Antiphospholipid syndrome in cardiac surgery—an underestimated coagulation disorder?☆

Lupus anticoagulant and valvular cardiac surgery

Despite its name, lupus anticoagulant (LAC) neither exclusively occurs in lupus nor induces anticoagulation. It is an antiphospholipid antibody found in 2%-4% of the population that promotes clot formation by targeting phospholipid-protein complexes in cell membranes. However, in vitro, LAC exhibits paradoxical effects, prolonging clotting times in phospholipid-dependent assays such as Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT). This unpredictability extends to point-of-care tests like Activated Clotting Time (ACT), which are frequently used to monitor anticoagulation during cardiac surgeries involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). High doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) are administered in these procedures, but the presence of LAC complicates ACT measurements, creating challenges for both anesthesiologists and surgeons. This case report highlights the clinical implications of LAC in perioperative management, underscoring the difficulties in ensuring adequate anticoagulation during CPB.

Efficacy of the Hepcon system in reducing hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in antiphospholipid syndrome patients undergoing cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery are at increased risk for thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Anticoagulation during CPB is typically monitored with activated clotting time (ACT) which may be falsely prolonged in patients with APS. The Hepcon Hemostasis Management System quantitatively determines the whole blood heparin concentration through heparin/protamine titration.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of APS patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring CPB at the Cleveland Clinic between April 2013, and July 2020. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications per surgical case in patients monitored by Hepcon versus patients monitored by ACT. Secondary endpoints were median volume of chest tube output and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within the first three post-operative days.

RESULTS

43 patients were included. 20 (47%) patients were monitored using Hepcon while 23 (53%) were monitored using ACT. For the primary endpoint of rate of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications per surgical case, there was no statistically significant difference between the Hepcon and ACT groups (HMS, 6/20 [30%]; ACT, 7/23 [30%]; p = >0.99). For the secondary endpoints, there was no statistically significant difference in median post-operative chest tube output (780 mL vs. 850 mL; p = 0.88) and median post-operative PRBC transfusion (1 unit vs. 0 unit; p = 0.28) between the Hepcon and ACT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the composite outcome of thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications in patients monitored by Hepcon versus those monitored by ACT.

Management of Anticoagulation and Antifibrinolytics in Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder that presents with hypercoagulability and results in a lab artifact of prolonged PTT. The most severe form is catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (CAPS), which manifests as rapidly progressing thromboses in multiple organ systems leading to multi-organ ischemia. The mainstay management CAPS is anticoagulation and systemic corticosteroids. Antifibrinolytic agents have previously been thought to be relatively contraindicated in CAPS due to the pro-thrombotic nature of the disease; the complex coagulation profile of CAPS can make it difficult to assess the risks and benefits of antifibrinolytic therapy. Also, should a patient with CAPS require cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for surgery, it poses a unique challenge in providing appropriate anticoagulation in the setting of prolonged ACT. We present a case of a 32-year-old postpartum female with CAPS requiring heart transplant who safely received intraoperative antifibrinolytic therapy and was successfully anticoagulated during CPB after perioperative plasmapheresis.

Purtscher-like retinopathy following coronary artery bypass grafting in an antiphospholipid syndrome patient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Purtscher retinopathy is a rare occlusive microangiopathy comprising a constellation of retinal signs including cotton wool spots, retinal hemorrhages and Purtscher flecken. While classical Purtscher must be antedated by a traumatic incident, Purtscher-like retinopathy is used to refer to the same clinical syndrome in the absence of trauma. Various non-traumatic conditions have been associated with Purtscher-like retinopathy e.g. acute pancreatitis, preeclampsia, parturition, renal failure and multiple connective tissue disorders. In this case study, we report the occurrence of Purtscher-like retinopathy following coronary artery bypass grafting in a female patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old Caucasian female patient presented with a complaint of acute painless diminution of vision in the left eye (OS) that occurred approximately two months earlier. Clinical history revealed that the patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) two months earlier and that visual symptoms started 4 days thereafter. Furthermore, the patient reported undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) one year before for another myocardial ischemic event. Ophthalmological examination revealed multiple yellowish-white superficial retinal lesions i.e. cotton-wool spots, exclusively in the posterior pole and predominantly macular within the temporal vascular arcades only OS. Fundus examination of the right eye (OD) was normal and the anterior segment examination of both eyes (OU) was unremarkable. A diagnosis of Purtscher-like retinopathy was made based on clinical signs, suggestive history and consolidated by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) of macula, optic nerve head (ONH) according to the diagnostic guidelines of Miguel. The patient was referred to a rheumatologist to identify the underlying systemic cause and was diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

CONCLUSIONS

We report a case of Purtscher-like retinopathy complicating primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) following coronary artery bypass grafting. This conveys a message to clinicians that patients presenting with Purtscher-like retinopathy should undergo meticulous systemic work-up in order to identify potentially life-threatening underlying systemic diseases.

