Regulation of invadosomes by microtubules: Not only a matter of railways

A MAP1B-cortactin-Tks5 axis regulates TNBC invasion and tumorigenesis

The microtubule-associated protein MAP1B has been implicated in axonal growth and brain development. We found that MAP1B is highly expressed in the most aggressive and deadliest breast cancer subtype, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but not in other subtypes. Expression of MAP1B was found to be highly correlated with poor prognosis. Depletion of MAP1B in TNBC cells impairs cell migration and invasion concomitant with a defect in tumorigenesis. We found that MAP1B interacts with key components for invadopodia formation, cortactin, and Tks5, the latter of which is a PtdIns(3,4)P2-binding and scaffold protein that localizes to invadopodia. We also found that Tks5 associates with microtubules and supports the association between MAP1B and α-tubulin. In accordance with their interaction, depletion of MAP1B leads to Tks5 destabilization, leading to its degradation via the autophagic pathway. Collectively, these findings suggest that MAP1B is a convergence point of the cytoskeleton to promote malignancy in TNBC and thereby a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for TNBC.

miR96- and miR182-driven regulation of cytoskeleton results in inhibition of glioblastoma motility

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most common forms of brain tumor. As an excessively invasive tumor type, GBM cannot be fully cured due to its invasion ability into healthy brain tissues. Therefore, molecular mechanisms behind GBM migration and invasion need to be deeply investigated for the development of effective GBM treatments. Cellular motility and invasion are strictly associated with the cytoskeleton, especially with actins and tubulins. Palladin, an actin-binding protein, tightly bundles actins during initial invadopodia and contraction fiber formations, which are essential for cellular motility. Spastin, a microtubule-binding protein, cuts microtubules into small pieces and acts on invadopodia elongation and cellular trafficking of invadopodia-associated proteins. Regulation of proteins such as spastin and palladin involved in dynamic reorganization of the cytoskeleton, are rapidly carried out by microRNAs at the posttranscriptional level. Therefore, determining possible regulatory miRNAs of spastin and palladin is critical to elucidate GBM motility. miR96 and miR182 down-regulate SPAST and PALLD at both transcript and protein levels. Over-expression of miR96 and miR182 resulted in inhibition of the motility. However, over-expression of spastin and palladin induced the motility. Spastin and palladin rescue of miR96- or miR182-transfected U251 MG cells resulted in diminished effects of the miRNAs and rescued the motility. Our results demonstrate that miR96 and miR182 over-expressions inhibit GBM motility by regulating cytoskeleton through spastin and palladin. These findings suggest that miR96 and miR182 should be investigated in more detail for their potential use in GBM therapy.

Mechanisms and roles of podosomes and invadopodia

Cell invasion into the surrounding extracellular matrix or across tissue boundaries and endothelial barriers occurs in both physiological and pathological scenarios such as immune surveillance or cancer metastasis. Podosomes and invadopodia, collectively called 'invadosomes', are actin-based structures that drive the proteolytic invasion of cells, by forming highly regulated platforms for the localized release of lytic enzymes that degrade the matrix. Recent advances in high-resolution microscopy techniques, in vivo imaging and high-throughput analyses have led to considerable progress in understanding mechanisms of invadosomes, revealing the intricate inner architecture of these structures, as well as their growing repertoire of functions that extends well beyond matrix degradation. In this Review, we discuss the known functions, architecture and regulatory mechanisms of podosomes and invadopodia. In particular, we describe the molecular mechanisms of localized actin turnover and microtubule-based cargo delivery, with a special focus on matrix-lytic enzymes that enable proteolytic invasion. Finally, we point out topics that should become important in the invadosome field in the future.

