Off-pump coronary artery bypass and avoidance of hypothermic cardiac arrest improves early left ventricular function in patients with systolic dysfunction

Long-term results following off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in left ventricular dysfunction

Severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is an independent risk factor for early and long-term mortality after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) significantly reduces the early incidence of major complications in high-risk patients. Moreover, bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting after CABG is associated with improved long-term outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multivessel OPCAB with BITA grafting for complete revascularization on postoperative and long-term outcomes in patients with low LV ejection fraction (EF). We included 121 patients with EF ≤ 30.0% who underwent isolated multivessel OPCAB (average LVEF, 24.8%) between April 2007 and December 2019. Sixty-six patients received BITA grafts, while 55 had single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafts. We conducted multivariate analyses to examine the correlation between perioperative data and late mortality rate. The early mortality rate was 1.65%. After excluding in-hospital mortality cases, we performed long-term follow-up of 119 patients. Early postoperative echocardiography showed significant LVEF improvement in 89 (75.2%) patients. However, LVEF remained ≤ 30.0% in 30 (24.8%) patients. We recorded 15 and 30 cases of cardiac death and cardiac events, respectively, during the long-term follow-up period. Postoperative LVEF ≤ 30.0% (P < 0.01) and no use of BITA grafting (P = 0.03) were significant predictors of cardiac death and events; moreover, hemodialysis was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality rather than cardiac death. Multivessel OPCAB in patients with severe LV dysfunction was associated with acceptable in-hospital mortality and early postoperative improvement in LV function. Additionally, OPCAB with BITA grafting may provide long-term benefits with respect to cardiac death and events. However, the long-term benefits were significantly limited in patients without early postoperative improvement in LV function and patients with chronic hemodialysis.Clinical registration number: 5590 (14/5/2020 Tokyo Women's Medical University).

Stroke and mortality rates after off-pump vs. pump-assisted/no-clamp coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Ascending aorta manipulation during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery can release embolic matter and may cause stroke. Strategies for lowering the stroke rate associated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery include off-pump surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass and pump-assisted surgery with minimal aortic manipulation (i.e., without aortic cross-clamping). We examined whether one approach is superior to the other in reducing stroke and perioperative mortality rates.

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive elective, urgent, and emergency off-pump/no-bypass and pump-assisted/no-clamp coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed by a single surgeon at our institution from June 2011 through October 2017.

RESULTS

Of 570 patients analyzed, 395 (69.3%) underwent off-pump/no-bypass surgery, 43 (7.5%) underwent pump-assisted/no-clamp surgery, and 132 (23.2%) transitioned mid-procedure from off-pump/no-bypass to pump-assisted/no-clamp surgery. Patients who were >70 years old, were female, or had diabetes, cardiomegaly, or a history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure were more likely to undergo pump-assisted/no-clamp surgery or the combined technique. None of the pump-assisted/no-clamp patients had a stroke, versus 0.3% of the off-pump/no-bypass patients and 0.8% of the combination patients. Stroke and in-hospital mortality rates did not differ by technique.

CONCLUSIONS

A hybrid strategy incorporating off-pump, pump-assisted, and combined off-pump/pump-assisted techniques achieved very low stroke rates in patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Perioperative mortality was similar for all three techniques. Avoiding aortic clamping may be crucial for decreasing CABG-related stroke rates. Off-pump/no-bypass surgery had no significant advantage over the pump-assisted/no-clamp or combined techniques in reducing the stroke rate after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison

Objective

On-pump beating heart (OP-BH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often undertaken as an alternative between off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG), especially in India. However, outcome data following OP-BH surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of OP-BH CABG with OPCAB.

Methods

From our institutional database, all patients undergoing OP-BH CABG (n = 531) were identified. A propensity-matched cohort undergoing OPCAB (n = 531) was identified from the database. Nearest neighbor matching technique was used and the groups were matched for variables including age, gender, body mass index, EuroSCORE, history of recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes, pre-op renal impairment, pre-op neurological events, and left ventricular function.

Results

The propensity-matched groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. The mean EuroSCORE was 3.17 and 3.20 in the OP-BH and the OPCAB groups. The unadjusted 30-day mortality in the propensity-matched OPCAB group was 2.07% (11/531) while mortality in the on-pump beating heart group was significantly higher at 6.9% (37/531). Multivariate analysis showed that OP-BH CABG was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality as well as major adverse post-operative outcomes including renal, neurological, and respiratory outcomes and post-operative atrial fibrillation.

Conclusions

OP-BH CABG is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients undergoing OPCAB.

