1
|
Siegel CH, Sammaritano LR. Safety of Medications Used to Treat Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases During Pregnancy and Lactation. J Clin Rheumatol 2024; 30:S25-S33. [PMID: 39325122 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000002123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) often affect women during their reproductive years, and early studies of pregnancy in these patients reported high rates of adverse outcomes. Continuation or initiation of safe and effective medications in the preconception period is beneficial for maintaining or achieving disease quiescence throughout pregnancy thereby improving both maternal and pregnancy outcomes. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, the American College of Rheumatology, and the British Society for Rheumatology have published recommendations and guidelines regarding management of ARDs during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Gastroenterological Association have also provided guidance statements with relevant recommendations. This review provides an overview of available recommendations for medication use in ARD pregnancy, with discussion of safety considerations for maternal and fetal well-being. Medications considered compatible with pregnancy include hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and TNF inhibitors. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, leflunomide, and cyclophosphamide should be avoided before and during pregnancy. Other medications, most of them newer, are largely discouraged for use in pregnancy due to inadequate data or concerns for neonatal immunosuppression, including non-TNF biologics and small molecule therapies. Further investigation is needed regarding effects of non-TNF biologics, biosimilars, and small molecules in pregnancy. Important efforts for the future will include improved methodologies to gather critical safety data, with consideration of inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials, a complex and controversial issue. Long-term information on outcomes in offspring of treated women is lacking for many of these medications.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gouveia I, Xavier M, Silva J, Martins P. Malignant tumour in pregnancy: Ewing-like sarcoma of the gluteal region. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e257493. [PMID: 38649246 PMCID: PMC11043757 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-257493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
We report a case of an Ewing-like sarcoma of the gluteal region with ongoing growth during the second trimester of pregnancy and noted during the third trimester. This lesion was consequently studied to infer its malignant potential. Several examinations were conducted to characterise this lesion, such as ultrasound and MR, which showed signs of tumourous invasion of the deep tissues of the gluteal region.Given that the pregnancy was at the end of the third trimester, the decision was made to schedule the delivery at 37 weeks of gestation and treat the tumour afterwards to balance maternal and fetal health.This case illustrates the need for a detailed investigation and guidance by a multidisciplinary team to provide prenatal counselling regarding a malignant tumour during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Gouveia
- Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Marta Xavier
- Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Joana Silva
- Obstetrics & Ginecology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Pedro Martins
- Cirurgia Geral, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil EPE, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Damoiseaux D, Amant F, Beijnen JH, Barnett S, Veal GJ, Huitema ADR, Dorlo TPC. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to predict doxorubicin and paclitaxel exposure in infants through breast milk. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2023; 12:1931-1944. [PMID: 37798909 PMCID: PMC10725259 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Limited information is available concerning infant exposure and safety when breastfed by mothers receiving chemotherapy. Whereas defining distribution to breast milk is important to infer drug exposure, infant pharmacokinetics also determine to what extent the infant will be exposed to potential toxic effects. We aimed to assess the impact of chemotherapy containing breast milk on infants by predicting systemic and local (intestinal) exposure of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in infants through breast milk using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach. Whole-body PBPK models of i.v. paclitaxel and doxorubicin were extended from the literature, with an oral absorption component to enable predictions in infants receiving paclitaxel or doxorubicin-containing breast milk. For safety considerations, worst-case scenarios were explored. Finally, paclitaxel and doxorubicin exposures in plasma and intestinal tissue of infants following feeding of breast milk from paclitaxel- or doxorubicin-treated mothers were simulated and breast milk discarding strategies were evaluated. The upper 95th percentile of the predicted peak concentrations in peripheral venous blood were 3.48 and 0.74 nM (0.4%-1.7% and 0.1%-1.8% of on-treatment) for paclitaxel and doxorubicin, respectively. Intestinal exposure reached peak concentrations of 1.0 and 140 μM for paclitaxel and doxorubicin, respectively. Discarding breast milk for the first 3 days after maternal chemotherapy administration reduced systemic and tissue exposures even further, to over 90% and 80% for paclitaxel and doxorubicin, respectively. PBPK simulations of chemotherapy exposure in infants after breastfeeding with chemotherapy containing breast milk suggest that particularly local gastrointestinal adverse events should be monitored, whereas systemic adverse events are not expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Damoiseaux
- Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of GynecologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Gynecologic OncologyUZ LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jos H. Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Shelby Barnett
- Newcastle University Centre for CancerNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Gareth J. Veal
- Newcastle University Centre for CancerNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Alwin D. R. Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PharmacologyPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Thomas P. C. Dorlo
- Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PharmacyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Loibl S, Azim HA, Bachelot T, Berveiller P, Bosch A, Cardonick E, Denkert C, Halaska MJ, Hoeltzenbein M, Johansson ALV, Maggen C, Markert UR, Peccatori F, Poortmans P, Saloustros E, Saura C, Schmid P, Stamatakis E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, van Gerwen M, Vandecaveye V, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Amant F. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC). Ann Oncol 2023; 34:849-866. [PMID: 37572987 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Berveiller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy; UMR 1198 - BREED, INRAE, Paris Saclay University, RHuMA, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - A Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Cardonick
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and Marburg University Hospital (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Universital Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Hoeltzenbein
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy, Berlin, Germany
| | - A L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - U R Markert
- Placenta Lab, Department of Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - F Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - C Saura
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Schmid
- Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - E Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Alexandra' General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - M van Gerwen
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Amant
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Division Gynaecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Damoiseaux D, Centanni D, Beijnen JH, Amant F, Huitema ADR, Dorlo TPC. Predicting Chemotherapy Distribution into Breast Milk for Breastfeeding Women Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Approach. Clin Pharmacokinet 2023; 62:969-980. [PMID: 37154994 PMCID: PMC10338611 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01251-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Information on the distribution of chemotherapeutic drugs to breast milk is scarce, and reports are limited to small sample sizes. Anecdotal pharmacokinetic data have typically been acquired from lactating but non-breastfeeding patients who collect breast milk by means of an expression pump, which might not necessarily be representative for a breastfeeding population due to differences in milk production. Consequently, little is known about the variability of chemotherapy distribution to breast milk and the effect of milk production on the distribution of chemotherapy to breast milk. Our aim was to predict chemotherapy distribution to breast milk in a more realistic breastfeeding population and evaluate the effect of discarding breast milk on the potential chemotherapy exposure in infants. METHODS We developed a population pharmacokinetic model that described the breast milk production and the chemotherapy distribution to breast milk of a non-breastfeeding population, linked it to plasma pharmacokinetics, and extrapolated this to a breastfeeding population. RESULTS We found that cumulative relative infant doses (RID) were higher than 10% for cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin and approximately 1% for paclitaxel. Simulations allowed us to predict the cumulative RID and its variability in the population for patients with different milk productions and the amount of breast milk that has to be discarded to reach cumulative RIDs below 1%, 0.1%, and 0.01%. Discarding 1-2, 3-6, and 0-1 days of breast milk (depending on the milk production of the patient) resulted in cumulative RID below 1% for cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results may help clinicians to derive the optimal breast milk discarding strategy for an individual patient that wants to breastfeed during chemotherapy and minimize chemotherapy exposure in their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Damoiseaux
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Daniel Centanni
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Gynecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P C Dorlo
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mills GS, Chadwick V, Tang C, Perram J, Anderson MA, Anazodo A, Kidson-Gerber G, Shand A, Lavee O, Withers B, Milliken S, Di Ciaccio PR, Hamad N. Immunochemotherapy for life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature and cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial eligibility. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e458-e467. [PMID: 37263722 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00059-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The management of potentially life-threatening malignancies in pregnancy is complicated by a lack of robust safety and efficacy evidence. This data shortage stems from a historical exclusion of women of childbearing potential from prospective clinical trials due to concerns around potential teratogenicity and toxicity of investigational agents. We conducted a systematic review of published data on immunochemotherapeutic treatment of life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy between 2010 and 2022, and the maternal and neonatal outcomes. We then performed a cross-sectional observational study of clinical trial protocols on ClinicalTrials.gov, between 2016 and 2022, recruiting women of childbearing potential with potentially life-threatening haematological malignancies, collecting trial demographic data, and documenting whether pregnant or lactating women were explicitly excluded, along with the type and duration of contraception required for women of childbearing potential. We included 17 studies for analysis in our systematic review. A total of 595 women were treated with immunochemotherapy during pregnancy, with a median age of 29 years (range 14-48). Of these, 81 women (14%) were treated in the first trimester, and 514 (86%) were treated in the second and third trimesters collectively. In total, 68 trials for acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma (40%, 26%, 21%, and 13%, respectively) were included in our ClinicalTrials.gov analysis. Most protocols (66 [97%]) explicitly excluded pregnant women, with 40 (69%) not providing a rationale for exclusion. The potential harm to the fetus from anti-cancer therapy has historically been given greater moral precedence than a pregnant woman's autonomy. This pattern is reflected in the lack of rigorous evidence for immunochemotherapy in pregnancy and a universal exclusion of pregnant and lactating women from clinical trial protocols in this study. Nonetheless, the administration of systemic chemotherapy in the second and third trimesters was not associated with an increased rate of congenital malformations or perinatal mortality in our systematic review cohort, with maternal outcomes broadly comparable to those of the non-pregnant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia S Mills
