1
|
Giulia O, Alessandro B, Angelo C, Paolo M, Rosa C, Marina M, Umberto P, Catia C, Giulia V, Massimo F, Michele R. Isolated lung metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of a different disease. Semin Oncol 2024; 51:69-76. [PMID: 38879350 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis, mostly due to the high rate of distant dissemination. However, growing evidence shows that isolated lung recurrence or metastases (ILM) from PDAC are not only less common, but also correlated with a better prognosis. Lung-only recurrence after surgery occurs later in time and is associated with more favorable prognostic characteristics of the primary tumor. Moreover, recent findings suggest that this specific site of metastases is characterized by an immunologically "hot" microenvironment and a more favorable molecular profile that could possibly justify its clinical behavior. Thus, ILM from PDAC emerge as a distinct entity, that might also benefit from a different therapeutic approach, possibly with the integration of surgery and de-intensified chemotherapy regimens, especially in selected patients. In this review we delve into the current scientific evidence on the clinical and biological characteristics of isolated LM from PDAC, also focusing on concerns with their diagnostic process and the therapeutic options for the management of this subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orsi Giulia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bandiera Alessandro
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vita- Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carretta Angelo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vita- Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Migliori Paolo
- Medical Sciences, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chavez Rosa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Macchini Marina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Peretti Umberto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carconi Catia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronesi Giulia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vita- Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Falconi Massimo
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, Vita -Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Reni Michele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ang A, Michaelides A, Chelala C, Ullah D, Kocher HM. Prognostication for recurrence patterns after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:248-261. [PMID: 38556877 PMCID: PMC11128784 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims This study aimed to investigate patterns and factors affecting recurrence after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC (2011-21) and consented to data and tissue collection (Barts Pancreas Tissue Bank) were followed up until May 2023. Clinico-pathological variables were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of 91 people (42 males [46%]; median age, 71 years [range, 43-86 years]) with a median follow-up of 51 months (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 40-61 months), the recurrence rate was 72.5% (n = 66; 12 loco-regional alone, 11 liver alone, 5 lung alone, 3 peritoneal alone, 29 simultaneous loco-regional and distant metastases, and 6 multi-focal distant metastases at first recurrence diagnosis). The median time to recurrence was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.6-10.5 months). Median survival after recurrence was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.3 months). Stratification by recurrence location revealed significant differences in time to recurrence between loco-regional only recurrence (median, 13.6 months; 95% CI, 11.7-15.5 months) and simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence (median, 7.5 months; 95% CI, 4.6-10.4 months; p = 0.02, pairwise log-rank test). Significant predictors for recurrence were systemic inflammation index (SII) ≥ 500 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.3), lymph node ratio ≥ 0.33 (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.8), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7). Conclusions Timing to loco-regional only recurrence was significantly longer than simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence. Significant predictors for recurrence were SII, lymph node ration, and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Ang
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Athena Michaelides
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Claude Chelala
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Dayem Ullah
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Hemant M. Kocher
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdalla TSA, Duhn J, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Zeissig SR, Kleihues-van Tol K, Honselmann KC, Braun R, Kist M, Bolm L, von Fritsch L, Lapshyn H, Litkevych S, Hummel R, Zemskov S, Wellner UF, Keck T, Deichmann S. Oncological Outcomes and Patterns of Recurrence after the Surgical Resection of an Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm versus Primary Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis from the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2016. [PMID: 38893136 PMCID: PMC11171342 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are premalignant cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CNPs), which can progress to invasive IPMN and pancreatic cancer. The available literature has shown controversial results regarding prognosis and clinical outcomes after the resection of invasive IPMN. AIMS This study aims to characterize the oncologic outcomes and metastatic progression pattern after the resection of non-metastatic invasive IPMN. METHODS Data were obtained from 24 clinical cancer registries participating in the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers (ADT). Patients with invasive IPMN (n = 217) as well as PDAC (n = 5794) between 2000 and 2021 were included and compared regarding oncological outcomes. RESULTS Invasive IPMN was significantly smaller in size (p < 0.001) and of a lower tumor grade (p < 0.001), with fewer lymph node metastases (p < 0.001), lymphangiosis (p < 0.001), and consequently a higher R0 resection rate (88 vs. 74%) compared to PDAC. Moreover, invasive IPMN was associated with fewer local (11 vs. 15%) and distant recurrences (29 vs. 46%) and metastasized more frequently in the lungs only (26% vs. 14%). Invasive IPMN was associated with a longer median OS (29 vs. 19 months) and DFS (31 vs. 15 months) compared to PDAC and stayed independently prognostic in multivariable analyses. These survival differences were most pronounced in early tumor stages. Interestingly, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in surgically resected invasive IPMN. CONCLUSIONS Invasive IPMN is a rare pancreatic entity with increasing incidence in Germany. It is associated with favorable histopathological features at the time of resection and longer OS and DFS compared to PDAC, particularly before the locoregional spread has occurred. Invasive IPMNs are associated with lung-only metastasis. The benefit of postoperative chemotherapy after the resection of invasive IPMN remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaer S. A. Abdalla
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jannis Duhn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sylke Ruth Zeissig
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B), University of Würzburg, 97974 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kees Kleihues-van Tol
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kim C. Honselmann
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Braun
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Kist
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Louisa Bolm
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lennart von Fritsch
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hryhoriy Lapshyn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stanislav Litkevych
