Increased risk of Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia in individuals with a positive family history

The impact of family cancer history on tumor metabolism and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and the role of family cancer history in disease progression and treatment response remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the influence of family tumor history on disease-free survival, tumor metabolism, and treatment response in NSCLC patients. A retrospective, single-center study of 414 NSCLC patients was conducted, with 101 patients having a family history of cancer (FHC). Disease-free survival (DFS), tumor glucose metabolism assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT, and treatment response to chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy were analyzed. Multivariate modeling was performed to improve prognostic prediction. Patients with FHC exhibited higher TNM staging, increased susceptibility to lymph node invasion, and elevated tumor glucose metabolism levels. Family history of cancer, particularly colorectal and lung cancer, was a significant risk factor for disease-free survival. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy significantly improved patient prognosis, while family history of cancer affected the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy but not targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Multivariate modeling combining FHC, treatment, and tumor metabolism levels yielded improved predictive performance. Our study highlights the importance of considering a patient's family history when assessing risk profiles and formulating treatment decisions for NSCLC patients. Further research is needed to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying these observed associations and to develop more effective treatment strategies for NSCLC patients with a cancer family history.

Categorizing Risks within Barrett's Esophagus To Guide Surveillance and Interception; Suggesting a New Framework

Barrett's esophagus is a precancerous condition that can progress in a stepwise manner to dysplasia and eventually esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Once diagnosed, patients with Barrett's esophagus are kept on surveillance to detect progression so that timely intervention can occur with endoscopic therapy. Several demographic and clinical risk factors are known to increase progression toward EAC, such as longer Barrett's segments, and these patients are kept on tighter surveillance. While p53 IHC has been advocated as an adjunct to histopathologic diagnosis, use of this biomarker is variable, and no other molecular factors are currently applied. Given the new evidence available, it is time to consider whether other risk factors or tools could be applied in clinical practice to decide on closer or attenuated surveillance. In this commentary, we summarize the most relevant risk factors for Barrett's esophagus progression, highlight the most promising novel risk stratification tools-including nonendoscopic triage and commercial biomarker panels, and propose a new framework suggesting how to incorporate risk stratification into clinical practice.

Dutch individuals' views of screening for oesophageal cancer: a focus group study

OBJECTIVE

Screening for early oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), including its precursor Barrett's oesophagus (BO), can potentially reduce OAC-related morbidity and mortality. This study explores Dutch at-risk individuals' views of screening an at-risk population for BO/OAC.

DESIGN

We invited 372 individuals with risk factors for OAC from primary care practices, 73 individuals with surveillance experience, and 221 participants of previous studies (BO/OAC screening trial or survey) to participate in focus groups. Transcripts were inductively and thematically analysed by two independent researchers.

RESULTS

A total of 50 individuals (42% with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms) of 50-75 years participated. Themes that were raised included: theme 1 'screening intentions' describing participants' motivation to be screened (eg, early diagnosis, potential reassurance, physician recommendation, and knowing someone with cancer) or decline screening (eg, anticipated discomfort or suboptimal accuracy of the test); theme 2 'risk-based eligibility' describing the tension between effectiveness (eg, targeting high-risk individuals) and inclusivity (eg, making screening available for everyone); theme 3 'distributive justice', in which the pressure of a potential new screening programme on healthcare resources was discussed; and theme 4 'information needs' describing the perceived lack of information access and individuals' preference to discuss screening with their general practitioner.

CONCLUSION

Individuals not only expressed high willingness to be screened but also voiced the concern that a new screening programme may pressure limited healthcare resources. If implemented, it is crucial to develop educational materials that meet the public's information needs and explain the test procedures and eligibility criteria while avoiding stigmatising language.

Toward Targeted Therapies in Oesophageal Cancers: An Overview

Oesophageal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Oesophageal cancer occurs as squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or adenocarcinoma (EAC). Prognosis for patients with either ESCC or EAC is poor, with less than 20% of patients surviving more than 5 years after diagnosis. A major progress has been made in the development of biomarker-driven targeted therapies against breast and lung cancers, as well as melanoma. However, precision oncology for patients with oesophageal cancer is still virtually non-existent. In this review, we outline the recent advances in oesophageal cancer profiling and clinical trials based on targeted therapies in this disease.