastases, leading to a multitude of complications and poorer prognosis. The corresponding refractory bone pain is still a challenging issue managed through multidisciplinary approaches to enhance the quality of life. Radiopharmaceuticals are mainly used in the latest courses of the disease. Bone-pain palliation with easy-to-administer radionuclides offers advantages, including simultaneous treatment of multiple metastatic foci, the repeatability and also the combination with other therapies. Several β¯- and α-emitters as well as pharmaceuticals, from the very first [⁸⁹Sr]strontium-dichloride to recently introduced [²²³Ra]radium-dichloride, are investigated to identify an optimum agent. In addition, the combination of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals with chemotherapy or radiotherapy has been employed to enhance the outcome. Radiopharmaceuticals demonstrate an acceptable response rate in pain relief. Nevertheless, survival benefits have been documented in only a limited number of studies. In this review, we provide an overview of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals used for bone-pain palliation, their effectiveness and toxicity, as well as the results of the combination with other therapies. Bone-pain palliation with radiopharmaceuticals has been employed for eight decades. However, there are still new aspects yet to be established.

Spine and Non-spine Bone Metastases - Current Controversies and Future Direction

Bone is a common site of metastases in advanced cancers. The main symptom is pain, which increases morbidity and reduces quality of life. The treatment of bone metastases needs a multidisciplinary approach, with the main aim of relieving pain and improving quality of life. Apart from systemic anticancer therapy (hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy), there are several therapeutic options available to achieve palliation, including analgesics, surgery, local radiotherapy, bone-seeking radioisotopes and bone-modifying agents. Long-term use of non-steroidal analgesics and opiates is associated with significant side-effects, and tachyphylaxis. Radiotherapy is effective mainly in localised disease sites. Bone-targeting radionuclides are useful in patients with multiple metastatic lesions. Bone-modifying agents are beneficial in reducing skeletal-related events. This overview focuses on the role of surgery, including minimally invasive treatments, conventional radiotherapy in spinal and non-spinal bone metastases, bone-targeting radionuclides and bone-modifying agents in achieving palliation. We present the clinical data and their associated toxicity. Recent advances are also discussed.

Phase I trial of docetaxel plus lutetium-177-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 (177Lu-J591) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel remains a standard of care for metatsatic castration resistant porstate cancer (mCRPC) and has radiosensitizing properties. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of radioimmunotherapy is myelosuppression; dose fractionation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591 allows similar administered doses with less toxicity. This study (NCT00916123) was designed to determine the safety, DLT, and maximum tolerated dose of fractionated ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591 administered concurrently with standard docetaxel.

METHODS

Men with progressive mCRPC received docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks with escalating 2 fractionated doses of ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591 (1.48 GBq/m² up to max of 2.96 GBq/m²) with cycle 3. Cycle 4 of docetaxel was planned 6 weeks after cycle 3 to allow for recovery from ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591-associated hematologic toxicity. DLT was defined as delay in docetaxel >3 weeks, prolonged myelosuppression or need for >2 platelet transfusions, febrile neutropenia, or grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicity following ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591. PSA was assessed prior to each cycle and serial computed tomography (CT) and bone scan were performed.

RESULTS

Fifteen men with progressive mCRPC received dose-escalated targeted radionuclide therapy in 4 cohorts up to the highest planned dose (2.96 GBq/m²). No DLT was seen at any dose level. Grade 4 neutropenia without fever occurred in 8 (53.5%) and thromboytopenia in 2 (13.3%), with 2 receiving prophylactic platelet transfusion. No grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicity was observed. 11 (73.3%) had >50% PSA decline, with 78.6% having favorable circulating tumor cell counts after ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591. All patients had targeting of known sites of disease by planar ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591 imaging.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ¹⁷⁷Lu-J591 delivered as a single fractionated cycle with docetaxel/prednisone is feasible in patients with mCRPC. Without preselection for prostate-specific membrane antigen, accurate targeting of known sites of disease and a strong preliminary efficacy signal was observed.