Feasibility of off-pump coronary artery grafting for patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction: A retrospective cohort study from a single institutional database

OBJECTIVE

Despite substantial advances in surgical practice, the management of patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains challenging. Furthermore, evidence on the outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in this population is inconsistent. We conducted the present study to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of OPCAB in patients with different ejection fractions.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Hua-Shan Cardiac Surgery and included consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent OPCAB procedures during 2016-2019. The patients included in the study were followed up until death or the end of data collection. Patients with different ejection fractions were matched 1:2 using propensity score matching. Factors associated with short-term outcomes were determined using logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for the differences in all-cause death were generated.

RESULTS

The two propensity score matched groups consisted of 40 left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and 80 normal left ventricular function (NLVF) patients. No significant intergroup differences were observed in the postoperative outcomes for the occurrence of left heart failure (22.5% in LVD vs. 5.0% in NLVF, p = .009). Age (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-1.18) but not the preoperative LVEF was shown to be a strong predictor of short-term events in logistic regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves displayed similar freedom from all-cause death (p = .119) or cardio-death (p = .092) between groups.

CONCLUSION

The immediate postoperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were similar between the groups, indicating that OPCAB is a safe and effective choice for patients with LVD.

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Performance in Patients Undergoing On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Purpose: Benefits of off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) over on-pump (ONCAB) remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the early impacts of OPCAB vs ONCAB for varying left ventricular (LV) function baselines by applying the non-invasive myocardial work (MW) analysis, which enables further insights in cardiac mechanics, contractility, and efficacy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 98 patients (55 ONCAB vs 43 OPCAB). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and concurrent arterial blood pressure measurements taken at rest, prior to, and early after surgery were performed. Global myocardial work index (GMWI), global constructive work (GCW), and global work efficiency (GWE), inter alia, were quantified.

Results: Preoperatively, OPCAB patients had significantly lower values than ONCAB patients in terms of GMWI (1404.33 ± 585.41 mmHg% vs 1619.07 ± 535.42 mmHg%, p = 0.039), GWE (90% (60%, 96%) vs 93% (74%, 98%), p = 0.028). After surgery, GMWI was reduced in both groups. However, a more significant GMWI impairment occurred early after ONCAB than after OPCAB (−343.14 ± 35.20 mmHg%, p <0.001 vs −224.04 ± 120.91 mmHg%, p = 0.042).

Conclusion: Despite lower preoperative LV function in OPCAB patients, GMWIs after OPCAB were superior to ONCAB, indicating better preservation of systolic LV function early after OPCAB by means of contractility compared to ONCAB. Further studies should investigate the long-term course of MW response and their clinical impact.

Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications

Although the literature has failed to project an overall superiority of off-pump vs. on-pump surgery, nevertheless, small randomized control trials and large meta-analysis studies have concluded that the incidence of a stroke is less than 1 % when anaortic off-pump techniques are advocated in patients with diseased ascending aorta. Furthermore, off-pump techniques or their combination with hybrid procedures may lead to a reduction of adverse outcome in the aged high-risk population with concomitant poor left ventricular function and co-morbidities. However, despite this, controversy still exists among the cardiac surgery community in terms of the benefit of this technique and its safety; hence, off-pump is becoming out of fashion. In this review paper, by looking at a "marginal group of patients" (elderly, high risks, atherosclerotic aortas) we attempt to re-establish and justify this technique and re-invent its usage.

Concomitant off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting results in improved in-hospital outcomes for patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing surgery

OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) has primarily consisted of revascularization with or without the addition of mitral valve repair or replacement. We hypothesize that performing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting before fixing MR improves in-hospital outcomes for patients with IMR undergoing surgery.

METHODS

From January 2000 through December 2010, a total of 96 consecutive patients with moderate or severe IMR, as determined by preoperative echocardiography, underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 66) or OPCAB (n = 30) revascularization with concomitant mitral valve repair or replacement. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cardiac surgery database (PATS; Dendrite Clinical Systems, Oxford, UK) was performed. In addition, medical notes and charts were reviewed for all study patients.

RESULTS

The 2 groups had similar preoperative demographic and EuroSCORE risk-stratification characteristics. The operative mortality rate for the entire cohort was 9.4%. Patients who underwent OPCAB grafting had a lower operative mortality than those who underwent CABG (3.3% versus 12.1%; P = .006). The mean ±SD cardiopulmonary bypass time (82.7 ± 34.7 minutes versus 160.7 ± 45.2 minutes; P < .001) and cross-clamp time (49.0 ± 22.4 minutes versus 103.4 ± 39.5 minutes; P < .001) were significantly shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group. The OPCAB group also had significantly less in-hospital morbidity and shorter stays in the intensive care unit and the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that OPCAB grafting (compared with conventional CABG) before repairing MR is associated with favorable in-hospital outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for IMR.