1
|
Martin-Broto J, Diaz-Beveridge R, Moura D, Ramos R, Martinez-Trufero J, Carrasco I, Sebio A, González-Billalabeitia E, Gutierrez A, Fernandez-Jara J, Hernández-Vargas L, Cruz J, Valverde C, Hindi N. Phase Ib Study for the Combination of Doxorubicin, Dacarbazine, and Nivolumab as the Upfront Treatment in Patients With Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: A Study by the Spanish Sarcoma Group (GEIS). J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2400358. [PMID: 39356980 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Doxorubicin, alongside a select group of cytotoxic agents, is capable of inducing an adaptive immune response via a well-established peculiar type of tumor cell death called immunogenic cell death (ICD). We hypothesize that combining doxorubicin and dacarbazine with nivolumab may enhance therapeutic efficacy by exerting synergy in the ICD circuit. We hereby present a phase Ib trial with this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma and anthracycline-naïve were eligible. The initial dose level consisted of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 once on day 1, once every three weeks, followed by dacarbazine 400 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 2, once every three weeks, plus nivolumab 360 mg once on day 2, once every 3 weeks, for six courses and then 1 year of nivolumab. A (-1) dose level was the same regimen but with nivolumab 240 mg. A classic 3 + 3 phase-I design was used to determine the recommended phase-II dose (RP2D). Secondary end points included overall response rate, safety profile, survival, and translational research. RESULTS From January 2002 to July 2023, 24 patients were enrolled and 23 were evaluable for efficacy, excluding one patient because of noncompliant dose. All patients were treated with the initial dose level, then the RP2D. Toxicity was mild, with the most frequent being grade 4 toxicity neutropenia (16.7%) and thrombocytopenia (8.3%), while no grade 5 toxicity occurred. The centrally reviewed objective response rate was as follows: partial response 56.5%, stable disease 39.1%, and progression 4.4%. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80% (95% CI, 63 to 98). Dynamic increases of HMGB1 in blood significantly correlated with longer PFS. CONCLUSION This scheme of doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and nivolumab is feasible and well tolerated. Clinical activity is encouraging and the prognostic impact of HMGB1 supports the relevance of ICD activation. Further clinical research is already underway with this concept in leiomyosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Martin-Broto
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, University Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz (IIS/FJD; UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - David Moura
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz (IIS/FJD; UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Ramos
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Irene Carrasco
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Ana Sebio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Gutierrez
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | - Josefina Cruz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
| | - Claudia Valverde
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, University Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz (IIS/FJD; UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ijaz I, Shahzad MN, Hosseinifard H, Liu S, Sefidan MO, Kahloon LE, Imani S, Hua Z, Zhang YQ. Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37081717 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the standard therapy for patients with uLMS. However, it is unclear which treatment regimen results in the most favorable clinical outcome. We performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to assess the efficiency of different treatments received by patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing uLMS by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as primary endpoints. The frequentist random effects meta-analysis model was used to compare the outcomes of different treatment regimens for advanced uLMS. A meta-regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the study-specific hazard ratios and specific demographic variables. A meta-analysis of 51 reports including 1664 patients was conducted. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (916 patients; 55%), gemcitabine and docetaxel were the most frequently used drugs. First-line monotherapy with alkylating agents (pooled ORR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.52) and second-line monotherapy with protein kinase inhibitors (pooled ORR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.39-0.52) resulted in favorable prognoses. The combinations of anthracycline plus alkylating therapy (pooled DCR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.79) and of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (pooled DCR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75) showed the greatest benefits when used as first-line and second-line chemotherapies, respectively. Subgroup meta-analysis results revealed that dual-regimen therapies comprising anthracycline plus alkylating therapy and gemcitabine plus docetaxel are practical therapeutic choices for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III-IVb with distant metastases when assessed by computed tomography (p = 0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and local radiotherapy resulted in favorable outcomes for patients with earlier stages of distant relapsed uLMS (p < 0.001). Our findings provide a basis for designing new therapeutic strategies and can potentially guide clinical practice toward better prognoses for uLMS patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iqra Ijaz
