High on-aspirin platelet reactivity predicts cardiac death in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI

Monitoring antiplatelet therapy: where are we now?

Single antiplatelet therapy represents the cornerstone of thrombosis prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing both coronary and peripheral percutaneous interventions. Recent data suggest the efficacy of DAPT also after minor stroke. In this setting, a large body of evidence has documented that genetic and acquired patients' characteristics may affect the magnitude of platelet inhibition induced by antiplatelet agents. The implementation of tools allowing the identification and prediction of platelet inhibition has recently been shown to improve outcomes, leading to an optimal balance between antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding risk. We are therefore clearly moving towards tailored antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this paper is to summarize the available evidence on the evaluation of platelet inhibition in patients with coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. We will here focus on antiplatelet therapy based on both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors. In addition, we provide practical insights into the clinical settings in which it appears reasonable to implement antiplatelet therapy monitoring.

Residual platelet reactivity after pre-treatment with ticagrelor prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with suboptimal myocardial reperfusion

BACKGROUND

The evidence of a clinical benefit of P2Y12 inhibitor pre-treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the relation between the level of platelet inhibition and myocardial reperfusion with newer potent P2Y12 inhibitors remain unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between platelet reactivity at the time of primary PCI after pre-treatment with aspirin and ticagrelor and the post-PCI myocardial blush grade (MBG).

METHODS

We prospectively included 61 patients. Platelet reaction units for ticagrelor (PRU) and aspirin reaction units (ARU) were measured using the point-of-care test VerifyNow before PCI. The high on-ticagrelor (PRU >208) and on-aspirin (ARU ⩾ 550) platelet reactivity (HPR and HaPR) were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups according to MBG 3 or <3.

RESULTS

MBG 3 was identified in 28 (46%) patients. Mean PRU was lower in such patients as compared with those with MBG <3 (155.82 ± 90.91 vs. 227.42 ± 65.18; p=0.001) while mean ARU was similar between groups. HPR and HaPR were observed in 30 (49.2%) and 11 patients (18%), respectively. HPR but not HaPR was more frequent in the group with impaired MBG (66.7 vs. 28.6%; p=0.003 and 21.2 vs. 14.3%; p=0.48 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that higher PRU and the subsequent HPR at the time of primary PCI, after pretreatment with ticagrelor, are the only correlates of post PCI MBG. These findings support the earliest possible loading with ticagrelor prior to primary PCI.

Correlation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Biomarkers With Platelet Reactivity in Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Low response to aspirin, aspirin resistance, and high platelet reactivity on aspirin treatment are similar names for lack of response to block arachidonic acid-induced aggregation with aspirin therapy and have an important role in the evolution of coronary artery disease (CAD) with thromboembolic events.

STUDY QUESTION

Was to evaluate the correlation between cardiovascular risk factors, biomarkers, and low response to aspirin in patients (pts) with CAD.

STUDY DESIGN

Four hundred pts with CAD were divided into 8 groups of study, consistent with the type of CAD and low response to aspirin. Cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers-including some of high platelet reactivity, endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability, and oxidative stress-were evaluated in correlation with low response to aspirin, defined as on treatment aspirin test (ASPItest) >30U by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry.

RESULTS

In patients with CAD, low response to aspirin was significantly correlated with age older than 65 years, smoking, presence of diabetes mellitus, body mass index >25, hypertension, previous aspirin treatment, low response to clopidogrel, high mean platelets volume and von Willebrand factor activity, low flow-mediated vasodilation, and total antioxidant status (P < 0.01). In unstable angina patients, low response to aspirin was significantly correlated with male sex (P < 0.03). Incidence of other hypercoagulability biomarkers-S Protein, C Protein, Antithrombin III, and V Factor Leiden resistance to activated protein C-was low and not correlated with low response to aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

In CAD, low response to aspirin was significantly correlated with age older than 65 years, smoking, presence of diabetes mellitus, body mass index I >25, hypertension, previous aspirin treatment, and only in unstable angina with male sex. Low response to aspirin was also statistically associated with low response to clopidogrel, high mean platelets volume, high von Willebrand factor activity, low flow-mediated vasodilation, and low total antioxidant status values.

