The road to systemic therapy in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease: Are we there yet?

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Germline Genetics and Hereditary Syndromes

OPINION STATEMENT

The vast majority of neuroendocrine 'neoplasms (NENs) are sporadic, although recent evidence has indicated that a subset of these cancers may also originate as a result of genetic germline mutations. To date, 10% of these cancers can be linked to an inherited genetic syndrome. Genetic diagnosis is crucial for patients with a suspected hereditary NEN syndrome, as it recognizes patients carrying germline mutations and allows for personalized clinical follow-up, considering the higher risk of developing other tumours. The potential for early genetic detection has significant implications for the treatment of patients with hereditary NEN syndrome, as it may facilitate the delivery of precision therapy that differs from that typically provided to other patients. Thus, the integration of genotypic and phenotypic diagnostic methods help clinicians to provide more informed treatment and to extend appropriate prevention to family members.

The efficacy and safety of belzutifan inhibitor in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The belzutifan is a hypoxia inducible factor-2 alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor for the treatment of advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) and has exhibited good safety and efficacy in clinical trials. We conducted a meta-analysis of relevant studies to further clarify the efficacy and safety of belzutifan for the treatment of mccRCC.

METHODS

Multiple databases and abstracts from major scientific meetings were systematically reviewed for eligible articles published before June 1, 2024. The following outcomes were analyzed: objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median duration of response (mDOR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAes). 426 records were reviewed, and data were extracted by at least two individuals.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 715 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23-46%), the DCR was 79% (95% CI: 66-90%), the mDOR was 21.8 months (95% CI: 14.82-28.78), and the mPFS time was 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.15-11.44). The pooled incidence of grade 3-5 TRAes was 46%, and the most common TRAe was anemia. Further subgroup analysis revealed that, compared with belzutifan monotherapy, the combination of belzutifan with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as second- or later-line therapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in the ORR. Toxicity was also greater with combined inhibition therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis revealed moderate antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile of the inhibitor belzutifan in patients with mccRCC.

Belzutifan in Individuals with von Hippel-Lindau Retinal Hemangioblastomas: Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature

Introduction

The systemic HIF-2 alpha inhibitor, belzutifan, has been approved for use in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL)-associated renal cell carcinoma, central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This drug has also shown promise in controlling VHL retinal hemangioblastomas (RHs), but little work has been published on the use of the drug in this setting.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with VHL-associated RHs followed by the retina service at our institution who were treated with systemic belzutifan. Patient age, gender, genotype, presence of systemic tumors, indication for the drug, initial dose, adjusted dose, side effects, and tumor response were recorded. We also conducted a literature search for all manuscripts describing the effect of belzutifan on VHL-associated ocular tumors.

Results

We identified 12 eyes of 7 patients with VHL-associated ocular tumors who were treated with belzutifan at our institution. Of these, 5 eyes of 3 patients had progressing ocular tumors when belzutifan was started. Of the 7 total patients, 2 were treated for renal cell carcinoma, 2 for CNS hemangioblastomas, 2 for RHs, and one for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Initial dose was 120 mg PO daily in 6 patients and 80 mg PO daily in 1 patient. The dose was reduced in all but 1 patient due to side effects. The ocular tumors were controlled in all patients with an average follow-up of 13 months (range 4-24 months). Literature review identified 7 manuscripts that described belzutifan-mediated control of ocular tumors in patients with VHL-associated RHs in 21 patients.

Conclusion

The drug belzutifan shows great promise for controlling RHs and preventing vision loss in patients with VHL. Further work needs to address the optimal dose, role of the drug as a neoadjuvant therapy, and long-term efficacy and tolerability of the drug in a larger cohort of patients with ocular tumors.

