Neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in synchronous clinical stage III melanoma

Treatment strategies with electrochemotherapy for limb in-transit melanoma: Real-world outcomes from a European, retrospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study analysed treatment strategies with electrochemotherapy (ECT) in melanoma with limb in-transit metastases (ITM).

METHODS

We audited AJCC v.8 stage IIIB-IIID patients treated across 22 centres (2006-2020) within the International Network for Sharing Practices of ECT (InspECT).

RESULTS

452 patients were included, 58 % pre-treated (93 % had lower limb ITM, 44 % had ≤10 metastases [median size 1.5 cm]. Treatment strategies included first-line ECT (n = 145, 32 %), ECT with concurrent locoregional/systemic treatment (n = 163, 36 %), and salvage ECT (n = 144, 32 %). The objective response rate was 63 % (complete response [CR], 24 %), increasing to 74 % (CR, 39 %) following retreatment (median two ECT, range 1-8). CR rate in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients was 50 % vs 32 % (p < 0.001). Bleomycin de-escalation was associated with lower CR (p = 0.004). Small tumour number and size, hexagonal electrode, retreatment, and post-ECT skin ulceration predicted response in multivariable analysis. At a median follow-up of 61 months, local and locoregional recurrence occurred in 55 % and 81 % of patients. Median local progression-free, new lesions-free, and regional recurrence-free survival were 32.9, 6.9, and 7.7 months. Grade-3 toxicity was 15 %. Concurrent treatment and CR correlated with improved regional control and survival. Concomitant checkpoint inhibition did not impact toxicity or survival outcomes. The median overall survival was 5.7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with low-burden limb-only ITM, standard-dose bleomycin ECT results in durable local response. Treatment naivety, low tumour volume, hexagonal electrode application, retreatment, and post-ECT ulceration predict response. CR and concurrent treatment correlate with improved regional control and survival outcomes. Combination with checkpoint inhibitors is safe but lacks conclusive support.

Clinical updates in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma before surgery

INTRODUCTION

Locoregionally advanced melanoma represents a large group of high-risk melanoma patients at presentation and poses major challenges in relation to management and the risks of relapse and death.

AREAS COVERED

Melanoma systemic therapy has undergone substantial advancements with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecularly targeted therapies, which have been translated to the neoadjuvant setting for the management of locoregionally advanced disease. Notably, PD1 blockade as monotherapy, in combination with CTLA4 blockade or LAG3 inhibition, has demonstrated significant progress in reducing the risk of relapse and mortality, attributed to high pathologic response rates. Likewise, BRAF-MEK inhibition for BRAF mutant melanoma has yielded comparable outcomes, albeit with lower response durability than immunotherapy. Localized intralesional therapies such as Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and Tavokinogene Telseplasmid (TAVO) electro-gene-transfer combined with anti-PD1 have demonstrated favorable pathologic responses and increased immune activation. Most importantly, the S1801 randomized trial has demonstrated for the first time the advantage of the neoadjuvant approach over standard surgery followed by adjuvant therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Current evidence supports neoadjuvant therapy as a standard of care for locoregionally advanced melanoma. Ongoing research will define the optimal regimens and the biomarkers of therapeutic predictive and prognostic value.

Current knowledge about immunotherapy resistance for melanoma and potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers

Melanoma still reaches thousands of new diagnoses per year, and its aggressiveness makes recovery challenging, especially for those with stage III/IV unresectable melanoma. Immunotherapy, emerging as a beacon of hope, stands at the forefront of treatments for advanced melanoma. This review delves into the various immunotherapeutic strategies, prominently featuring cytokine immunotherapy, adoptive cell therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and vaccinations. Among these, immune checkpoint inhibitors, notably anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, emerge as the leading strategy. However, a significant subset of melanoma patients remains unresponsive to these inhibitors, underscoring the need for potent biomarkers. Efficient biomarkers have the potential to revolutionize the therapeutic landscape by facilitating the design of personalized treatments for patients with melanoma. This comprehensive review highlights the latest advancements in melanoma immunotherapy and potential biomarkers at the epicenter of recent research endeavors.

