Autonomic dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A pilot study

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Doppler Ultrasound in Grading Renal Artery Stenosis

Objective

This study is aimed at exploring the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in grading renal artery stenosis.

Methods

122 renal arteries with suspected renal artery stenosis were selected. DSA, DUS, and CEUS were performed for all patients with suspected renal artery stenosis in the research. DSA was selected as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS or Doppler ultrasound (DUS) in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis were analyzed. The consistency between CEUS and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was compared. The accuracy of DUS or CEUS in grading renal artery stenosis was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared between groups.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CEUS in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis were 88.9%, 87.8%, 88.5%, 93.5%, and 80.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in grading renal artery stenosis between CEUS and DSA (X² = 0.643, P = 0.424). 77 of the 122 renal arteries were diagnosed with the stenosis rate more than 30% by CEUS. Compared with the results of DSA, the kappa value of CEUS was 0.749 (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CEUS is accurate in grading renal artery stenosis, and it may represent the method of choice in diagnosing renal artery stenosis.

Reduction in Heart Rate Variability in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Autonomic dysfunction is associated with an increased risk for all cardiovascular events in the general population and can be evaluated with heart rate variability (HRV).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate HRV in ADPKD patients with mild hypertension versus hypertensive patients with organ damage and healthy controls (HC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have enrolled 65 patients: 21 ADPKD patients (10 males), 20 patients with hypertension (14 males), and 24 HC (10 males). Biochemical analysis, clinical evaluation, anthropometric data, intima-media thickness, 24-h ECG Holter recording, and echocardiography were investigated at the time of enrollment.

RESULTS

No significant differences in HRV parameters were found between ADPKD with mild hypertension and hypertensive patients with organ damage. The median of HRV variables in time domain as SDNN (global autonomic activity) was significantly lower in ADPKD and hypertensive patients than HC (p < 0.05). In the frequency domain analysis, low frequency (LF), which mainly reflects the sympathetic component, showed higher values in ADPKD and hypertensive patients than HC during the night (p < 0.01). During the night, the sympathovagal balance, LF/high frequency (HF), showed higher values in ADPKD and hypertensive patients than HC (p < 0.0001). Conversely, LF day was lower in ADPKD and hypertensive patients than HC (p < 0.01). HF, which mainly reflects the parasympathetic component, was lower in ADPKD and hypertensive patients during the night than HC (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

HRV reduction is present in ADPKD patients with mild hypertension in the absence of organ damage. The evaluation of sympathovagal balance can provide novel information on the cardiovascular risk in ADPKD patients in addition to classical risk factors.

WITHDRAWN: Are high heart rate variability and parasympathetic activity a key for wellness?

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.