Prognostic factors for long-term survival in patients with thoracic metastatic disease: a 10-year experience

Diagnosis and Pattern Identification of Intrathoracic Malignant Melanoma Metastasis: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

The lung is a frequent site of secondary malignancies. Melanoma is a malignant tumor originating from melanocytes, that accounts for the majority of death related to skin cancers. In advanced stages, it can also present with intrathoracic metastasis, particularly in the lungs, but infrequent intrathoracic manifestations are possible. A retrospective analysis of the cases referred to the pulmonary endoscopy unit of the hospital of Reggio Emilia in the last 10 years (since December 2012) was carried out, discovering 17 cases of melanoma metastasis with thoracic localizations, either with or without a diagnosis of primary melanoma. Four repetitive patterns of clinical-radiological presentation have been identified and described through the same number of paradigmatic clinical cases: nodal involvement (35%), lung mass(es) (41%), diffuse pulmonary involvement (12%), and pleural involvement (12%). These different presentations imply the use of different diagnostic techniques, with an overall high diagnostic yield (87.5%). Finally, a brief analysis of survival based on the pattern of presentation has been performed, finding no statistically significant differences between the four groups at metastasis diagnosis (p-value = 0.06, median survival of respectively 54, 8, 9, and 26 months from metastasis diagnosis), while there is a significant difference considering patients with lung involvement versus nodal/pleural involvement (p = 0.01).

"Multimodality imaging of the extrapleural space lesions"

Extrapleural space (EPS) is a potential space between the outer layer of the parietal pleura and the inner layer of the chest wall and the diaphragm. Many different pathologies including chronic inflammatory conditions, infections, trauma, neoplastic disease (both benign and malignant) as well as many infiltrative disorders can involve the EPS. It is one of the frequently overlooked entity on imaging due to relative lack of understanding of the anatomy and the imaging appearances of the diseases localized to this space. The knowledge of the EPS is essential for the radiologists as the pathologies which involve the EPS may require different treatment approach compared to pleural or parenchymal lung disease. Additionally, the EPS involvement may influence the staging and treatment planning for chest malignancies. In this review, we give an overview of the anatomy and various pathologies involving EPS, utility of different imaging modalities in the evaluation of EPS lesions with emphasis on cross sectional imaging and emerging technologies like spectral CT and its role in recognizing the imaging features which enable specific diagnosis of various pathologies.

Surgical outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients according to approach method: thoracoscopic versus open approach

Background

The role of surgical intervention as a treatment for pulmonary metastasis (PM) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy. Using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, we compared the results according to the surgical approach: video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus the open method.

Methods

A total of 134 patients (115 men) underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for isolated PM of HCC between January 1998 and December 2010 at Seoul Asan Medical Center. Of these, 84 underwent VATS (VATS group) and 50 underwent thoracotomy or sternotomy (open group). PSM analysis between the groups was used to match them based on the baseline characteristics of the patients.

Results

During the median follow-up period of 33.4 months (range, 1.8–112.0), 113 patients (84.3%) experienced recurrence, and 100 patients (74.6%) died of disease progression. There were no overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and pulmonary-specific disease-free survival rate differences between the VATS and the open groups (p = 0.521, 0.702, and 0.668, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed local recurrence of HCC, history of liver cirrhosis, and preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.729/2.495/2.632, 95% confidence interval 1.142–2.619/1.571–3.963/1.554–4.456; p = 0.010/< 0.001/< 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Metastasectomy can be considered a potential alternative for selected patients. VATS metastasectomy had outcomes comparable to those of open metastasectomy.

Evaluation of prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases

Aim of the study

The resection of pulmonary metastases is a routine practice of thoracic surgery wards; however, clear protocols or prognostic factors defining the surgical treatment criteria are still not available. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in a group of patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a group of 250 patients admitted to the Wrocław Thoracic Surgery Centre for radical resection of pulmonary lesions in the years 1996–2010.

Results

The patients included in the study (n = 250) underwent 339 thoracotomies in total. The overall five-year survival was 52.8%. The univariate data analysis showed that the survival rate was significantly better in patients subjected to more than one thoracotomy (p = 0.01674). Among the other data, such as sex, tumour histology, disease-free interval (DFI) ≤ 12 and > 12 months, DFI ≤ 36 and > 36 months, age, number of tumours identified in CT and number of tumours subject to resection, operated side, resection type, radicality of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy, no statistical significance was observed in univariate and multivariate analysis (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Outcomes of re-metastasectomy are satisfactory if patients meet the baseline criteria for surgical treatment. None of the evaluated factors potentially influencing the patient survival was demonstrated to have any prognostic value. Further research, including the biology of tumours with pulmonary metastases, is necessary to select the group of patients that will benefit most from surgical treatment.

