Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide measurement as a biomarker in asthma and COPD compared with local and systemic inflammatory markers

Modern understanding of bronchial asthma with fixed airflow obstruction

The review provides data on one of the phenotypes of severe bronchial asthma it is asthma with fixed airway obstruction. According to data published today, there is no single pathway for the formation of fixed airway obstruction in patients with severe asthma. Increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of fixed airway obstruction, as well as identifying the most significant risk factors, is essential for the successful treatment of such patients. In addition, the development of fixed obstruction is associated with a worse and sometimes fatal prognosis. Expanding the existing views is also necessary to overcome the difficulties of differential diagnosis between bronchial asthma with fixed airway obstruction and bronchial asthma in combination with COPD. All this will optimize the approach to the management of patients with bronchial asthma to prevent the formation of fixed airway obstruction.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide as an Inflammatory Biomarker in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with or without Concurrent Diagnosis of Asthma: The Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD)

We studied whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F _ENO) can differentiate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with concurrent diagnosis of asthma from COPD-only as well as its ability to predict disease severity and progression. This study was embedded in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD). Subjects of ≥40 years old completed F _ENO measurements were subdivided into four groups, including COPD (N = 86 [COPD-only (N = 35) and COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma (N = 51)], healthy (N = 72), and at risk (N = 151). Three of the most common clinical definitions were used for characterizing COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma: 1) atopy and self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma, 2) ≥12% and ≥200 ml post-bronchodilator FEV1; 3) self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma. F _ENO values were classified using quartiles and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline 2011. Compared to COPD-only, more COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma had a significant F _ENO50 level of [Formula: see text] 33.5 ppb (fourth quartile) than COPD-only (p = 0.045, 0.011, and 0.006, for definition 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Considering the ATS guideline 2011, fewer COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma had F _ENO50 < 25 than COPD-only, which was statistically significant with definition 1 and 3 (p = 0.038 and 0.026, respectively). F _ENO as a biomarker has the potential to be used as a complementary value for differentiating COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma from COPD-only. Further studies should be conducted on validated definitions of COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma, which may include a reference to the type of airway inflammation in addition to the clinical definition.

The Fraction Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Biomarker of Asthma Control

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The main goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain clinical control of the disease. The exhaled fraction nitric oxide (FeNO) level is a biomarker of T-helper cell type 2 (Th2) inflammation of the airways. Our objective was to determine whether the FeNO level can be used to discriminate between patients with controlled, partially controlled, and uncontrolled asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The FeNO level and asthma control were evaluated in a retrospective and analytic cross-sectional study through data collected from asthmatic patients who were assessed by clinical history, asthma control, physical examination, spirometry, and FeNO level. Asthma control was determined by the criteria of the Global Initiative for Asthma and classified as controlled asthma, partially controlled asthma, and uncontrolled asthma. The FeNO values were classified as low (<25 ppb) or intermediate/high (⩾25 ppb) based on the American Thoracic Society recommendations.

RESULTS

The symptoms of 81 asthmatic patients were classified as controlled (34 [42%] patients), partially controlled (27 [33.3%] patients), and uncontrolled (20 [24.7%] patients). The FeNO level discriminated between the uncontrolled and controlled groups (P = .01) and between the uncontrolled and partially controlled groups (P = .01), but not between the controlled and partially controlled groups (P = .98). An FeNO level >30 ppb was associated with uncontrolled asthma (P = .0001) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.65-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

FeNO level could be helpful in determining asthma control as >30 ppb was associated with uncontrolled asthma.

Investigating Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO): A Scoping Review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common fixed airflow limitation. Individuals may present with the features of both asthma and COPD called asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) with more severity and worse health-related quality of life than COPD or asthma. One of the promising biomarkers that could be used in clinical practice to differentiate ACO from COPD is fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO). The role of Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO) in COPD/ACO remains unknown. This scoping review aims to investigate the role of F_ENO measurement to differentiate COPD from ACO, to anticipate disease severity/progression and treatment response. A structured comprehensive literature search was performed in major databases including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and BIOSIS from 2005 onwards. Thirty-eight studies were retrieved. Based on the synthesis of the reviewed literature, six themes emerged. Thirty-four articles covered more than one theme. From which, 24 articles were on modifying factors in F_ENO measurement, 18 on F_ENO in COPD compared with healthy subjects, and seven on F_ENO in ACO compared with COPD, 22 on F_ENO and disease severity/progression,12 on F_ENO and biomarkers, and eight on F_ENO and treatment response. F_ENO measurement cannot be used alone in the clinical settings of COPD patients. Although F_ENO level is higher in ACO patients than COPD-only, it is still unclear if there is a F_ENO cut-off that can be used to make the diagnosis of ACO and/or to guide therapy with inhaled corticosteroids/glucocorticoids in COPD patients.