The circle of life: Phases of podosome formation, turnover and reemergence

Podosomes are highly dynamic actin-rich structures in a variety of cell types, especially monocytic cells. They fulfill multiple functions such as adhesion, mechanosensing, or extracellular matrix degradation, thus allowing cells to detect and respond to a changing environment. These abilities are based on an intricate architecture that enables podosomes to sense mechanical properties of their substratum and to transduce them intracellularly in order to generate an appropriate cellular response. These processes are enabled through the tightly orchestrated interplay of more than 300 different components that are dynamically recruited during podosome formation and turnover. In this review, we discuss the different phases of the podosome life cycle and the current knowledge on regulatory factors that impact on the genesis, activity, dissolution and reemergence of podosomes. We also highlight mechanoregulatory processes that become important during these different stages, on the level of individual podosomes, and also at podosome sub- and superstructures.

Probing invadosomes: technologies for the analysis of invadosomes

Invadosomes are protrusive and mechanosensitive actin devices critical for cell migration, invasion, and extracellular matrix remodeling. The dynamic, proteolytic, and protrusive natures of invadosomes have made these structures fascinating and attracted many scientists to develop new technologies for their analysis. With these exciting methodologies, many biochemical and biophysical properties of invadosomes have been well characterized and appreciated, and those discoveries elegantly explained the biological and pathological effects of invadosomes in human health and diseases. In this review, we focus on these commonly used or newly developed methods for invadosome analysis and effort to reason some discrepancies among those assays. Finally, we explore the opposite regulatory mechanisms among invadosomes and focal adhesions, another actin-rich adhesive structures, and speculate a potential rule for their switch.

Targeting SNARE-Mediated Vesicle Transport to Block Invadopodium-Based Cancer Cell Invasion

During metastasis, cancer cells can invade extracellular matrix (ECM) through a process mediated by matrix-degrading protrusions of the plasma membrane, termed invadopodia. Formation of invadopodia correlates with cells’ invasive and metastatic potential, and thus presents a potential target for therapeutic approaches to target metastatic progression. Invadopodia formation is dependent on the recruitment of proteins involved in intracellular signaling, actin cytoskeleton remodeling, and proteolytic matrix modification. The latter includes matrix degrading enzymes such as MT1-MMP, MMP2, and MMP9. These essential invadopodium-associated enzymes are required for localized matrix degradation, and their localization at invadopodia is central to invadopodium-based cancer cell invasion. Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) facilitate intracellular vesicle traffic, including that involved in the transport of invadopodium-associated proteins, and in so doing promote modification of ECM and modulation of signaling pathways involved in the movement of cancer cells. Specific SNARE complexes have been found to support invadopodia formation, and these complexes are, in turn, regulated by associated proteins that interact specifically with SNAREs. Targeting SNARE regulatory proteins thus provides a possible approach to disrupt SNARE-dependent delivery of invadopodial proteins, including MT1-MMP, to sites of ECM modification. Here, we review recent studies of SNARE regulators that hold potential as targets for the development of anti-metastatic therapies for patients burdened with invadopodia-forming cancer types.

EB1 Restricts Breast Cancer Cell Invadopodia Formation and Matrix Proteolysis via FAK

Regulation of microtubule dynamics by plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) plays an essential role in cancer cell migration. However, the role of +TIPs in cancer cell invasion has been poorly addressed. Invadopodia, actin-rich protrusions specialized in extracellular matrix degradation, are essential for cancer cell invasion and metastasis, the leading cause of death in breast cancer. We, therefore, investigated the role of the End Binding protein, EB1, a major hub of the +TIP network, in invadopodia functions. EB1 silencing increased matrix degradation by breast cancer cells. This was recapitulated by depletion of two additional +TIPs and EB1 partners, APC and ACF7, but not by the knockdown of other +TIPs, such as CLASP1/2 or CLIP170. The knockdown of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) was previously proposed to similarly promote invadopodia formation as a consequence of a switch of the Src kinase from focal adhesions to invadopodia. Interestingly, EB1-, APC-, or ACF7-depleted cells had decreased expression/activation of FAK. Remarkably, overexpression of wild type FAK, but not of FAK mutated to prevent Src recruitment, prevented the increased degradative activity induced by EB1 depletion. Overall, we propose that EB1 restricts invadopodia formation through the control of FAK and, consequently, the spatial regulation of Src activity.