Survival after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: importance of previous liver metastasis as a prognostic factor

AIMS

To analyse patient survival after the resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma and specifically to verify whether presence of liver metastasis prior to lung metastasectomy affects survival.

METHODS

All patients who, between 1998 and 2008, underwent lung metastasectomy due to colorectal cancer were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with the log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

During this period, 101 metastasectomies were performed on 84 patients. The median age of patients was 65.4 years, and 60% of patients were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 2%, and incidence of complications was 7%. The overall survival was 72 months, with 3-and 5-year survival rates of 70% and 54%, respectively. A total of 17 patients (20%) had previously undergone resection of liver metastasis. No significant differences were found in the distribution of what were supposed to be the main variables between patients with and without previous hepatic metastases. Multivariate analysis identified the following statistically significant factors affecting survival: previous liver metastasectomy (p = 0.03), tumour-infiltrated pulmonary lymph nodes (p = 0.04), disease-free interval ≥ 48 months (p = 0.03), and presence of more than one lung metastasis (p < 0.01). In patients with previous liver metastasis, the shorter the time between primary colorectal surgery and the hepatectomy, the lower the survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

A previous history of liver metastasis shortens survival after lung metastasectomy. The time between hepatic resection and lung metastasectomy does not affect survival; however, patients with synchronous liver metastasis and colorectal neoplasia have poorer survival rates than those with metachronous disease.

The prognostic factors of chest wall metastasis resection

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist regarding the outcomes after resection of pure hematogenous chest wall (CW) metastases. Therefore, we reviewed our 17 years' experience to determine clinically relevant factors.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CW metastasectomy (other than breast cancer) from October 1991 to August 2008 at a single institution was performed. Post-CW metastasectomy survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Factors predictive of improved survival were determined by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 90 CW metastasectomies were performed on 79 patients (33 females and 46 males). The median follow-up period was 25.6 months. Operative mortality was 1.1%. The 5-year survival was 40%. Significant factors after multivariable analysis were margin status, histology, and a history of heavy smoking (≥ 20 pack years). Microscopically positive margin (P=0.01; hazard ratio (HR) 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-6.35) and grossly positive margin (P<0.01; HR 9.55; 95% CI 2.60-35.1) fared worse. Compared with carcinoma, sarcoma (P<0.01; HR 3.9; 95% CI 1.7-9.2) and melanoma (P<0.01; HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.7-24) had worse survival. A history of heavy smoking diminished survival (P<0.01; HR 3.7; 95% CI 1.6-8.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The resection of CW metastases in highly selected patients as a part of multimodality treatment has low risk and is associated with prolonged survival. The margin status and histology are significant factors in the survival after CW metastasectomy. In addition, heavy smoking history also has a significant negative impact on survival.

[Review and update of the prognostic factors in lung metastasis surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Since the International Registry of Lung Metastases established the factors that determine survival after performing lung metastasectomy in 1997, numerous studies have attempted to determine these prognostic factors of survival. Our objective has been to analyse the mortality, survival and disease-free survival lung metastasis surgery by studying the different variables that determine them.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

All patients subjected to surgery for lung metastasectomy between 1998 and 2008 were included in this study. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed, as well as a Cox regression using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 178 lung metastases were removed in 146 patients during this period. The mean age was 62.22 years (median 63 years) and 64.6% were males. There were 2 cases (1.1%) of mortality and the incidence of complications was 5.02% (9 cases). The overall survival was 67.75 months with a 3 and 5 year survival of 67.4% and 52.4%, respectively. The variables that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: age disease free interval, number of nodules and size of nodules. The "state of the margins" variable was almost significant (P=.054).

DISCUSSION

To have only one metastasis and it is less than 1cm, a long disease free interval, and a resection with free margins, are the most favourable prognostic factors after resection of lung metastasis.

Outcomes after repeated resection for recurrent pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether metastasectomy is still feasible in patients with pulmonary recurrence from colorectal cancer, after initial metastasectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of repeated metastasectomy in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1995 to 2007, 202 patients had received a pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer at our institution. Over a median follow-up of 28.9 months, 48 patients received second metastasectomy (29 wedge resections, 5 segmentectomies, 13 lobectomies, and 1 completion pneumonectomy). The median disease-free interval was 9.6 months. Among these 48 patients, 28 showed pulmonary recurrence again and of those, 10 patients received third metastasectomy (two wedge resections, two segmentectomies, four lobectomies, and two completion pneumonectomies).

RESULTS

There was no postoperative mortality. Of the 48 patients who underwent second metastasectomy, overall and disease-free 5-year survivals were 79% and 49%, respectively, after second operation. Of the 10 patients who received third metastasectomy, overall survival was 78% at 5 years after last operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated resection after initial metastasectomy can be carried out safely and provides long-term survival in patients with recurrent pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer. Our findings indicate that close follow-up for the early detection of recurrence and parenchyma-saving resection can improve the results after repeated resection.