- Department of Haematology, Northern Beaches Hospital, Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
| | - Verity Chadwick
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Tang
- Department of Haematology, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Jacinta Perram
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary Ann Anderson
- Department of Clinical Haematology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Division of Blood Cells and Blood Cancer, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Giselle Kidson-Gerber
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia; Department of Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Antonia Shand
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Orly Lavee
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Barbara Withers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Sam Milliken
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Pietro R Di Ciaccio
- Department of Haematology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Nada Hamad
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dell’Aquila K, Hodges H, Moshiri M, Katz DS, Elojeimy S, Revzin MV, Tembelis M, Revels JW. Imaging evaluation of lymphoma in pregnancy with review of clinical assessment and treatment options. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1663-1678. [PMID: 36595067 PMCID: PMC9808767 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03779-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Lymphoma-related malignancies can be categorized as Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) based on histologic characteristics. Although quite rare during pregnancy, HL and NHL are the fourth and fifth most common malignancies during the pregnancy period, respectively. Given the rarity of lymphoma among pregnant patients, radiologists are usually unfamiliar with the modifications required for staging and treatment of this population, even those who work at centers with busy obstetrical services. Therefore, this manuscript serves to not only review the abdominopelvic imaging features of lymphoma in pregnancy, but it also discusses topics including birthing parent and fetal lymphoma-related prognosis, both antenatal and postpartum, current concepts in the management of pregnancy-related lymphoma, as well as the current considerations regarding birthing parent onco-fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Dell’Aquila
- grid.260914.80000 0001 2322 1832New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY USA
| | - Hannah Hodges
- grid.266832.b0000 0001 2188 8502Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - Mariam Moshiri
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Douglas S. Katz
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health–Long Island, Mineola, NY USA
| | - Saeed Elojeimy
- grid.259828.c0000 0001 2189 3475Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA
| | - Margarita V. Revzin
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Miltiadis Tembelis
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health–Long Island, Mineola, NY USA
| | - Jonathan W. Revels
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health–Long Island Division, 560 1St Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vukusic S, Carra-Dalliere C, Ciron J, Maillart E, Michel L, Leray E, Guennoc AM, Bourre B, Laplaud D, Androdias G, Bensa C, Bigaut K, Biotti D, Branger P, Casez O, Cohen M, Daval E, Deschamps R, Donze C, Dubessy AL, Dulau C, Durand-Dubief F, Guillaume M, Hebant B, Kremer L, Kwiatkowski A, Lannoy J, Maarouf A, Manchon E, Mathey G, Moisset X, Montcuquet A, Pique J, Roux T, Marignier R, Lebrun-Frenay C. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis: 2022 recommendations from the French multiple sclerosis society. Mult Scler 2023; 29:11-36. [PMID: 36317497 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221129472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations on pregnancy management for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). BACKGROUND MS typically affects young women in their childbearing years. Increasing evidence is available to inform questions raised by MS patients and health professionals about pregnancy issues. METHODS The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and university databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on healthcare topics; it was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence. RESULTS A strong agreement was reached for all 104 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, locoregional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses and disease-modifying treatments. CONCLUSION The 2022 recommendations of the French MS society should be helpful to harmonise counselling and treatment practice for pregnancy in persons with MS, allowing for better and individualised choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Vukusic
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Bron, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France/Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation against Multiple Sclerosis, State-approved Foundation, Bron, France
| | | | - Jonathan Ciron
- Centre Ressources et Compétences sclérose en plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Elisabeth Maillart
- Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, CRC-SEP, Paris, France
| | - Laure Michel
- Neurology Department, CIC_P1414 INSERM, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Leray
- EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes - UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé) - U 1309, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - David Laplaud
- Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université and INSERM, Nantes, France/CIC INSERM 1413, CRC-SEP Pays de la Loire, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Géraldine Androdias
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Bensa
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Bigaut
- CRC-SEP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Damien Biotti
- Centre Ressources et Compétences sclérose en plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Branger
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Casez
- Pathologies Inflammatoires du Système Nerveux, Neurologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France/Translational Research in Autoimmunity and Inflammation Group (T-RAIG), TIMC-IMAG, Université de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Mikael Cohen
- CRCSEP Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice Pasteur 2, Nice, France/Université Nice Côte d'Azur UR2CA-URRIS, Nice, France
| | - Elodie Daval
