Role of bronchoscopy during non invasive ventilation in hypercapnic respiratory failure

Efficacy of different respiratory supports to prevent hypoxia during flexible bronchoscopy in patients of COPD: a triple-arm, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD) undergo bronchoscopy for various reasons, and are at relatively higher risk of complications. This study evaluated the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow-oxygen-therapy (HFOT) compared with conventional-oxygen-therapy (COT) in patients with COPD undergoing bronchoscopy, to prevent hypoxia.

METHODS

It was a triple-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Ninety patients with COPD were randomly assigned into three intervention arms in 1:1:1 ratio. The incidence of hypoxia, lowest recorded oxygen saturation measured by plethysmography (SpO2), ECG, patient vitals and comfort levels were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population was 61.71±7.5 years. Out of 90 cases enrolled, 51, 34 and 5 were moderate, severe and very-severe COPD, respectively, as per GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) classification. Rest of the baseline characteristics were similar. SpO2 during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) was lowest in COT group (COT: 87.03±5.7% vs HFOT: 95.57±5.0% vs NIV: 97.40±1.6%, p<0.001). Secondary objectives were similar except respiratory-rate (breaths-per-minute) which was highest in COT group (COT: 20.23±3.1 vs HFOT: 18.57±4.1 vs NIV: 16.80±1.9, p<0.001). Whereas post FB partial of oxygen in arterial blood was highest in NIV group (NIV: 84.27±21.6 mm Hg vs HFOT: 69.03±13.6 mm Hg vs COT: 69.30±11.9 mm Hg, p<0.001). Post FB partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood was similar in the three arms. Operator's ease-of-performing-procedure was least in the NIV group as assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (p<0.01). A higher number of NIV group participants reported nasal pain as compared with the other two arms (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

NIV and HFOT are superior to COT in preventing hypoxia during bronchoscopy, but NIV is associated with poor patient-tolerance and inferior operator's ease of doing procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2021/03/032190.

Complications and safety analysis of diagnostic bronchoscopy in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often coexists with many diseases that require bronchoscopy. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and complication rate of diagnostic bronchoscopy in patients with COPD.

METHODS

We retrieved clinical trials that reporting the complications of conducting diagnostic bronchoscopy on patients with COPD through electronic databases. Analyses of the overall major complication rate of bronchoscopy and potential risk factors in patients with COPD were conducted.

RESULTS

18 trials/arms were evaluated. The overall major complication rate of bronchoscopy was 4.3% (95% CI, 2.2%-8.2%; 18 trials/arms, n = 2000). The major complication rate of the patients with an exacerbation of COPD was higher than that of the stable patients (7.8% vs. 4.5%, Q-value = 11.29, df (Q) = 1, p < 0.01); using of sedative medicine was also related with higher major complication rate (Q-value = 6.303, df (Q) = 2, p = 0.043). Patients with severe COPD who were GOLD stages III and IV (Q = 13.40, df = 1, p < 0.01; R² = 0.66) or had a high BMI (Q = 30.83, df = 1, p < 0.01; R² = 0.91) more easily encountered complications during bronchoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The major complication rate of diagnostic bronchoscopy in patients with COPD was acceptable and low Exacerbations of COPD and using sedative medicine were related with higher major complication rate.

EXPERT OPINION

COPD is a major risk factor for lung cancer and infection, so the patients with COPD often required bronchoscopy. Although our results showed diagnostic bronchoscopy might not be more fatal for patients with COPD, further studies are needed to explore the potential risk factors for major complications of bronchoscopy in patients with COPD.

Noninvasive Ventilation-assisted Bronchoscopy in High-risk Hypoxemic Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hypoxemic patients undergoing fiber-optic bronchoscopy (FOB) are at risk of worsening of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation due to FOB procedure itself and its complications. As patients with respiratory failure are frequently managed by non-invasive ventilation (NIV); feasibility of FOB through NIV mask has been evaluated in some studies to avoid intubation. We describe here our own case series.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of 28 FOB done through NIV mask in 27 intensive care unit (ICU) patients over 6 years period at our center was collected retrospectively and analysed.

RESULTS

Study comprises 27 (17 male; 52±21.6 years age) hypoxemic (PaO2 71.3±14.2, on NIV and oxygen supplementation) patients. All FOB were done at bedside, 15 of them were given sedation for the procedure. Twenty four patients had bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); three underwent bronchial biopsies, four brush cytology and seven transbronchial biopsies. In 10 patients lung or lobar collapse was reversed. There was no significant change between pre and post bronchoscopy ABG parameters except for improved post FOB PaO2 (p = 0.0032) and SpO2 (p = 0.0046). One patient (3.57%) developed late pneumothorax and 3 patients (10.7%) had bleeding after biopsy. Prior to bronchoscopy 17 (16 BIPAP, 1 CPAP) patients were already on NIV. Two patients required mechanical ventilation 6 hours after FOB due to subsequent clinical deterioration but could be weaned off later. One patient died on third day after FOB from acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

Hypoxemic patients in ICU can safely undergo bedside diagnostic and simple therapeutic bronchoscopy with NIV support while mostly avoiding intubation and with low complication rates.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Sircar M, Jha OK, Chabbra GS, Bhattacharya S. Noninvasive Ventilation-assisted Bronchoscopy in High-risk Hypoxemic Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(8):363-367.

Therapeutic bronchoscopy vs. standard of care in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess patient-important benefits and harms of therapeutic bronchoscopy vs. standard of care (no bronchoscopy) in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) according to the Cochrane Handbook and GRADE methodology, including a predefined protocol (PROSPERO no. CRD42016046235). We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing therapeutic bronchoscopy to standard of care in critically ill patients with ARF. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by conventional meta-analysis. The risk of random errors was assessed by TSA. Exclusively patient-important outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

We included five trials (n = 212); all were judged as having high risk of bias. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between therapeutic bronchoscopy and standard of care (TSA adjusted RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.07; I² 0%), and only 3% of the required information size had been accrued. There was no difference in ICU length of stay. A shorter duration of mechanical ventilation was suggested by conventional meta-analysis, however TSA highlighted that only 42% of the required information size had been accrued, indicating high risk of random errors. No trials reported data on adverse events, hospital length of stay, quality of life or performance status.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity and quality of evidence supporting therapeutic bronchoscopy in critically ill patients with ARF is very low with no firm evidence for benefit or harm.