Treatment of Stage III Resectable Melanoma-Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Approaches

ABSTRACT

Patients with stage III resectable melanoma carry a high risk of melanoma recurrence that ranges from approximately 40% to 90% at 5 years following surgical management alone. Postoperative systemic adjuvant therapy targets residual micrometastatic disease that could be the source of future recurrence and death from melanoma. Randomized phase III adjuvant trials reported significant improvements in overall survival with high-dose interferon α in 2 of 3 studies (compared with observation and GMK ganglioside vaccine) and with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg compared with placebo and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg compared with high-dose interferon α. In the modern era, more recent phase III trials demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival improvements with anti-programmed cell death protein 1, pembrolizumab, and BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination dabrafenib-trametinib (for BRAF mutant melanoma) versus placebo. Furthermore, anti-programmed cell death protein 1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both been shown to significantly improve recurrence-free survival as compared with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. For melanoma patients with clinically or radiologically detectable locoregionally advanced disease, emerging data support an important role for preoperative systemic neoadjuvant therapy. Importantly, a recent cooperative group trial (S1801) reported superior event-free survival rates with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy. Collectively, current data from neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy trials support a future change in clinical practice in favor of neoadjuvant therapy for eligible melanoma patients.

Influence of microbiota-associated metabolic reprogramming on clinical outcome in patients with melanoma from the randomized adjuvant dendritic cell-based MIND-DC trial

Tumor immunosurveillance plays a major role in melanoma, prompting the development of immunotherapy strategies. The gut microbiota composition, influencing peripheral and tumoral immune tonus, earned its credentials among predictors of survival in melanoma. The MIND-DC phase III trial (NCT02993315) randomized (2:1 ratio) 148 patients with stage IIIB/C melanoma to adjuvant treatment with autologous natural dendritic cell (nDC) or placebo (PL). Overall, 144 patients collected serum and stool samples before and after 2 bimonthly injections to perform metabolomics (MB) and metagenomics (MG) as prespecified exploratory analysis. Clinical outcomes are reported separately. Here we show that different microbes were associated with prognosis, with the health-related Faecalibacterium prausnitzii standing out as the main beneficial taxon for no recurrence at 2 years (p = 0.008 at baseline, nDC arm). Therapy coincided with major MB perturbations (acylcarnitines, carboxylic and fatty acids). Despite randomization, nDC arm exhibited MG and MB bias at baseline: relative under-representation of F. prausnitzii, and perturbations of primary biliary acids (BA). F. prausnitzii anticorrelated with BA, medium- and long-chain acylcarnitines. Combined, these MG and MB biomarkers markedly determined prognosis. Altogether, the host-microbial interaction may play a role in localized melanoma. We value systematic MG and MB profiling in randomized trials to avoid baseline differences attributed to host-microbe interactions.

Do patients receive any benefit from the addition of perioperative immunotherapy-chemotherapy for solid tumors?

BACKGROUND

Progress in the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has become a highlight of cancer research. Our meta-analysis aimed to better elucidate the activity, efficacy and safety of this combination using data obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and conference proceedings up to January 31, 2023 was carried out to identify RCTs investigating neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors. Using fixed- and random-effects models, pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for pathological complete response (pCR, defined as ypT0/is pN0) and immunotherapy treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 1876 studies were identified, and 6 RCTs (N = 2558 patients) were included. The pCR was significantly higher with neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy than with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.43-3.71, P < .001). The pCR was confirmed to be statistically significant in the PD-L1-positive subgroup (OR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.55-2.59, P = .012). The pCR was confirmed to be statistically significant in the PD-1 inhibitor subgroup (OR = 4.17; 95% CI: 1.47-11.87, P = .000), while no statistically significant was observed in the PD-L1 inhibitor subgroup (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12-2.07, P = .308). The pooled ORs of any grade treatment-related or immunotherapy-related adverse events were significant, but the grade 3-4 immunotherapy-related adverse events were not.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides comprehensive data that the addition of PD1 blockade to neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in better treatment efficacy than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with solid tumors and had a similar safety profile.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Melanoma: Where Are We Now?

