1
|
Awad K, Mikhailidis DP, Toth PP, Jones SR, Moriarty P, Lip GYH, Muntner P, Catapano AL, Pencina MJ, Rosenson RS, Rysz J, Banach M. Efficacy and Safety of Alternate-Day Versus Daily Dosing of Statins: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2017; 31:419-431. [DOI: 10.1007/s10557-017-6743-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
2
|
Algharably EAH, Filler I, Rosenfeld S, Grabowski K, Kreutz R. Statin intolerance - a question of definition. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016; 16:55-63. [PMID: 27645111 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1238898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Statin therapy is the backbone of pharmacologic therapy for low-density lipoproteins cholesterol lowering and plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular disease prevention. Statin intolerance is understood as the inability to continue using a statin to reduce individual cardiovascular risk sufficiently, due to the development of symptoms or laboratory abnormalities attributable to the initiation or dose escalation of a statin. Muscle symptoms are the most common side effects observed. Areas covered: The main aim of this article is to present a review on published definitions of statin intolerance. In addition, a brief review on clinical aspects and risk factors of statin intolerance is provided and features for a common definition for statin intolerance are suggested. Expert opinion: A definition of statin intolerance by major drug regulatory agencies is not available. In clinical studies, different definitions are chosen and results are not comparable; different medical associations do not agree on one common definition. There is an unmet need to establish a common definition of statin intolerance to ensure an appropriate clinical use of this important drug class. Further work is required to develop a consensus definition on statin intolerance that could have significant positive impact on both research and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Engi Abdel-Hady Algharably
- a Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie , Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany.,b Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt
| | - Iris Filler
- a Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie , Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Stephanie Rosenfeld
- c Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH , Evidence Based Medicine , Berlin , Germany
| | - Katja Grabowski
- a Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie , Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- a Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie , Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banach M, Rizzo M, Toth PP, Farnier M, Davidson MH, Al-Rasadi K, Aronow WS, Athyros V, Djuric DM, Ezhov MV, Greenfield RS, Hovingh GK, Kostner K, Serban C, Lighezan D, Fras Z, Moriarty PM, Muntner P, Goudev A, Ceska R, Nicholls SJ, Broncel M, Nikolic D, Pella D, Puri R, Rysz J, Wong ND, Bajnok L, Jones SR, Ray KK, Mikhailidis DP. Statin intolerance – an attempt at a unified definition. Position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015; 14:935-55. [PMID: 25907232 DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1039980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
4
|
Banach M, Rizzo M, Toth PP, Farnier M, Davidson MH, Al-Rasadi K, Aronow WS, Athyros V, Djuric DM, Ezhov MV, Greenfield RS, Hovingh GK, Kostner K, Serban C, Lighezan D, Fras Z, Moriarty PM, Muntner P, Goudev A, Ceska R, Nicholls SJ, Broncel M, Nikolic D, Pella D, Puri R, Rysz J, Wong ND, Bajnok L, Jones SR, Ray KK, Mikhailidis DP. Statin intolerance - an attempt at a unified definition. Position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel. Arch Med Sci 2015; 11:1-23. [PMID: 25861286 PMCID: PMC4379380 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.49807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 266] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Revised: 03/08/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Statins are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in clinical practice. They are usually well tolerated and effectively prevent cardiovascular events. Most adverse effects associated with statin therapy are muscle-related. The recent statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) has focused on statin associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), and avoided the use of the term 'statin intolerance'. Although muscle syndromes are the most common adverse effects observed after statin therapy, excluding other side effects might underestimate the number of patients with statin intolerance, which might be observed in 10-15% of patients. In clinical practice, statin intolerance limits effective treatment of patients at risk of, or with, cardiovascular disease. Knowledge of the most common adverse effects of statin therapy that might cause statin intolerance and the clear definition of this phenomenon is crucial to effectively treat patients with lipid disorders. Therefore, the aim of this position paper was to suggest a unified definition of statin intolerance, and to complement the recent EAS statement on SAMS, where the pathophysiology, diagnosis and the management were comprehensively presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Banach
- Department of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Manfredi Rizzo
- Biomedical Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Peter P. Toth
- University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Wilbert S. Aronow
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Vasilis Athyros
