1
|
Martínez-Barros H, Pousada-Fonseca Á, Pedreira-Bouzas J, Clopés-Estela A. [Translated article] Characteristics, clinical benefit, and reimbursement of new authorisations for oncohaematology drugs in Spain between 2017 and 2020. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2024:S1130-6343(24)00121-1. [PMID: 39069449 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the authorisations and funding resolutions for new onco-haematological drugs in Spain between 2017 and 2020, as well as the results of their main trials. METHODS Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted between October and December 2022. Onco-haematology drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2017 and 2020 were included, according to EFPIA patients W.A.I.T Indicator 2021 Survey. Authorisation information was obtained from the main study of the European Public Assessment Report. Data were collected on medicines, their authorisation and main study, benefit shown, cost, and status and time to reimbursement. RESULTS Forty-one new drugs authorised for 49 indications were identified. More than half (58.5%) were targeted therapies, and 61.2% were for the treatment of solid tumours (61.2%). Most had palliative intent (71.4%) and were indicated in relapsed or refractory disease (55.1%). Of the clinical trials, 57.1% were phase III and 63.3% were randomised. The primary endpoint was overall survival in 16.3%, increasing to 25.8% among randomised clinical trials. Regarding licensed drugs based on response rate, the median response rate was 56.4% [IQI 40-66.3]. In those authorised on the basis of surrogate time-to-event endpoints, the median hazard ratio was 0.54 [IQI 0.38-0.57], and among those using overall survival was 0.71 [IQI 0.59-0.77]. Globally, 22.4% had shown benefit in overall survival, with a median gain of 4 months [IQI 3.6-16.7]. One-third (33.3%) of the indications evaluable according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale showed substantial clinical benefit. Of the indications, 75.5% were funded, half (48.6%; 36.7% of the total) with restrictions. The median time to funding was 19.5 months [IQI 11.4-29.3]. CONCLUSIONS Most main clinical trials of new onco-haematology drugs approved in Spain used surrogate primary endpoint and, at the time of authorisation, few had shown to prolong overall survival. More than a third were uncontrolled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ana Clopés-Estela
- Servicio de Farmacia, Instituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO) t, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universidad Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martínez-Barros H, Pousada-Fonseca Á, Pedreira-Bouzas J, Clopés-Estela A. Characteristics, clinical benefit and reimbursement of new authorisations for oncohaematology drugs in Spain between 2017 and 2020. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2024:S1130-6343(24)00079-5. [PMID: 38797624 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the authorisations and funding resolutions for new onco-hematological drugs in Spain between 2017 and 2020, as well as the results of their main trials. METHODS Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted between October and December 2022. Onco-hematology drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2017 and 2020 were included, according to EFPIA patients W.A.I.T Indicator 2021 Survey. Authorisation information was obtained from the main study of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). Data were collected on medicines, their authorisation and main study, benefit shown, cost, and status and time to reimbursement. RESULTS Forty-one new drugs authorised for 49 indications were identified. More than half (58.5%) were targeted therapies, and 61.2% were for the treatment of solid tumors (61.2%). Most had palliative intent (71.4%) and were indicated in relapsed or refractory disease (55.1%). Of the clinical trials, 57.1% were phase III and 63.3% were randomised. The primary endpoint was overall survival in 16.3%, increasing to 25.8% among randomised clinical trials. Regarding licensed drugs based on response rate, the median response rate was 56.4% (IQI 40.0-66.3). In those authorised on the basis of surrogate time-to-event endpoints, the median Hazard Ratio was 0.54 (IQI 0.38-0.57), and among those using overall survival was 0.71 (IQI 0.59-0.77). Globally, 22.4% had shown benefit in overall survival, with a median gain of 4 months (IQI 3.6-16.7). One third (33.3%) of the indications evaluable according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale showed substantial clinical benefit. Of the indications, 75.5% were funded, half (48.6%; 36.7% of the total) with restrictions. The median time to funding was 19.5 months (IQI 11.4-29.3). CONCLUSIONS Most main clinical trials of new onco-haematology drugs approved in Spain used surrogate primary endpoint and, at the time of authorisation, few had shown to prolong overall survival. More than a third were uncontrolled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ana Clopés-Estela
- Servicio de Farmacia, Instituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universidad Ramon Llull, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sengar M, Hopman WM, Mohyuddin GR, Goodman AM, Gyawali B, Mukherji D, Hammad N, Pramesh CS, Aggarwal A, Sullivan R, Booth CM. Randomised controlled trials evaluating anticancer therapies in haematological cancers: an overview of global research activity. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1558. [PMID: 37396096 PMCID: PMC10310333 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Design, results, and interpretation of oncology randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have changed substantially over the past decade. In this study, we describe all RCTs evaluating anticancer therapies in haematological cancers published globally during 2014-2017 with comparisons with solid tumours RCTs. Methods A PubMed literature search identified all phase 3 RCTs of anticancer therapy for haematological cancers and solid tumours published globally during 2014-2017. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare RCT design results, and output between haematological cancers and solid tumours as well as for different haematological cancer subtypes. Results 694 RCTs were identified; 124 in haematological cancers and 570 in solid tumours. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint in only 12% (15/124) of haematological cancer trials compared to 35% (200/570) in solid tumours (p < 0.001). Haematological cancer RCTs evaluated the systemic novel therapy more often than the solid tumour RCT (98% versus 84%, p = 0.002). Use of surrogate endpoints like progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were more common in haematological cancers than solid tumours (47% versus 31%, p < 0.001). Within haematological cancers, the use of PFS and TTF was more prevalent in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma as compared to others (80%-81% versus 0%-41%, p < 0.001). Seventy-eight percent of haematologic trials were funded by industry as compared to 70% of solid tumour trials. Only 4% (5/124) of haematologicalcancer trials were led by investigators in upper-middle and lower-middle-income countries as compared to the 9% of solid tumour trials. Conclusion The fact that only 12% of haematological cancer RCTs are designed to show improvements in OS is of grave concern for the field and the care of future patients. This is further compounded by the highly prevalent use of alternative primary endpoints that are rarely valid surrogates for OS in haematological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manju Sengar
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Wilma M Hopman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin
- Division of Hematology and Haematological Malignancies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Aaron M Goodman
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Bishal Gyawali
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 11-0236, Lebanon
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
| | - CS Pramesh
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King’s College London, WC2R 2LS London, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, WC1E 7HT London, UK
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King’s College London, WC2R 2LS London, UK
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite tremendous advances in multiple myeloma (MM) care, the disease maintains considerable morbidity and requires long-term treatment associated with significant financial toxicity to patients and high costs to society. In this review, we explore why - despite treatment advances - value in MM treatment is largely a myth, then explain some ways the myth might become a reality. RECENT FINDINGS We discuss how value-based care in MM should include patient-centered outcomes such as financial toxicity and quality of life, which are heavily impacted by cost of drugs and the indefinite duration of therapy that is standard in MM treatment. We propose multiple paths to work toward reducing cost and augmenting value of care for patients with MM, including improving access to generic drugs, increasing federal funding for clinical trials, designing more patient-centric clinical trials, and exploring the utilization of minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven treatment de-escalation, among others. We remain optimistic that despite the challenges, we can work toward making progress in the realm of value-based care for patients with MM and make it a reality.
Collapse
|
5
|
Characteristics of measurable residual disease assessment in myeloma: a review of clinical trials from 2015–2020. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:155. [DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00750-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
6
|
Sengar M, Booth CM. Contemporary clinical trials in hematologic cancer: Have we forgotten where we came from? Eur J Cancer 2022; 167:161-163. [PMID: 35246369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manju Sengar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|