Direct new oral anticoagulants in the emergency department: Experience in everyday clinical practice at a Swiss university hospital

Epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma in elderly patients receiving oral anticoagulant or antithrombotic medication; a Swiss retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The percentage of elderly trauma patients under anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents has been rising lately. As newer agents are introduced, each comes with its own advantages and precautions. Our study covered elderly patients admitted to the ED with maxillofacial trauma while on anticoagulation (AC) or antiplatelet therapy (APT). We aimed to investigate the demographic characteristics, causes, and types of maxillofacial trauma, along with concomitant injuries, duration of hospitalisation, haemorrhagic complications, and the overall costs of care in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Data were gathered from the ED of Bern University Hospital. In this retrospective analysis, patients over 65 of age were included, who presented at our ED with maxillofacial trauma between 2013 and 2019 while undergoing treatment with therapeutic AC/APT.

RESULTS

The study involved 188 patients with a median age of 81 years (IQR: 81 [74; 87]), of whom 55.3% (n=104) were male. More than half (54.8%, n=103) were aged 80 years or older. Cardiovascular diseases were present in 69.7% (n=131) of the patients, with the most common indications for AC/APT use being previous thromboembolic events (41.5%, n=78) and atrial fibrillation (25.5%, n=48). The predominant cause of facial injury was falls, accounting for 83.5% (n=157) of cases, followed by bicycle accidents (6.9%, n=13) and road-traffic accidents (5.3%, n=10). The most common primary injuries were fractures of the orbital floor and/or medial/lateral wall (60.1%, n=113), zygomatic bone (30.3%, n=57), followed by isolated orbital floor fractures (23.4%, n=44) and nasal bone fractures (19.1%, n=36). Fractures of the mandible occurred in 14.9% (n=28). Facial hematomas occurred in 68.6% of patients (129 cases), primarily in the midface area. Relevant facial bleeding complications were intracerebral haemorrhage being the most frequent (28.2%, n=53), followed by epistaxis (12.2%, n=23) and retrobulbar/intraorbital hematoma (9%, n=17). Sixteen patients (8.5%) experienced heavy bleeding that required emergency treatment. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% (4 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that falls are the leading cause of maxillofacial trauma in the elderly, with the most common diagnoses being orbital, zygomatic, and nasal fractures. Haemorrhagic complications primarily involve facial hematomas, especially in the middle third of the face, with intracerebral haemorrhage being the second most frequent. Surgical intervention for bleeding was required in 8.5% of cases. Given the aging population, it is essential to improve prevention strategies and update safety protocols, particularly for patients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy (AC/APT). This can ensure rapid diagnostic imaging and prompt treatment in emergencies.

Impaired kidney function at ED admission: a comparison of bleeding complications of patients with different oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Up to a fourth of patients at emergency department (ED) presentation suffer from acute deterioration of renal function, which is an important risk factor for bleeding events in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy. We hypothesized that outcomes of patients, bleeding characteristics, therapy, and outcome differ between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs).

METHODS

All anticoagulated patients older than 17 years with an impaired kidney function treated for an acute haemorrhage in a large Swiss university ED from 01.06.2012 to 01.07.2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patient, treatment, and bleeding characteristics as well as outcomes (length of stay ED, intensive care unit and in-hospital admission, ED resource consumption, in-hospital mortality) were compared between patients on DOAC or VKA anticoagulant.

RESULTS

In total, 158 patients on DOAC and 419 patients on VKA with acute bleeding and impaired renal function were included. The renal function in patients on VKA was significantly worse compared to patients on DOAC (VKA: median 141 μmol/L vs. DOAC 132 μmol/L, p = 0.002). Patients on DOAC presented with a smaller number of intracranial bleeding compared to VKA (14.6% DOAC vs. 22.4% VKA, p = 0.036). DOAC patients needed more emergency endoscopies (15.8% DOAC vs, 9.1% VKA, p = 0.020) but less interventional emergency therapies to stop the bleeding (13.9% DOAC vs. 22.2% VKA, p = 0.027). Investigated outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC patients were found to have a smaller proportional incidence of intracranial bleedings, needed more emergency endoscopies but less often interventional therapy compared to patients on VKA. Adapted treatment algorithms are a potential target to improve care in patients with DOAC.