- Second Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippocration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dragan M. Djuric
- Institute of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marat V. Ezhov
- Department of Atherosclerosis, Cardiology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - G. Kees Hovingh
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karam Kostner
- Mater Hospital, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Corina Serban
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, Romania
| | - Daniel Lighezan
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, Romania
| | - Zlatko Fras
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Preventive Cardiology Unit, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Patrick M. Moriarty
- Department of Medicine, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Paul Muntner
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Assen Goudev
- Department of Cardiology, Queen Giovanna University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Richard Ceska
- 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Stephen J. Nicholls
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Marlena Broncel
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Dragana Nikolic
- Biomedical Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniel Pella
- First Department Of Internal Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia
| | | | - Jacek Rysz
- Department of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Nathan D. Wong
- Heart Disease Prevention Program, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Laszlo Bajnok
- First Department of Medicine, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Steven R. Jones
- The Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kausik K. Ray
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Campus, University College London Medical School, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Influence of combined treatment with mianserin and simvastatin on selected biochemical serum parameters of liver and kidney function in rats. CURRENT ISSUES IN PHARMACY AND MEDICAL SCIENCES 2013. [DOI: 10.12923/j.2084-980x/26.3/a.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of combined 14-day treatment with mianserin (10 mg/kg) and simvastatin (1 or 10 mg/kg) on selected biochemical liver and kidney parameters in rats (AST and ALT activities and the concentrations of AFP, total protein, urea, creatinine and ß2-M). The results showed the increase in both transaminases activities, creatinine concentration and the decrease of AFP, total protein and ß2-M concentrations. The results indicate that 14-day combined administration of mianserin with simvastatin negatively affects the liver functioning. The observed changes in kidney biochemical parameters may suggest a risk of renal dysfunction during long-term combined treatment with these drugs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Visser ME, Wagener G, Baker BF, Geary RS, Donovan JM, Beuers UHW, Nederveen AJ, Verheij J, Trip MD, Basart DCG, Kastelein JJP, Stroes ESG. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in high-risk statin-intolerant patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:1142-9. [PMID: 22507979 PMCID: PMC3751967 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) synthesis inhibitor, in patients who are statin intolerant and at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and results Thirty-three subjects, not receiving statin therapy because of statin intolerance, received a weekly subcutaneous dose of 200 mg mipomersen or placebo (2:1 randomization) for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was per cent change in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) from the baseline to Week 28. The other efficacy endpoints were per cent change in apoB and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)]. Safety was determined using the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory evaluations. After 26 weeks of mipomersen administration, LDL-c was reduced by 47 ± 18% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). apoB and Lp(a) were also significantly reduced by 46 and 27%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). Four mipomersen (19%) and two placebo subjects (17%) discontinued dosing prematurely due to AEs. Persistent liver transaminase increases ≥3× the upper limit of normal were observed in seven (33%) subjects assigned to mipomersen. In selected subjects, liver fat content was assessed, during and after treatment, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Liver fat content in these patients ranged from 0.8 to 47.3%. Liver needle biopsy was performed in two of these subjects, confirming hepatic steatosis with minimal inflammation or fibrosis. Conclusion The present data suggest that mipomersen is a potential therapeutic option in statin-intolerant patients at high risk for CVD. The long-term follow-up of liver safety is required. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00707746
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje E Visser
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mancini GBJ, Baker S, Bergeron J, Fitchett D, Frohlich J, Genest J, Gupta M, Hegele RA, Ng D, Pope J. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of statin adverse effects and intolerance: proceedings of a Canadian Working Group Consensus Conference. Can J Cardiol 2011; 27:635-62. [PMID: 21963058 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2011] [Revised: 05/19/2011] [Accepted: 05/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