- Sichuan Provincial Center for Gynecological and Breast Diseases, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, PR China
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Naveed Shahzad
- Stem Cell Laboratory, Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Hossein Hosseinifard
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Shuya Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Masoud Ostadi Sefidan
- Department of General Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Lubna Ejaz Kahloon
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Saber Imani
- Shulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhong Hua
- Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Yu Qin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou, Sichuan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rothermundt C, Andreou D, Blay JY, Brodowicz T, Desar IME, Dileo P, Gelderblom H, Haas R, Jakob J, Jones RL, Judson I, Kunz WG, Liegl-Atzwanger B, Lindner LH, Messiou C, Miah AB, Reichardt P, Szkandera J, van der Graaf WTA, van Houdt WJ, Wardelmann E, Hofer S. Controversies in the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma: Recommendations of the Conference on State of Science in Sarcoma 2022. Eur J Cancer 2023; 180:158-179. [PMID: 36599184 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to the rarity and heterogeneity in biology and presentation, there are multiple areas in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), with no, low-level or conflicting evidence. METHODS During the first Consensus Conference on the State of Science in Sarcoma (CSSS), we used a modified Delphi process to identify areas of controversy in the field of sarcoma, to name topics with limited evidence-based data in which a scientific and knowledge gap may remain and a consensus statement will help to guide patient management. We determined scientific questions which need to be addressed in the future in order to generate evidence and to inform physicians and caregivers in daily clinical practice in order to improve the outcomes of patients with sarcoma. We conducted a vote on STS key questions and controversies prior to the CSSS meeting, which took place in May 2022. RESULTS Sixty-two European sarcoma experts participated in the survey. Sixteen strong consensus (≥95%) items were identified by the experts, as well as 30 items with a ≥75% consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic questions. Ultimately, many controversy topics remained without consensus. CONCLUSIONS In this manuscript, we summarise the voting results and the discussion during the CSSS meeting. Future scientific questions, priorities for clinical trials, registries, quality assurance, and action by stakeholders are proposed. Platforms and partnerships can support innovative approaches to improve management and clinical research in STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Dimosthenis Andreou
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medicine, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Brodowicz
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital - Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Palma Dileo
- London Sarcoma Service, Department of Oncology, University College Hospital London, United Kingdom
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rick Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam and the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Jakob
- Sarcoma Unit, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Robin L Jones
- Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Judson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lars H Lindner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aisha B Miah
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joanna Szkandera
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feasibility of Longitudinal ctDNA Assessment in Patients with Uterine and Extra-Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010157. [PMID: 36612153 PMCID: PMC9818540 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are aggressive malignancies with a propensity for early relapse. Current surveillance modalities include physical exam and imaging; however, radiological response to therapy may only manifest after 4-6 cycles of treatment. Herein, we evaluated the feasibility of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment in LMS patients to identify disease progression. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with LMS who underwent treatment at Stanford Cancer Center between September 2019 and May 2022. ctDNA detection was performed using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Genomic analysis was conducted to characterize tumor mutation burden (TMB) and known driver mutations. Results: A total of 148 plasma samples were obtained from 34 patients with uterine (N = 21) and extrauterine (N = 13) LMS (median follow-up: 67.2 (19-346.3) weeks] and analyzed for ctDNA presence. Nineteen patients had metastatic disease. The most frequently mutated driver genes across sub-cohorts were TP53, RB1, and PTEN. Patients were stratified into four sub-cohorts (A-D) based on ctDNA kinetics. ctDNA levels tracked longitudinally with progression of disease and response to therapy. Conclusion: Our results indicate that while undetectable ctDNA may suggest a lower likelihood of relapse, ctDNA positivity may indicate progressive disease, enabling closer monitoring of patients for early clinical intervention.