Combining germline, tissue and liquid biopsy analysis by comprehensive genomic profiling to improve the yield of actionable variants in a real-world cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive next-generation sequencing is widely used for precision oncology and precision prevention approaches. We aimed to determine the yield of actionable gene variants, the capacity to uncover hereditary predisposition and liquid biopsy appropriateness instead of, or in addition to, tumor tissue analysis, in a real-world cohort of cancer patients, who may benefit the most from comprehensive genomic profiling.

METHODS

Seventy-eight matched germline/tumor tissue/liquid biopsy DNA and RNA samples were profiled using the Hereditary Cancer Panel (germline) and the TruSight Oncology 500 panel (tumor tissue/cfDNA) from 23 patients consecutively enrolled at our center according to at least one of the following criteria: no available therapeutic options; long responding patients potentially fit for other therapies; rare tumor; suspected hereditary cancer; primary cancer with high metastatic potential; tumor of unknown primary origin. Variants were annotated for OncoKB and AMP/ASCO/CAP classification.

RESULTS

The overall yield of actionable somatic and germline variants was 57% (13/23 patients), and 43.5%, excluding variants previously identified by somatic or germline routine testing. The accuracy of tumor/cfDNA germline-focused analysis was demonstrated by overlapping results of germline testing. Five germline variants in BRCA1, VHL, CHEK1, ATM genes would have been missed without extended genomic profiling. A previously undetected BRAF p.V600E mutation was emblematic of the clinical utility of this approach in a patient with a liver undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma responsive to BRAF/MEK inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the clinical relevance of performing extended parallel tumor DNA and cfDNA testing to broaden therapeutic options, to longitudinally monitor cfDNA during patient treatment, and to uncover possible hereditary predisposition following tumor sequencing in patient care.

A novel peptide PDHK1-241aa encoded by circPDHK1 promotes ccRCC progression via interacting with PPP1CA to inhibit AKT dephosphorylation and activate the AKT-mTOR signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent kidney cancer with high aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that circRNAs have been identified as pivotal mediators in cancers. However, the role of circRNAs in ccRCC progression remains elusive.

METHODS

The differentially expressed circRNAs in 4 paired human ccRCC and adjacent noncancerous tissues ccRCC were screened using circRNA microarrays and the candidate target was selected based on circRNA expression level using weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database. CircPDHK1 expression in ccRCC and adjacent noncancerous tissues (n = 148) were evaluated along with clinically relevant information. RT-qPCR, RNase R digestion, and actinomycin D (ActD) stability test were conducted to identify the characteristics of circPDHK1. The subcellular distribution of circPDHK1 was analyzed by subcellular fractionation assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) and immunofluorescence (IF) were employed to evaluate the protein-coding ability of circPDHK1. ccRCC cells were transfected with siRNAs, plasmids or lentivirus approach, and cell proliferation, migration and invasion, as well as tumorigenesis and metastasis in nude mice were assessed to clarify the functional roles of circPDHK1 and its encoded peptide PDHK1-241aa. RNA-sequencing, western blot analysis, immunoprecipitation (IP) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were further employed to identify the underlying mechanisms regulated by PDHK1-241aa.

RESULTS

CircPDHK1 was upregulated in ccRCC tissues and closely related to WHO/ISUP stage, T stage, distant metastasis, VHL mutation and Ki-67 levels. CircPDHK1 had a functional internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and encoded a novel peptide PDHK1-241aa. Functionally, we confirmed that PDHK1-241aa and not the circPDHK1 promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of ccRCC. Mechanistically, circPDHK1 was activated by HIF-2A at the transcriptional level. PDHK1-241aa was upregulated and interacted with PPP1CA, causing the relocation of PPP1CA to the nucleus. This thereby inhibited AKT dephosphorylation and activated the AKT-mTOR signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated that circPDHK1-encoded PDHK1-241aa promotes ccRCC progression by interacting with PPP1CA to inhibit AKT dephosphorylation. This study provides novel insights into the multiplicity of circRNAs and highlights the potential use of circPDHK1 or PDHK1-241aa as a therapeutic target for ccRCC.