Falls in ED patients: do elderly patients on direct oral anticoagulants bleed less than those on vitamin K antagonists?

Background

Falls from standing are common in the elderly and are associated with a significant risk of bleeding. We have compared the proportional incidence of bleeding complications in patients on either direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA).

Methods

Our retrospective cohort study compared elderly patients (≥65 years) on DOAC or VKA oral anticoagulation who presented at the study site – a Swiss university emergency department (ED) – between 01.06.2012 and 01.07.2017 after a fall. The outcomes were the proportional incidence of any bleeding complication and its components (e.g. intracranial haemorrhage), as well as procedural and clinical parameters (length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit, in-hospital-mortality). Uni- and multivariable analyses were used to compare the studied outcomes.

Results

In total, 1447 anticoagulated patients were included – on either VKA (n = 1021) or DOAC (n = 426). There were relatively more bleeding complications in the VKA group (n = 237, 23.2%) than in the DOAC group (n = 69, 16.2%, p = 0.003). The difference persisted in multivariable analysis with 0.7-fold (95% CI: 0.5–0.9, p = 0.014) lower odds for patients under DOAC than under VKA for presenting with any bleeding complications, and 0.6-fold (95% 0.4–0.9, p = 0.013) lower odds for presenting with intracranial haemorrhage. There were no significant differences in the other studied outcomes.

Conclusions

Among elderly, anticoagulated patients who had fallen from standing, those under DOACs had a lower proportional incidence of bleeding complications in general and an even lower incidence of intracranial haemorrhage than in patients under VKAs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00866-6.

Severe Enoral Bleeding with a Direct Oral Anticoagulant after Tooth Extraction and Heparin Bridging Treatment

Background

The number of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing, however, this treatment is associated with the risk of bleeding. More than 10 percent of patients on DOACs have to interrupt their anticoagulation for an invasive procedure every year. For this reason, the correct management of DOACs in the perioperative setting is mandatory.

Case Presentation

An 81-year-old male patient, with known impaired renal function, presented to our emergency department with a severe enoral bleeding after tooth extraction. The DOAC therapy—indicated by known atrial fibrillation—was interrupted perioperatively and bridged with Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH). The acute bleeding was stopped by local surgery. The factors contributing to the bleeding complication were bridging of DOAC treatment, together with prolonged drug action in chronic kidney disease.

Conclusion

In order to decide whether it is necessary to stop DOAC medication for tooth extraction, it is important to carefully weigh up the individual risks of bleeding and thrombosis. If DOAC therapy is interrupted, bridging should be reserved for thromboembolic high-risk situations. Particular caution is required in patients with impaired kidney function, due to the risk of accumulation and prolonged anticoagulant effect of both DOACs and LMWH.

Shorter Hospital Stay and Fewer Hospitalizations in Patients With Visible Hematuria on Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to on Vitamin K Antagonists

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of type of anticoagulation - direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) - on length of hospital stay (LOS) and hospitalization rates in patients with visible hematuria, as visible hematuria in anticoagulated patients can be distressing, difficult to control and even life-threatening.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary university hospital in Switzerland. All patients admitted with visible hematuria from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016 were included. We compared the primary clinical outcome parameters (hospitalization rate and LOS) as well as secondary outcomes (ICU admission, ED LOS, and in-hospital mortality) in patients with visible hematuria on either DOAC therapy, VKA therapy or no anticoagulants.

RESULTS

We included 811 (100%) patients with visible hematuria; 53 (6.5%) patients were on DOAC, compared to 85 (10.5%) on VKA and 673 (83.0%) patients without any anticoagulation. In confounder-adjusted multivariable testing, there were fewer hospitalizations (odds ratio: 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.9, P = .028) and shorter LOS (geometric mean ratio: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.3-4.0, P = .006) on DOAC than on VKA. The secondary outcomes were not significantly associated with the anticoagulation groups. No differences were found between the DOAC and no-anticoagulant groups for any outcome.