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kantidakis G, Litière S, Neven A, Vinches M, Judson I, Blay JY, Wardelmann E, Stacchiotti S, D'Ambrosio L, Marréaud S, van der Graaf WTA, Kasper B, Fiocco M, Gelderblom H. New benchmarks to design clinical trials with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or synovial sarcoma patients: An EORTC - Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) meta-analysis based on a literature review for soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer 2022; 174:261-276. [PMID: 36116829 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, we performed a meta-analysis based on a literature review for STS trials (published 2003-2018, ≥10 adult patients) to update long-standing reference values for leiomyosarcomas. This work is extended for liposarcomas (LPS) and synovial sarcomas (SS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Study endpoints were progression-free survival rates (PFSRs) at 3 and 6 months. Trial-specific estimates were pooled per treatment line (first-line or pre-treated) with random effects meta-analyses. The choice of the therapeutic benefit to target in future trials was guided by the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). RESULTS Information was acquired for 1030 LPS patients (25 trials; 7 first-line, 17 pre-treated, 1 both) and 348 SS patients (13 trials; 3 first-line, 10 pre-treated). For LPS, the overall pooled first-line PFSRs were 69% (95%-CI 60-77%) and 56% (95%-CI 45-67%) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. These rates were 49% (95%-CI 40-57%)/28% (95%-CI 22-34%) for >1 lines. For SS, first-line PFSRs were 74% (95%-CI 58-86%)/56% (95%-CI 31-78%) at 3 and 6 months, and pre-treated rates were 45% (95%-CI 34-57%)/25% (95%-CI 16-36%). Following ESMO-MCBS guidelines, the minimum values to target are 79% and 69% for first-line LPS (82% and 69% for SS) at 3 and 6 months. For pre-treated LPS, recommended PFSRs at 3 and 6 months suggesting drug activity are 63% and 44% (60% and 41% for SS). CONCLUSIONS New benchmarks are proposed for advanced/metastatic LPS or SS to design future histology-specific phase II trials. More data are needed to provide definitive thresholds for the different LPS subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Kantidakis
- EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anouk Neven
- EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Competence Center for Methodology and Statistics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Marie Vinches
- EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Ian Judson
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Gerhard Domagk Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Silvia Stacchiotti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bernd Kasper
- Sarcoma Unit, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Mathematical Institute Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Somaiah N, Conley AP, Parra ER, Lin H, Amini B, Solis Soto L, Salazar R, Barreto C, Chen H, Gite S, Haymaker C, Nassif EF, Bernatchez C, Mitra A, Livingston JA, Ravi V, Araujo DM, Benjamin R, Patel S, Zarzour MA, Sabir S, Lazar AJ, Wang WL, Daw NC, Zhou X, Roland CL, Cooper ZA, Rodriguez-Canales J, Futreal A, Soria JC, Wistuba II, Hwu P. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab in advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a single-centre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1156-1166. [PMID: 35934010 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few standard treatment options are available for patients with metastatic sarcomas. We did this trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and changes in the tumour microenvironment for durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 drug, and tremelimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 drug, across multiple sarcoma subtypes. METHODS In this single-centre phase 2 trial, done at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX USA), patients aged 18 years or older with advanced or metastatic sarcoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 who had received at least one previous line of systemic therapy were enrolled in disease subtype-specific groups (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, osteosarcoma, alveolar soft-part sarcoma, chordoma, and other sarcomas). Patients received 1500 mg intravenous durvalumab and 75 mg intravenous tremelimumab for four cycles, followed by durvalumab alone every 4 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 weeks in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who received at least one dose of treatment). Safety was also analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02815995, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Aug 17, 2016, and April 9, 2018, 62 patients were enrolled, of whom 57 (92%) received treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 37·2 months (IQR 1·8-10·1), progression-free survival at 12 weeks was 49% (95% CI 36-61). 21 grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported, the most common of which were increased lipase (four [7%] of 57 patients), colitis (three [5%] patients), and pneumonitis (three [5%] patients). Nine (16%) patients had a treatment related serious adverse event. One patient had grade 5 pneumonitis and colitis. INTERPRETATION The combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab is an active treatment regimen for advanced or metastatic sarcoma and merits evaluation in specific subsets in future trials. FUNDING AstraZeneca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edwin Roger Parra
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Behrang Amini
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luisa Solis Soto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ruth Salazar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carmelia Barreto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Honglei Chen
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Swati Gite
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Akash Mitra