Heart Valve Surgery in Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patients—Morbidity and Mortality

Objectives: To assess valve surgery outcomes in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Methods: A retrospective study assessing complications and mortality rate and possible factors associated with adverse outcomes of APS patients undergoing valve surgery in two tertiary medical centers. Results: Twenty-six APS patients (median age at surgery 47.5 years) who underwent valve surgery were detected, of whom 11 (42.3%) had secondary APS. The mitral valve was most commonly involved (n = 15, 57.7%). A valve replacement was performed in 24 operations (92.3%), 16 of which (66.7%) were mechanical valves. Fourteen (53.8%) patients sustained severe complications, and four of them died. The presence of mitral regurgitation (MR) was associated with severe complications and mortality (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 12.5 (1.85–84.442), p = 0.008, for complications. All deceased patients had MR (p = 0.033). The presence of Libman-Sacks endocarditis (LSE) (7.333 (1.272–42.294), p = 0.045), low C3 (6.667 (1.047–42.431), p = 0.05) and higher perioperative prednisone doses (15 ± 21.89 vs. 1.36 ± 3.23 mg/day, p = 0.046) were also associated with complications. A lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was associated with mortality (30.75 ± 19.47 vs. 70.68 ± 34.44 mL/min, p = 0.038). Conclusions: Significant morbidity and mortality were observed among APS patients undergoing valve surgery. MR was associated with mortality and complications. LSE, low complement and higher doses of corticosteroids were associated with complications, while a low GFR was associated with mortality.

Management of perioperative anticoagulation in a patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome undergoing cardiac surgery: A case report

Patients with Antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) are at high risk for both bleeding and thrombotic complications during cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In this case we present a patient with APLS and Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura who successfully underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with CPB despite recent craniotomy for subdural hematoma evacuation. Anticoagulation for CPB was monitored by targeting an Activated Clotting Time (ACT) that was 2× the upper limit of normal. A multidisciplinary approach was essential in ensuring a safe and successful operation.

Protamine-Induced Coronary Graft Thrombosis: A Review

Perioperative myocardial infarction is a serious complication affecting a significant portion of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This may arise due to coronary graft thrombosis, a rare but potentially fatal phenomenon associated with both congenital and acquired risk factors. Multiple case reports implicate the role of protamine in the development of such thromboses. The role of protamine in facilitating the regulation of hemostasis by reversing the anticoagulant effects of heparin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass is well-recognized. However, discussion of its potential contribution to coronary graft thrombosis and mechanisms by which this may occur is lacking. Furthermore, its narrow therapeutic index and side effect profile are such that its appropriateness as a universal reversal agent to heparin requires reconsideration. This article reviews the current body of evidence regarding the use of protamine in cardiac surgery and the limited case reports pertaining to its potential role in the pathophysiology of coronary graft thrombosis.

Literature review of apheresis procedures performed perioperatively in cardiac surgery for ASFA category indications

BACKGROUND

Perioperative therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with cardiovascular diseases poses several challenges, including alterations in intravascular volume, serum electrolytes, the coagulation cascade, and drug pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

This review article summarizes different indications of plasma exchange for patients requiring cardiac surgery based on reported case reports and case series.

RESULTS

The most common reported indication is plasma exchange for the management of allosensitized cardiac transplant candidate patients in combination with immunosuppressive regimens, which increases the likelihood of obtaining a cross-match-negative allograft, improving post-transplant clinical outcome. The second most common indication is for patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome that permits the use of heparin in cardiopulmonary bypass in an urgent cardiac surgery. Less common indications are restoration of clotting factors for patients with congenital bleeding disorders or removal of cold agglutinins. No severe complications were described in reported cases.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic plasma exchange is an effective and safe procedure that could be performed preoperatively and intraoperatively in urgent cardiac surgery for the management of antibody-mediated disorders including allosensitized cardiac transplant candidate patients or patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome.

A Patient With Remote Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Antiphospholipid Syndrome Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Do Current Guidelines Apply?

Anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is required to prevent acute disseminated intravascular coagulation and clot formation within the bypass circuit. Unfractionated heparin is the standard anticoagulant for CPB due to its many advantages and long history of successful use. However, heparin has the unique drawback of triggering Heparin-PF4 (PF4) antibodies potentially leading to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We have limited data regarding reformation of antibodies if a patient has had a prior (remote) antibody production or full HIT. Patients with antiphospholipid antibodies undergoing CPB with unfractionated heparin have a high complication rate, even in the absence of HIT. Antiphospholipid antibodies have a multifaceted, cumulatively inhibitory effect on the normal anticoagulation armamentarium in vivo. Even more concerning is the possibility that antiphospholipid syndrome and HIT may be synergistic. We report a patient with risk factors for both thromboembolic (remote history of HIT and antiphospholipid syndrome) and hemorrhagic complications who underwent an aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting on CPB using bivalirudin. We discuss the complex decision making regarding anticoagulant for CPB, particularly with regard to American College of Chest Physicians guidelines.

[Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension developed in a female patient with lupus erythematosus and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome]

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is one of the potentially curable forms of pulmonary hypertension, in which pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is the gold standard treatment. However, over the last decade, great attention has been given to a combined therapeutic approach including both drug therapy and surgical treatment and the application of endovascular technologies. This clinical case demonstrates the diagnostic difficulties of CTEPH and the opportunities of a comprehensive approach to therapy for the disease with mandatory assessment of preoperative surgical and medical treatment in order to improve the patient status and to prepare for surgery.

Anesthetic management of antiphospholipid syndrome patients who underwent cardiac surgery: three cases report

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare disease in which patients display prolonged coagulation test results in vitro, but usually develop thrombotic symptoms in vivo. Patients with APS are at increased risk of valvular heart disease or coronary vascular disease, conditions that often necessitate cardiac surgery via bypass. The management of anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is particularly challenging in these patients because of the unique features of APS. Patients with APS are constantly at risk of arterial and venous thrombotic events. Therefore it is very important to maintain proper anticoagulation perioperatively, especially during CPB. In this paper, we present three successful cases of APS patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB.

A case of coronary artery disease with antiphospholipid syndrome that showed repeated stent thrombosis

A 55-year-old man with severe chest pain was hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome. Coronary angiography revealed total occlusion of his left anterior descending coronary artery, which was successfully recanalized by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the patient subsequently experienced subacute stent thrombosis, restenosis in the stent, and frequent thrombosis in PCI toward restenosis. Primary antiphospholipid syndrome should be considered as a possible cause of repeated stent thrombosis, and, if salvage by PCI is impossible, salvage by coronary artery bypass graft should be considered.

Lupus Anticoagulant, Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Cardiac Surgery

The presence of lupus anticoagulant and the related condition antiphospholipid syndrome present a challenge in cardiac surgery where measured anticoagulation may not reflect the in vivo patient status of hypercoagulation. We report the successful management of a patient with lupus anticoagulant presenting for aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularisation. We used heparin for anticoagulation, specialised additional tests of anticoagulation and a reduced protamine dose. We also used tranexamic acid. The clinical problems with anticoagulation in patients with lupus anticoagulant include anticoagulant choice, measurement of adequate anticoagulation, antifibrinolytic usage, protamine dosing and blood product transfusion.

The Heart and APS

The heart is a target organ in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Endocardial disease, intracardiac thrombosis, myocardial involvement including coronary heart disease and microvascular thrombosis, as well as pulmonary hypertension have all been described in APS patients. Valvular involvement is the most common manifestation with a prevalence of 82% detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Symmetrical, nodular thickening of the mitral and/or aortic valves is characteristic. Anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment is ineffective in terms of valvular lesion regression. Some patients require cardiac valve replacement. However, patients with APS have shown an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. Intracardiac thrombosis, although a rare complication, can cause pulmonary and systemic emboli. Differential diagnosis with myxoma may be very difficult.

Thrombophilia in cardiac surgery--patients with protein S deficiency

BACKGROUND

Thrombophilic diathesis may cause severe problems in cardiac surgical patients. Among these, protein S deficiency is a coagulation disorder associated with recurrent thromboembolic events. We analyzed our experience with 7 patients with protein S deficiency who underwent cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data, operative and postoperative courses, and the long-term results of 7 patients who were diagnosed to have protein S deficiency. Six of them were operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass, one was operated on with an off-pump procedure.

RESULTS

Procedures performed were emergent pulmonary embolectomy (patient 1), aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, patient 2), re-CABG (patients 3 and 7), and CABG (patients 4, 5, and 6). In patients 1, 2, 3, and 7, the diagnosis was made perioperatively. Patients 4, 5, and 6 were treated with a modified regimen of warfarin or protamine. All of the latter 3 patients had an uneventful perioperative course without thromboembolic complication. At follow-up, all but 1 of the 7 patients were on continuous warfarin, and were well and without any further thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a past medical history of thromboembolic events or with a perioperative thromboembolic complication, elaborate laboratory investigation should lead to a definite diagnosis. For instance, patients with protein S deficiency undergoing cardiac surgery belong to a high-risk subgroup. Although rare, this and other coagulation disorders can be a critical issue in cardiac surgery. In such patients, we suggest perioperative warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 and incomplete protamine antagonism to minimize the risk of a perioperative thromboembolic event.