Targeted Alpha Therapy: Current Clinical Applications

α-Emitting radionuclides have been approved for cancer treatment since 2013, with increasing degrees of success. Despite this clinical utility, little is known regarding the mechanisms of action of α particles in this setting, and accurate assessments of the dosimetry underpinning their effectiveness are lacking. However, targeted alpha therapy (TAT) is gaining more attention as new targets, synthetic chemistry approaches, and α particle emitters are identified, constructed, developed, and realized. From a radiobiological perspective, α particles are more effective at killing cells compared to low linear energy transfer radiation. Also, from these direct effects, it is now evident from preclinical and clinical data that α emitters are capable of both producing effects in nonirradiated bystander cells and stimulating the immune system, extending the biological effects of TAT beyond the range of α particles. The short range of α particles makes them a potent tool to irradiate single-cell lesions or treat solid tumors by minimizing unwanted irradiation of normal tissue surrounding the cancer cells, assuming a high specificity of the radiopharmaceutical and good stability of its chemical bonds. Clinical approval of ²²³RaCl₂ in 2013 was a major milestone in the widespread application of TAT as a safe and effective strategy for cancer treatment. In addition, ²²⁵Ac-prostate specific membrane antigen treatment benefit in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients, refractory to standard therapies, is another game-changing piece in the short history of TAT clinical application. Clinical applications of TAT are growing with different radionuclides and combination therapies, and in different clinical settings. Despite the remarkable advances in TAT dosimetry and imaging, it has not yet been used to its full potential. Labeled ²²⁷Th and ²²⁵Ac appear to be promising candidates and could represent the next generation of agents able to extend patient survival in several clinical scenarios.

Fracture risk and survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients sequentially treated with abiraterone acetate and RADIUM-223

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fracture risk and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received sequentially abiraterone acetate (AA) and radium 223 [223Ra]RaCl₂ in the daily clinical practice.

MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of mCRPC patients who received [223Ra]RaCl₂ immediately after progressing during an AA treatment line in everyday clinical practice.

RESULTS

We reviewed data of a consecutive series of 94 mCRPC patients. Most of the patients (85.1%) received [223Ra]RaCl₂ as second- or third-line treatment. [223Ra]RaCl₂ treatment was well-tolerated; there were only four cases of grade 3 anaemia, two cases of grade 3 leukopenia and one case of grade 3 neutropenia. The overall fracture rate is 2.1%; one fracture was recorded during the course of [223Ra]RaCl₂ treatment, and one was recorded 1 month after its end. The fractures both occurred at metastatic sites. Median OS from [223Ra]RaCl₂ start was more than 14 months regardless of the treatment line when [223Ra]RaCl₂ was administered.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that the treatment with [223Ra]RaCl₂ immediately after AA was active and safe with a very low risk of a fracture. Thus, the present observational report makes a valuable contribution to the current debate concerning the risks and benefits of including [223Ra]RaCl₂ in the therapeutic algorithm.

Targeted α-Therapy in Cancer Management: Synopsis of Preclinical and Clinical Studies

The approval of ²²³Ra dichloride (²²³RaCl₂) in 2013 was a principal event in introducing targeted α-therapy as a form of safe and effective management strategy in cancer. There is an increasing interest in research and development of new targeted α-therapy agents spearheaded by advancements in cancer biology, radiochemistry, and availability of clinically relevant α particles. There are active clinical studies on sequencing or combining ²²³RaCl₂ with other drug regimens in the setting of metastatic prostate cancer and in other cancers such as osteosarcoma and bone-dominant breast cancer. Targeted α-therapy strategy is also being actively explored through many preclinical and few early clinical studies using ²²⁵Ac, ²¹³Bi, ²¹¹At, ²²⁷Th, and ²¹²Pb. Investigations incorporating ²²⁵Ac are more robust and active at this time with promising results. The author provide a brief synopsis of the preclinical and clinical studies in the rapidly evolving field of targeted α-therapy in cancer management.

Radium-223 as an Approved Modality for Treatment of Bone Metastases

Radium-223 dichloride (²²³Ra) is an α-emitter radionuclide approved for treatment of osteoblastic metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. ²²³Ra increases overall survival, improves bone pain, increases the median time to the first skeletal-related event, reduces the use of external beam radiation therapy for bone pain palliation, reduces the rates of spinal cord compression, and hospitalization. ²²³Ra therapy has minimal side effects; the most common hematological side effects are anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia while the nonhematological side effects that may occur are bone pain flare, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Alongside ²²³Ra therapy there are currently a variety of first-line therapeutic options available to treat mCRPC patients and much debate regarding the appropriate treatment algorithm for these patients and the possible combination of therapies among the ones available. In this article, we review the rationale behind ²²³Ra therapy as well as ²²³Ra mechanisms of action, biodistribution and dosimetry, optimal timing possibilities to initiate ²²³Ra in contrast to other treatments available, the association of ²²³Ra with other therapies and the means of evaluating patients in order to properly deliver to ²²³Ra therapy. Furthermore, we will discuss ²²³Ra dose administration possibilities, patient and dose preparation and the challenges of treatment response evaluation during and after ²²³Ra.