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Andrew Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dejka M Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria A Zarzour
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharjeel Sabir
- Department of General Interventional Radiology, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Najat C Daw
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiao Zhou
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Oncology Research & Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- General Director, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sobczuk P, Bątruk H, Wójcik P, Iwaniak K, Kozak K, Rutkowski P. In search of effective therapies: the current landscape of phase II trials in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04149-0. [PMID: 35778653 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04149-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are diagnosed in 4-6 cases per 100 000 people a year and are associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Around one-third of patients will develop metastatic disease that requires palliative systemic therapy. Current therapeutic options have limited activity, and new treatments are tested, mainly in phase II trials. There is high variability and no standardization of phase II designs. We aimed to analyze the current landscape of phase II studies in STS and evaluate how its statistical design can affect the results. METHODS Full-text phase II studies published in STS patients between 2005 and 2020 were identified and analyzed. RESULTS We have identified 102 trials, of which 77.4% were single-arm trials, 16.7% were randomized comparative trials (RCT), and 5.9% were randomized noncomparative trials. Including multiple cohorts, 22 randomized and 128 single-arm cohorts were analyzed. Nearly 80% of trials reported full statistical bases of the design. Over 20 different primary endpoints were used, with PFS as the most common in RCT trials (81.8%) and ORR (36.7%) and 3-months progression-free survival (PFS) rate (21.9%) in single-arm trials. Overall, 27.3% of RCT and 37.5% of single-arm trials were positive. Among single-arm trials, studies using 3- or 6-month rates were more often positive than those based on ORR. CONCLUSIONS There is high heterogeneity in sarcoma trial designs, mainly in primary-endpoint and hypotheses used for size calculation. There is an unmet need for standardization that will incorporate factors associated with the rarity of the disease, outcomes detected in previous trials and real-life studies, and specific characteristics of new therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Sobczuk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
| | | | | | | | - Katarzyna Kozak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kyriazoglou A, Gkaralea LE, Kotsantis I, Anastasiou M, Pantazopoulos A, Prevezanou M, Chatzidakis I, Kavourakis G, Economopoulou P, Nixon IF, Psyrri A. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in sarcoma treatment. Oncol Lett 2022; 23:183. [PMID: 35527786 PMCID: PMC9073578 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Sarcomas are a group of rare mesenchymal malignant tumors that arise from transformed cells of the mesenchymal connective tissue, which are challenging to treat. The majority of sarcomas are soft tissue sarcomas (STSs; 75%) and this heterogeneous group of tumors is further comprised of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (~15%) and bone sarcomas (10%). Although surgery remains the current primary therapeutic approach for localized disease, recurrent, metastatic and refractory sarcomas require cytotoxic chemotherapy, which usually yields poor results. Therefore the efficiency of sarcoma treatment imposes a difficult problem. Furthermore, even though progress has been made towards understanding the underlying molecular signaling pathways of sarcoma, there are limited treatment options. The aim of the present study was therefore to perform a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence regarding the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with recurrent or refractory STSs and bone sarcomas over the last two decades. Tyrosine kinases are principal elements of several intracellular molecular signaling pathways. Deregulation of these proteins has been implicated in driving oncogenesis via the crosstalk of pivotal cellular signaling pathways and cascades, including cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Subsequently, small molecule TKIs that target these proteins provide a novel potential therapeutic approach for several types of tumor by offering significant clinical benefits. Among the eligible articles, there were 45 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase II and non-randomized. Numerous studies have reported promising results regarding the use of TKIs, mainly resulting in disease control in patients with STSs. The lack of randomized clinical trials demonstrates the ambiguous efficiency of various studied treatment options, which therefore currently limits the approved drugs used in clinical practice. Research both in clinical and preclinical settings is needed to shed light on the underlying molecular drivers of sarcomagenesis and will identify novel therapeutic approaches for pretreated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Kyriazoglou
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ioannis Kotsantis
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Anastasiou
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Maria Prevezanou
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Chatzidakis
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Kavourakis
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiota Economopoulou
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Amanda Psyrri
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|