Association among PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism, laboratory aspirin resistance and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the association among the PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism, laboratory aspirin resistance and adverse clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who were on aspirin maintainance therapy. A comprehensive literature search was performed and 35 eligible clinical trials including 19025 CAD patients were recruited. Adverse clinical outcomes involving all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were analyzed. The definition of aspirin resistance in each study was accepted. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3.5 System. In CAD patients, the PlA2 gene carriers had similar incidence of laboratory aspirin resistance compared to those with PlA1/A1 genotype [29.7% vs 28.3%, OR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.40, P = 0.74)], and there were no significant differences in the adverse clinical outcomes between the PlA2 carriers and the PlA1/A1 genotype patients. However, the laboratory aspirin non-responders had higher risks of death [7.9% vs. 2.5%, OR = 2.42 (95% CI 1.86 to 3.15, P < 0.00001)] and TVR [4.5% vs. 1.7%, OR = 2.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 4.08, P = 0.01)] compared to the responders. In aspirin-treated CAD patients, the laboratory aspirin resistance predicts all-cause death and TVR. However, the PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism predicts neither the laboratory aspirin response nor the clinical outcomes.

High Residual Platelet Reactivity during Aspirin Therapy in Patients with Non-St Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Comparison Between Initial and Late Phases

Background

High platelet reactivity (HPR) during therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is a poor prognostic factor in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The prevalence of HPR during ACS is greater than that reported in stable diseases. However, it is unclear whether this prevalence of HPR is a transient phenomenon or a characteristic of this high-risk population.

Objective

The main objective is to compare the effects of ASA on platelet function in the initial and late phases of ACS in a single population. Secondary objectives are: correlation between the tests between themselves and the relationship between the tests and the variation of the inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and interleukin-6).

Methods

Seventy patients with non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) ACS in use of 100-200 mg of ASA per day for at least 7 days were prospectively studied. Platelet function was assessed in the first 48 hours and subsequently after 3 months using four methods: VerifyNow™ (VFN), whole blood platelet aggregation (WBPA) with arachidonic acid (AA) and collagen as agonists, and platelet function analyzer (PFA). The level of statistical significance considered was < 0.05.

Results

According to the more specific methods (WBPA with AA and VFN), the incidence of HPR was significantly higher in the early phase than in the late phase: WBPA with AA: 31% versus 13%, p = 0.015; VFN: 32% versus 16%, p = 0.049. The other methods tested, which were less specific for ASA, did not show significant differences between phases. The correlation between the methods was weak or moderate (r ranging from 0.3 to 0.5, p < 0.05), and there were no significant associations between HPR and inflammatory markers.

Conclusion

The prevalence of HPR during AAS therapy, assessed by specific methods for cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1), is higher during the acute phase than in the late phase of NSTE ACS.

Factors Influencing Aspirin Hyporesponsiveness in Elderly Chinese Patients

Background

Aspirin hyporesponsiveness increases the risk of ischemic events. Therefore, it is important to investigate the factors influencing aspirin hyporesponsiveness.

Material/Methods

Patients aged 60 years or older who did not take aspirin before enrollment were included, with aspirin 100 mg/day administered after enrollment. The arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation rate (Ara) was measured by light transmission assay to evaluate aspirin responsiveness. Patients with Ara in the upper quartile after taking aspirin were assigned to the aspirin hyporesponsive group (Ara-Q4).

Results

A total of 292 elderly patients were included. The median value of Ara after taking aspirin was 5.87% (interquartile range 3.86–10.04%). Compared with the aspirin non-hyporesponsive group (Ara-Q1-3, Ara ≤10.04%, n=220), the level of uric acid (UA) (341.30 μmol/L vs. 299.10 μmol/L, p=0.027) and the ratios of β-blockers (9.72% vs. 2.27%, p=0.015) and diuretics (6.94% vs. 1.36%, p=0.036) were higher in the aspirin hyporesponsive group (Ara-Q4, Ara >10.04%, n=72). After multivariate adjustment, the results demonstrated baseline Ara (odds ratio [OR]: 1.030, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004–1.056, p=0.021), UA level (OR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.000–1.006, p=0.038), and β-blockers use (OR: 5.487, 95% CI: 1.515–19.870, p=0.010) were independently and positively associated with aspirin hyporesponsiveness.

