1
|
Qin S, Fang W, Ren Z, Ou S, Lim HY, Zhang F, Lee KC, Choi HJ, Tong J, Tao M, Xu A, Cheng A, Lu CH, Chiu CF, Abdul Wahid MI, Kamble S, Norquist JM, Zhong W, Li C, Chen Z. A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab versus Placebo for Previously Treated Patients from Asia with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Health-Related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-394. Liver Cancer 2024; 13:389-400. [PMID: 39114760 PMCID: PMC11305669 DOI: 10.1159/000535338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction KEYNOTE-394 showed pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with manageable safety versus placebo for patients from Asia with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We present results on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires. Key HRQoL endpoints were least squares mean (LSM) score changes from baseline to week 12 and time to deterioration (TTD) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL. p values were one-sided and nominal without adjustment for multiplicity. Results The HRQoL population included patients randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 298) and placebo (n = 152). From baseline to week 12, a greater decline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was observed with placebo (LSM, -8.4; 95% CI: -11.7 to -5.1) versus pembrolizumab (-4.0; 95% CI: -6.4 to -1.6; difference vs. placebo: 4.4; 95% CI: 0.5-8.4; nominal p = 0.0142). Similarly, a greater decline in the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale score was observed with placebo (-6.9; 95% CI: -9.4 to -4.5) versus pembrolizumab (-2.7; 95% CI: -4.5 to -1.0; difference vs. placebo: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.2-7.2; nominal p = 0.0030). TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58-1.25; nominal p = 0.1993). Conclusion Patients receiving placebo showed a greater decline in HRQoL than those receiving pembrolizumab. Combined with efficacy and safety data from KEYNOTE-394 and the global KEYNOTE-240 and KEYNOTE-224 trials, our data support the clinically meaningful benefit and manageable tolerability of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shukui Qin
- GI Cancer Center, Nanjing Tianyinshan Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Weijia Fang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenggang Ren
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Ho Yeong Lim
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Kin Chung Lee
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Hye Jin Choi
- Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Min Tao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Aibing Xu
- Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, China
| | - Ashley Cheng
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong SAR
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhendong Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Majeed A, Alaparthi S, Halegoua-DeMarzio D, Eberle-Singh J, Jiang W, Anne PR, Shah AP, Bowne WB, Lin D. Complete Pathologic Response to Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy After Prior Therapies in a Patient With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Peritoneal Metastases Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. World J Oncol 2024; 15:511-520. [PMID: 38751709 PMCID: PMC11092419 DOI: 10.14740/wjon1840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed at a late stage and frequently recurs despite curative intervention, leading to poor survival outcomes. Frontline systemic therapies include combination immunotherapy regimens and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We report a case of a 38-year-old woman with chronic hepatitis B and C coinfection-associated non-cirrhotic HCC, which recurred in the peritoneum after initial resection of her primary tumor. Disease progression occurred on both atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib, and she was subsequently treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy and exhibited a profound clinical response on imaging with normalization of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) after several months. Following extensive multidisciplinary discussion, she underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) that removed all visible macroscopic tumor. Her pathology demonstrated a complete pathologic response. She received two additional months of postoperative chemotherapy, and then proceeded with close monitoring off therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a complete pathologic response to GEMOX chemotherapy in the context of CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastases in HCC, after progression on standard immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments. In this report, we review the current systemic treatment landscape in HCC. We highlight potential consideration of cytotoxic chemotherapy, which is less frequently utilized in current practice, in selected patients with HCC, and discuss the role of CRS/HIPEC in the management of peritoneal metastases. Further investigation regarding predictors of response to systemic treatments is strongly needed. Multidisciplinary management may ultimately prolong survival in patients with advanced HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amry Majeed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sneha Alaparthi
- Department of General Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dina Halegoua-DeMarzio
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jaime Eberle-Singh
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pramila Rani Anne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashesh P. Shah
- Department of General Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wilbur B. Bowne
- Department of General Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2022; 400:1345-1362. [PMID: 36084663 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01200-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 724] [Impact Index Per Article: 362.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common cancers worldwide and represents a major global health-care challenge. Although viral hepatitis and alcohol remain important risk factors, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is rapidly becoming a dominant cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. A broad range of treatment options are available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, including liver transplantation, surgical resection, percutaneous ablation, and radiation, as well as transarterial and systemic therapies. As such, clinical decision making requires a multidisciplinary team that longitudinally adapts the individual treatment strategy according to the patient's tumour stage, liver function, and performance status. With the approval of new first-line agents and second-line agents, as well as the establishment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies as standard of care, the treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is more diversified than ever. Consequently, the outlook for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma has improved. However, the optimal sequencing of drugs remains to be defined, and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to inform treatment selection. In this Seminar, we present an update on the causes, diagnosis, molecular classification, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Tim Meyer
- Research Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Abdominal Transplant & HPB Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anna Saborowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|