Combination radium-223 therapies in patients with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer: A review

Chemotherapeutic agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), hormonal therapies (abiraterone, enzalutamide) and radium-223 improve survival in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Combinations of radium-223 with these agents or novel drugs have been investigated in order to improve survival and decrease bone-related morbidity. In mCRPC, clinical and preclinical data indicate that radium-223, abiraterone and enzalutamide have a direct effect on prostate cancer cells and bone microenvironment when administered as single agents. Initial results from studies of radium-223 and abiraterone, enzalutamide or docetaxel demonstrated efficacy without any safety concern in pre-treated mCRPC; however, this safety profile changed when radium-based combination therapies were administered in un-pretreated mCRPC. This review underline the biological rationale for combining radium strategies, investigating their effects on bone in terms of control of skeletal-related events and bone disease progression. The aim is to understand the possible reasons why different radium-based combination treatments can led to different clinical outcomes.

Radium-223 mechanism of action: implications for use in treatment combinations

The targeted alpha therapy radium-223 (223Ra) can prolong survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who have symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastases. Preclinical studies demonstrate that 223Ra preferentially incorporates into newly formed bone matrix within osteoblastic metastatic lesions. The emitted high-energy alpha particles induce DNA double-strand breaks that might be irreparable and lead to cell death in nearby exposed tumour cells, osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Consequently, tumour growth and abnormal bone formation are inhibited by these direct effects and by the disruption of positive-feedback loops between tumour cells and the bone microenvironment. 223Ra might also modulate immune responses within the bone. The clinical utility of 223Ra has encouraged the development of other anticancer targeted alpha therapies. A thorough understanding of the mechanism of action could inform the design of new combinatorial treatment strategies that might be more efficacious than monotherapy. On the basis of the current mechanistic knowledge and potential clinical benefits, combination therapies of 223Ra with microtubule-stabilizing cytotoxic drugs and agents targeting the androgen receptor axis, immune checkpoint receptors or DNA damage response proteins are being explored in patients with CRPC and metastatic bone disease.

Development of Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy for Solid Tumors

Targeted alpha-particle therapy (TAT) aims to selectively deliver radionuclides emitting α-particles (cytotoxic payload) to tumors by chelation to monoclonal antibodies, peptides or small molecules that recognize tumor-associated antigens or cell-surface receptors. Because of the high linear energy transfer (LET) and short range of alpha (α) particles in tissue, cancer cells can be significantly damaged while causing minimal toxicity to surrounding healthy cells. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of TAT in the treatment of metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the current consensus regarding the properties of the α-particle-emitting radionuclides that are potentially relevant for use in the clinic; the TAT-mediated mechanisms responsible for cell death; the different classes of targeting moieties and radiometal chelators available for TAT development; current approaches to calculating radiation dosimetry for TATs; and lead optimization via medicinal chemistry to improve the TAT radiopharmaceutical properties. We have also summarized the use of TATs in pre-clinical and clinical studies to date.

The Mode-of-Action of Targeted Alpha Therapy Radium-223 as an Enabler for Novel Combinations to Treat Patients with Bone Metastasis

Bone metastasis is a common clinical complication in several cancer types, and it causes a severe reduction in quality of life as well as lowering survival time. Bone metastases proceed through a vicious self-reinforcing cycle that can be osteolytic or osteoblastic in nature. The vicious cycle is characterized by cancer cells residing in bone releasing signal molecules that promote the differentiation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts either directly or indirectly. The increased activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts then increases bone turnover, which releases growth factors that benefit metastatic cancer cells. In order to improve the prognosis of patients with bone metastases this cycle must be broken. Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223), the first targeted alpha therapy (TAT) approved, is an osteomimetic radionuclide that is incorporated into bone metastases where its high-linear energy transfer alpha radiation disrupts both the activity of bone cells and cancer cells. Therefore, radium-223 treatment has been shown preclinically to directly affect cancer cells in both osteolytic breast cancer and osteoblastic prostate cancer bone metastases as well as to inhibit the differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Clinical studies have demonstrated an increase in survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Due to the effectiveness and low toxicity of radium-223, several novel combination treatment strategies are currently eliciting considerable research interest.