CONCLUSION

Visible hematuria in patients on DOAC therapy is associated with shorter hospital stays and fewer hospitalizations compared to VKA.

Application of prothrombin complex concentrate for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in clinical practice: indications, patient characteristics and clinical outcomes compared to reversal of vitamin K antagonists

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is widely used to reverse the action of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in accordance with current guidelines and because of a lack of specific reversal agents. Indications, clinical characteristics and patient outcomes of patients might differ in comparison to reversal of vitamin K antagonists where reversal with PCC is well established.

METHODS

Our cohort study explores patient characteristics, indications and clinical outcomes for reversal of all DOAC patients receiving PCC at our university emergency department from 01.06.2012 to 01.07.2017, in comparison with patients on VKA.

RESULTS

Out of 199,982 consultations, we studied 346 patients who were given PCC for reversal of either DOAC (n = 74) or VKA (n = 272). The most common reason for treatment was acute bleeding; in 86.7% of both groups. 37.3% of bleeding was traumatic (p = 0.666). The most frequent bleeding location was intracranial (61.6%, p = 0.881). Gastrointestinal bleeding was more often found in the DOAC group (18.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.014). More erythrocyte concentrates (ECs) were given to DOAC patients with blood transfusion (p = 0.014). Tranexamic acid was used more often in DOAC patients than in VKA patients (28.4% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001). No significant group differences were found for the following patient outcomes: in-hospital mortality, ICU stay, and length of stay at the ICU or in hospital.

CONCLUSION

In DOAC treated patients, PCC was applied more often because of gastrointestinal bleeding and patients received higher numbers of ECs as well as tranexamic acid. No differences were observed with regard to important clinical outcomes.

Characteristics, treatment and outcome of bleeding after tooth extraction in patients on DOAC and phenprocoumon compared to non-anticoagulated patients-a retrospective study of emergency department consultations

OBJECTIVES

Bleeding after tooth extraction range from minor bleeding to life-threating haemorrhagic shock and are among the leading complications in patients under oral anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or phenprocoumon. Little is known about how anticoagulation in patients under DOAC or phenprocoumon alters the characteristics, treatment or outcome of bleeding events, in comparison to non-anticoagulated patients.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a tertiary ED in Bern, Switzerland, from June 1st 2012 to 31st May 2016 with bleeding related to tooth extraction under DOAC, phenprocoumon or without anticoagulation, were compared.

RESULTS

Out of 161,458 emergency consultations, 64 patients with bleeding from tooth extraction were included in our study. In anticoagulation groups, we found significantly more delayed bleeding events than in patients without anticoagulation (9 (81.3%) DOAC, 19 (86.4%) phenprocoumon, 8 (30.8%) no anticoagulation, p < 0.001). Anticoagulated patients had to stay longer in the ED than non-anticoagulated patients, with no significant difference between DOAC or phenprocoumon (hours: 4.8 (3.2-7.6 IQR) DOAC, 3.0 (2.0-5.5 IQR) phenprocoumon, p = 0.133; 2.7 (1.6-4.6) no anticoagulation; p = 0.039). More patients with anticoagulation therapy needed surgery than patients without anticoagulant therapy (11 (68.8%) DOAC, 12 (54.6%) VKA, p = 0.506; 7(26.9%) no anticoagulation; p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed bleeding occur more often in anticoagulated patients with both DOAC and phenprocoumon compared to patients without anticoagulation. Bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with DOAC and phenprocoumon equally need longer ED treatment and more frequent surgical intervention.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Caution with delayed bleeding in anticoagulated patients with DOACs and phenprocoumon is necessary and treatment of bleeding is resource-demanding.

Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Communication breakdown is one of the main causes of adverse events in clinical routine, particularly in handover situations. The communication tool SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) was developed to increase handover quality and is widely assumed to increase patient safety. The objective of this review is to summarise the impact of the implementation of SBAR on patient safety.