Conclusions

This study found that baseline Ara, UA level, and β-blockers use were independently and positively associated with aspirin hyporesponsiveness in elderly Chinese patients, which needs to be validated in large-scale studies.

Observational Study of Platelet Reactivity in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Due to Coronary Stent Thrombosis Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the European PREvention of Stent Thrombosis by an Interdisciplinary Global European Effort Registry

OBJECTIVES

High platelet reactivity (HPR) was studied in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to stent thrombosis (ST) undergoing immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

HPR on P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (HPR-ADP) is frequently observed in stable patients who have experienced ST. The HPR rates in patients presenting with ST for immediate PCI are unknown.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with definite ST were included in a multicenter ST registry. Platelet reactivity was measured before immediate PCI with the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ or Aspirin assay.

RESULTS

Platelet reactivity was measured in 129 ST patients presenting with STEMI undergoing immediate PCI. HPR-ADP was observed in 76% of the patients, and HPR on aspirin (HPR-AA) was observed in 13% of the patients. HPR rates were similar in patients who were on maintenance P2Y₁₂ inhibitor or aspirin since stent placement versus those without these medications. In addition, HPR-ADP was similar in patients loaded with a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor shortly before immediate PCI versus those who were not. In contrast, HPR-AA trended to be lower in patients loaded with aspirin as compared with those not loaded.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 3 out of 4 ST patients with STEMI undergoing immediate PCI had HPR-ADP, and 13% had HPR-AA. Whether patients were on maintenance antiplatelet therapy while developing ST or loaded with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors shortly before undergoing immediate PCI had no influence on the HPR rates. This raises concerns that the majority of patients with ST have suboptimal platelet inhibition undergoing immediate PCI.

Long Term Cardiovascular Outcome Based on Aspirin and Clopidogrel Responsiveness Status in Young ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction Patients

Background

A subset of patients who take antiplatelet therapy continues to have recurrent cardiovascular events which may be due to antiplatelet resistance. The effect of low response to aspirin or clopidogrel on prognosis was examined in different patient populations.

Objective

We aimed to investigate the prevalence of poor response to dual antiplatelet therapy and its relationship with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in young patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

In our study, we included 123 patients under the age of 45 with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous intervention. A screening procedure to determine both aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness was performed on the fifth day of admission. We followed a 2x2 factorial design and patients were allocated to one of four groups, according to the presence of aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance. Patients were followed for a three-year period. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We identified 48% of resistance against one or more antiplatelet in young patients with STEMI. More MACE was observed in patients with poor response to dual platelet therapy or to clopidogrel compared those with adequate response to the dual therapy (OR: 1.875, 1.144-3.073, p < 0.001; OR: 1.198, 0.957-1.499, p = 0.036, respectively). After adjustment for potential confounders, we found that poor responders to dual therapy had 3.3 times increased odds for three-year MACE than those with adequate response to the dual therapy.

Conclusion

Attention should be paid to dual antiplatelet therapy in terms of increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events especially in young patients with STEMI.

MiR-21 role in aspirin-dependent PPARα and multidrug resistance protein 4 upregulation

BACKGROUND

A mechanism involved in high on-aspirin treatment residual platelet reactivity is platelet multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) overexpression. Aspirin enhances platelet MRP4 expression with a PPARα-dependent mechanism and reduces miR-21 expression that, in turn, downregulates PPARα expression.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to verify the relationship between miR-21 and MRP4-PPARα levels induced by aspirin treatment.