While the proportion of patients with significant statin-associated adverse effects or intolerance is very low, the increasing use and broadening indications have led to a significant absolute number of such patients commonly referred to tertiary care facilities and specialists. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence pertaining to a broad variety of statin-associated adverse effects followed by a consensus approach for the prevention, assessment, diagnosis, and management. The overview is intended both to provide clarification of the untoward effects of statins and to impart confidence in managing the most common issues in a fashion that avoids excessive ancillary testing and/or subspecialty referral except when truly necessary. The ultimate goal is to ensure that patients who warrant cardiovascular risk reduction can be treated optimally, safely, and confidently with statin medications or alternatives when warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B John Mancini
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Amin NP, Blaha MJ, Chow GV, Blumenthal RS, Ashen D. Comprehensive Lipid Management in the Coronary Artery Disease Patient. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/s12170-011-0191-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Statin-induced myopathy is an important cause of statin intolerance and the most common cause of statin discontinuation. Observational studies estimate that 10 - 15% of statin users develop statin-related muscle side effects ranging from mild myalgia to more severe muscle symptoms with significant CPK elevations. AREAS COVERED This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors and mechanisms of statin-induced myopathy and provides an evidence-based algorithm for managing patients with statin myopathy. EXPERT OPINION There are multiple risk factors for statin-induced myopathy that are both patient-related (age, genetics, co-morbidities) and drug-related (statin metabolism via the CYP system, drug-drug interactions and statin drug transport). Management options for statin-intolerant patients include statin switching, especially to low-dose, non-daily doses of long-acting statins, such as rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, and other non-statin lipid-lowering agents, such as ezetimibe and colesevelam, and possibly red yeast rice. In conclusion, statin-induced myopathy is a significant clinical problem that contributes considerably to statin therapy discontinuation. However, there exist multiple and effective management options for statin intolerant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thura T Abd
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, J. Willis Hurst Internal Medicine Residency Program, 69 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Adams MR, Konaniah E, Cash JG, Hui DY. Use of NBD-cholesterol to identify a minor but NPC1L1-independent cholesterol absorption pathway in mouse intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2011; 300:G164-9. [PMID: 21071508 PMCID: PMC3025510 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00392.2010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The importance of Niemann-Pick C1 Like-1 (NPC1L1) protein in intestinal absorption of dietary sterols, including both cholesterol and phytosterols, is well documented. However, the exact mechanism by which NPC1L1 facilitates cholesterol transport remains controversial. This study administered 22-(N(-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)-23,24-bisnor-5-cholen-3β-ol (NBD-cholesterol) and [(3)H]cholesterol to Npc1l1(+/+) and Npc1l1(-/-) mice to determine whether NPC1L1 facilitates dietary sterol uptake by enterocytes and/or participates in intracellular sterol delivery to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for lipoprotein assembly before secretion into plasma circulation. Results showed that [(3)H]cholesterol absorption was reduced but not abolished in Npc1l1(-/-) mice compared with Npc1l1(+/+) mice. In the presence of Pluronic L-81 to block pre-chylomicron exit from the ER, significant amounts of [(3)H]cholesterol were found to be associated with lipid droplets in the intestinal mucosa of both Npc1l1(+/+) and Npc1l1(-/-) mice, and the intracellular [(3)H]cholesterol can be esterified to cholesteryl esters. These results provided evidence indicating that the main function of NPC1L1 is to promote cholesterol uptake from the intestinal lumen but that it is not necessary for intracellular cholesterol transport to the ER. Surprisingly, NBD-cholesterol was taken up by intestinal mucosa, esterified to NBD-cholesteryl esters, and transported to plasma circulation to similar extent between Npc1l1(+/+) and Npc1l1(-/-) mice. Ezetimibe treatment also had no impact on NBD-cholesterol absorption by Npc1l1(+/+) mice. Thus, NBD-cholesterol absorption proceeds through an NPC1L1-independent and ezetimibe-insensitive sterol absorption mechanism. Taken together, these results indicate that NBD-cholesterol can be used to trace the alternative cholesterol absorption pathway but is not suitable for tracking NPC1L1-mediated cholesterol absorption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R. Adams
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Metabolic Diseases Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Eddy Konaniah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Metabolic Diseases Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - James G. Cash
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Metabolic Diseases Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David Y. Hui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Metabolic Diseases Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|