1
|
Gurukeerthi B, Thiagarajan S. Role of Imaging and Histopathology for Predicting Neck Node Involvement in Recurrent/Second Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma (pN-ROC Study). J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2024; 23:837-842. [PMID: 39118935 PMCID: PMC11303735 DOI: 10.1007/s12663-024-02272-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background After improvement in the treatment of oral cancers over the years we now see more patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and second primary. Recommendations for addressing the neck (ipsilateral and/or contralateral) in these patients are still unclear and debatable. Methods In this retrospective study we included patients with recurrent and second primary OSCC who underwent surgery between January 2016 and December 2021. We analysed to identify factors and better imaging modality that help predict a pathologically N + neck in these patients. Results In our cohort of 219 patients treated for recurrent/second primary OSCC, 131 patients underwent a neck dissection along with surgery for primary, out of which 59 patients had pN + neck. Factors that predicted ipsilateral pN + status were the clinical stage (advanced) p = 0.009, 2.724(1.291-5.750), subsite (Tongue + floor of mouth) p = 0.01, 3.105(1.305-7.386), previous treatment received (surgery alone) p = 0.0472.148(1.011-4.562) and histopathology [poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (PDSCC)] p = 0.014, 3.070(1.253-7.519). PET-CECT had the best agreement (p < 0.001, kappa = 0.742) to predict nodal metastasis. There were no factors that could predict contralateral nodal metastasis. Conclusions Patients with advanced clinical stage, Tongue + floor of mouth subsite, only surgery done previously, and histopathology (PDSCC) had a higher incidence of ipsilateral nodal metastasis in our cohort. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12663-024-02272-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shivakumar Thiagarajan
- Division of Head and Neck, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mahata A, Chakraborty S, Mandal S, Achari RB, Bhattacharyya T, Mallick I, Arunsingh M, Chatterjee S. Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy (RT)-Specific Trials: Indian Scenario. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024:S0936-6555(24)00211-5. [PMID: 38897901 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
AIMS There is evidence that proper radiotherapy trial quality assurance (RTTQA) translates into improved outcomes for patients. However, the practice of RTTQA is heterogeneous and implemented in a diverse manner across trials. In this paper, we review the RTTQA report for randomised trials (RCT) conducted in India and present our experience with RTTQA for various clinical trials and highlight the key achievements and challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS Search was performed using the keywords and the variations thereof for "radiotherapy" and author affiliations from India, its states and major metropolitan cities. Pubmed search filters were used to restrict results to RCT published in the past 5 years (2019-2024). Reporting of RTTQA procedures from publications and protocols was documented along with the protocol-specified dosimetric goals. We also evaluated a few clinical trials performed in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Tata Medical Center. The different RTTQA procedures and results for four representative clinical trials have been described. RESULTS A formal RTTQA process was reported by only one out of 24 randomised controlled trials and formal dosimetric goals were pre-specified by 9 of 13 trials where IMRT was used as treatment. RTTQA requirements were tailored for each clinical trial at Tata Medical Center. For the HYPORT trial, the RTTQA process focused on ensuring the matchline doses were homogenous. HYPORT B trial commissioned the use of a simultaneous integrated boost technique which emphasised conformal avoidance of dose spillage to contralateral breast and lung. HYPORT Adjuvant and PROPARA trials are multicentre clinical trials. While HYPORT Adjuvant focussed on ensuring that the dose delivery met the predefined constraints, segmentation of the target volume was important for the PROPARA trial. CONCLUSION We demonstrate different RTTQA procedures required for representative clinical trials and highlight key challenges encountered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mahata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| | - S Chakraborty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India.
| | - S Mandal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| | - R B Achari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| | - T Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| | - I Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| | - M Arunsingh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| | - S Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sethuraman S, Ramalingam K. Metronomic Chemotherapy in Oral Cancer: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e49825. [PMID: 38169679 PMCID: PMC10758533 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Treatment of locally advanced oral cancer requires multidisciplinary care, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which varies based on the stage of the disease, site of involvement, and surgical access. Oral cancer usually presents with an increased recurrence rate and potential for distant metastatic spread. It confers a poor prognosis with a 50% mortality rate after five years. Oral metronomic chemotherapy aims to achieve higher patient compliance due to its ease of administration, lower dosage, and lesser side effects than conventional IV regimens of platinum-based drugs. In this review, we have summarized the relevant literature to benefit the readers regarding the potential application of metronomic therapy in the management of oral cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sathya Sethuraman
- General Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND
| | - Karthikeyan Ramalingam
- Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohamad I, Glaun MDE, Prabhash K, Busheri A, Lai SY, Noronha V, Hosni A. Current Treatment Strategies and Risk Stratification for Oral Carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389810. [PMID: 37200591 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Surgery is ideally the primary treatment option for nonmetastatic OSCC, and less invasive curative surgical approaches are preferred in early-stage disease to minimize surgical-related morbidity. For patients at high risk of recurrence, adjuvant treatment using radiation therapy or chemoradiation is often used. Systemic therapy may also be used in the neoadjuvant setting (for advanced-stage disease with the intent of mandibular preservation) or in the palliative setting (for nonsalvageable locoregional recurrence and/or distant metastases). Patient involvement in treatment decision is the key for patient-driven management, particularly in clinical situation with poor prognosis, for example, early postoperative recurrence before planned adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issa Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mica D E Glaun
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ahmed Busheri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Kuwait
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghosh Laskar S, Sinha S, Gupta M, Karmakar S, Nivedha J M, Kannan S, Budrukkar A, Swain M, Kumar A, Gupta T, Murthy V, Chaukar D, Pai P, Chaturvedi P, Pantvaidya G, Nair D, Nair S, Thiagarajan S, Deshmukh A, Noronha V, Patil V, Joshi A, Prabhash K, Agarwal JP. Prophylactic versus reactive feeding approach in patients undergoing adjuvant radiation therapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matched-pair analysis. Head Neck 2023; 45:1226-1236. [PMID: 36912016 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the efficacy of prophylactic versus reactive feeding strategy in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of patients of OCSCC enrolled in a randomized trial comparing three adjuvant strategies. In this trial, till 2010, a prophylactic feeding approach was followed for all patients. Since January 2011, a reactive feeding approach was followed. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty-eight in each cohort (total n = 526) were eligible for analysis after propensity score matching. At 6 weeks post-RT completion, the median weight loss in the prophylactic versus reactive cohort was 5 versus 3 kg, p = 0.002. At all other time points until 1 year, the median weight loss was lesser in reactive than in the prophylactic cohort. CONCLUSIONS A reactive feeding tube approach should be preferred for OCSCC receiving adjuvant RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shwetabh Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Meetakshi Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shreyasee Karmakar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Meenakshi Nivedha J
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ashwini Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Monali Swain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anuj Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Devendra Chaukar
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prathamesh Pai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gouri Pantvaidya
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deepa Nair
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudhir Nair
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shivakumar Thiagarajan
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anuja Deshmukh
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|