1
|
van Prehn J, Reigadas E, Vogelzang EH, Bouza E, Hristea A, Guery B, Krutova M, Norén T, Allerberger F, Coia JE, Goorhuis A, van Rossen TM, Ooijevaar RE, Burns K, Scharvik Olesen BR, Tschudin-Sutter S, Wilcox MH, Vehreschild MJGT, Fitzpatrick F, Kuijper EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27 Suppl 2:S1-S21. [PMID: 34678515 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
SCOPE In 2009, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This document was updated in 2014. The growing literature on CDI antimicrobial treatment and novel treatment approaches, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and toxin-binding monoclonal antibodies, prompted the ESCMID study group on C. difficile (ESGCD) to update the 2014 treatment guidance document for CDI in adults. METHODS AND QUESTIONS Key questions on CDI treatment were formulated by the guideline committee and included: What is the best treatment for initial, severe, severe-complicated, refractory, recurrent and multiple recurrent CDI? What is the best treatment when no oral therapy is possible? Can prognostic factors identify patients at risk for severe and recurrent CDI and is there a place for CDI prophylaxis? Outcome measures for treatment strategy were: clinical cure, recurrence and sustained cure. For studies on surgical interventions and severe-complicated CDI the outcome was mortality. Appraisal of available literature and drafting of recommendations was performed by the guideline drafting group. The total body of evidence for the recommendations on CDI treatment consists of the literature described in the previous guidelines, supplemented with a systematic literature search on randomized clinical trials and observational studies from 2012 and onwards. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to grade the strength of our recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The guideline committee was invited to comment on the recommendations. The guideline draft was sent to external experts and a patients' representative for review. Full ESCMID endorsement was obtained after a public consultation procedure. RECOMMENDATIONS Important changes compared with previous guideline include but are not limited to: metronidazole is no longer recommended for treatment of CDI when fidaxomicin or vancomycin are available, fidaxomicin is the preferred agent for treatment of initial CDI and the first recurrence of CDI when available and feasible, FMT or bezlotoxumab in addition to standard of care antibiotics (SoC) are preferred for treatment of a second or further recurrence of CDI, bezlotoxumab in addition to SoC is recommended for the first recurrence of CDI when fidaxomicin was used to manage the initial CDI episode, and bezlotoxumab is considered as an ancillary treatment to vancomycin for a CDI episode with high risk of recurrence when fidaxomicin is not available. Contrary to the previous guideline, in the current guideline emphasis is placed on risk for recurrence as a factor that determines treatment strategy for the individual patient, rather than the disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joffrey van Prehn
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Elena Reigadas
- Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Erik H Vogelzang
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emilio Bouza
- Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adriana Hristea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Prof Dr Matei Bals, Romania
| | - Benoit Guery
- Infectious Diseases Specialist, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marcela Krutova
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic
| | - Torbjorn Norén
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Reference Laboratory for Clostridioides difficile, Clinical Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | - John E Coia
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital South West Jutland and Department of Regional Health Research IRS, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Abraham Goorhuis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tessel M van Rossen
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier E Ooijevaar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Burns
- Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital & Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sarah Tschudin-Sutter
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Universitatsspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mark H Wilcox
- Department of Microbiology, Old Medical, School Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals & University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fidelma Fitzpatrick
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ed J Kuijper
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Rossen TM, Ooijevaar RE, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Dekkers OM, Kuijper EJ, Keller JJ, van Prehn J. Prognostic factors for severe and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 28:321-331. [PMID: 34655745 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), its subsequent recurrences (rCDIs), and severe CDI (sCDI) provide a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Identifying patients diagnosed with initial CDI who are at increased risk of developing sCDI/rCDI could lead to more cost-effective therapeutic choices. In this systematic review we aimed to identify clinical prognostic factors associated with an increased risk of developing sCDI or rCDI. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science and COCHRANE Library databases were searched from database inception through March, 2021. The study eligibility criteria were cohort and case-control studies. Participants were patients ≥18 years old diagnosed with CDI, in which clinical or laboratory factors were analysed to predict sCDI/rCDI. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Quality in Prognostic Research (QUIPS) tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool modified for prognostic studies. Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers. Overview tables of prognostic factors were constructed to assess the number of studies and the respective effect direction and statistical significance of an association. RESULTS 136 studies were included for final analysis. Greater age and the presence of multiple comorbidities were prognostic factors for sCDI. Identified risk factors for rCDI were greater age, healthcare-associated CDI, prior hospitalization, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) started during or after CDI diagnosis, and previous rCDI. CONCLUSIONS Prognostic factors for sCDI and rCDI could aid clinicians to make treatment decisions based on risk stratification. We suggest that future studies use standardized definitions for sCDI/rCDI and systematically collect and report the risk factors assessed in this review, to allow for meaningful meta-analysis of risk factors using data of high-quality trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessel M van Rossen
- Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Medical Microbiology & Infection Control, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Rogier E Ooijevaar
- Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls
- Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Medical Microbiology & Infection Control, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Aarhus University, Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Olaf M Dekkers
- Leiden University Medical Center, Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ed J Kuijper
- Leiden University Medical Center, Center for Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Josbert J Keller
- Haaglanden Medical Center, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The Hague, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joffrey van Prehn
- Leiden University Medical Center, Center for Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Clostridium (reclassified as " Clostridioides ") difficile infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated infection and significant source of potentially preventable morbidity, recurrence, and death, particularly among hospitalized older adults. Additional risk factors include antibiotic use and severe underlying illness. The increasing prevalence of community-associated CDI is gaining recognition as a novel source of morbidity in previously healthy patients. Even after recovery from initial infection, patients remain at risk for recurrence or reinfection with a new strain. Some pharmaco-epidemiologic studies have suggested an increased risk associated with proton pump inhibitors and protective effect from statins, but these findings have not been uniformly reproduced in all studies. Certain ribotypes of C. difficile , including the BI/NAP1/027, 106, and 018, are associated with increased antibiotic resistance and potential for higher morbidity and mortality. CDI remains a high-morbidity healthcare-associated infection, and better understanding of ribotypes and medication risk factors could help to target treatment, particularly for patients with high recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C. De Roo
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Scott E. Regenbogen
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berger FK, Gfrörer S, Becker SL, Baldan R, Cirillo DM, Frentrup M, Steglich M, Engling P, Nübel U, Mellmann A, Bischoff M, Gärtner B, von Müller L. Hospital outbreak due to Clostridium difficile ribotype 018 (RT018) in Southern Germany. Int J Med Microbiol 2019; 309:189-193. [PMID: 30879971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile is the main cause of nosocomial diarrhoea. Ribotype 018 (RT018) has been recognized as the predominant strain responsible for C. difficile infection (CDI) in Italy, whereas in most other European countries only sporadic RT018 cases occur. Between August and October 2015, a suspected C. difficile outbreak at two associated hospitals in Southern Germany was investigated by comprehensive molecular typing. Surprisingly, RT018 was detected in 9/82 CDI patients, which has never been described before in a German outbreak. Phenotypic analysis revealed fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance. Genetic subtyping using multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed and outbreak isolates were directly compared to sporadic German RT018 isolates and to epidemic ones from Milan, Northern Italy. Molecular typing confirmed a hospital outbreak with closely related RT018 isolates. Both, MLVA and WGS revealed high similarity of outbreak strains with epidemic isolates from Italy, but low similarity to other German isolates. Comparison between both typing strategies showed that ribotyping in combination with MLVA was appropriate to identify related isolates and clonal complexes, whereas WGS provided a better discrimination with more detailed information about the phylogenetic relationship of isolates. This is the first hospital outbreak in Germany presumably caused by cross-national transmission of an Italian epidemic RT018 strain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian K Berger
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße, Building 43, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany.
| | - Sabine Gfrörer
- Regionale Kliniken Holding RKH GmbH, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Sören L Becker
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße, Building 43, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, P.O. Box, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rossella Baldan
- Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Via Olgettina Milano 60, 20132 Italy
| | - Daniela Maria Cirillo
- Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Via Olgettina Milano 60, 20132 Italy
| | | | - Matthias Steglich
- Leibniz Institute DSMZ, Inhoffenstraße 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Braunschweig-Hannover, Inhoffenstraße 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Pit Engling
- Leibniz Institute DSMZ, Inhoffenstraße 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Ulrich Nübel
- Leibniz Institute DSMZ, Inhoffenstraße 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Braunschweig-Hannover, Inhoffenstraße 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany; Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Technical University Braunschweig, Rebenring 56, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Alexander Mellmann
- Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Robert-Koch-Straße 41, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Bischoff
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße, Building 43, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Barbara Gärtner
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße, Building 43, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Lutz von Müller
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Saarland University, Kirrberger Straße, Building 43, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology and Hygiene, National Reference Centre for Clostridium difficile, Christophorus Kliniken, Südwall 22, 48653 Coesfeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|