Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation and exercise training in patients with stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Non-invasive ventilation intervention during exercise training in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

evidence is inconsistent for the effect of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during exercise training. This review aimed to determine the effect of NIV in COPD individuals during exercise training on exercise capacity, quality of life, functional performance and symptoms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

we searched for studies evaluating the effect of NIV on COPD individuals during exercise training published until May 2020 in 6 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, clinical trial registers and Wanfang). The included studies were appraised with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Downs and Black criteria. The primary outcomes were improvement in 6-min walking distance and quality of life. Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated.

RESULTS

among 855 identified articles, reports for 15 studies with heterogeneous populations were eligible, with 520 individuals: 257 in the NIV group and 263 in the control group. Across studies, NIV intervention during exercise training affected exercise performance (6-min walking distance: SMD: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.06; 0.59, P=0.02; quality of life: SMD: -0.77, 95% CI: -1.01; -0.53, P<0.001). In the analysis of dyspnea, pooled estimates demonstrated improvement in the NIV versus control group. NIV intervention was also better than exercise alone in ameliorating oxygen saturation, PaO2, PaCO2, blood lactate level and breath rate. The groups did not differ in duration of exercise, BODE index, minute ventilation, heart rate and systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

our review suggests that NIV is a relevant adjuvant for exercise training in COPD individuals because the intervention could improve exercise performance and quality of life. The current results also demonstrate the importance of further investigations of higher methodological quality to assess the effect on exercise capacity and quality of life.

Association of Home Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation With Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

The association of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) with outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypercapnia is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of home NIPPV via bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) devices and noninvasive home mechanical ventilator (HMV) devices with clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients with COPD and hypercapnia.

DATA SOURCES

Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Registrar of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Scopus for English-language articles published from January 1, 1995, to November 6, 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies that enrolled adults with COPD with hypercapnia who used home NIPPV for more than 1 month were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction was completed by independent pairs of reviewers. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for RCTs and select items from the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were mortality, all-cause hospital admissions, need for intubation, and quality of life at the longest follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 21 RCTs and 12 observational studies evaluating 51 085 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [2.1] years; 43% women) were included, among whom there were 434 deaths and 27 patients who underwent intubation. BPAP compared with no device was significantly associated with lower risk of mortality (22.31% vs 28.57%; risk difference [RD], -5.53% [95% CI, -10.29% to -0.76%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.87]; P = .003; 13 studies; 1423 patients; strength of evidence [SOE], moderate), fewer patients with all-cause hospital admissions (39.74% vs 75.00%; RD, -35.26% [95% CI, -49.39% to -21.12%]; OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.11-0.43]; P < .001; 1 study; 166 patients; SOE, low), and lower need for intubation (5.34% vs 14.71%; RD, -8.02% [95% CI, -14.77% to -1.28%]; OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14-0.83]; P = .02; 3 studies; 267 patients; SOE, moderate). There was no significant difference in the total number of all-cause hospital admissions (rate ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.71-1.17]; P = .47; 5 studies; 326 patients; SOE, low) or quality of life (standardized mean difference, 0.16 [95% CI, -0.06 to 0.39]; P = .15; 9 studies; 833 patients; SOE, insufficient). Noninvasive HMV use compared with no device was significantly associated with fewer all-cause hospital admissions (rate ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.35-0.71]; P < .001; 1 study; 93 patients; SOE, low), but not mortality (21.84% vs 34.09%; RD, -11.99% [95% CI, -24.77% to 0.79%]; OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.29-1.08]; P = .49; 2 studies; 175 patients; SOE, insufficient). There was no statistically significant difference in the total number of adverse events in patients using NIPPV compared with no device (0.18 vs 0.17 per patient; P = .84; 6 studies; 414 patients).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this meta-analysis of patients with COPD and hypercapnia, home BPAP, compared with no device, was associated with lower risk of mortality, all-cause hospital admission, and intubation, but no significant difference in quality of life. Noninvasive HMV, compared with no device, was significantly associated with lower risk of hospital admission, but there was no significant difference in mortality risk. However, the evidence was low to moderate in quality, the evidence on quality of life was insufficient, and the analyses for some outcomes were based on small numbers of studies.