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Romain Deschamps
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Donze
- Hôpital saint Philibert, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Faculté de médecine et de maïeutique de Lille, Lomme, France
| | - Anne-Laure Dubessy
- Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP-6, Paris, France/Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Dulau
- CRC-SEP, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Françoise Durand-Dubief
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | | | | | - Laurent Kremer
- CRC-SEP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Arnaud Kwiatkowski
- Department of Neurology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France
| | - Julien Lannoy
- Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier de Lens, Lens, France
| | - Adil Maarouf
- CRMBM, UMR 7339, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France/APHM Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Manchon
- Department of Neurology, Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France
| | - Guillaume Mathey
- Service de neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy - Hôpital Central, Nancy, France
| | - Xavier Moisset
- Neuro-Dol, Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France/Department of neurology et CRC-SEP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Julie Pique
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Bron, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Roux
- Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, CRC-SEP, Paris, France
| | - Romain Marignier
- Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Christine Lebrun-Frenay
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France/Université Nice Côte d'Azur UR2CA-URRIS, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Damoiseaux D, Calpe S, Rosing H, Beijnen JH, Huitema ADR, Lok C, Dorlo TPC, Amant F. Presence of Five Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Breast Milk as a Guide for the Safe Use of Chemotherapy During Breastfeeding: Results From a Case Series. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112:404-410. [PMID: 35486426 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about infant's safety of chemotherapy during breastfeeding where evidence is limited to a few case reports. This lack of knowledge has led to a general tendency to advise against breastfeeding during cytotoxic therapy despite the overwhelming benefits that breastfeeding offers to both the mothers and their children. In this case series, the presence of five chemotherapies in breast milk was determined. The aim was to obtain insight into the presence of these drugs in breast milk to inform and help clinicians in making informed decisions for women who want to breastfeed. Three patients collected 24-hour samples of breast milk every day for 1, 2, or 3 weeks after chemotherapy, 210 in total. After determination of drug concentrations, the infant daily dose, relative daily infant dose (RID%) and cumulative RID were calculated. Cumulative RIDs in patients varied from 10% to values lower than 1%. Rich data allowed us to design a table which gives predictions on the amount of days that breast milk has to be discarded to reach cumulative RIDs below 5, 1, and 0.1% for each compound. For cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin, cumulative RIDs below 1 or 0.1% are reached if breast milk is discarded for 1-3 days after administration. This might suggest that breastfeeding in between cycles is an option. However, other pharmacological parameters should also be taken into consideration. For doxorubicin, also the levels of the active metabolite doxorubicinol need quantification. Similarly, breastfeeding during treatment with cisplatin might give substantial exposure and we advise caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Damoiseaux
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Calpe
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P C Dorlo
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Gynecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peccatori FA, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Mellgren G, Buonomo B, Baldassarre E, Lien EA, Bifulco E, Hustad S, Zachariassen E, Johansson H, Helland T. First-in-human pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and its metabolites in the milk of a lactating mother: a case study. ESMO Open 2021; 5:e000859. [PMID: 33115771 PMCID: PMC7594360 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer represents the most frequent neoplasm diagnosed in women of childbearing age. When the tumour is oestrogen receptor-positive, tamoxifen is among the recommended endocrine treatments. Lactating women are advised not to breastfeed while receiving tamoxifen. However, information about tamoxifen transfer into breast milk is lacking.MethodsWe measured the concentration of tamoxifen and its metabolites by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in the milk of a nursing mother that was treated for pregnancy-associated breast cancer diagnosed a few months after delivery. She was advised not to breastfeed her child and she collected milk samples for 23 days while the baby was fed with formula.ResultsTamoxifen concentrations in milk increased reaching a maximum of 214 nM. The two active metabolitesZ-4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and Z-endoxifen, could not be quantified in milk the first days after tamoxifen intake, but increased over time and reached clinically significant levels after day 18.ConclusionThis study demonstrates for the first time in human that tamoxifen and its metabolites transfer into milk. Since tamoxifen has a complete oral bioavailability, a long half-life (>7 days) and may interfere with the normal development of the infant, mothers should not breastfeed during tamoxifen treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Universita degli Studi La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.
| | - Gunnar Mellgren
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Barbara Buonomo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ernst Asbjorn Lien
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ersilia Bifulco
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Core Facility for Metabolomics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Steinar Hustad
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Core Facility for Metabolomics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Emil Zachariassen
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Core Facility for Metabolomics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Harriet Johansson
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Helland
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|