1
|
Gollub MJ, Lall C, Lalwani N, Rosenthal MH. Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3549-3558. [PMID: 31062058 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01996-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There has been a rapid increase in the utilization of MRI in rectal cancer staging in the USA essentially replacing endorectal ultrasound and mimicking the trend in Europe seen in the 1990s and 2000s. Accompanying this trend, there is a demand, and recognized need, for greater precision and clarification of confusing, misunderstood and poorly understood concepts, facts, statements and nomenclature regarding rectal cancer and the use of pelvic MRI for diagnosis. As such, this Review, part evidence-based and part expert opinion, will attempt to elucidate and clarify several concepts the authors have encountered in 25 years of imaging rectal cancer, focusing on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Chandana Lall
- Division of Abdominal and Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, 32209, FL, USA
| | - Neeraj Lalwani
- Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging, Wake Forest University and Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, 27103, NC, USA
| | - Michael H Rosenthal
- Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, 02215, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gollub MJ, Lall C, Lalwani N, Rosenthal MH. Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019. [PMID: 31062058 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01996-3.pmid:31062058;pmcid:pmc7365137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
There has been a rapid increase in the utilization of MRI in rectal cancer staging in the USA essentially replacing endorectal ultrasound and mimicking the trend in Europe seen in the 1990s and 2000s. Accompanying this trend, there is a demand, and recognized need, for greater precision and clarification of confusing, misunderstood and poorly understood concepts, facts, statements and nomenclature regarding rectal cancer and the use of pelvic MRI for diagnosis. As such, this Review, part evidence-based and part expert opinion, will attempt to elucidate and clarify several concepts the authors have encountered in 25 years of imaging rectal cancer, focusing on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Chandana Lall
- Division of Abdominal and Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, 32209, FL, USA
| | - Neeraj Lalwani
- Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging, Wake Forest University and Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, 27103, NC, USA
| | - Michael H Rosenthal
- Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, 02215, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kitz J, Fokas E, Beissbarth T, Ströbel P, Wittekind C, Hartmann A, Rüschoff J, Papadopoulos T, Rösler E, Ortloff-Kittredge P, Kania U, Schlitt H, Link KH, Bechstein W, Raab HR, Staib L, Germer CT, Liersch T, Sauer R, Rödel C, Ghadimi M, Hohenberger W. Association of Plane of Total Mesorectal Excision With Prognosis of Rectal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:e181607. [PMID: 29874375 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Previous retrospective studies have shown that surgical quality affects local control in rectal cancer.. Objective In this secondary end point analysis, we evaluated the prognostic effect of the total mesorectal excision (TME) plane in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants The CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial enrolled 1236 patients with cT3-4 and/or node-positive rectal adenocarcinoma from 88 centers in Germany between July 25, 2006, and February 26, 2010. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive treatment with standard fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone (control arm) or oxaliplatin (experimental arm) followed by TME and adjuvant chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The TME quality (mesorectal, intramesorectal, and muscularis propria plane) was prospectively assessed in 1152 operation specimens. An assessment was performed independently by pathologists and surgeons. The results were correlated with clinicopathologic data and the clinical outcome was tested, including multivariable analysis with the Cox regression model. Results Of 1152 German Caucasian participants, 332 (28.8) were women and the mean age was 63 years. The plane of TME was mesorectal in 930 patients (80.7%), intramesorectal in 169 (14.7%), and muscularis propria in 53 (4.6%). In a univariable analysis, the TME plane was significantly associated with 3-year disease-free survival (mesorectal vs intramesorectal vs muscularis propria, 95% CI, 73.1-78.8 vs 61.6-76.0 vs 55.6-81.3, respectively; P = .01), cumulative incidence of local and distant recurrences (mesorectal vs intramesorectal vs muscularis propria, 95% CI, 2.0-4.5 vs 1.2-8.1 vs 2.5-20.5, respectively; P < .001; and mesorectal vs intramesorectal vs muscularis propria, 95% CI, 17.0-22.4 vs 18.3-32.0 vs 14.2-39.0, respectively; P = .03, respectively), and overall survival (mesorectal vs intramesorectal vs muscularis propria, 95% CI, 88.3-92.3 vs 79.7-91.0 vs 81.6-98.7, respectively; P = .02). In contrast to the pathologist-based evaluation, the assessment of TME plane by the operating surgeon failed to demonstrate prognostic significance for any of these clinical end points. In a multivariable analysis, the plane of surgery (mesorectal vs muscularis propria TME) constituted an independent factor for local recurrence (P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance This phase 3 randomized clinical trial confirms the long-term clinical effect of TME plane quality on local recurrence, as initially reported in the MRC CR07 study. The data highlight the key role of pathologists and surgeons in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00349076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Kitz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tim Beissbarth
