Handicap status of exclusive narghile smokers compared to exclusive cigarette smokers: A case control-study

[Applicability of the Arabic version of the French quality of life' (QOL) questionnaire (VQ11) in Tunisian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

BACKGROUND

There is no validated Arabic version of the French questionnaire of quality of life, the VQ11. This study aimed to test the applicability of the Arabic version of the VQ11 in Tunisian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

It was a prospective and cross-sectional study, spread over seven months, that included 40 stable COPD male patients. The Arabic version of VQ11, translated by a bilingual expert, was used. The functional, psychological, relational and total scores were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the GOLD classification: "A-B" (n=25) and "C-D" (n=15). A significant correlation-coefficient (r) of≥0.51, between the VQ11 total score and the ADO index (age, dyspnoea, obstruction), and higher quality of life scores in GOLD "C-D" when compared to GOLD "A-B" would be in favour of application of the Arabic version of the VQ11.

RESULTS

The mean±standard deviation of age, post-bronchodilator FEV₁/FVC, ADO index and VQ11 total score were 64±8 years, 0.55±0.08, 4.8±1.7 and 2±10, respectively. A significant "r" (0.56) was identified between the ADO index and the total score. Psychological, relational and total scores of GOLD "A-B" patients were significantly lower than those in GOLD "C-D" patients: 10±4 vs. 12±3, 11±4 vs. 13±3 and 30±11 vs. 36±7, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Arabic version of VQ11 is applicable in Tunisian COPD patients with reliable results.

The impacts of waterpipe (hookah, narghile) -use on quality of life: a special report

Introduction While waterpipe-use induced deficiency and incapacity have already been extensively explored, its impacts on quality of life (QoL) was rarely raised. The main aim of this Special Report was to briefly highlight the key results of the studies raising the effects of waterpipe-use on smokers' QoL. Areas covered SCOPUS was consulted on July 3^rd, 2020, using the combination of the following two medical subject headings (MeSH) words: 'Tobacco, Waterpipe' AND 'Quality of Life'. Only English original articles were retained. Merely five studies raised the effects of waterpipe-use on QoL. Studies were performed in Middle East (n = 2), USA (n = 1), Tunisia (n = 1) and 'Egypt, Morocco, Oman and Jordan' (n = 1). Conflicting results were reported related to the effects of waterpipe-use on QoL. While four studies concluded that waterpipe-smokers' have a worse QoL, one study concluded that waterpipe-smokers have a normal QoL. Expert opinion This Special Report is a call to encourage future research to identify the real effects of waterpipe-use on QoL.

Comparison of Periodontal Status Between Male Exclusive Narghile Smokers and Male Exclusive Cigarette Smokers

Studies evaluating the effects of narghile use on the periodontium present conflicting conclusions. This study aimed to compare the periodontal status of exclusive narghile smokers (ENSs, n = 74) to that of exclusive cigarette smokers (ECSs, n = 74). Males aged 20-40 years were recruited to participate in this comparative study. Information concerning oral health habits (number of yearly visits to the dentist, daily toothbrushing frequency) and tobacco exposure were obtained. Clinical measurements were performed on all the existing teeth, except the third molars. The number of remaining teeth and decayed/missing/filled teeth (DMFT) were noted. The plaque levels were recorded using the plaque index of Löe and Silness. The gingival index modified by Löe was used to evaluate gingival inflammation. Teeth mobility was measured using bidigital mobility. The probing pocket depth was measured using a periodontal probe. Periodontal disease was defined as the presence of at least 10 sites with a probing depth ≥5 mm. Student's t and chi-square tests were used to compare, respectively, the two groups' quantitative and qualitative data. The two groups were matched for quantities of used tobacco, age, daily toothbrushing frequency, teeth mobility, number of remaining teeth, plaque index, and DMFT. Compared to the ECS group, the ENS group had a significantly lower number of yearly visits to the dentist (mean ± SD: 0.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2), lower probing pocket depth (mean ± SD: 2.33 ± 0.63 vs. 2.02 ± 0.80 mm), and gingival index (median [interquartile]: 0.46 [0.10-0.89] vs. 0.00 [0.00-0.50]), and it included significantly lower percentages of smokers with periodontal disease (24.3% vs. 9.5%). In conclusion, chronic exclusive narghile smoking has fewer adverse effects on the periodontium than chronic exclusive cigarette smoking.