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current state of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy for locoregionally advanced melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Melanoma systemic therapy has witnessed major advances with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecularly targeted therapy that have been translated into the neoadjuvant setting in managing locoregionally advanced disease. PD1 blockade as monotherapy and combined with CTLA4 blockade or LAG3 inhibition has demonstrated major improvements in reducing the risk of relapse and death that were associated with high pathologic response rates. Similar results were reported with BRAF-MEK inhibition for BRAF mutant melanoma with high pathologic response rates that appear to be less durable compared to immunotherapy. More importantly, in a recent randomized trial, event-free survival was significantly improved with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab compared to standard surgery and adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for locoregionally advanced melanoma. Ongoing studies will define the most optimal combination regimens.

Increasing cure rates of solid tumors by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy has become the central pillar of cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a major category of tumor immunotherapy, reactivate preexisting anticancer immunity. Initially, ICIs were approved only for advanced and metastatic cancers in the salvage setting after or concurrent with chemotherapy at a response rate of around 20-30% with a few exceptions. With significant progress over the decade, advances in immunotherapy have led to numerous clinical trials investigating ICIs as neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for resectable solid tumors. The promising results of these trials have led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ICIs as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and bladder cancer, and the list continues to grow. This therapy represents a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, as many early-stage cancer patients could be cured with the introduction of immunotherapy in the early stages of cancer. Therefore, this topic became one of the main themes at the 2021 China Cancer Immunotherapy Workshop co-organized by the Chinese American Hematologist and Oncologist Network, the China National Medical Products Administration and the Tsinghua University School of Medicine. This review article summarizes the current landscape of ICI-based immunotherapy, emphasizing the new clinical developments of ICIs as curative neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for early-stage disease.

Nidogen-2 (NID2) is a Key Factor in Collagen Causing Poor Response to Immunotherapy in Melanoma

Background

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma continues to rise rapidly and has an extremely poor prognosis. Immunotherapy strategies are the most effective approach for patients who have developed metastases, but not all cases have been successful due to the complex and variable mechanisms of melanoma response to immune checkpoint inhibition.

Methods

We synthesized collagen-coding gene expression data (second-generation and single-cell sequencing) from public Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. Bioinformatics analysis was performed using R software and several database resources such as Metascape database, Gene Set Cancer Analysis (GSCA) database, and Cytoscape software, etc., to investigate the biological mechanisms that may be related with collagens. Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical staining were used to validate the expression and localization of Nidogen-2 (NID2).

Results

Melanoma patients can be divided into two collagen clusters. Patients with high collagen levels (C1) had a shorter survival than those with low collagen levels (C2) and were less likely to benefit from immunotherapy. We demonstrated that NID2 is a potential key factor in the collagen phenotype, is involved in fibroblast activation in melanoma, and forms a barrier to limit the proximity of CD8+ T cells to tumor cells.

Conclusion

We clarified the adverse effects of collagen on melanoma patients and identified NID2 as a potential therapeutic target.

Surgical Management of Melanoma: Advances and Updates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review and update surgeons about the evolving complexities in the surgical management of melanoma including lymph node staging and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Primary resection with adequate margins continues to be the standard of care for localized cutaneous melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is confirmed to be a powerful tool due to its prognostic value and informative guidance for adjuvant treatments and surveillance. Due to the lack of benefit in melanoma-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival, completion lymph node dissection is not performed routinely after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Neoadjuvant systemic treatment approaches for advanced loco-regional disease show promise in phase I and II clinical trial data, and phase III studies. The surgical management of cutaneous melanoma continues to evolve with further de-escalation of the extent of excision of primary melanomas and the management of lymph node disease.