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ulrich Kania
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Krankenhaus Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans Schlitt
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinrich Link
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Wolf Bechstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans-Rudolf Raab
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Ludger Staib
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Christoph-Thomas Germer
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Liersch
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rolf Sauer
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Werner Hohenberger
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Traa MJ, Roukema JA, De Vries J, Rutten HJT, Langenhoff B, Jansen W, Den Oudsten BL. Biopsychosocial predictors of sexual function and quality of sexual life: a study among patients with colorectal cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2016; 4:206-17. [PMID: 26816825 PMCID: PMC4708118 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.03.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective A low sexual function (SF) has been reported in patients with colorectal cancer. However, research often focusses on clinical predictors of SF, hereby omitting patients’ subjective evaluation of SF [i.e., the quality of sexual life (QoSL)] and psychosocial predictors of SF and QoSL. In addition, research incorporating a biopsychosocial approach to SF and QoSL is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate (I) relatedness between SF and the QoSL, (II) the course of SF and QoSL, and (III) biopsychosocial predictors of SF and QoSL. Methods Patients completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic factors (i.e., age, sex) and personality characteristics (i.e., neuroticism, trait anxiety) before surgery. Questionnaires assessing psychological (i.e., anxious and depressive symptoms, body image, fatigue) and social (i.e., sexual activity, SF, non-sensuality, avoidance of sexual activity, non-communication, relationship function) aspects were measured preoperative and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Clinical characteristics were obtained from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR). Bivariate correlations evaluated relatedness between SF and QoSL. Linear mixed-effects models examined biopsychosocial predictors of SF and QoSL. Results SF and QoSL are related constructs (r=0.206 to 0.642). Compared to preoperative scores, SF did not change over time (P>0.05). Overall, patients’ QoSL decreased postoperatively (P=0.001). A higher age (β=−0.02, P=0.006), fatigue (β=−0.02, P=0.034), not being sexually active (β=−0.081, P<0.001), and having a stoma (β=0.37, P=0.035) contributed to a lower SF. Having rectal cancer (β=−1.64, P=0.003), depressive symptoms (β=−0.09, P=0.001), lower SF (β=1.05, P<0.001), and more relationship maladjustment (β=−0.05, P=0.027) contributed to a lower QoSL (P<0.05). In addition, partners’ SF (β=0.24, P<0.001) and QoSL (β=0.30, P<0.001) were predictive for patients’ SF and QoSL, respectively. A significant interaction between time and gender was reported for both outcomes (P’s=0.002). Conclusions SF and QoSL are related but distinctive constructs. The course of SF and QoSL differed. Different biopsychosocial predictors were found for SF and QoSL. The contribution of partner-related variables to patients’ outcomes suggests interdependence between patients and partners. Men and women showed different SF and QoSL trajectories. We recommend that health care professionals, when discussing sexuality, realize that SF and QoSL are no interchangeable terms and should, therefore, be discussed as two separate entities. In addition, it is favored that clinicians focus not only on biological predictors of SF and QoSL, but obtain a broader perspective in which they also pay attention to psychosocial factors that may impair SF and QoSL. More in depth research on interdependence between patients and partners, biopsychosocial predictors of partners’ SF and QoSL, and gender effects is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Johanna Traa
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Anne Roukema
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda De Vries
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Harm Jozef Theodorus Rutten
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Langenhoff
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Walther Jansen
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Brenda Leontine Den Oudsten
- 1 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Medical Psychology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands ; 4 Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; 5 Research Institute for Growth & Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 6 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg/Waalwijk, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|