Off-label use of recombinant activated factor VII in intractable haemorrhage after cardiovascular surgery: an observational study of practices in 23 French cardiac centres (2005-7)

Perioperative management of the bleeding patient

Perioperative bleeding remains a major complication during and after surgery, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. The principal causes of non-vascular sources of haemostatic perioperative bleeding are a preexisting undetected bleeding disorder, the nature of the operation itself, or acquired coagulation abnormalities secondary to haemorrhage, haemodilution, or haemostatic factor consumption. In the bleeding patient, standard therapeutic approaches include allogeneic blood product administration, concomitant pharmacologic agents, and increasing application of purified and recombinant haemostatic factors. Multiple haemostatic changes occur perioperatively after trauma and complex surgical procedures including cardiac surgery and liver transplantation. Novel strategies for both prophylaxis and therapy of perioperative bleeding include tranexamic acid, desmopressin, fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrates. Point-of-care patient testing using thromboelastography, rotational thromboelastometry, and platelet function assays has allowed for more detailed assessment of specific targeted therapy for haemostasis. Strategic multimodal management is needed to improve management, reduce allogeneic blood product administration, and minimize associated risks related to transfusion.

Comparison of low- and high-dose recombinant activated factor VII for postcardiac surgical bleeding

Aim of the Study:

A retrospective observational study to compare safety and efficacy of high and low doses of recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in severe postcardiac surgical bleeding.

Patients and Methods:

From 2004 to 2014, all patients who received rFVIIa for bleeding after cardiac surgery were included and arranged in two groups; Group 1: Low dose (40–50 mcg/kg) (n = 98) and Group 2: High dose (90–120 mcg/kg) (n = 156).

Results:

There was no significant difference in demographic and surgical characteristics of both groups on admission to Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit (CSICU). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the reduction in chest tube bleeding in the first 6 h or the transfusion requirement in the 24 h after admission to CSICU. A total of 15 patients (5.9%) had thromboembolic adverse events. (Seven (7.1%) patients in Group 1 compared to 8 (5.1%) patients in Group 2, P = 0.58). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality at 30 days (2% in Group 1 vs. 3.2% in Group 2, P = 0.6) and at hospital discharge between the two study groups (6.1% in Group 1 vs. 8.3% in Group 2, P = 0.5), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the need for re-exploration, days on mechanical ventilation, CSICU, or hospital stay.

Conclusion:

In this report, Low-dose rFVIIa showed equivalent efficacy and safety to high-dose rFVIIa. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for Bleeding in the Perioperative Setting

Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) contain vitamin K-dependent clotting factors (II, VII, IX, and X) and are marketed as 3 or 4 factor-PCC formulations depending on the concentrations of factor VII. PCCs rapidly restore deficient coagulation factor concentrations to achieve hemostasis, but like with all procoagulants, the effect is balanced against thromboembolic risk. The latter is dependent on both the dose of PCCs and the individual patient prothrombotic predisposition. PCCs are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the reversal of vitamin K antagonists in the setting of coagulopathy or bleeding and, therefore, can be administered when urgent surgery is required in patients taking warfarin. However, there is growing experience with the off-label use of PCCs to treat patients with surgical coagulopathic bleeding. Despite their increasing use, there are limited prospective data related to the safety, efficacy, and dosing of PCCs for this indication. PCC administration in the perioperative setting may be tailored to the individual patient based on the laboratory and clinical variables, including point-of-care coagulation testing, to balance hemostatic benefits while minimizing the prothrombotic risk. Importantly, in patients with perioperative bleeding, other considerations should include treating additional sources of coagulopathy such as hypofibrinogenemia, thrombocytopenia, and platelet disorders or surgical sources of bleeding. Thromboembolic risk from excessive PCC dosing may be present well into the postoperative period after hemostasis is achieved owing to the relatively long half-life of prothrombin (factor II, 60-72 hours). The integration of PCCs into comprehensive perioperative coagulation treatment algorithms for refractory bleeding is increasingly reported, but further studies are needed to better evaluate the safe and effective administration of these factor concentrates.

Recombinant activated factor VII for uncontrolled bleeding postcardiac surgery

A retrospective observational study to review the safety and efficacy of rFVIIa in persistent hemorrhage in post cardiac surgical patients.

Methods

Patients who had bleeding of 3 ml/kg/h or more for 2 consecutive hours after cardiac surgery were arranged into two groups; control group, who received conventional treatment and rFVIIa group, who received conventional treatment and rFVIIa.

Results

There was no significant difference in demographic and surgical characteristics of both groups. The chest tube output significantly decreased in the rFVIIa group compared to the other group 4 hours after admission {1.4 (IQR: 1–2.2) ml/kg/h vs 3.9 (IQR: 3.1–5.6) ml/kg/h; p = 0.004} and continues to be significant till 9 hours after CSICU admission {0.6 (IQR: 0.4–1.1) ml/kg/h vs 1.9 (IQR: 1.2–2.2) ml/kg/h; p = 0.04}. The median number of blood products units transfused to rFVIIa group was significantly lower compared to control group in the period from 3–12 hours after CSICU admission. 13 (5.5%) patients in rFVIIa group had Thromboembolic adverse events (TAE) compared to 7 (2.4%) patients in other group p = 0.27. 8 patients in the rFVIIa group needed reexploration compared to 19 patients in the other group, p = 0.01. No significant difference was noticed between the 2 groups regarding: new onset renal failure, median number of mechanical ventilator days, pneumonia, mediastinitis, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, survival at 30 days and at discharge.