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Richard Hummel
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Greiswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sergii Zemskov
- Department of General Surgery, Bogomolets National Medical University, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Ulrich Friedrich Wellner
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Deichmann
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT), German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers, 14057 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meyer JE, Kharofa J. The Role of Dose Escalation in Pancreatic Cancer: Go Big or Go Home? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:395-397. [PMID: 36621234 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jordan Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holmberg M, Linder S, Kordes M, Liljefors M, Ghorbani P, Löhr JM, Sparrelid E. Impact of spatio-temporal recurrence pattern on overall survival for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia - A comparison with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology 2022; 22:598-607. [PMID: 35501218 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resections for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) have increased dramatically during the last decade. Recurrence pattern and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for solid pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known, but not for invasive IPMN (inv-IPMN). OBJECTIVES To elucidate the impact of spatio-temporal recurrence pattern and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival for inv-IPMN compared with PDAC. METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study of consecutive patients ≥18 years of age who underwent resection for inv-IPMN or PDAC at Karolinska University Hospital, between 2009 and 2018. Different initial recurrence sites and time frames as well as predictors for death were assessed with multivariable Cox and logistic regressions. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier model and log rank test. RESULTS Of 396 resected patients, 92 were inv-IPMN and 304 PDAC. Both recurrence rate and death rate within three-years were lower for inv-IPMN compared to PDAC (p = 0.006 and p = 0.007 respectively). Across the whole cohort, the most common recurrence patterns were multi-site (25%), single-site liver (21%) and single-site locoregional (10%) recurrence. The most prominent predictors for death in multivariable Cox regression, especially if occurred within the first year, were multi-site (HR 17.0), single-site peritoneal (HR 13.6) and single-site liver (HR 13.1) recurrence. These predictors were less common in inv-IPMN compared to PDAC (p = 0.007). The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION Resected inv-IPMN exhibits a less aggressive recurrence pattern than PDAC that translates into a more favorable overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Holmberg
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Stefan Linder
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maximilian Kordes
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Liljefors
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J-Matthias Löhr
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kruger SF, Lohneis A, Abendroth A, Berger AW, Ettrich TJ, Waidmann O, Kapp M, Steiner B, Kumbrink J, Reischer A, Haas M, Westphalen CB, Zhang D, Miller-Phillips L, Burger PJ, Kobold S, Werner J, Subklewe M, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Kunzmann V, Seufferlein T, Siveke JT, Sinn M, Heinemann V, Ormanns S, Boeck S. Prognosis and tumor biology of pancreatic cancer patients with isolated lung metastases: translational results from the German multicenter AIO-YMO-PAK-0515 study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100388. [PMID: 35121522 PMCID: PMC8818907 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pulmonary metastasis (M1-PUL) as first site of dissemination in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a rare event and may define a distinct biological subgroup. Patients and methods Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie-Young Medical Oncologists-Pankreas-0515 study (AIO-YMO-PAK-0515) was a retrospective German multicenter study investigating clinical and molecular characteristics of M1-PUL PDAC patients; 115 M1-PUL PDAC patients from 7 participating centers were included. Clinical characteristics and potential prognostic factors were defined within the M1-PUL cohort. Archival tumor samples were analyzed for Her2/neu, HNF1A and KRT81 expression. Additionally, messenger RNA (mRNA) expression analysis (using a 770-gene immune profiling panel) was carried out in the M1-PUL and in a control cohort (M1-ANY). Results Median overall survival in the entire M1-PUL cohort was 20 months; the most favorable prognosis (median survival: 28 months) was observed in the subgroup of 66 PDAC patients with metachronous lung metastases after previous curative-intent surgery. The number of metastatic lesions, uni- or bilateral lung involvement as well as metastasectomy were identified as potential prognostic factors. Her2/neu expression and PDAC subtyping (by HNF1A and KRT81) did not differ between the M1-PUL and the M1-ANY cohort. mRNA expression analysis revealed significant differentially expressed genes between both cohorts: CD63 and LAMP1 were among the top 20 differentially expressed genes and were identified as potential mediators of organotropism and favorable survival outcome of M1-PUL patients. Conclusion M1-PUL represents a clinically favorable cohort in PDAC patients. Site of relapse might already be predetermined at the time of surgery and could potentially be predicted by gene expression profiling. The retrospective multicenter AIO-YMO-PAK-0515 study defines M1-PUL as a clinically favorable subgroup in PDAC. The number of metastatic lesions, bilateral lung involvement and surgical metastasectomy may serve as prognostic factors. Immune-related gene expression differs between patients with isolated pulmonary relapse versus other sites of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Kruger
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - A Lohneis
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Berlin, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - A Abendroth
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - A W Berger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - T J Ettrich
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - O Waidmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; University Cancer Centre Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - M Kapp
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Wuerzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - B Steiner
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - J Kumbrink
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Reischer
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Haas
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C B Westphalen
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - L Miller-Phillips
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P J Burger
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Kobold
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany; Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Subklewe
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M von Bergwelt-Baildon
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V Kunzmann
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Wuerzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - T Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - J T Siveke
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - M Sinn
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Berlin, Germany; Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Ormanns
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Boeck
- Department of Internal Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|