Pathological Response and Immune Biomarker Assessment in Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) due to the clinical benefits reported in several clinical trials. In these settings, the pathological assessment of the tumor bed to quantify a pathological response has been used as a surrogate method of clinical benefit to neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, several clinical trials are including the assessment of tissue-, blood-, or host-based biomarkers to predict therapy response and to monitor the response to neoadjuvant treatment. In this manuscript, we provide an overview of current recommendations for the evaluation of pathological response and describe potential biomarkers used in clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been used in the perioperative setting of non-small-cell carcinoma (NSCLC); however, the five-year survival rate only improves by about 5%. Neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become significant due to improved survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy agents. The assessment of pathology response has been proposed as a surrogate indicator of the benefits of neaodjuvant therapy. An outline of recommendations has been published by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) for the evaluation of pathologic response (PR). However, recent studies indicate that evaluations of immune-related changes are distinct in surgical resected samples from patients treated with immunotherapy. Several clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC have included the study of biomarkers that can predict the response of therapy and monitor the response to treatment. In this review, we provide relevant information on the current recommendations of the assessment of pathological responses in surgical resected NSCLC tumors treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and we describe current and potential biomarkers to predict the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Personalized response-directed surgery and adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in high-risk stage III melanoma: the PRADO trial

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab induces high pathologic response rates (pRRs) in clinical stage III nodal melanoma, and pathologic response is strongly associated with prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS). The PRADO extension cohort of the OpACIN-neo trial ( NCT02977052 ) addressed the feasibility and effect on clinical outcome of using pathologic response after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab as a criterion for further treatment personalization. In total, 99 patients with clinical stage IIIb-d nodal melanoma were included and treated with 6 weeks of neoadjuvant ipilimumab 1 mg kg-1 and nivolumab 3 mg kg-1. In patients achieving major pathologic response (MPR, ≤10% viable tumor) in their index lymph node (ILN, the largest lymph node metastasis at baseline), therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) and adjuvant therapy were omitted. Patients with pathologic partial response (pPR; >10 to ≤50% viable tumor) underwent TLND only, whereas patients with pathologic non-response (pNR; >50% viable tumor) underwent TLND and adjuvant systemic therapy ± synchronous radiotherapy. Primary objectives were confirmation of pRR (ILN, at week 6) of the winner neoadjuvant combination scheme identified in OpACIN-neo; to investigate whether TLND can be safely omitted in patients achieving MPR; and to investigate whether RFS at 24 months can be improved for patients achieving pNR. ILN resection and ILN-response-tailored treatment were feasible. The pRR was 72%, including 61% MPR. Grade 3-4 toxicity within the first 12 weeks was observed in 22 (22%) patients. TLND was omitted in 59 of 60 patients with MPR, resulting in significantly lower surgical morbidity and better quality of life. The 24-month relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 93% and 98% in patients with MPR, 64% and 64% in patients with pPR, and 71% and 76% in patients with pNR, respectively. These findings provide a strong rationale for randomized clinical trials testing response-directed treatment personalization after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Strategies in HPV-Related Head-and-Neck Cancer

Purpose of review

Herein, we review current evidence and future directions of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) by describing published data and ongoing clinical trials.

Recent findings

Although HNSCCs have shown response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent/metastatic disease, a limited number of patients benefit from this treatment. There is an expanding interest in clarifying the clinical benefit of immunotherapy in earlier stage disease setting including at initial presentation. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for HPV-related HNSCCs represents a rational approach, as these cancers bear strong viral antigens.

Summary

The majority of patients with HPV-related HNSCC have good prognosis and treatment de-intensification strategies are under evaluation to decrease toxicity and maintain efficacy. On the other hand, a subset of patients with HPV-related HNSCC have a poorer prognosis and additional treatment options are need to improve outcome. Multiple clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy will achieve these goals.