Conclusion

In this analysis, rFVIIa succefully reduced the chest tube bleeding and blood products transfused during severe post cardiac surgical bleeding. However, safety of rFVIIa remains unclear. Prospective controlled trials are still needed to confirm the role of rFVIIa.

Recombinant Activated Factor VII Significantly Reduces Transfusion Requirements in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Background

The off-label use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for intractable bleeding is associated with a risk of thrombotic events. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of rFVIIa-related thrombotic events and its efficacy in the reduction of transfusion requirements during various surgeries.

Methods

Ninety-two cases received rFVIIa for uncontrollable bleeding despite medical and surgical hemostasis. The incidence and risk factors of thrombotic events were analyzed. Blood products transfused in the 24 h before and after rFVIIa injection were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed to see which types of surgeries benefited most from rFVIIa.

Results

The main indication for rFVIIa administration was uncontrollable bleeding during cardiothoracic surgery followed by coagulopathy due to liver failure followed by neurosurgical procedures. Requirements of blood products after rFVIIa decreased significantly by 45 % (p = 0.012), 52 % (p = 0.0001), and 75 % (p = 0.0001) for red blood cells, plasma, and cryoprecipitate, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that cardiothoracic surgery was the sole group that benefited from rFVIIa with a reduction in transfusion of red blood cells (p = 0.013), plasma (p = 0.0001), and cryoprecipitate (p = 0.0001). Thrombotic events occurred in 9.8 % of the cases mostly on the arterial side (89 %) and have not contributed to mortality.

Conclusion

rFVIIa can significantly reduce transfusion requirements when given for intractable bleeding during cardiothoracic surgery at the expense of thrombotic events in approximately one tenth of the cases. Further prospective studies are necessary to study if this effect of rFVIIa is translated to a favorable outcome.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40268-015-0093-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recombinant factor VII is associated with worse survival in complex cardiac surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) decreases requirements for allogeneic blood transfusion and chest reexploration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Whether rFVIIa increases the risk of postoperative adverse events is unclear. We tested whether rFVIIa administration was associated with increased mortality and neurologic and renal morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Risk of thromboembolic complications and the dose-response of rFVIIa on mortality and morbidity were also evaluated.

METHODS

Of 27,977 patients who had complex cardiac surgery, 164 patients (0.59%) received rFVIIa perioperatively. Using propensity-matching techniques, patients were matched to a maximum of 3 control patients. Patients who received rFVIIa were compared with control patients on risk of mortality, neurologic and renal morbidity, and thromboembolic complications, including a composite of myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis. A corresponding dose-response analysis using multivariable logistic regression was also performed.

RESULTS

Propensity techniques successfully matched 144 patients (88%) with 359 control patients. Of patients who received rFVIIa, 40% experienced in-hospital mortality compared with 18% of control patients (odds ratio, 2.82; 98.3% confidence interval, 1.64 to 4.87; p<0.001). Furthermore, 31% of patients treated with rFVIIa versus 17% of control patients experienced renal morbidity (odds ratio, 2.07; 98.3% confidence interval, 1.19 to 3.62; p=0.002); however, neurologic morbidity and thromboembolic complications were not different among groups. High-dose rFVIIa (>60 μg/kg) did not increase the risk for mortality compared with treatment with low-dose rFVIIa (<60 μg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of rFVIIa is associated with increased mortality and renal morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Intraoperative use of low-dose recombinant activated factor VII during thoracic aortic operations

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have supported the effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for the control of bleeding after cardiac procedures; however safety concerns persist. Here we report the novel use of intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa in thoracic aortic operations, a strategy intended to improve safety by minimizing rFVIIa exposure.

METHODS

Between July 2005 and December 2010, 425 consecutive patients at a single referral center underwent thoracic aortic operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); 77 of these patients received intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa (≤60 μg/kg) for severe coagulopathy after CPB. Propensity matching produced a cohort of 88 patients (44 received intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa and 44 controls) for comparison.

RESULTS

Matched patients receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa got an initial median dose of 32 μg/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 16-43 μg/kg) rFVIIa given 51 minutes (42-67 minutes) after separation from CPB. Patients receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa demonstrated improved postoperative coagulation measurements (partial thromboplastin time 28.6 versus 31.5 seconds; p=0.05; international normalized ratio, 0.8 versus 1.2; p<0.0001) and received 50% fewer postoperative blood product transfusions (2.5 versus 5.0 units; p=0.05) compared with control patients. No patient receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa required postoperative rFVIIa administration or reexploration for bleeding. Rates of stroke, thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events were equivalent between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa led to improved postoperative hemostasis with no apparent increase in adverse events. Intraoperative rFVIIa administration in appropriately selected patients may correct coagulopathy early in the course of refractory blood loss and lead to improved safety through the use of smaller rFVIIa doses. Appropriately powered randomized studies are necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.