DESIGN

A systematic review of articles published on SBAR was performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO in January 2017. All original research articles on SBAR fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were included: (1) SBAR was implemented into clinical routine, (2) the investigation of SBAR was the primary objective and (3) at least one patient outcome was reported.

SETTING

A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care and nursing homes.

PARTICIPANTS

A variety of heath professionals including nurses and physicians.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Aspects of patient safety (patient outcomes) defined as the occurrence or incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a before-after design and three controlled clinical trials performed in different clinical settings met the inclusion criteria. The objectives of the studies were to improve team communication, patient hand-offs and communication in telephone calls from nurses to physicians. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to study characteristics, especially patient outcomes. In total, 26 different patient outcomes were measured, of which eight were reported to be significantly improved. Eleven were described as improved but no further statistical tests were reported, and six outcomes did not change significantly. Only one study reported a descriptive reduction in patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found moderate evidence for improved patient safety through SBAR implementation, especially when used to structure communication over the phone. However, there is a lack of high-quality research on this widely used communication tool.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

none.

Direct new oral anticoagulants: follow-up, guidelines and bleeding complications in general practice-a survey of Swiss general internal medicine practitioners

BACKGROUND

The present study investigated how much Swiss general internal medicine practitioners (GPs) know about new direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs), particularly the relevant guidelines, follow-up tests, dosing adjustments, indications and complications. We conducted a paper-based survey of GPs, performed in Bern, Switzerland. Our questionnaire assessed the physicians' preference for NOACs rather than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), prevalence and choice of NOAC, clinical follow-up including follow-up blood testing, and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

53 GPs participated in our pilot investigation. They treated 32.7% ± 19 of their patients requiring oral anticoagulation with NOACs. New patients who had started oral anticoagulation received NOACs from 49 GPs (92.5%) but most GPs would not switch patients from existing VKA therapy to NOACs. Clinical controls are scheduled by a majority of GPs (67.9%) at least every 3 months; creatinine and haemoglobin are monitored by most GPs (51 (96.2%) and 39 (73.6%), respectively). In the preceding 2 years, GPs had seen 1.9 ± 2.87 bleeding complications in patients with NOACs. 0.5 ± 0.95 (range 0-5) of these required hospital treatment.

CONCLUSION

NOACs are broadly accepted by investigated Swiss GPs as the first choice for patients newly requiring oral anticoagulation. This was in preference to VKAs and especially if recommended by a haematologist or cardiologist. As, in our population, only about two-thirds of GPs adhere to recommendations on clinical and blood test follow-ups, further efforts to implement follow-up guidelines seem necessary. Further research in a large representative GP population is recommended; this should compare NOACs and VKAs. Bleeding complications were rare in our population and could mostly be handled without hospital admission.

Reversal of Dabigatran Using Idarucizumab in a Septic Patient with Impaired Kidney Function in Real-Life Practice

Background. Immediate reversal of anticoagulation is essential when facing severe bleeding or emergency surgery. Although idarucizumab is approved for the reversal of dabigatran in many countries, clinical experiences are lacking, particularly in special patient-populations such as sepsis and impaired renal function. Case Presentation. We present the case of a 67-year-old male septic patient with a multilocular facial abscess and chronic kidney disease (GFR 36.5 mL/min). Thrombin time (TT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 15 hours after the last intake of 150 mg dabigatran were both prolonged (>120 sec, resp., 61 sec), as well as unbound dabigatran concentration (119.05 ng/mL). Before immediate emergency surgery dabigatran was antagonised using idarucizumab 2 × 2.5 g. Dabigatran concentration was not detectable 10 min after idarucizumab administration (<30 ng/mL). TT and aPTT time were normalised (16.2 sec, resp., 30.2 sec). Sepsis was controlled after surgery and kidney function remained stable. In the absence of postoperative bleeding, dabigatran was restarted 36 hours after admission. Conclusion. Idarucizumab successfully reversed the effect of dabigatran in real-life practice in a patient with sepsis and renal impairment and allowed emergency surgery with normal haemostasis. Efficacy and safety in real-life practice will nevertheless require prospective registries monitoring.