Biochemical Data and Metabolic Profiles of Male Exclusive Narghile Smokers (ENSs) Compared With Apparently Healthy Nonsmokers (AHNSs)

Studies evaluating the metabolic profiles of ENSs are scarce and presented controversial conclusions. This study aimed to compare the metabolic profiles of ENSs' and AHNSs' groups. Males aged 25-45 years and free from a known history of metabolic and/or cardiovascular diseases were included. According to the smoking status, two groups of ENSs and AHNSs were identified. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), waist circumference (WC, cm), systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP, DBP, mmHg), fasting blood data in mmol/L (blood glycemia [FBG], triglycerides [TG], total cholesterol [TC], high- and low- density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C, LDL-C]) and obesity status were evaluated. The metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined according to the 2006 International Diabetes Federation (IDF) recommendations. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( SD) or percentages. Compared to the AHNSs' group ( n = 29), the ENSs' one ( n = 29) had (a) higher values of BMI (26.5 ± 2.3 vs. 28.2 ± 3.6), WC (95 ± 7 vs. 100 ± 10), and TG (1.22 ± 0.40 vs. 1.87 ± 0.85); and (b) included a lower percentage of males having low HDL-C (82.7% vs. 62.0%), and higher percentages of males having obesity (6.9% vs. 37.9%) or hypertriglyceridemia (10.7% vs. 51.7%). Both the ENSs' and AHNSs' groups: (a) had similar values of FBG (5.38 ± 0.58 vs. 5.60 ± 0.37), TC (4.87 ± 1.16 vs. 4.36 ± 0.74), HDL-C (0.92 ± 0.30 vs. 0.82 ± 0.21), LDL-C (3.09 ± 0.98 vs. 2.92 ± 0.77), SBP (117 ± 9 vs. 115 ± 8), and DBP (76 ± 6 vs. 73 ± 7); and (b) included similar percentages of males having normal weight (17.2% vs. 31.0%); overweight (44.8% vs. 62.1%); android obesity (79.3% vs. 59.6%), hypertension (10.3% vs. 10.3%), hyperglycemia (37.9% vs. 48.2%), and MetS (51.7% vs. 34.5%). There is a need to monitor narghile use among male metabolic patients since it alters some components of the MetS.

[Evaluation of quality of life (QOL) of Tunisians patients with COPD]

AIM

To test the Arabic version of the St. George's Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in stable Tunisian COPD patients.

HYPOTHESES

A correlation coefficient between the post-bronchodilator FEV1 and the "Total" score of SGRQ higher than "-0.40", and QOL scores lower in COPD with "mild to moderate airway obstruction" than in those with "severe to very severe airway obstruction" will be in favor of a possible application of the Arabic version of the SGRQ in Tunisians COPD patients.

METHODS

This is a prospective cross-sectional study including 50 clinically stable COPD patients. The Arabic version of the SGRQ was used. Four scores were calculated for the "Symptoms", "Activities", "Impacts" and "Total" components. Patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of their airway obstruction: "mild to moderate, n=30" and "severe to very severe, n=20". The correlation between the QOL "Total" score and postBD FEV1 was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean±SD of age, cigarette smoking and post-bronchodilator FEV1 were, respectively, 60±10, 61±36 pack-years and 55±20 %. The correlation between the post-bronchodilator FEV1 and QOL "Total" score was significant at "-0.65". "Symptoms", "Activities", "Impacts" and "Total" scores were significantly less altered in patients with "mild to moderate airway obstruction" than among those with "severe to very severe airway obstruction" (respectively, 52±24 vs. 77±17, 66±28 vs. 87±18, 48±25 vs. 70±23 and 54±22 vs. 76±17).

CONCLUSION

The application of the Arabic version of the SGRQ in stable COPD patients gives reliable results.