Resection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcomatous metastases is associated with long-term survival

BACKGROUND

The presence of extrapulmonary sarcomatous metastases has traditionally been a contraindication for the resection of pulmonary metastases. We, therefore, reviewed our experience with resection of pulmonary metastases in patients who had documented extrapulmonary metastases to determine long-term outcome.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2006, 234 patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy. They were grouped as follows: group A (lung metastasectomy only); group B1 (with either synchronous or prior extrapulmonary metastasectomy); group B2 (with nonsurgical treatment of synchronous or prior extrapulmonary metastases); group C1 (with later extrapulmonary metastasectomy); group C2 (with later extrapulmonary metastasis which was not resected).

RESULTS

Groups A, B1, and B2 consisted of 147 (62.8%), 26 (11.1%), and 13 (5.6%) patients, respectively. The median survival from lung metastasectomy date was 35.5, 37.8, and 13.5 months in groups A, B1, and B2, respectively. Comparison among the three groups showed no significant survival difference in groups A versus B1 (p = 0.96), but a survival difference was found comparing groups A versus B2 (p < 0.001) and B1 versus B2 (p < 0.001). Prognostic factors for increased survival included 3 or greater redo pulmonary operations, greater than 12 month mean time between pulmonary recurrences, greater than 24 month mean time between extrathoracic recurrences, and a prolonged disease-free interval. Prognostic factors for decreased survival included 3 or greater pulmonary metastases and group B2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest extrapulmonary metastases should no longer be viewed as a contraindication to resection of sarcomatous pulmonary metastases. Long-term survival can be achieved when a complete resection is possible for both the pulmonary and extrapulmonary metastases.

Extension of survival by resection of asynchronous renal cell carcinoma metastases to mediastinal lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether or not resection of isolated mediastinal lymph node renal cell carcinoma metastases confers a survival advantage, as compared with patients with stage IV disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with renal cell carcinoma whose histologic specimens were evaluated at our institution from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, we compared the survival of patients who underwent resection of asynchronous mediastinal lymph node metastases with that of patients with stage IV disease.

RESULTS

During the 7-year study period, of the 386 patients with renal cell carcinoma who were evaluated at our institution, 9 underwent resection of asynchronous mediastinal lymph node metastases. After primary tumor resection and before diagnosis of asynchronous mediastinal lymph node metastases, all patients completed chemotherapy, cytokine therapy, or tumor vaccination; 3 underwent radiotherapy. The median age at resection of mediastinal lymph nodes was 57.7 years (range, 39.7-81.2). The median time from primary tumor resection to mediastinal lymph node resection was 2.8 years (range, 0.5-23.3). In all, 4 patients underwent resection of metastases via thoracotomy and 5, via thoracoscopy. The median number of mediastinal lymph nodes pathologically evaluated was 7 (range, 2-28); the median number of positive mediastinal lymph nodes per patient was 1.5 (range, 1-3). We found no surgical complications. The median survival after resection of metastases (3.2 years) was significantly longer (P = .021) than for other patients with stage IV disease at our institution (1.1 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of renal cell carcinoma mediastinal lymph node metastases is safe, appears to extend survival, and should be considered an important component of treating patients with renal cell carcinoma who have asynchronous mediastinal lymph node metastases.

Long-term survival in stage IV melanoma after repetitive surgical therapy

BACKGROUND

Surgical therapy in patients with stage IV melanoma is controversial and always an individual decision.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a young melanoma patient, who underwent resection of 5 distant metastases from 4 different organ systems. Thereby, the patient achieved a stable state of disease and a good quality of life for up to now 67 months without any evidence for further tumor manifestations at present. A systemic chemo- or immunotherapy was never applied.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with stage IV melanoma, surgery alone can provide long-term survival with good quality of life.

Pulmonary metastasectomy: a common practice based on weak evidence

The resection of secondary metastases from the lungs is a wide-spread surgical practice. Patients are referred from coloproctology teams to thoracic surgeons specifically for this surgery. What is the expected benefit? I have explored the rationale and searched the literature in order to present these patients with a well-informed opinion for their consideration. I find only weak evidence based on uncontrolled retrospective series which have been interpreted as showing a survival benefit. This has been extrapolated to policy and practice that do not stand up to scrutiny. The practice has never been subjected to randomised trial and I will argue that the present evidence is insufficient to justify the uncontrolled use of an intervention with inescapable short-term morbidity, permanent loss of function, and major cost implications. I propose ways in which the evidence may be improved, including a trial in the areas of most uncertainty.