METHODS

We evaluated the changes in MRP4-PPARα, mRNA, MRP4 protein, and miR-21 expression induced by aspirin in: (i) in vitro-treated megakaryoblastic cell line (DAMI), (ii) primary megakaryocytes cultures and derived platelets, (iii) healthy volunteers' platelets treated with aspirin, and (iv) aspirinated patients (aspirin-treated patients) and in a control population (control).

RESULTS

We observed an aspirin-induced reverse relationship between the expression of miR-21 and PPARα-MRP4. In DAMI cells the miR-21 mimic transfection reduces PPARα and MRP4 expression, even if cells were treated with aspirin after transfection. MiR-21 inhibitor transfection induces PPARα and MRP4 expression that are not enhanced by aspirin treatment. In human megakaryocytes, aspirin treatment lead to a miR-21 downregulation and a MRP4 upregulation and this trend is confirmed in derived platelets. In aspirin-treated volunteers, an inverse relationship between miR-21 and MRP4 platelet expression was found after aspirin treatment. A similar negative relationship was found in aspirin-treated patients vs the control population.

CONCLUSION

The results reported in this study provide information that aspirin induces the modulation of platelet miR-21 expression levels and this modulation can be responsible for MRP4 enhancement in circulating platelets.

Study of the Association of PEAR1, P2Y12, and UGT2A1 Polymorphisms with Platelet Reactivity in Response to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Chinese Patients

Objectives: Genetic variation is thought to contribute to considerable interindividual variability in platelet function, and there is a pressing need to identify genetic markers that can be used to predict the response to treatment. Our study investigated whether PEAR1, P2Y12, and UGT2A1 polymorphisms were associated with platelet reactivity in response to dual antiplatelet therapy in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: Patients with inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) < 30% after treatment were classified as the high platelet reactivity (HPR) group. Patients with IPA > 30% were classified as the normal platelet reactivity (NPR) group. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was measured by thromboelastography (TEG) platelet-mapping assay. Thirteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of PEAR1, P2Y12 and UGT2A1 were genotyped using the Mass­ARRAY platform. Results: Seven SNPs were significantly associated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation by univariate analysis. Major allele G at rs12041331, minor allele G at rs2644592, minor allele C at rs11264580, and minor allele C at rs11249454 were significantly associated with HPR, whereas minor allele T at rs57731889, minor allele A at rs16863356, and minor allele T at rs7634096 were significantly associated with NPR. The mean IPA was significantly lower in patients suffering recurrent ischemic events than in patients without recurrent events in our study (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PEAR1, P2Y12, and UGT2A1 genetic variants may be potential biomarkers that can be used to guide clinical applications of clopidogrel and aspirin in Chinese patients.

On-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral and coronary blood in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pre-analytical variables may influence platelet function analysis results. Our aim was to evaluate the on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral artery vs coronary blood in patients with STEMI. We enrolled one hundred and nine patients who consecutively underwent p-PCI at Cardiology Unit of Padua University Hospital between June 2014 and June 2015. Before the procedure, all patients received intravenous aspirin 250 mg and either of the thienopyridines; clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg. ASPI-test and ADP-test using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) were performed in samples collected from both a peripheral artery and the culprit coronary artery. 'Low responders' were patients with an ASPI-test or ADP-test value greater than or equal to a pre-established normal range. No significant differences were observed in ASPI-test values between peripheral (19 (median) [3-49 (10-90 percentiles)] U) vs coronary (12 [1-40] U, p = .06) blood and in ADP-test (40 [14-82] U vs 33 [7-79] U, p =.68) blood. In peripheral blood, fifteen (14%) patients were 'low aspirin' and forty-one (38%) 'low thienopyridines' responders. The prevalence of 'low clopidogrel' responders was higher (45%) than prasugrel (36%) and ticagrelor (33%). Similar results were observed in coronary blood. In patients undergoing p-PCI for STEMI, MEA platelet function observed in coronary arteries was consistent with peripheral artery blood's independently of the antiplatelet drug used. The clinical significance of peripheral and coronary on-aspirin/thienopyridines platelet reactivity needs further clarification.

Combination of aspirin with essential fatty acids is superior to aspirin alone to prevent or ameliorate sepsis or ARDS

It has been suggested that aspirin may be of benefit in treating sepsis and ARDS in view of its ability to block cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 activities; inhibit nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB); enhance the production of endothelial nitric oxide (eNO) and lipoxin A4 (LXA4). Our previous studies revealed that plasma phospholipid content of arachidonic acid (AA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) is low in patients with sepsis. This implies that beneficial actions of aspirin in sepsis and ARDS is unlikely to be obtained in view of deficiency of AA and EPA, the precursors of LXA4 and resolvins respectively that are potent anti-inflammatory compounds and enhancers of eNO generation. In view of this, I propose that a combination of aspirin and AA and EPA (and possibly, docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) is likely to be superior in the management of sepsis and ARDS compared to aspirin alone. This suggestion is supported by the recent observation that trauma patients with uncomplicated recoveries had higher resolvin pathway gene expression and lower gene expression ratios of leukotriene: resolvin pathways.

Enhanced platelet MRP4 expression and correlation with platelet function in patients under chronic aspirin treatment

Platelet multidrug resistance protein4 (MRP4)-overexpression has a role in reducing aspirin action. Aspirin in vivo treatment enhances platelet MRP4 expression and MRP4 mediated transport inhibition reduces platelet function and delays thrombus formation. The aim of our work was to verify whether MRP4 expression is enhanced in platelets obtained from patients under chronic aspirin treatment and whether it correlates with residual platelet reactivity. We evaluated changes on mRNA and protein-MRP4 expression and platelet aggregation in four populations: healthy volunteers (HV), aspirin-free control population (CTR), patients who started the treatment less than one month ago (ASA<1 month patients) and aspirinated patients who started the treatment more than two months ago (ASA>2 months patients). In platelets obtained from ASA>2 months patients, it was found a statistically significant MRP4 enhancement of both mRNA and protein expression compared to HV, CTR and ASA<1 month patients. Platelets obtained from ASA>2 months patients that present high levels of platelet MRP4, have higher serum TxB₂ levels and collagen-induced platelet aggregation compared to patient with low levels of MRP4 in platelets. In addition collagen induced platelet aggregation is higher in in vitro aspirinated platelets obtained from patients with high levels of MRP4 patients compared to those obtained from patients with low MRP4 levels. We can assert that, in patients under chronic aspirin treatment, platelets that present high MRP4 levels have an increase of residual platelet reactivity, which is due in part to incomplete COX-1 inhibition, and in part to COX-1-independent mechanism.

Intensive atorvastatin improves endothelial function and decreases ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: A single-center randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intensive atorvastatin may be beneficial for patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, its effects on endothelial and residual platelet function remain uninvestigated in these patients.

METHODS

This single-center single-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial included STEMI patients undergoing PCI, aiming to investigate the acute effects of intensive atorvastatin (40mg) vs. standard atorvastatin (20mg) on serum endothelin-1 (ET-1) and ADP-induced platelet clot strength (MA-ADP), which were measured before and after 7days of atorvastatin treatment respectively. MA-ADP was measured by thromboelastography. The tolerance and safety of intensive atorvastatin therapy in these patients were also observed.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients (60 patients in the intensive group and 60 patients in the standard group) with STEMI, who are undergoing primary PCI, were included into this study (mean age, 63.5years). Patients from these two groups were matched for baseline characteristics. Atorvastatin did not significantly affect the serum level of LDL-C or CRP in either the standard or intensive group. Furthermore, ET-1 did not significantly change following treatment with atorvastatin in the standard group. However, intensive treatment with atorvastatin significantly reduced ET-1 serum level (0.65±0.38pmol/L vs. 0.49±0.21pmol/L, P<0.05) and achieved a greater reduction of MA-ADP (49.2±12.1 vs. 38.4±17.4mm, P<0.05). In addition, although not statistically significant, patients assigned to the intensive group appeared to suffer from less major adverse cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprocedural intensive atorvastatin is associated with improved endothelial function and platelet inhibition, and is well-tolerated in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.